• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Women: they get shit done

Where tasty lettuce and good mustard aren’t elitist.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

Let there be snark.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

There will be lawyers.

Nevertheless, she persisted.

They are all Michael Cohen now.

It was down to kool-aid drinkers and next of kin at the trump White House

We still have time to mess this up!

Wetsuit optional.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

False Scribes! False Scribes!

I’m going back to the respite thread.

I’m only here for the duck photos.

How do you get liars to care about the truth?

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

Shocking, but not surprising

Call the National Guard if your insurrection lasts more than four hours.

Something seems odd about that, but i have been drinking.

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn – Nancy Pelosi

We can agree to disagree, but i’m right.

Mobile Menu

  • Look Forward & Back
  • Balloon Juice 2021 Pet Calendar
  • Site Feedback
  • All 2020 Fundraising
  • I Voted!
  • Take Action: Things We Can Do
  • Team Claire, and Family
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • BJ PayPal Donations
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Nature & Respite
  • Information As Power
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • On The Road
  • Garden Chats
  • Nature & Respite
  • Look Forward & Back
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Schrodinger’s Coverage

Schrodinger’s Coverage

by David Anderson|  November 26, 20187:17 am| 5 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance, Election 2017, Election 2018, Fuck Yeah!

Facebook0Tweet0Email0

Here is a koan for Balloon Juice:

If you do not know you are insured, are you insured?

Maine is in the process of expanding Medicaid.  The new Governor-Elect, Janet Mills (D), has promised to expand Medicaid on her first day in office.  She wants to make the coverage retroactive to July 2, 2018.

A Maine judge has ordered the current Maine governor to expand Medicaid with claims payment retroactive to July 2, 2018.

In most states, Medicaid has an individualized retroactive eligibility processes.  Someone who is uninsured will interact with the medical system.  The medical service provider will ask several standardized questions to determine if the uninsured patient is highly likely to be eligible for Medicaid.  If they determine that the patient is likely to be eligible, they can file a claim and an eligibility determination.  If the beneficiary is deemed eligible, some state Medicaid programs will pay both the index claim that initiated the eligibility determination process and claims in the three previous months if the benefeciary would have been eligible for Medicaid if they had applied.

The trigger event is a claim which means the trigger is an encounter with the healthcare system.  Most people who are eligible for Medicaid but not enrolled don’t interact with the healthcare system in any given month because most people don’t interact with the healthcare system in any given month.

Retrospective eligibility is a safety net for both the patient who will not be faced with crippling medical bills and healthcare providers who will get reasonably timely payment that is most likely more than the net present value of the minimal cash stream that uninsured and Medicaid eligible patients can and will pay.

Retrospective eligibility is highly likely to occur for either pregnancy or major medical events that require hospitalization.  More common and lower cost events like a primary care physician visit are less likely to generate a claim and retrospective eligibility determination because that appointment will either not be made by the beneficiary or the appointment will be denied by the provider once they are sure that they won’t get paid.

Maine is going to be doing something very different.  It will be declaring that all claims on or after July 2 will be eligible for retroactive payments if the beneficiary would have been Medicaid eligible (either for legacy or expansion).

Now this is where I have a question.

Will we see changes in provider and beneficiary behavior in anticipation of a Medicaid Expansion?  Did they increase the number of determination assessments that they submitted that would fail for legacy Medicaid but pass for Medicaid Expansion in July, August and September?  Are providers pre-emptively opening up appointment blocks for people who are uninsured but Medicaid Expansion eligible?  Are people who are Medicaid Expansion eligible making appointments in anticipation of retroactive eligibility?

How do people behave when they are covered if they are not sure that they are covered?

 

I don’t know but I think that this is one hell of a question.

 

 

Facebook0Tweet0Email0
Previous Post: « On the Road and In Your Backyard
Next Post: Deploraville Dispatch »

Reader Interactions

5Comments

  1. 1.

    SRW1

    November 26, 2018 at 9:54 am

    Quantum mechanics is a hell of a way to run a health care system. But then that makes it only two was to spin it.

  2. 2.

    Ken

    November 26, 2018 at 10:56 am

    How do people behave when they are covered if they are not sure that they are covered?

    This sounds a little like the pre-ACA status, where people thought they were covered until they tried to file a claim.

  3. 3.

    bbleh

    November 26, 2018 at 11:43 am

    Well, it’s kind of axiomatic that people act on the basis of the beliefs they have. And it’s so evident in practice that it might as well be axiomatic that (1) almost all people’s beliefs are materially both incorrect and subject to uncertainty and (2) people are mostly not very good at decisions under material uncertainty, e.g., they substitute imperfect heuristics for sound reasoning. These apply just as well to people who believe they ARE covered as well as to those who believe they’re not or aren’t sure. (For example: how many people know the details of their coverage? How many people are aware of the ERAP problem? How many people know which area hospitals are in-network and out? Etc.)

    I would guess that the answer to the question is a 2-D continuum, over both actual coverage and sophistication regarding medical decision-making, and that the behavior of many well-covered people resembles that of people who aren’t covered (or don’t believe they are) in that they act impulsively and irrationally, e.g. by neglecting wellness care, delaying seeking care, using ERs for everything when they do seek care, not checking to see what may be covered or not before selecting treatment, etc. etc.

    Somebody needs to do a thesis, including lots of empirical research.

  4. 4.

    David Anderson

    November 26, 2018 at 6:02 pm

    @bbleh: yep this is a cool dissertation

  5. 5.

    Agorabum

    November 26, 2018 at 8:38 pm

    It has always baffled me that hospitals and medical professionals, especially those who provide coverage in rural areas, haven’t done more to push the Medicaid expansion.

    As for the greater question, I’d expect that most patients take a “I’ll believe it when I see it” other than those who are both politically savvy and desperate (a small subset), while hospitals will be maximizing revenue in a much more thoughtful way.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Do Something!

Call Your Senators & Representatives
Directory of US Senators
Directory of US Representatives

I Got the Shot!  (Month 2)
I Got the Shot!

 

🎈Ways to Support Our Site

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal
Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice ⬇  

Recent Comments

  • Brachiator on Open Thread: Actual Golden Calf (Feb 26, 2021 @ 12:17pm)
  • SiubhanDuinne on Open Thread: Actual Golden Calf (Feb 26, 2021 @ 12:16pm)
  • mrmoshpotato on Open Thread: Actual Golden Calf (Feb 26, 2021 @ 12:15pm)
  • lowtechcyclist on Friday Morning Open Thread: Minimum Wage vs. Pandemic Relief? (Feb 26, 2021 @ 12:14pm)
  • FelonyGovt on Open Thread: Actual Golden Calf (Feb 26, 2021 @ 12:13pm)

Team Claire, and Family

Claire Updates
Claire is Home!

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year

Featuring

John Cole
Silverman on Security
COVID-19 Coronavirus
Medium Cool with BGinCHI
Furry Friends

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Submit Photos to On the Road
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Meetups: Proof of Life
2021 Pets of Balloon Juice Calendar

Culture: Books, Film, TV, Music, Games, Podcasts

Noir: Favorites in Film, Books, TV
Book Recommendations & Indy Recs
Mystery Recommendations
Netflix Favorites
Amazon Prime Favorites
Netflix Suggestions in July
Longmire & Netflix Suggestions

Twitter

John Cole’s Twitter

[custom-twitter-feeds]

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!