The Whistleblower Saga Bifurcates
There are at least two things going on in what we might call the whistleblower saga. I got confused by them last night, so let me try to clarify them for myself and whomever else might be confused.
A whistleblower submitted a complaint to the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG), which the ICIG was then required by law to pass on to the Senate and House Intelligence Committees. Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire intercepted the complaint and stonewalled when Adam Schiff, chair of the House Intelligence Committee subpoenaed the document and him to appear before the committee. (Lawfare) Later reports were that the complaint was against something that President Donald Trump did and that multiple actions were included in it.
More specifically, a telephone conversation that included a promise to a foreign leader was said to be part of it. Initial speculation centered around Vladimir Putin and possible sharing of information about agents inside Russia. Then we were told that the country involved was Ukraine and its new president, Volodymyr Zelensky.
There was a great scramble to find recent news about Trump’s interactions with Ukraine, and a timeline suggested that Trump had withheld aid that Congress had voted for Ukraine until Zelensky agreed to find (or manufacture) dirt on the business dealings of Joe Biden’s son, Hunter. And there seems to have been an additional $140 million that went to Ukraine later.
In a wild interview with Chris Cuomo, Rudy Giuliani, the President’s lawyer, admitted that he had asked Ukrainian officials to investigate the Bidens. Trump initially tweeted a number of contradictory things about his conversation with Zelensky. On Sunday, he admitted that he had asked Zelensky to look into the Bidens.
This is where the story bifurcates. On the one hand, we have the whistleblower complaint, about which we know little. The reports of a promise and multiple interactions seem not to fit with what Giuliani and Trump have admitted to. The Acting DNI continues to (probably illegally) stonewall Congress.
On the other, we have the admission of the President and his lawyer that they were engaged in strongarming the new president of Ukraine to help them with Trump’s re-election campaign. This is clearly a misuse of power, a high crime or misdemeanor, suitable for a charge in impeachment. This is what the news has been running with.
Both stories are important, and different from each other. Trump’s Ukraine blackmail/ extortion/ soliciting campaign assistance from a foreign country did not come directly from the whistleblower complaint. It came from Trump and Giuliani’s admissions in response to speculation about what that complaint contained. Trump has (sorta, in his confusing way) offered a transcript of the telephone conversation, maybe redacted.
That’s not enough. The stories have become separate, but they are related at a fundamental level that has to do with Trump’s corruption. Congress must continue to investigate the whistleblower complaint and include the Ukraine connection.
Trump loves to confuse things, and that’s what he’s doing now. We’ve got to keep things clear in our minds.
Update: Profile of Michael Atkinson, the ICIG, “a straightshooter.”
Good points. Always have to be careful we’re not being punk’d.
Thank you for keeping this straight. Trying to extort Zelensky is bad, arguably impeachable, but I suspect that it’s not what the whistleblower was blowing the whistle about. Unfortunately, the attempted extortion is sucking all the oxygen out of the room.
@Gin & Tonic: That’s okay for now. It’s enough by itself for impeachment, so it’s important. Schiff seems to be keeping his eye on the ball with respect to the whistleblower.
Thanks. This is an important point that a commenter made in a previous thread. And one reason no one should fall for the Trumpster gambit of releasing a transcript of the ‘perfect call’. Whistle blower report mentions eight episodes of urgent concern. And for the intelligent community IG agreed that it was under their purview, so they deem it contain something related to intelligence matters.
There is a lot more here than one call to to Zelensky.
This is what we don’t know what did he say to Putin. That is why they need to know the whistle blower’s statement. If he wanted Russia to pressure Ukraine, we need to know that. Of course, it’s possible he didn’t and the whistle blower could clear it up. One transcript is not enough.
The 140 million from State is key, because it even caught Munchin by surprise.
It’s not just that he’s confusing the two issues. I think he’s pushing the part about him strongarming Ukraine because he’s hoping he can get the news to focus on his smear of Biden rather than his own attempts to fabricate evidence about it. So in addition to keeping the two aspects of Trump’s misdeeds separate in our minds, we also have to try to keep the Biden smears from sucking up all the oxygen.
@Gin & Tonic: @Cheryl Rofer: I think it is pretty clear that the leak about the phone call, which had a very different tenor to the leaks before and after it from former senior Intelligence officials, was from within the President’s orbit in an attempt to reshape the narrative. By doing so it brought it to Ukraine, corruption, and allegations about both Hunter Biden and Vice President Biden. Those accusations, which have all been debunked by multiple sources, have now morphed into Vice President Biden conspired with (someone in) Ukraine’s government to interfere in the 2016 election. That was Secretary Pompeo’s line yesterday on the CBS’s Sunday news show. This is itself a modification of a three year old spurious and debunked accusation that a DNC staffer who approached contacts in Ukraine for oppo on Manafort was interfering in the election. Which was itself then modified, once Secretary Clinton took the 2016 nomination, into she and senior officials on her campaign had approached contacts in Ukraine’s government for oppo on Manafort to interfere in the 2016 election. This was basically Trumpworld’s attempt to both sides the now substantiated accusation that the President and members of his familial, his business associates, and campaign personnel had actually conspired with Russians to interfere in the campaign, even if they did so in an inept manner.
This is tangentially related, or has been tangentially connected, by other leaks with a different tone and tenor, to the unknown whistleblower’s complaint and the almost completely unknown substance and details of that complaint.
@Adam L Silverman: If that was what commenter Dork was talking about in an earlier thread, then he or she had a point.
@Roger Moore:
The ship has already sailed on part one of your prescription. People who care about 2020 should focus every sliver of energy into not letting this be the only conversation we have until Biden drops out.
@jl: While Moss has been walled off by his boss, who is now of counsel to the whistleblower, so that Moss can publicly comment, he does know who the whistleblower is and what the outlines of the various incidents that the whistleblower complained about are.
@Adam L Silverman: Nice genealogy. All we need to remember is that everything Trump says about Biden is a lie.
I purposely left out the Biden “story” from the OP because it’s a distraction. The balls we need to keep our eyes on are that we don’t know what’s in the whistleblower complaint and that Trump and Giuliani have admitted they tried to force the Ukrainian president to help them with Trump’s campaign.
One thing people can do is call up our worthless media and complain. And suggest that instead of falling all over themselves to fall for GOP talking points and get cheap clicks and eyeballs from speculation, they could report some facts.
One fact that they could report is that there is a formal legal procedure the Trumpsters could have followed to get the Ukrainian government to open an investigation if they had any evidence. But the Trumpsters didn’t follow that. Trump made secret threats, had the Dept of State arrange for Giuliani go make threats and offer sticks and carrots in person, and sent Pence to introduce himself as the bag man.
Channel user/MeredithCollegeLive on the YouTube.
@JPL: From what I can gather from Friday’s and Saturday’s reporting, as well as the pushback by a Ukrainian government official in WaPo, is that Giuliani is targeting specific Ukrainian elected and appointed officials to try to tie them to some sort of cover up to help Biden. All of these current and former officials are solidly anti-Putin. I think there’s much more at play here than we’re seeing, as I wrote in an earlier comment, and that yesterday’s leak to WaPo about the call between Trump and Zelensky came from the Trump camp and was a strategic attempt to tailor the narrative. I think the deeper story here is that this is an attempt to bring down Ukraine’s new government or, at least, so severely cripple it that Ukraine can’t defend itself against Putin. And I think that’s what the leaks earlier on Friday from unnamed former Intelligence officials that there were a series of interactions or events that drove the whistleblower to file the complaint. Right now everyone is chasing the shiny object of Trump and Giuliani pressuring Zelensky to conspire with them to take down Biden with fabricated evidence. And whatever Vogel’s doing and his role in it, which is still, I think a story in itself. And that’s obscuring that Rudy has longstanding ties to some of the shadiest post Soviet oligarchs throughout eastern Europe, as well as those who made their way to Israel and the US. And that these connections, while often in plain sight, are largely unexamined. No one has really looked into who is paying him for all this security consulting in the post Soviet states. These oligarchs are all tied to the post Soviet mobs in their states or back in Russia. And weakening Ukraine is definitely in Putin’s and therefore their interests.
@jl: Other than to do focused research, I’ve been offline and off Balloon Juice most of the day, so I have no idea about earlier comments in earlier threads.
@jl: Thanks, I don’t always lay out my points as well as I might like but this is indeed the pattern I was trying to point out.
On the other hand, the Trumpsters were going to smear Biden anyway. It is wasn’t this, it would have been something else. They’ll smear any Democratic candidate who looks like a winner. So, Democrats need to learn how to respond to smears, not fret about falling for this or that ‘trap’. If there will always be a trap they try to lay and worrying about how to detect traps might distract from something Democrats have to get better at anyway. Just learn how to respond to smears, which will come anyway.
I guess Trumpsters will start worrying about Warren now. But Trump thinks he can defeat her by calling her names.
@Adam L Silverman: I am gracious and merciful and I grant you a pardon in this case.
Mittens seems (shockingly) to have held onto the actual whistleblower thread.
@Cheryl Rofer: The problem that I have with some who want Biden to drop out is that the same thing will be used against the other candidates. It’s difficult to disprove a non event or a negative. MSM plays along with trump.
Am I right that the corrupt Ukrainian prosecutor, Shokin, was essentially doing an Alberto Gonzales? And that Trump and Giuliani and maybe Ken Vogel are trying to lean on his successor until he does that too?
@Adam L Silverman: Which is why we need to know what the whistle blower knows.
@Dork: I don’t follow all of the threads in a day, so I missed your contribution.
@Cheryl Rofer: No complaints, and my comment wasn’t meant as one, in regard to your post.
My real interest at this point is in the counterintelligence and counterinfluence components. Specifically, how exactly did the President and Giuliani get turned on to a piece of five year old Russian disinformation and provocation placed in a RIA-Novosti interview with a dodgy and discredited “American peace activist” that was intended to primarily obscure and distract from Putin’s scarfing up Crimea and invading eastern Ukraine under the maskirovka cover of an ethnic Russian breakaway. How and why this got to Vogel and why Vogel is so determined to push it no matter how many times it is debunked. And finally, how to counter this influence operation so it is neutralized.
@JPL: ” It’s difficult to disprove a non event or a negative. ”
But if relevant facts are reported, there will be indirect evidence that can make it much less difficult. For example, reporting that there is a legal procedure for the US to request the Ukrainian government to open, or re-open an investigation into the Bidens. Trumpsters didn’t follow that, the acted like mob bosses.
Edit: people should contact news outlets to complain about crummy coverage. Contact your local and the national outlets. I do that in bursts, and am in the midst of another one now.
@Raoul: Senator Willard M. Romney is the Senator Susan Collins of Senator Jeff Flakes.
@jl: But will the rest of us forgive your act of mercy and grace?
You don’t need to be a Biden supporter to know that first they come from…………yadda, yadda, yadda … That is where we are at.
@Omnes Omnibus: No, not the commenters. Never. I am prepared to stride the everlasting blasts.
@jl: haha We work with the MSM we have not the one we wished we had.
Today I had a deep pit because you know the next step is Barr opening an investigation into Hunter Biden’s dealings.
@Adam L Silverman: Oh yes, and yes to your earlier comment. I very much want to know what’s been going on behind the scenes and all the connections. It’s very much like the Russian influence through Trump’s campaign organization – we still don’t know the full story there, like how Carter Page (and a few other scummy folk) became foreign policy advisors, among many other questions. The Mueller Report barely touches on all this, even though it was supposed to look at Russian influence. The counterintelligence investigation, which is still ongoing, is probably answering these questions. I know that counterintelligence is very allergic to making its findings public, but we need to know a lot more.
@JPL: ” Barr opening an investigation into Hunter Biden’s dealings. ”
A little late for that, and if he does and corporate media fall for it, people need to contact them and explain why it is far to late for that sweep this part of the whistleblower issue under the rug. That’s why you have people like Barr plan things. So, this is probably some scheme Trump hatched himself and bullied and threatened some of chicken shittier, flakier, or dumber flunkies into. Pompeo and Mnuchin probably fit the bill, Barr doesn’t.
@Cheryl Rofer: I don’t think you needed to modify that second sentence with “about Biden” – pretty much everything Trump says is a misrepresentation, if not an outright lie.
As I mentioned earlier, the key word that has stuck with me was “promise”. And I still think that the promise was made to Putin and did involve Ukraine, i.e. withhold military aid, isolate them more, work to undermine the new government, etc. This was in response, I believe, to Putin providing more context regarding Biden. The context was undoubtedly a lie, but Trump bought it hook, line and sinker.
I think that would have alarmed an intelligence expert far more than trying to strongarm the Ukraine President into digging up dirt.
Adam Silverman: I agree with your thinking.
The whistleblower was unnerved by a “promise.” It is unlikely that a “promise” of aid to Ukraine – that they were already supposed to receive – in return for dirt on Biden would get that reaction, or be deemed “urgent.” But a “promise” to Putin to freeze Ukraine out of that aid, facilitating a Russian attack, using the pretext of requiring dirt on Biden first, *would* be both hair-raising and urgent.
I agree. I think this Ukraine thing is what Nosferatu and the Fat Cheeto think is the least damaging thing the whistleblower had, with the added bonus of dragging Uncle Joe in the mud. Now, neither of them are very bright so I think this is a plausible explanation for what they are doing.
Politico just came out with a profile of Michael Atkinson, the ICIG, who is characterized as “a straightshooter.” That’s been pretty obvious from his actions so far. I’ve added a link up top.
Even in what he know from Trump leak, he and members of his administration are willing to harm and perhaps overthrow a new democracy fighting to free itself from the bonds of fascist Russia. Whether it is just a consequence of a ruthess narcissist no holds barred fight for re-election or the purposeful spread of fascism by fascists, the consequences for ukraine are an under appreciated part of the media’s representation of this story.
@geg6: ” think is the least damaging thing the whistleblower had ”
And/or, the rest of the whistle blower’s report is truly horrendous.
@Cheryl Rofer: @Adam L Silverman: I keep seeing people on Twitter saying that the White House requested a list of all American spies, but there’s been nothing in the news stories about it. Is there anything to it, do you know.
@jl:
TMI.
O/T, but Uncle Joe stepped in it again:
@Mary G: I’ve wondered about this too. If Trump planned/plans on handing a list of American spies in Russia to Putin, that would be 20 times the disaster that the Ukraine story seems to be.
@FlipYrWhig:
Shokin refused to investigate claims of corruption and looting, and staffed the offices with “prosecutors” tied into the corruption.
With the West promising Ukraine military and economic aid contingent on reforms, Shokin had to go.
@Mary G: I have seen that and not followed up.
One of my surmises early on, before the report that the country involved was Ukraine, was that Trump might have given up spies’ identities to Russia, or promised to. On September 10, it was reported that Trump doesn’t like using spies in other countries. Bits of that have come out in the past, but I always like to ask why a story is coming out now. Was Trump particularly agitated about that in the recent past? Why?
It’s a very thin connection, and Trump hasn’t admitted it yet, so it’s not on the same footing with the Mob approach to Ukraine. I’m keeping my eye on it, though, and I’ll bet some reporters are working on it.
I thought, when I first heard about the phone call with the promise, that T***p had promised Putin something, perhaps to let him have a free hand in Ukraine.
@Jay: haha I imagine for money he will say he wanted to.
@Cheryl Rofer: Trump sure doesn’t seem to like spying or operations on his sponsor countries. Doesn’t seem to mind them spying or operating here.
@Jay: Ukraine has had a terrible problem with corruption since the Soviet Union broke up. It’s why Ukraine hasn’t done as well economically as the Baltic states, for example. Petro Poroshenko, the last president, was elected because he was less corrupt than the previous president, but there is still some ways to go. Part of Zelensky’s platform is to clean up corruption, so it’s natural that some people, like Shokin, will be booted out.
@jl:
If the whistleblower Knew what Trump was doing, then others in the administration also know, including Bars and Pompeo. It’s amazing, but if this is as bad as it sounds, there is a broad conspiracy .- — not just Trump and this immediate toadies – – acting against the interests of this county and democracy in the world.
@Faithful Lurker: Wow! That’s horrific. That would certainly result in their deaths.
@patrick II: Don’t forget that Pence made a trip to Ukraine too.
@Mary G: Then run on that and not some bull shit made up campaign. If that works against Biden every other candidate will have the same thing. Maybe not Ukraine but something.
@Raoul:
LOL. good ol’ soft and spineless mitt.
Fat Bastard has been gaslighting the world for three years now.
@patrick II: Barr was probably let in on it later, when they realized they couldn’t keep the oover on. I think Barr is smart enough to understand they should have gone through the motions of a lawful investigation and request to Ukraine at the beginning of the plot.
Starting one now will prompt our lazy media to finally ask him why he didn’t open one earlier when he should have in order to follow lawful process of making a request to Ukraine. Barr starting now would make actual reporting ‘newsworthy’, maybe get a gotcha out of Barr. That would be worth doing some actual work on reporting the news.
@Cheryl Rofer:
i do think that this event is going to end up shifting a lot of dems in the house caucus to the impeachment side. once that number gets close to 218 the pressure on pelosi is gonna go thermonuclear.
here’s hoping she’d figure out a way to stretch it out til the election, cause there’s no way moscow mitch won’t ratfuck the shit out of it in the senate.
@Mary G:
This strikes me as such a weird statement to make that I suspect this tweet is missing a lot of context. Probably something like “Mr. Vice President, I want to start by saying I’ve always admired you and the work you’ve done. But I have some serious doubts about the following things…”, to which Biden says “Thanks for admiring me so much”, and then doesn’t answer her actual question.
In order words, it sounds like a normal (though ‘bad’) political interaction that’s being pushed outsize to its actual content. At least, that would be my impression without watching the actual video. :/
I don’t have any faith in impeachment as a process but they have to do it now, or it’s dead letter.
If you don’t enforce laws they cease to exist, as a practical matter. This isn’t a magical time-out period from laws. Use them or lose them.
I’m sympathetic to the concerns of more vulnerable D’s but they had to have contemplated there might come a time where their political concerns would be overtaken by events that are beyond their control. They may hate it, but they have a job to do and it’s not a popularity contest. Grit your teeth and get going. No one said it was going to easy, or risk-free.
@Cheryl Rofer: Pence admitted, Trumpster fashion, earlier today he was going to be the inspector general of Ukrainian compliance with the deal, and the bag man.
I agree that Ukraine and Biden corruption is the least likely issue to be the cause of the original WhistleBlower Filing. It may be a small passing detail, but is probably totally fabricated given what we know about the Biden family. But the fact that Trump and Putin spoke on the phone on July 31st, and Trump’s White House requested a list of all Top Spies on Aug 3rd, that’s a big ole whopping clue right there.
Then there’s this list of dated events, included in this twitter feed:
7/28 Coats resigning soon
7/31 Trump-Putin ‘wildfire’ call
8/2 US out of INF Treaty
8/6 Huntsman resigns
8/8 Coats tells Sue Gordon to resign asap
8/12 #Whistleblower complaint filed
8/15 Coats out
9/9 News-CIA extracted key spy from Russia in ’17
9/10: Bolton resigns
Remember, Coats burst into a meeting to tell Ms Gordon that she needed to resign immediately… what’s up with that? Very strange behavior indeed! That’s not how internal office affairs work at all, so there was urgency about her resignation and something else happening on a date right around that event.
@JPL: That’s it, that’s exactly it – why the additional $140M, and what was asked for/promised in return?
(Insert dive klaxon here)
(Or ‘ENNNT!” lol)
Yeah, thanks but no thanks, NYTimes. We’ll just read the whistleblower complaint and listen to the testimony. We need original sources. And we get those! Pursuant to our laws, we’re permitted to see, hear and evaluate the original documents and actual testimony.
@J R in WV: Well if they have guts they need to leak to the Post because we know the NYTimes is not longer trustworthy.
@Cheryl Rofer: Don Jr was over in Europe meeting with some of the same people that Giuliani has been dealing with on this Ukraine influence op.
If that concern is supposed to go to Congress as a matter of law, how come nobody is going to the court to get them to enforce it? What am I missing here? If it is the letter of the law, then the court should easily back it up.
@Kay: In honor of EFG.. F..KEM
@Adam L Silverman: Of course he was..
@Kay: Exactly. If they keep putting off coming out for impeachment, and then the smoking gun is found, they’ll lose progressive support and maybe even the Republicans who voted them in. So there’s risk in what they’re doing now. They need to be brave.
While I’m dubious of Trump’s ability to think strategically, I do wonder if the Ukraine leaks/disclosures are a repeat of the Access Hollywood tapes — i.e. using a less damaging scandal to distract from a far more serious one.
Especially given Trump and minions seeing this as chance to tar Biden, and Trump likely trying to brazen it out as “it’s just politics.” Versus something like turning over a spy to the Russians, and/or knee-capping the Ukrainians so that the Russians could move against them.
@Kay:
That’s part of what’s wrong with the Impeachment process now… While the House has the power to arrest and fine people, they haven’t used that power in so long that people feel free to ignore that power’s existence.
I think Pelosi needs to get with DC police ( or any available and willing police force she can work with, I just think DC police would be willing and able to do this. a shame the FBI won’t be able to do it! ) and arrange for them to act as the House’s police force, arrest several of these guys who have refused to appear at 3 am and book them into a DC municipal jail, with a daily fine that will quickly make them bankrupt.
The right to act is right there in the Constitution IIRC and should be restored, polished up and implemented post haste~!!~ Stop these cheap crooks from sneering at the laws. Produce the IRS records Mr Mnuchin, or stay in a city jail cell for the rest of Trump’s time in office! Produce the whistleblower report ACTING DNI Joseph Maguire, or stay in jail for the rest of Trump’s term in office!
Etc. We need to do all of these at the same time one night, to make it clear that laws are to be obeyed by Trump and all of his slimy minions.
@J R in WV:
Out of curiosity, will this also stop folks to appear before congress? You’ll still have to figure out where they are hiding.. and if they decide to hang out in California or something then what is the process then?
@Patricia Kayden: I think that’s the point. Putin doesn’t fool around.
Maybe I’m misremembering, but I recall in the initial rumors about the whistleblower report, there were supposed to be multiple incidents, so releasing an (untrustworthy) transcript of one phone call wouldn’t cover it. Certainly there *could* be more information in the whistleblower report and there is no way to know it without it being released.
Ukraine is worth pursuing but it’s hard not to see it as chaff in this context.
@Mary G:
I don’t even mean that. I mean, I get it- they have political concerns. But Trump forced their hand. If they don’t impeach now the process is dead letter. It doesn’t mean anything. They no longer have a choice of “be brave or be cautious”. They have a choice of “start enforcing laws or we’re lawless”. That’s not a choice at all, which is when most people do “brave” things, really- when they have absolutely no other choice. They’re there.
@Fair Economist: The report of multiple incidents is what sticks in my mind, along with that a promise was made.
@Jeffro:
LOL
@MisterForkbeard: I watched it, and I thought it was sarcastic. Kindly Uncle Joe was blowing her off with the ‘admiring me so much.’ It came off as callous. I think the had holding was to set up a sweet moment where he can comfort a child with his wise Kindly Uncle Joe-ness and it didn’t work.
I had some hopes that a Biden campaign would serve some purpose. I thought he did some good things in the Obama administration, and was responsible for bringing in some very good more progressive advisers on economics than Obama had. But his campaign has been a huge disappointment.
I did watch youtubes of Bidens early appearances before he formally announced. He’s been practicing the Kindly Uncle Joe schtick since the beginning, and was so clumsy at it early on, his speeches were nearly incomprehensible. So, I am cynical about the whole Biden act. If he is starting to fade in the polls, I think he’ll have trouble coming back, since he really doesn’t have anything except his act from the Obama administration.
edit: in sum, new old Joe is the same as the old old Joe, kind of clueless doofus.
@J R in WV:
I don’t know that any of these people are up to it. But- they are stuck with it. You go to war with the army you have. I know they’d prefer to be talking about health care! Donald Trump made that impossible. He won’t stop lawbreaking until they stop him and they’re all we have. That’s the “dam” that’s breaking. They’re realizing they no longer have a choice.
Because there is infinite shit being shoveled to try to bury Orangemandius’s corruption,….
@J R in WV:
I read that Wall Streeters are mad because they see Warren as the threat, not Biden.
They’re not even competent sleazy plutocrats. They can’t even take out the right person.
@Cheryl Rofer: I think that Trump floated sending a former ambassador to Russia to be ‘investigated’. McFaul? I forget for what. For obvious reasons, the trial balloon was dropped almost instantaneously.
@jl: Yes, it was Michael McFaul. I think Putin asked for him and Trump was ready to give him up, but I could be wrong on that. And yes, Trump dropped it quickly.
@cain:
That’s the last place they’d want to hang out.
@Mary G: @Faithful Lurker: @Cheryl Rofer: I think they’re referring to this from the beginning of August. From The Daily Beast:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/white-house-asks-for-list-of-top-intel-officials-amid-intelligence-shakeup
More at the link!
Also, any of those personnel – at the GS 15 level and higher, so Senior Analytical Service or Senior Clandestine Service (the CIA/Intel Community equivalent of Senior Executive Service) – that are in covered and not for covered forward deployed positions doing clandestine work would be compartmented from the reply. Both because recalling them to serve as Acting DNI would do serious harm to the ops they’re working on. And while the President, as the original classification authority for the entire US government has the right to know all of this information, virtually no one else in the White House does, so the folks working on ops would’ve been protected. I don’t think there’s really any there here beyond face value except that no one trusts these people, so even reasonable things seem hinky and troubling.
Did you hear Trump bargaining with media today? Hinting that he would release the transcript.
They really don’t want to turn over that complaint, which is all the more reason the public should get it.
I didn’t authorize political media to make a deal with Donald Trump on my behalf. I don’t want the phone call. I want the complaint. Offer rejected.
@JPL:
If they’re going to leak, there are two plausible options:
1) Leak to HPSCI. This gets the information to the people who legally ought to have it and puts the burden of what to do with it on them.
2) Leak to everybody. People in the Trump administration have probably already figured out the whistleblower’s identity, so there’s no serious worry about somebody you leak to revealing their source. So release it as widely as possible so that no single reporter or news outlet can control the flow of information.
@Sister Golden Bear:
That’s almost certainly part of it, but the attempt to steer the discussion to the fabricated claims against Biden are obviously also important.
@Adam L Silverman: Huh… no wonder they are in panic mode. Ratcliffe would a good candidate to oversee that operation.
@chopper: There was this today, too: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/dam-could-break-impeachment-week-n1057741
I’ve been reluctant to overreact gleefully to the latest developments and conclude this time they’re definitely going to do something, since that’s been a Lucy with the football situation. But while there’s a lot of off the record and inside info sort of language here, I haven’t heard even Congressional aides predicting that the impeachening is nigh, previously. There’s also a lot of details suggesting that behind the scenes the House Dems do in fact have a spreadsheet, possibly entitled “ITMFA Elements,” and have been adding to and sorting it for awhile now in preparation for proceedings. Meaning the idea that they’re just getting steamrolled by the zone flooding with scandals and distractions by Drumpfco, and can’t keep up or have lost the forest for the trees, might not be an entirely accurate working theory.
We’re still missing strong and consistent messaging from actual House Dems. I would like all of them to be laying out the same discreet talking points, heavily populated by words like “betrayal,” “oath of office,” “personal enrichment,” “shameful” and “disgraceful.” They need to be in full attack mode. It’s not hard – Kamala just tweeted out this afternoon that impeachment’s a must and “He’s gotta go.” But this article’s contents make it seem like we might be on the precipice.
@Roger Moore: Twofer. Best thing they could do to get in front of the worse stuff if it comes out, and get a ding on Biden. They probably are in some kind of frenzied fugue state; shuttling between smug appreciation of their brilliance and sheer pants pissing panic.
Rosa DeLauro, Connecticut District 3, clearly sees the two issues:
@Jay:
At the risk of answering a rhetorical question, Trump does this because he hates formal chains of command and defined areas of responsibility. He wants a bunch of ministers without portfolio who he can assign to tasks as they come up without having to worry about who is supposed to be in charge of what area. He apparently trusts Mulvaney, so sending aid to Ukraine got assigned to OMB to be within his area. This is a huge reason he has so many acting directors: it makes it easier for him to shuffle people around to wherever he thinks they’ll be able to help him most.
I don’t understand why they are not proceeding with the simplest of options…an impeachment inquiry into the failure of DNI Maguire to follow the law.
It would force the republicans to come out of hiding and drive trump even more crazy when he is asked every day why he is politicizing this and hanging a long serving veteran out to dry just t protect his fat ass.
@Kay: Steve Benen made an interesting connection on that today, noting Dotard’s use of the phrase “respected source.” That’s the exact wording some other POTUS who was dogged by impeachable activities used, when offering to have a blue dog Dem listen to his White House tapes discussing a hotel break-in and then summarize everything for the rest of us.
Hard pass, Donnie.
@Adam L Silverman: Indeed. He’s managed to shrink into the Senate wallpaper most every day. I was just surprised he stuck his neck out even that teeny, tiny bit.
@Cheryl Rofer: You are correct. Happened at that whacked joint press conference in Helsinki. Which means that the President had already agreed to it in the one on one talks with no US note taker and with a US translator who had to surrender her notes to the President.
@MCA1: Vodka heir/moderate suburban first-term congressman Dean Phillips came out pretty strongly for impeachment today. He’s being seen by some as a bellwether. If the R to D first term flippers start moving towards impeachment, the current is going to get moving. Let’s hope so.
Ukrainian troll sites recycling IRA bs.
I’d not normally recommend watching the Chris Cuomo show on CNN, but he’s supposed to have Serhiy Leshchenko on, at, I think, 9:00 PM EDT.
@MCA1:
Fuck him with his weasel deals and especially fuck him for making the offer to media, instead of to the public.
They’re not the interested party. We are. I didn’t consent to them lowering the standard for Donald Trump.
@Raoul: Yeah, I know. His statement was the subject of a tweet Cheryl Rofer dropped in here that started this little subthread. I grew up in his District, so was glad to see it. My own congressperson, a longtime incumbent in a very safe District, came out in favor this summer, which was already frustratingly late, but better late than never, I guess.
@Cheryl Rofer:
You’re not wrong. That was during the famous Helsinki conference (“I don’t see why it would be Russia”). The one at which Trump met privately with Putin and the confiscated the interpreter’s notes.
Mueller wanted to interrogate the Russian agents behind election hacking and Putin offered an exchange:
Pretending ingnorance,…
@Adam L Silverman:
Serhiy Leshchenko is not currently a government official. He was, earlier, a Member of Parliament.
Excellent summary, but it must be remembered that the whistleblower report was a distraction from the emoluments lawsuit, which was a distraction from the falsification of weather service alerts, which was a distraction from the subpoena of tax records, which was a distraction from…
Oh dear, we’re in a depth first search that may never bottom out, because every time you think you’ve reached the bottom Trump shows he can do lower.
@Cheryl Rofer:
Shokin was fired by Poroshenko, replaced by the only slightly-less-corrupt Lutsenko, whom Zelensky has now replaced.
Impeachment hearings could easily last until the next election – the Watergate hearings lasted 13 months. Done right (for instance a good counsel doing the questioning, hard-assed subpoena/contempt procedures to keep things on track) could yield a steady stream of newsworthy tidbits that you know would distract Trump. The Watergate hearings led to a decrease in Nixon’s and Republicans’ support; no reason to think hearings now would be different.
When should they end? Shortly before the election, to shine a light on Senate Republicans when they dismiss the impeachment, or shortly after, leaving Trump to contemplate the criminal charges coming when he leaves office in a couple of months? Assuming he loses . . .
How the sausage gets made.
@Gin & Tonic: I’m aware.
TIPPING POINT MOMENT: look which Dems signed onto this:
If True, trump’s actions represent an impeachable offense
I lit up just seeing Spanberger’s name there. Not my Congresswoman (district next door, sadly) but still!
You’re gonna get it now, Donnie…
@Jay: That’s not really sausage.
@Adam L Silverman: @Jinchi: Thanks. That Helsinki conference was something else. Donny came out of it looking like Putin had slapped him around or put something in his diet Coke.
Looks like McFaul isn’t the only one Trump is willing to give up to dictators.
.
Fuck me, this Chris Cuomo is a moron.
Over 70 civilliansvdead in two days. Just some of the crap Cheetolini’s turd funnel buries.
Well, that was fast
Seven freshman Democrats: These allegations are a threat to all we have sworn to protect
@Cheryl Rofer: That is HOLY FUCKING SHIT BAD!!!!!
@Cheryl Rofer:
And yet they still hump Cheetolinni’s leg, hard, every day.
@Adam L Silverman: Yes. Embassies are supposed to protect American citizens.
@Cheryl Rofer: Yes they are.
@Cheryl Rofer: @Adam L Silverman: I think you’re both forgetting the President’s inherent power to strip citizenship from any person, retroactively to whatever date is convenient. It’s in the Constitution somewhere, I’m sure, probably near the inherent power to rearrange the budget and spend funds not allocated by Congress.
@MCA1: Clearly the current administration has learned from the crimes of Watergate, and are meticulously repeating them. Complete with “it’s not the crime but the coverup” (except it’s both).
@Ken:
No it isn’t.
Only fringe rightwingers make that argument.
@Adam L Silverman: Closer to Hudson River whitefish IMHO.
@Jinchi:
It was snark, or meant to be,
But who knows, it could be in that fake “pocket Constitution” wingers and Soverigns carry.
@Jay:
Hard to tell these days. It’s also literally what Trump has stated, repeatedly. And I wouldn’t put it past Barr to try to push the argument.
@Jinchi: Check the batteries in your sarcasmometer.
@Uncle Cosmo: Burned out at this point.
@Jinchi:
I can sell you a new one, powered by anger, no need for batteries, from my Amazon site, for $24.99 plus shipping.
@Jinchi:
My fault for forgetting the sarcasm fontwhich is ironic since I introduced it to BJ. I hope the new site supports it.So while eating frozen pizza for dinner, we watched Rachael Maddow’s show. She had, after a long discussion of Paulie Manafort’s Ukranian work, a newly elected House member, former Commander in the USN, elected from a district that includes Virginia Beach and the navy yards at Norfolk and Newport News.
She was on the Maddow show because she and 6 other new members of the House wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post in favor of the House moving forward with Impeachment, because this latest news is what they swore an oath to protect the Constitution against enemies both foreign and domestic.
So… maybe the dam is broken now? I hope they don’t actually vote in the House as a whole until late next summer!
@J R in WV: That would be Elaine Luria of Virginia Beach. Great to hear about the op ed. Gonna hunt for it now.
@Elizabelle: Linky here.
I’m seeing a lot of Democratic Representatives on Twitter coming out for impeachment. Nobody’s going to want to be the last, so this process is likely to speed up.
There is a Democratic caucus meeting tomorrow afternoon at 4 pm Eastern time. If you want to check on your representative, this is a good way to do it. But that site hasn’t been fully updated yet – there are a lot more than 136 who have declared now.
To sum up, Programmer pulled his owned code from @Chef that was their core, over not supporting Nazis, on Friday,
CEO published a non-apology on Saturday and got ratioed for supporting Nazis,
Monday, @Chef will no longer Nazi with Nazis and will donate to immigrant and refugee support orgs.
@Jinchi: Poe’s Law in action….
Someone with the whistleblower report should send it to wikileaks and then to all the other free speech orgs and journalists that are weirdly skeptical of Russian propaganda playing a role in Western elections in order until someone posts it… and, following that, leak a list of all orgs/people that didn’t publish the report. Kill a few birds with one stone by revealing who’s just a propaganda outfit at the same time.
April 2019: Shokin told me in written answers to questions that, before he was fired as general prosecutor, he had made “specific plans” for the investigation that “included interrogations and other crime-investigation procedures into all members of the executive board, including Hunter Biden.”
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/436816-joe-bidens-2020-ukrainian-nightmare-a-closed-probe-is-revived