In a rant on the new Che movie, something I have less than zero desire to watch, Nick Gillespie states the following:
And you’ve got to ask: Who precisely is still debating Che’s methodology, other than, I don’t know, Lynndie England and various al Qaeda cells?
Can someone explain the Lynndie England reference? Not to downplay the Lynndie England monstrous behavior at Abu Ghraib, but I thought even Nick himself recognized that the failures there were due to leadership:
Hmm, how else to explain the abuse? Take a cue from U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba, who investigated it for the Pentagon. He told the Senate the abuse was due to “failure in leadership–lack of discipline, no training whatsoever and no supervision.”
What am I missing?