Posts

Release The Memo Metastasizes

The release the memo attempt to discredit the career prosecutors at the DOJ and agents and analysts at the FBI, as well as personnel in the US intelligence community, has metastasized as Special Counselor Mueller’s investigation has gotten closer to the President.

There is now a fake British GCHQ surveillance request memo making the rounds. This is not the Nunes’ memo, which was created by Congressman Nunes and his staff by cherry picking information from classified materials provided to his committee by the DOJ and FBI in order to implicate the DOJ and FBI in some sort of conspiracy against the President. The fake GCHQ memo appears to have been mainstreamed from an article here that is just a hot mess.

I know it is hard to read, but if you look closely at paragraph 3 you can see a reference to MI5 agent Michael Steele.

This is Michael Steele:

He’s from Maryland. Was the Maryland lieutenant governor. He also used to be the chair of the Republican National Committee and is now a contributing political analyst at NBC/MSNBC.

This is also Michael Steel (no finale e):

He was a senior advisor for the Jeb! 2016 campaign, was Speaker Boehnnor’s spokesperson, and is also a contributing political analyst for NBC/MSNBC. They do try not to book them at the same time so as not to confuse anyone (because they were clearly separated at birth!).

This is Christopher Steele:

Christopher Steele is the retired MI6 officer, and former head of their Russia Desk, who was hired by Fusion GPS to conduct opposition research during the 2016 campaign.

One final note, MI5 is Britain’s domestic security service, roughly equivalent to the FBI. Michael Steele, Michael Steel, and Christopher Steele never worked for MI5.

Aside from this easily debunked mess of a forged GCHQ request memo, apparently the FBI Special Agent Strzok and FBI attorney Page saga has also metastasized. According to Senator Johnson, he has whistleblower testimony that there is a secret society within the FBI. And it was meeting off site from FBI headquarters to plot something having to do with preventing the President from becoming the President or to overthrow him now that he is President or something. The FBI secret society conspiracy theory developed out of text messages sent between Strzok and Page on their work phones while having an affair during the 2016 election. My best guess is someone overheard Strzok and Page, who were planning to get together, because they were having an affair, with reference to their “place” or their “secret place” or their “secret site” and decided that 2+2 = 763. Or it may be that Senator Johnson is just making it up completely.

And, because where would we be without an Alex Jones-Rush Limbaugh meeting of the minds, Jones did a show yesterday claiming to have Nunes’ memo. What Jones actually had was a 99 page declassified Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court opinion in regard to Section 702 violations. It has been declassified and posted online since April 2016 and served as the basis for several breathless conspiracy mongering articles by John Solomon and Sara Carter in an attempt to gin up an Obama administration spied on the Trump campaign scandal. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court memo says no such thing. It is basically a catalogue of 702 violations, when they happened, by which agency, and the Court’s position on what needed to be done to rectify the violations. That’s it. (This is also a good example of just how the oversight rules for Section 702 work and what the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court does when violations are discovered.)

Limbaugh has decided to follow Jones’ lead and gone full tin foil (Never go full tin foil! Unless you’re a baked potato.) He’s now claiming that the deep state fabricated the WMD intelligence to destroy President Bush (43). And that this somehow ties into support for President Obama, who was a state senator at the time, and President Obama’s conspiracy with former FBI Director Comey to protect Secretary Clinton and sabotage the current President and his campaign. Or something like that, because honestly I’ve read the transcript three times and I’m still not sure I’ve got it right. I’m beginning to wonder what is actually in those cigars Limbaugh smokes all the time.

What we’re seeing here is an attempt to throw every type of wild, crazy, and half baked conspiracy theory at the wall in an attempt to discredit the Department of Justice, the FBI, the US intelligence community, and by extension Special Counselor Mueller and his team. We now know, because Fox News reporters actually did reporting, that it wasn’t just the information on Strzok’s and Page’s FBI issued Samsung work phones that wasn’t captured by the DOJ/FBI information archiving system. Rather thousands of cell phones issued to FBI personnel had the same problem.

Just don’t expect to see this get much coverage after 5 PM on Fox News. Or by Limbaugh. Or by Solomon and Carter. Or on Sinclair’s local news media holdings. Or mentioned by any GOP members of the House Special Committee on Intelligence. Or by members of the House Freedom Caucus. Or Senator Johnson. The closer it appears that Mueller is getting, the more of this insanity we’re going to see. I honestly never thought I’d live long enough to see Republican elected and appointed officials, as well as their proxies from a variety of conservative organizations, media outlets, and think tanks turn on the FBI and the US intelligence committee. If they ever figure out that 16 of the 18 agencies within the US intelligence community are US military agencies, I expect they’ll finally turn on the troops. Or their heads will explode.

Updated at 5:50 PM EST:

Commenter lgerard makes a good catch that I’d missed. The source for the fake GCHQ memo is Hal Turner:

Hal Turner, a former FBI agent who worked with the Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) between 2003-2008, explains that contacts in the international Intelligence Community (IC) provided him with the leak.

“In that role, I worked with many people in the Intelligence Community (IC) including folks in the military and law enforcement, in many countries around the world.  The relationships I forged with these folks endure to this day.

“Thanks to my contacts in the IC, I have now obtained the TOP SECRET MEMO from inside British Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) proving the facts laid out about above concerning spying on President Trump.”

Stay frosty!

Open thread.

 

 

 



Sources and Methods: The Betrayal of an Intelligence Partner

Vanity Fair‘s Howard Blum has done an excellent, long form piece of journalism that finally shed’s light on exactly what the President did when he betrayed the Israelis and told Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov and Ambassador Kislyak about their anti-ISIS intelligence mission.

The covert mission into the forbidden plains of northern Syria was a “blue and white” undertaking, as Israel, referring to the colors of its flag, calls ops that are carried out solely by agents of the Jewish state.

Yet—and this is an ironclad operational rule—getting agents in and then swiftly out of enemy territory under the protection of the nighttime darkness can be accomplished only if there is sufficient reconnaissance: the units need to know exactly where to strike, what to expect, what might be out there waiting for them in the shadows. For the mission last winter that targeted a cell of terrorist bombers, according to ABC News, citing American officials, the dangerous groundwork was done by an Israeli spy planted deep inside ISIS territory. Whether he was a double agent Israel had either turned or infiltrated into the ISIS cell, or whether he was simply a local who’d happened to stumble upon some provocative information he realized he could sell—those details remain locked in the secret history of the mission.

The sources agree, however, that the teams got in and out that night, and, even before the returning choppers landed back in Israel, it was confirmed to the jubilant operatives that the audio intercept was already up and running.

Now the waiting began. From an antenna-strewn base near the summit of the Golan Heights, on Israel’s border with Syria, listeners from Unit 8200 monitored the transmissions traveling across the ether from the target in northern Syria. Surveillance is a game played long, but after several wasted days 8200’s analysts were starting to suspect that their colleagues had been misinformed, possibly deliberately, by the source in the field. They were beginning to fear that all the risk had been taken without any genuine prospect of reward.

Then what they’d been waiting for was suddenly coming in loud and clear, according to Israeli sources familiar with the operation: it was, as a sullen spy official described it, “a primer in constructing a terror weapon.” With an unemotional precision, an ISIS soldier detailed how to turn a laptop computer into a terror weapon that could pass through airport security and be carried on board a passenger plane. ISIS had obtained a new way to cause airliners to explode suddenly, free-falling from the sky in flames. When the news of this frightening ISIS lecture arrived at Mossad’s headquarters outside Tel Aviv, officials quickly decided to share the field intelligence with their American counterparts. The urgency of the highly classified information trumped any security misgivings. Still, as one senior Israeli military official suggested, the Israeli decision was also egged on by a professional vanity: they wanted their partners in Washington to marvel at the sort of impossible missions they could pull off.

They did. It was a much-admired, as well as appreciated, gift—and it scared the living hell out of the American spymasters who received it.

I highly recommend you click over and read the whole thing, however, I’d like to highlight just one or two more of the important portions of Blum’s reporting. Back in January I wrote:

Last week Yediot Ahronot reported, now confirmed by Haaretz and The Jerusalem Post, that Israel’s Intelligence Community has itself been warned to be careful sharing and transferring information and intelligence with the White House during the next Administration.  Now the Sunday Times of London and The Guardian are reporting that our British allies are very, very concerned.

The concern is that any information and intelligence shared after the transition  will wind up with the Russians and the Russians would likely provide it to the Iranians (and the unspoken bit here for the Israelis is the Iranians would share it with the Syrians and Hezbullah). That this information quickly leaked from the Israelis is not an accident or a coincidence. It was intended to leak in order to provide the same message to our other allies and partners: that anything shared with the incoming Administration’s White House team may wind up with Russia. Through the Israeli leak the US’s other allies, partners, and clients have now been warned. This includes the other four members of the Five Eyes Intelligence alliance, the rest of our NATO allies, and other allies and partners. They have all been put on notice that the US Intelligence Community thinks that the incoming President, Vice President, their strategy, policy, and communication advisors, the incoming National Security Advisor and his deputies, and the rest of the incoming White House team cannot be trusted with classified information.

This means that the US will have its ability to see and hear seriously restricted starting next Friday. We won’t be blind, as we’ll still have our own capability, but our vision will be significantly dimmed and our hearing significantly dulled. This will make managing and mitigating the foreign, defense, and national security problem sets that we are currently facing, let alone the ability to anticipate future ones, much more difficult. And this includes the ongoing Russian active measures, influence, and cyber operations directed at us, at our allies, and at our partners.

We are off the looking glass and through the map.

Blum’s reporting confirms that what was reported in other sources in January was accurate, but he provides new and important details.

It was against this reassuring backdrop of recent successes and shared history, an Israeli source told Vanity Fair, that a small group of Mossad officers and other Israeli intelligence officials took their seats in a Langley conference room on a January morning just weeks before the inauguration of Donald Trump. The meeting proceeded uneventfully; updates on a variety of ongoing classified operations were dutifully shared. It was only as the meeting was about to break up that an American spymaster solemnly announced there was one more thing: American intelligence agencies had come to believe that Russian president Vladimir Putin had “leverages of pressure” over Trump, he declared without offering further specifics, according to a report in the Israeli press. Israel, the American officials continued, should “be careful” after January 20—the date of Trump’s inauguration. It was possible that sensitive information shared with the White House and the National Security Council could be leaked to the Russians. A moment later the officials added what many of the Israelis had already deduced: it was reasonable to presume that the Kremlin would share some of what they learned with their ally Iran, Israel’s most dangerous adversary.

Currents of alarm and anger raced through those pres­ent at the meeting, says the Israeli source, but their superiors in Israel remained unconvinced—no supporting evidence, after all, had been provided—and chose to ignore the prognostication.

But it is Blum’s conclusion that is the real chilling peace of his reporting:

“Trump betrayed us,” said a senior Israeli military official bluntly, his voice stern with reproach. “And if we can’t trust him, then we’re going to have to do what is necessary on our own if our back is up against the wall with Iran.” Yet while appalled governments are now forced to rethink their tactics in future dealings with a wayward president, there is also the dismaying possibility that a more tangible, and more lethal, consequence has already occurred. “The Russians will undoubtedly try to figure out the source or the method of this information to make sure that it is not also collecting on their activities in Syria—and in trying to do that they could well disrupt the source,” said Michael Morell.

What, then, was the fate of Israel’s agent in Syria? Was the operative exfiltrated to safety? Has he gone to ground in enemy territory? Or was he hunted down and killed? One former Mossad officer with knowledge of the operation and its aftermath will not say. Except to add pointedly, “Whatever happened to him, it’s a hell of price to pay for a president’s mistake.”

We are off the looking glass and through the map!



Veterans Day 2017

As Veterans Day 2017 draws to a close it is important to recognize that this has been a strange day in presidential-veteran relations.

This is a graphic of the departmental crests for the agencies that make up the US intelligence community.

(Figure 1: The US Intelligence Community)

You’ll notice that nine of these agencies are military. Of the remaining eight, one is the US Coast Guard, which while now in the Department of Homeland Security is one of the uniformed Services of the United States. Moreover, a significant number of the civilian personnel serving in the civilian portions of the US Intelligence Community are veterans, reservists, and/or members of the National Guard. This doesn’t make them infallible. It doesn’t make what they do and how they do it unquestionable. However, the President, by publicly disparaging the US Intelligence Community, is publicly disparaging a very large number of Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, and veterans no longer serving in uniform while siding with the dictatorial leader of a hostile foreign power. Everyone cheering the President on in doing so is also disparaging the troops while purposefully ignoring that the President is siding with the dictatorial leader of a hostile foreign power!

Now back to our regularly scheduled Veterans Day post.

There is a significant body of military history developing that convincingly argues that World War I did not actually end on the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month. Rather, the interstate war phase ended and a series of smaller insurgencies, asymmetric and irregular, and sub-regional wars continued. These low intensity wars among the winners and losers of World War I eventually reignited into another interstate war – World War II. As a result, World War I and World War II are more properly understood as phases of a longer, ongoing conflict akin to the Thirty Years War. I’ve only begun to scratch the surface of this revision within military history, but it is an important scholarly developmental in what it teaches us about battlefield termination, war, peace, and securing the peace. Especially because if we’re not careful we run the risk of having to live through a similar dynamic in the Middle East, Central Asia, Southeast Asia, and parts of Africa in the ongoing fight against terrorism and violent extremism.

We end with music. First the Dropkick Murphy’s covering Eric Bogle’s The Green Fields of France.

Interestingly enough a folk singer named Stephen Suffet wrote a reply from the Willie McBride that Bogle sings about to Bogle. It uses the same melody as Bogle’s original.

And for our Australian and New Zealand readers, here’s Bogle doing The Band Played Waltzing Matilda.

Open thread!

PS: Confederate Soldiers and Sailors are not considered to be US veterans, no matter what your crazy uncle emails you!

Many in the Georgia legislature may have differed with McKinley regarding the treatment of veterans and the place of the national cemeteries in society, as no disabled Confederate veteran was eligible to live in a federal soldier’s home, receive a pension, or, when they died, be buried in a national cemetery. However, it is certain that the president’s Atlanta speech began a process culminating eight years later in legislation creating the Commission for Marking Graves of Confederate Dead.66

66 Robert Louis Clark, Lee Allen Craig, and Jack Wilson, A History of Public Sector Pensions in the United States, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2003, p. 146; and Neff, Honoring the Civil War Dead, Commemoration and the Problem of Reconciliation, University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas, 2005, pp. 222–226.