• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Naturally gregarious and alpha

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

I did not have this on my fuck 2020 bingo card.

It was down to kool-aid drinkers and next of kin at the trump White House

They are all Michael Cohen now.

The revolution will be supervised.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

Fuck if i know. i just get yelled at when i try it.

The math demands it!

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

Not all heroes wear capes.

Yes we did.

Tick tock motherfuckers! Tick fucking tock!

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

I’m going back to the respite thread.

This fight is for everything.

Han shot first.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

Just a few bad apples.

A last alliance of elves and men. also pet photos.

Everybody saw this coming.

Mobile Menu

  • Look Forward & Back
  • Balloon Juice 2021 Pet Calendar
  • Site Feedback
  • All 2020 Fundraising
  • I Voted!
  • Take Action: Things We Can Do
  • Team Claire, and Family
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • BJ PayPal Donations
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Nature & Respite
  • Information As Power
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • On The Road
  • Garden Chats
  • Nature & Respite
  • Look Forward & Back
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Auto-renewal is important Mmkay….

Auto-renewal is important Mmkay….

by David Anderson|  September 23, 201911:02 am| 11 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

Facebook0Tweet0Email0

At JAMA-Internal Medicine, Dr. Coleman Drake of Pitt and I have published a research letter**.

We were curious about the importance of auto-renewals for the ACA individual market.  An auto-renewal happens when, at the end of the plan year, a person who did not make a choice to re-enroll in the same or a different plan for the next year is placed into a plan.  This is fairly common. Healthcare.gov has their own hierarchy that prioritizes putting people in the same insurer and metal level.  Covered California now has a similar set of rules, but for several years, they had a quirk.  California would not auto-re-enroll folks whose insurers left the market.  We took advantage of the quirk to find an answer for this question.

The short version is that auto-renewals are really critical for enrollment.

The longer version is that people who can auto-renew will show up in the next year’s enrollment file slightly more than half the time.  People who can’t auto-renew will show up in next year’s enrollment file about a fifth of the time.  It is a 30 percentage point difference even after we controlled for household and market characteristics.

This is a big deal.

Last January, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), published the draft Notice for Benefit and Payment Parameters-2020 (NBPP-2020) which is the ACA Exchange rulebook. It is published every year. There were two areas that HHS asked for advisory comments for action that would not occur until the 2021 plan year. The first was silverloading of Cost Sharing Reduction subsidies. The second was how to manage and prioritize the choices made in auto-renewals.

The practice of automatic re enrollment in the Exchanges gives rise to several concerns. Some consumers who are automatically re-enrolled in their current plan may be shielded from changes to their coverage, which may result in consumers being less aware of their options from year to year. There is a concern that automatic re-enrollment eliminates an opportunity for consumers to update their coverage and premium tax credit eligibility as their personal circumstances change, potentially leading to eligibility errors, tax credit miscalculations, unrecoverable federal spending on the credits, and general consumer confusion.

We seek comment on the automatic re-enrollment processes and capabilities as well as additional policies or program measures that would reduce eligibility errors and potential government misspending for potential action in future rule making applicable not sooner than plan year 2021.

Any automatic re-enrollment program is a matter of choice of priority.  Not allowing automatic re-enrollment is a choice to optimize on more aware buyers making active choices at the trade-off of far fewer people being covered.  The current Healthcare.gov rule set chooses to minimize disruption of coverage at a particular insurer while attempting to maximize enrollment.  This choice comes at a trade-off of less than optimal choices as post-subsidy premiums are likely to bounce year over year and people will face January premium shock when a zero premium plan suddenly becomes a $100 per month plan due to changes in the premium spread of their auto-renewed plan, the old benchmark and the new benchmark.  Other auto-renewal schemes are possible.  Each of them will have their own trade-offs.

Our new research letter highlights that any scheme that forces people to make annual choices will lead to significant attrition and surprise coverage drops.  Our research confirms CMS estimates with a different methodology and a different data set.  Erecting administrative barriers will lead to significant enrollment losses.

 

 

** Drake C, Anderson DM. Association Between Having an Automatic Reenrollment Option and Reenrollment in the Health Insurance Marketplaces. JAMA Intern Med. Published online September 23, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.3717

Facebook0Tweet0Email0
Previous Post: « Unbelivable
Next Post: Horses’ Asses (Open Thread) »

Reader Interactions

11Comments

  1. 1.

    jl

    September 23, 2019 at 11:21 am

    Thanks for links and interesting post. If I understand the results correctly even with automatic re-enrollment, the rate of churn is way too high for an efficient system.

  2. 2.

    David Anderson

    September 23, 2019 at 11:29 am

    @jl: Even with auto-enrollment, the overall rates of churn are high. Other (non-published at this time) evidence for certain subgroups have markedly different churn rates.

  3. 3.

    jl

    September 23, 2019 at 11:41 am

    @David Anderson: “evidence for certain subgroups have markedly different churn rates.”

    Hope you can put up a post with that data soon. Only subgroup you’ve posted on so far is pregnant women who, IIRC, have even higher churn rates, so discouraging. Though, I understand that the individual market is a relatively small segment, around 10 percent, I think. But, discouraging

    ‘

  4. 4.

    David Anderson

    September 23, 2019 at 11:43 am

    @jl: That paper is one I did a friendly pre-submission read and had no involvement with. Given where the authors are submitting to and the typical turnaround time for that subfield, I’m hoping to be able to write about it by this time next year.

  5. 5.

    Michael Allen

    September 23, 2019 at 11:46 am

    Doesn’t normal insurance just keep going if you don’t do anything? That’s how my Aetna HMO worked when it was my federal employee option and how my current Medicare Advantage program works. In both cases I thought I could probably do better with another plan but after figuring out providers in their pools including a dentist who was in their partial dental plans, and figuring out how their system works, I haven’t changed to another one. The devil you know.

    I’m guessing this is typical, although possibly with ACA plans being fairly new and rates etc. changing more often maybe more people would be looking into a change every fall. Also ACA plans have those different levels so there’s really more kinds of options.

  6. 6.

    rikyrah

    September 23, 2019 at 12:12 pm

    OT:

    Mayhew, did you see this and post on it already?

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-09-17/under-trump-health-insurance-with-less-coverage-floods-market

    Health Insurance That Doesn’t Cover the Bills Has Flooded the Market Under Trump
    The administration’s moves to weaken the Affordable Care Act have taken hold, and companies are cashing in
    By Zeke Faux, Polly Mosendz, and John Tozzi

    Early one Friday morning two years ago, David Diaz woke up his wife, Marisia, and told her he didn’t feel right. He asked her to pray with him. Their son called 911, and within minutes, Marisia was tailing an ambulance down the dirt road away from the couple’s house on the outskirts of Phoenix to a hospital in the city. David had had a massive heart attack.
    Before being wheeled into surgery, he whispered the PIN for his bank card to Marisia, just in case. But the double-bypass operation was successful, and two weeks later he was discharged.
    On her way out, Marisia gave the billing clerk David’s health insurance card. It looked like any other, listing a copay of $30 for doctor visits and $50 for “wellness.” She’d bought the plan a year earlier from a company called Health Insurance Innovations Inc., with the understanding that it would be comprehensive. She hadn’t noticed a phrase near the top of the card, though: “Short-Term Medical Insurance.”

    The Diazes’ plan was nothing like the ones consumers have come to expect under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, which bars insurers from capping coverage, canceling it retroactively, or turning away people with preexisting conditions. But the law includes an exemption for short-term plans that serve as a stopgap for people between jobs. The Trump administration, thwarted in its attempts to overturn the ACA, has widened that loophole by stretching the definition of “short-term” from three months to a year, with the option of renewing for as long as three years.

  7. 7.

    Damien

    September 23, 2019 at 12:46 pm

    @rikyrah: Fuck these people. I hope every one of them are fed through the healthcare meat grinder and get left penniless in the gutter.

    I have had my insurance canceled because TWICE I was told that I was set up for autopay, but was not. My premium was $30/mo. I don’t track my cash that closely, and they retroactively canceled it to May. This all happened juuuuuust before my diabetes flew out of control and I ended up in the hospital with DKA. Bye bye house down payment.

    So you know what? Fuck it, I vote we just burn down the whole goddamn system, shit on the ashes and then tar insurance executives with it.

  8. 8.

    David Anderson

    September 23, 2019 at 12:56 pm

    @Michael Allen: I will expand on this tomorrow or Wednesday.

  9. 9.

    jl

    September 23, 2019 at 1:21 pm

    @David Anderson: I’m looking forward to your post on that topic.

    In my view, the robot’s breakfast of many plans, the resulting, and often scaammy, pricing, options designed to segment the market, and network gaming, and the resulting high churn is just a horrifying slow motion train wreck demonstrating the instability of insurance markets with heterogeneous risks and probably lack of equilibrium unless market is concentrated enough to rake in massive excess profits (cough cough rothschildstigltz….)

  10. 10.

    jl

    September 23, 2019 at 1:27 pm

    @rikyrah: Sad and infuriating story. As Paul Krugman noted recently, the only business that thrives under Trumponomics is the scam business.

  11. 11.

    low-tech cyclist

    September 23, 2019 at 4:57 pm

    @rikyrah: The people who are responsible for that change, and the people running the companies that took advantage of it, ought to be pilloried. And I’m not talking metaphorically.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Do Something!

Call Your Senators & Representatives
Directory of US Senators
Directory of US Representatives

Vaccine Venting Here!
I Got the Shot!  (Month 2)
I Got the Shot!

 

🎈Ways to Support Our Site

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal
Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice ⬇  

Recent Comments

  • prostratedragon on Late Night Open Thread: Our Failed Media Mudlarks (Mar 5, 2021 @ 4:04am)
  • Keith P. on Late Night Open Thread: Our Failed Media Mudlarks (Mar 5, 2021 @ 3:44am)
  • SectionH on I Think You Need Some Respite (Mar 5, 2021 @ 3:32am)
  • opiejeanne on Late Night Open Thread: Our Failed Media Mudlarks (Mar 5, 2021 @ 2:59am)
  • joel hanes on Late Night Open Thread: Our Failed Media Mudlarks (Mar 5, 2021 @ 2:49am)

Team Claire, and Family

Claire Updates
Claire is Home!

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year

Featuring

John Cole
Silverman on Security
COVID-19 Coronavirus
Medium Cool with BGinCHI
Furry Friends

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Submit Photos to On the Road
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Meetups: Proof of Life
2021 Pets of Balloon Juice Calendar

Culture: Books, Film, TV, Music, Games, Podcasts

Noir: Favorites in Film, Books, TV
Book Recommendations & Indy Recs
Mystery Recommendations
Netflix Favorites
Amazon Prime Favorites
Netflix Suggestions in July
Longmire & Netflix Suggestions

Twitter

John Cole’s Twitter

[custom-twitter-feeds]

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!