• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Shocking, but not surprising

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

This blog will pay for itself.

Just a few bad apples.

All your base are belong to Tunch.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

Lighten up, Francis.

Too inconsequential to be sued

This blog goes to 11…

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

We survived Breitbartpocalypse!

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

It’s the corruption, stupid.

I can’t take this shit today. I just can’t.

Something seems odd about that, but i have been drinking.

I did not have this on my fuck 2020 bingo card.

Historically it is a little unusual for the president to be an incoherent babbling moron.

How has Obama failed you today?

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

Mobile Menu

  • Look Forward & Back
  • Balloon Juice 2021 Pet Calendar
  • Site Feedback
  • All 2020 Fundraising
  • I Voted!
  • Take Action: Things We Can Do
  • Team Claire, and Family
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • BJ PayPal Donations
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Nature & Respite
  • Information As Power
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • On The Road
  • Garden Chats
  • Nature & Respite
  • Look Forward & Back
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Changing the subsidy tables and benefits for whom?

Changing the subsidy tables and benefits for whom?

by David Anderson|  March 24, 20208:48 am| 4 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance, COVID-19 Coronavirus

Facebook0Tweet0Email0

Page 1089 of the House 3rd Wave COVID bill has massive health policy implications if it was to be enacted.  The changes would go into place on January 1, 2021 and they would be sufficient to address most of the under-subsidization problems of the ACA.

The big differences would be making the benchmark CSR-94 Silver plan be premium free for anyone earning under 150% Federal Poverty Level (FPL) and then trimming several points from the benchmark premium from 151% FPL to infinity and beyond.  Maximum allowed amount to be spent on the benchmark silver plan would be capped at 8.5% of income at any income level instead of the current 9.86% of income up to 400% FPL and infinite percentage of income above 400% FPL.

However the fundamental challenge of the age ratchet and premium spread game is still in place.  These policies will make insurance more attractive to the older population that is not particularly selected against versus the younger population that has adverse selection regarding who is covered now.  This will not be the case for individuals earning under 150% FPL as a perfectly healthy 21 year old will be paying the same as a deathly ill 64 year old — $0 but above 150% FPL, a lot of the benefit will be going to people who have already shown that they are more than willing to buy insurance at current prices.

Changing the subsidy formula so that the young can buy the least expensive plan relative to benchmark for the same premium as the old would produce bigger enrollment gains.  The key is to make the most risk tolerant groups see relatively cheaper prices than they are seeing now.  This will have a secondary effect of bringing into the marketplaces a large, fairly healthy cohort that will, in normal years, bring down average premiums because the pool will be, on average, significantly healthier.

At that point, we’ll be under the counter-intuitive dynamics where lower premium levels are bad for subsidized buyers as everyone will be a subsidized buyer and we won’t have a dichotomy of some people caring about spreads and other people caring about premium levels.  Instead, everyone who is not in the US Treasury market, will only care about premium spreads, but that is a future problem for a future Congress.

 

Changing the subsidy tables and benefits for whom? 1

Facebook0Tweet0Email0
Previous Post: « Calculating income for coverage
Next Post: Repub Pathology Open Thread: The Attention-Junkie-in-Chief »

Reader Interactions

4Comments

  1. 1.

    MJG

    March 24, 2020 at 9:03 am

    Thank you for flagging this. Do you by any chance know if the House bill also has carrots and/or sticks to encourage Medicaid expansion in the 14 remaining non-expansion states? Because otherwise the provision you highlight leaves the coverage gap in place for non-disabled adults who earn under 100% FPL in non-expansion states. They don’t qualify for premiums capped at 8.5%, let alone $0 premiums, and they can’t get Medicaid . . .

  2. 2.

    Xentik

    March 24, 2020 at 9:12 am

    Have you looked at either of the risk corridor sections in the bill? It appears that they’re implementing one for Medicare Advantage (p. 323/Sec. 70209), as well as stronger support for the currently crippled individual/small group market corridors for the next two years. (p. 404/Sec. 70308 and 70209)

    Will the latter help patch up the mess created by republicans and the court system relating to the original risk corridor program (even if only for the next two  years)?

    https://appropriations.house.gov/sites/democrats.appropriations.house.gov/files/COVIDSUPP3_xml.pdf

  3. 3.

    David Anderson

    March 24, 2020 at 9:56 am

    @Xentik: It looks like a reasonable step for a risk corridor (probably less disruptive nor gameable compared to risk adjustment OR reinsurance funds)

  4. 4.

    JaySinWA

    March 24, 2020 at 1:29 pm

    The big differences would be making the benchmark CSR-94 Silver plan be premium free for anyone earning under 150% Federal Poverty Level (FPL)

    For a minute I read this as eliminating the 100% FPL floor from ACA. But  looking at the table that appears not to be true.

    This would have been a good opportunity to fix that, wouldn’t it? Or is there something other than intransigence that stops that?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Biden-Harris Inauguration

Biden-Harris Inauguration Website

Official events – watch at top link

Do Something!

Call Your Senators & Representatives
Directory of US Senators
Directory of US Representatives
Letter to Elected Officials – Albatrossity
Letter to Elected Officials – Martin

I Got the Shot!

🎈Ways to Support Our Site

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal
Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice ⬇  

Recent Comments

  • Emma from FL on Respite Open Thread: Happy Birthday, Dolly Parton (Jan 19, 2021 @ 8:45pm)
  • NotMax on Respite Open Thread: Happy Birthday, Dolly Parton (Jan 19, 2021 @ 8:45pm)
  • Baud on Respite Open Thread: Happy Birthday, Dolly Parton (Jan 19, 2021 @ 8:45pm)
  • LeftCoastYankee on Christ It’s Almost Fucking Over (Jan 19, 2021 @ 8:45pm)
  • Nicole on Respite Open Thread: Happy Birthday, Dolly Parton (Jan 19, 2021 @ 8:44pm)

Team Claire, and Family

Help for David’s Niece Claire
Claire Updates
Claire update for the holidays 12/23

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year

Featuring

John Cole
Silverman on Security
COVID-19 Coronavirus
Medium Cool with BGinCHI
Information Is Power

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Submit Photos to On the Road
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Meetups: Proof of Life
2021 Pets of Balloon Juice Calendar

Culture: Books, Film, TV, Music, Games, Podcasts

Noir: Favorites in Film, Books, TV
Book Recommendations & Indy Recs
Mystery Recommendations
Medium Cool: What If (Books & Films)
Netflix Favorites
Amazon Prime Favorites
Netflix Suggestions in July
Fun Music Thread
Longmire & Netflix Suggestions
Medium Cool: Places!
Medium Cool: Games!
Medium Cool: Watch or Read Again

Twitter

John Cole’s Twitter

[custom-twitter-feeds]

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!