By Request: NANCY SMASH!


.

I was gonna wait to see how it turned out, but yeah, Pelosi deserves the spotlight…

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi took the rare step Wednesday of giving a marathon speech supporting Democrats’ attempts to legalize the status of young immigrant “dreamers,” in a bid to pressure Republicans to act.

Pelosi (D-Calif.) began talking shortly after 10 a.m., using her right as minority leader to speak for as long as she wants. She began by saying that she would lead opposition to a broad two-year budget agreement that includes several Democratic priorities but does not address immigration — the topic that has prolonged the spending debate for several months.

“I have no intention of yielding back,” Pelosi said at 3:41 p.m. Eastern as she neared the six-hour mark of her ongoing remarks.

The hope is that Pelosi and Democrats — whose support is often needed to pass spending bills in the face of opposition from fiscal conservatives — can pressure House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) to hold votes on immigration legislation, as the Senate is poised to begin doing next week.

“Why should we in the House be treated in such a humiliating way when the Republican Senate leader has given that opportunity in a bipartisan way to his membership? What’s wrong? There’s something wrong with this picture,” Pelosi said.

Pelosi, 77, peppered her speech with anecdotes about people protected by the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program and mentioned the biblical tale of the Good Samaritan…

At least six floor aides and 18 Democratic lawmakers sat around her, including Reps. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) and Jamie Raskin (D-Md.). But most sat skimming their phones or reading documents. One aide kept slipping her fresh pages with more stories to tell about dreamers affected by the ongoing impasse.

On the other side of the chamber sat only Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Tex.) and two aides, seemingly waiting to seize the floor and begin debate on a home mortgage bill scheduled to be voted on later Wednesday…

Of course (*sigh*) it wouldn’t be a Democratic landmark without some two-bit opportunist trying to grab some attention…

157 replies
  1. 1
    Yutsano says:

    I’m gonna keep saying it.
    Do.
    Not.
    Fuck.
    With.
    A.
    Nonna.

    ReplyReply
  2. 2
    trollhattan says:

    I’ll bet she didn’t need to turn to Dr. Seuss even once–take that, lyin’ Ted!

    Thanks once again, Nancy SMASH! A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

    ReplyReply
  3. 3
    WaterGirl says:

    Nice clip. I liked hearing her laugh like that. She is probably so tired that she is punchy.

    ReplyReply
  4. 4
    WaterGirl says:

    No water, no executive time. Wow, I hope that one leaves a mark.

    ReplyReply
  5. 5
    lamh36 says:

    @CNN
    2m2 minutes ago
    More
    Nancy Pelosi received a standing ovation from Democrats after speaking for more than 8 hours about the DACA program, setting the record for the longest speech on the House floor http://cnn.it/2nJIH8Z
    https://twitter.com/CNN/status/961381011270619136

    ReplyReply
  6. 6
    WaterGirl says:

    On the other side of the chamber sat only Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Tex.) and two aides, seemingly waiting to seize the floor and begin debate on a home mortgage bill scheduled to be voted on later Wednesday…

    Those fuckers. Total disrespect.

    ReplyReply
  7. 7
    JPL says:

    They should make an ad with clips of her on the floor, and say I’m the real Nancy Pelosi and I’m not running for this congressional seat. If the assholes don’t think that we are one America, then fkem.

    ReplyReply
  8. 8
    Patricia Kayden says:

    I’m glad she did this. We need to fight for immigrants. The fact that Trump has decided to demonize them is outrageous. We can have strong borders and fair immigration at the same time.

    ReplyReply
  9. 9
    Fair Economist says:

    I was listening for the last 2 hours. Not only was it physically impressive, it was good speechifying as well. She was sliding back and forth adeptly between the stories and what they meant. It’s hard enough to speak that long, and to speak well too is even more impressive.

    ReplyReply
  10. 10
    🌷 Martin says:

    “The reality is that the filibuster is only being done to cater to the left-wing of the party at the expense of the larger caucus, and it’s in the interest of one person: Leader Pelosi.”

    Alternatively substitute ‘California, where 23 Republicans will be fighting for re-election in a state Clinton carried by 31 points’ for ‘the left-wing of the party’.

    You can take the House in 2018 with California, or you can lose. Choose one. California is not going to back down.

    ReplyReply
  11. 11
    Chyron HR says:

    “The only thing that can stop the nazis from ethnically purging the country is staying home on election day and letting them consolidate their control.” – DSA

    ReplyReply
  12. 12
    jharp says:

    Damn, what an extraordinary lady. We are lucky to have her leadership.

    And Donald Trump isn’t fit to shine her fucking shoes.

    ReplyReply
  13. 13

    @JPL: Sounds like you’ve been hanging with efg a bit too much.

    ReplyReply
  14. 14
    Another Scott says:

    Well done, once and future Speaker. Well done.

    Cheers,
    Scott.

    ReplyReply
  15. 15
    WaterGirl says:

    @Patricia Kayden: Dreamers have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with border security.or gangs. That they are putting those together as if they are the same issue is absolutely wrong and an insult to our intelligence.

    ReplyReply
  16. 16
    Anne Laurie says:

    @lamh36: Now I feel like I jinxed her! (even though I’m sure Nancy Smash had this all gamed out in advance)

    ReplyReply
  17. 17
    Marcopolo says:

    Pelosi was reading letters from Dreamers to I think D congressmen talking about their hopes & “dreams” and what they were doing everyday in their communities all across the US to make them reality. It was great to listen to them as they laid out their very American sounding aspirations. Although there does not seem to be a path to legalizing them that doesn’t require the agreement of Ryan to hold an open vote in the House, I am working my @ss off over the next 9+ months to make sure Ryan doesn’t have that power in 2019.

    And thanks for this thread AL.

    ReplyReply
  18. 18
    Roger Moore says:

    @trollhattan:

    I’ll bet she didn’t need to turn to Dr. Seuss even once–take that, lyin’ Ted!

    If she had, I bet she would have picked one whose moral supported her point rather than contradicting it. I still can’t believe Ted Cruz doesn’t understand the moral of Green Eggs and Ham.

    ReplyReply
  19. 19
    Baud says:

    I am ashamed to not be more like her.

    ReplyReply
  20. 20
    Baud says:

    @Chyron HR: It worked in 2016.

    ReplyReply
  21. 21
    cain says:

    It just shows what great quality of politicians we have in the Democratic caucus. We have great Americans and we are being called traitors.

    ReplyReply
  22. 22
    TenguPhule says:

    @Baud:

    I am ashamed to not be more like her.

    Transgender Baud?

    ReplyReply
  23. 23
    TenguPhule says:

    @Baud:

    It worked in 2016.

    To be fair, we haven’t been purged. Yet. /S

    ReplyReply
  24. 24
    debbie says:

    Have the haters arrived yet, or can I say that Nancy Pelosi IS the leader of the party without fear of getting some man- or youngsplaining?

    ReplyReply
  25. 25
    lamh36 says:

    @Anne Laurie: yeah…I’m thinking she wanted to make it in time for the national nightly news

    ReplyReply
  26. 26
    🌷 Martin says:

    Understand too, that there are more registered DACA individuals in California than there are voters in Wyoming. This is not a small issue here. We view the lack of action on DACA as a direct affront to the state.

    ReplyReply
  27. 27
    Emma says:

    I want to find that snake of a Dem aide and do serious damage to his shinbones.

    ReplyReply
  28. 28
    cain says:

    @debbie:
    She was always the leader of the party. She was the one who made Obama successful in implementing his legislative agenda.

    ReplyReply
  29. 29
    Fair Economist says:

    To repeat from the previous thread, to give even one minute to talk about every Dreamer would take talking 24 hours nonstop for 1 and half years.

    ReplyReply
  30. 30
    patroclus says:

    @trollhattan: Nah, she turned to the Gospel of Matthew. The part about sheltering the homeless, feeding the hungry, caring for the sick..

    ReplyReply
  31. 31
    rikyrah says:

    Go Nancy Smash 😄😄😄

    ReplyReply
  32. 32
    MisterForkbeard says:

    @TenguPhule: Elected Official Baud.

    ReplyReply
  33. 33
    TenguPhule says:

    @patroclus:

    The part about sheltering the homeless, feeding the hungry, caring for the sick..

    Heresy. Burn the witch. The god will know who is good by how much money they possess. Amen. /S

    ReplyReply
  34. 34
    rikyrah says:

    @🌷 Martin:
    Good for California.
    Wipe them out
    All of them 😠

    ReplyReply
  35. 35
    TenguPhule says:

    @MisterForkbeard: But Paul Ryan is also an elected official and he looks terrible in a dress. Surely Baud can do better.

    ReplyReply
  36. 36
    debbie says:

    @cain:

    Tell that to Tim Ryan.

    ReplyReply
  37. 37
    Jim, Foolish Literalist says:

    Heather Caygle @ heatherscope
    As Pelosi enters hour four of DACA filibuster, Dem aide aligned with House mods emails me:

    “The reality is that the filibuster is only being done to cater to the left-wing of the party at the expense of the larger caucus, and it’s in the interest of one person: Leader Pelosi.”

    what’s the moderates theory of the game?

    ReplyReply
  38. 38

    I kind of want to dig up some of my friends’ ancient (six months or so) posts on how we need to replace her with leaders that care about immigrants, screenshot them, and tag them on Facebook.

    ReplyReply
  39. 39
    Immanentize says:

    @🌷 Martin: What are you talking about? By definition, dreamers are not citizens and cannot vote. In fact one of their mottos is “We cannot vote, but we have a voice.”. So please.explain?

    ReplyReply
  40. 40
    TenguPhule says:

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:

    what’s the moderates theory of the game?

    The only winning move is not to play. //

    ReplyReply
  41. 41
    magurakurin says:

    and one should always remember, the Wilmer cult hates Nancy Pelosi. They are not allies.

    ReplyReply
  42. 42
    MomSense says:

    @Yutsano:

    Word. She’s a champion.

    ReplyReply
  43. 43
    hueyplong says:

    Why does Heather give voice to a “Dem aide” afraid to identify himself while slagging the leader?

    The reality is that the Dem aide should go perform seemingly impossible acts of self gratification.

    ReplyReply
  44. 44
    🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka The Hope of the Universe) 🗳 🌷 says:

    I think I’m going to leave Tim Ryan’s bubble blank this time around.

    Last year, after one of the healthcare deform votes, I called his office to thank him for his vote and the person who answered the phone was totally uninterested in what I had to say. Sounded annoyed.

    ReplyReply
  45. 45
    JPL says:

    @🐾BillinGlendaleCA: Great minds and all that.

    @lamh36: She did on CBS, and then Porter.

    ReplyReply
  46. 46
    kindness says:

    Nancy is the AWESOME!

    I can’t believe how often I have to go on FB and tell my purity troll liberal friends from the East Coast that Nancy isn’t the devil incarnate and defend Nancy to their stupid asses. And yes, those are all the Bernie faction friends of mine. Many of them I just unfollowed because it wasted my time.

    ReplyReply
  47. 47
    MisterForkbeard says:

    @Major Major Major Major: Nah, she’s faking it. Just like Hillary!

    ReplyReply
  48. 48
    Immanentize says:

    @🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka The Hope of the Universe) 🗳 🌷: someone should run against him just for his “Dago red wine” comment. That one still chaps me.

    ReplyReply
  49. 49
    TenguPhule says:

    Shorter Ross Douhat at FYNYT, “Trump can be tamed and compelled to do our bidding. Take note, fainthearted Republicans tempted to vote Democratic.”

    He’s destined for a tumbrel ride no matter which side wins this.

    ReplyReply
  50. 50
    Gretchen says:

    Arrgghh! Chuck Todd led a panel asking what the Democratic Party could do about its “Nancy Pelosi problem”. Which I gather is that only the lefties care about DACA. He interviewed a Dem from a swing Illinois district about whether this won’t make it harder if she has a challenger. She said duh, she always has a challenger, and her district wants someone who will fight for them. Stephanie Cutter did a pretty good job. Todd says why aren’t the other Dems supporting Pelosi. Cutter, duh, look at the pictures you are showing, the entire caucus is sitting behind her clapping. Where is Schumer? Duh, Schumer is pushing the same thing in the Senate. Why is this man on my tv, and why does my husband have it on?

    ReplyReply
  51. 51
    magurakurin says:

    @kindness: the grip of Vermont Jesus is strong.

    ReplyReply
  52. 52
    Steve in the ATL says:

    @debbie: let me explain to you the problem with Pelosi: she is minority leader when she should be speaker

    ReplyReply
  53. 53
    TenguPhule says:

    @Steve in the ATL: But that’s America’s fault, not hers.

    ReplyReply
  54. 54
    🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka The Hope of the Universe) 🗳 🌷 says:

    @Gretchen:
    Someone who’s planning on retiring should just go on Todd’s stupid show and humiliate him. Who cares at that point if they aren’t invited back? That red headed twerp needs to get a beat down.

    ReplyReply
  55. 55
    debbie says:

    Not her fault. If voters don’t fuck it up, she will be Speaker…again.

    ReplyReply
  56. 56
    MomSense says:

    @Major Major Major Major:

    Don’t bother. The people that say that nonsense are not allies and they will not be there fighting with us when it counts.

    ReplyReply
  57. 57
    🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka The Hope of the Universe) 🗳 🌷 says:

    @Immanentize:
    I heard something about that. What was it about?

    ReplyReply
  58. 58
    lamh36 says:

    @Gretchen: I’d heard that La Blade (Stephanie Cutter’s nickname during the Obama campaigns for he ability to slice folks like Chuckles and the other punditry as an PBO spokesperson) tried to set Chuck straight…I saw the beginning when he opened w/his bullshit “Pelosi problem” and promptly turned it off..

    Was Chuckles at least chagrined?

    ReplyReply
  59. 59
    trollhattan says:

    @jharp:
    Tell me you wouldn’t kill to hear Nancy SMASH tell Deadbeat Donny to go fetch his shine box.

    ReplyReply
  60. 60
    Mike R says:

    @lamh36: Chuckles is too stupid to know if he gets sliced and diced. The man is an absolute waste of time.

    ReplyReply
  61. 61
    Baud says:

    @MomSense: Agreed.

    ReplyReply
  62. 62
    trollhattan says:

    @patroclus:
    The part missing from Republican Bibles? Nicely played.

    ReplyReply
  63. 63
    oldgold says:

    Have any of you been following the special House election in Pennsylvania’s 18th congressional district scheduled for March 13?

    ReplyReply
  64. 64
    Roger Moore says:

    @trollhattan:
    Didn’t you know that the red words in the Bible are colored that way to show they’re optional?

    ReplyReply
  65. 65
    Aleta says:

    Alison Barkoff‏ 
    @AlisonBarkoff
    The #ADA is under attack. The House may vote as early as next week on a bill that guts the protections of the ADA and takes away the rights of people with disabilities. Call your Rep and tell them to #VoteNo to H.R. 620.

    https://dredf.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/myths-and-truths-about-the-ada-education-and-reform-act.pdf

    ReplyReply
  66. 66

    @trollhattan: Right that’s the Commie Jesus, you know like in the King James version.

    ReplyReply
  67. 67
    WaterGirl says:

    @Major Major Major Major: That sounds like an excellent project for a wednesday evening. :-)

    ReplyReply
  68. 68

    @Roger Moore: And who uses red as their color? Commies and Republicans.

    ReplyReply
  69. 69
    magurakurin says:

    @trollhattan: I second the sentiment fully, but I’d rather see Nancy give Cadet Bones Spurs this speech: “I think all fairness, I should explain to you exactly what it is that I do…”

    ReplyReply
  70. 70
    Baud says:

    Olympic curling has already started. USA is playing Russian athletes (Russia was banned). I wonder which team Trump is rooting for.

    ReplyReply
  71. 71

    @Baud: Whoever is paying the most.

    ReplyReply
  72. 72
    Baud says:

    @🐾BillinGlendaleCA: So the Russians then.

    ReplyReply
  73. 73
    TenguPhule says:

    @Baud:

    I wonder which team Trump is rooting for.

    Whichever one buys his branded crap. SATSQ.

    ReplyReply
  74. 74
    Amaranthine RBG says:

    Speaking for 8 hours is great. Just really great. Mad props to her.

    So when is the DACA vote now?

    ReplyReply
  75. 75
    🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka The Hope of the Universe) 🗳 🌷 says:

    @oldgold:
    No, but it’s being described as a bellwether for some reason.

    Supreme Court Pass Means Pennsylvania Must Redraw Congressional Maps In 10 Days

    This is good news for that special election though.

    Democrats had already been eyeing the Philadelphia suburbs as a prime target for picking up Republican-held congressional seats this fall. The ruling — and the new maps that will follow — will boost Democrats’ efforts.

    “I think a fair map in Pennsylvania can give Democrats an opportunity to win up to five seats in Pennsylvania,” Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez told NPR last week.

    Democrats have pointed to several of the long, thin districts drawn on the eastern edge of the state as prime examples of lines drawn to maximize the number of Republican-held seats. The state is currently represented by 12 Republicans and five Democrats in the House, with one empty seat that was formerly held by a Republican.

    Of course, the asshole Republicans quoted in the article have sour grapes over it:

    The map passed with bipartisan support in 2011. Republican leaders in Pennsylvania’s General Assembly have decried the state court ruling as partisan and have refused to provide the court with map-drawing data requested by the judges.

    “We still do not believe that there was a violation of the state Constitution, that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court can direct us to draw a new congressional map, or that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has the authority to draw a new Congressional District Map under the Pennsylvania Constitution or United States Constitution,” state Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati said in a statement.

    State Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman conceded the 2011 maps were drawn with politics partly in mind but argued that’s perfectly valid. The U.S. Supreme Court, the Republican said, has repeatedly ruled that state legislatures have the right to draw district lines.

    “Obviously the Legislature is a political body. We have Republicans and we have Democrats. It’s a political body by definition,” he told NPR. “So they’ve put that in the hands of a political body to make decisions. If you look at maps in Illinois, you look at maps in Maryland, I think you’ll see maps that have interesting lines as well, that favor [Democrats]. Because they were in control. But the Supreme Court has time and time, and federal courts have time and time, ruled that that is allowed.”

    A federal court recently upheld Pennsylvania’s congressional districts. The U.S. Supreme Court is currently considering two cases that test whether extreme partisan gerrymandering is unconstitutional. One case tests state legislative district lines drawn in Wisconsin, while the second looks at a congressional district in Maryland. The court is expected to rule by June.

    But Pennsylvania’s ruling was based on the state, not federal, Constitution, and Justice Samuel Alito declined to interfere.

    ReplyReply
  76. 76
    Baud says:

    @Amaranthine RBG: As soon as Bernie makes McConnell look out his window.

    ReplyReply
  77. 77

    @Baud: Yup, but it’s curling; so I’m looking to the US to make a clean sweep.

    ReplyReply
  78. 78
    Gravenstone says:

    @Emma: Aim higher, and more centrally located.

    ReplyReply
  79. 79
    Emma says:

    @Amaranthine RBG: @Amaranthine RBG: Why don’t you tell us how the Democrats, who are in the minority in both the House and the Senate can push the vote through?

    ReplyReply
  80. 80
    Gravenstone says:

    @rikyrah: Uhoh, I think VDE is having a bad influence on you.

    ReplyReply
  81. 81
    Emma says:

    @Gravenstone: Let me get my slugger.

    ReplyReply
  82. 82
  83. 83
    TS says:

    @magurakurin: Paul Ryan is the one who has earned that speech

    ReplyReply
  84. 84
    WaterGirl says:

    Anybody here remember the crazy, abusive CEO of the non-profit I did the books for during the first half of 2017? Well, I got my 1099 from the organization last week, and the amount is wrong by 23,000. So I have spent the last few days trying to reach her.

    Office phone: disconnected.
    Office phone for the big grant in Chicago: disconnected.
    Checked the number on the 1099: same as office phone that has been disconnected.
    Checked Facebook page: phone number no longer listed.
    Called the board president: “I am not longer on the board”.
    Called the internal auditor who worked with them: “I haven’t heard from her.”
    Went by the new office (they were moving the week that I left): sign is still up, door locked, no one there during business hours.
    Called her cell phone (which I had been avoiding): number has been changed or is disconnected.

    Wondering if some interesting practices finally caught up with her. Inquiring minds want to know!

    I don’t want to show a 23k difference on my 1099 and what I am reporting for income from her, seems like that would raise red flags with the IRS? I will be showing the income of 23k more than her 1099 will show, so at least I won’t be claiming less.

    ReplyReply
  85. 85
    TenguPhule says:

    @WaterGirl: You may want to consider contacting the IRS about this. And be prepared to serve as a witness against her for tax fraud.

    ReplyReply
  86. 86
    MisterForkbeard says:

    @Amaranthine RBG: Apparently that all starts next week under the current budget agreement.

    But alternately, I’d love to see you offer some constructive advice. How exactly do you make the Republicans vote on something they don’t want to vote on, in a way which won’t damage the midterms or commit the Dems to incredibly irresponsible acts?

    ReplyReply
  87. 87
    burnspbesq says:

    @magurakurin:

    One of the only good things about climate change is that there are plenty of ice floes on which we can maroon the Wilmer Cult. And if those ice floes happen to be occupied by desperately hungry polar bears … well, shit happens.

    ReplyReply
  88. 88
    Gretchen says:

    @lamh36: nope. Todd is shameless.

    ReplyReply
  89. 89

    @WaterGirl: my actual project is cannabis and cartooning which seems like a much better use of everyone’s time. You know the old saying about teaching a pig to whistle.

    ReplyReply
  90. 90
    Mnemosyne says:

    @WaterGirl:

    Honestly, I would talk to a tax and/or labor lawyer and get their advice. You don’t want to accidentally abet whatever the hell she did.

    ReplyReply
  91. 91
    Formerly disgruntled in Oregon says:

    @Major Major Major Major: Sounds WAY more healthy than Facebook 😀

    ReplyReply
  92. 92
    Kathleen says:

    @lamh36: The word “chagrined” is not in Chuckles’ vocabulary. Too much nuance.

    ReplyReply
  93. 93
    WaterGirl says:

    @Mnemosyne: I actually did talk to my tax accountant last summer and he checked with people he said would know better than he would and the answer was that I would not be in jeopardy.

    When she would tell me to charge Grant B for an expense she had incurred for Grant A, but had been disallowed by that grant, I would explain why/how that would not work.

    After I left, I had also emailed the contact for two other major grants and had let her know that I left but that I would make myself available if they ever had any questions. I had consulted a couple of people to see if they thought I had an obligation to let anyone know about the situation, and the answer was always “no”, so I felt that I had said what I could in that email without going out of my way to accuse her of anything improper.

    What I’m mostly worried about is the tax side and the complete mismatch of reported income by me vs. the 1099 from her.

    ReplyReply
  94. 94
    Amaranthine RBG says:

    @Emma:
    Maybe a 9 hour filibuster in the house?

    ReplyReply
  95. 95
    Amaranthine RBG says:

    @MisterForkbeard:

    Cool, looking forward to the vote.

    I am sure that Pelosi’s record-breaking filibuster has the Republicans looking over their shoulders now!

    ReplyReply
  96. 96
    Chyron HR says:

    @Amaranthine RBG:

    Shouldn’t you be out boycotting Marvel Studios for failing to dedicate Black Panther to the REAL leader of the civil rights movement, Mr. Bernard S. of Burlington, VT?

    ReplyReply
  97. 97
    Gvg says:

    @TenguPhule: I would write down each time dare you tried to contact her. Take a pic of the closed business front etc. not sure what is next but write it down.

    I had a resteraunts owner skip town on me 30 years ago and I never got my w-2. I used my last pay stub and wrote an explanation. Of course I was small potatoes and I had years of prior income tax returns with similar totals. New owner bought the business and ran it into the ground. I saw customers being put off and found a new job/went back to school. Co workers told me he just stopped showing up and locked the store. Old owner took back the store because he stopped paying on the buyout and it recovered after awhile but returning owner couldn’t do w-2s for period he wasn’t there. I think the IRS must have seen it all though.

    ReplyReply
  98. 98
    🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka The Hope of the Universe) 🗳 🌷 says:

    @Amaranthine RBG:
    You’re such a smarmy fucking asshole. It’s supposed to show solidarity with Dreamers, hundreds of thousands of innocent human beings who work and live here in America. Literally no one else is advocating for them.

    I wish I could deport you.

    ReplyReply
  99. 99
    Ohio Mom says:

    @WaterGirl: I agree, it is probably time for an attorney. Or, since you did nothing wrong, maybe checking with the IRS first, asking them what to do?

    The IRS has been quite responsive and helpful to us — a couple of years ago, Ohio Dad had his identity stolen, and the the thief tried to get a tax refund with it.

    I am sure yours is not the first instance where someone tried pulling what your old boss is doing. The person you talk to will probably have a form and a form letter all ready to go.

    ReplyReply
  100. 100
    debit says:

    @WaterGirl: Wait, she put 23,000 less on your 1099 than what you actually earned?

    If that’s the case, it’s her loss, literally. When/if she files the corporate return, that 23,000 will be pure profit and will be taxable. Weird.

    Talk to your tax accountant. I’d go ahead and report it just in case of an audit. You don’t need to have it on a 1099, there’s another form for reporting cash income s/he can use.

    Again, weird.

    Also, too: not a tax practitioner, I just work in a tax office, and, coincidentally, produce and file 1099s along with W2s.

    ReplyReply
  101. 101
    efgoldman says:

    @debbie:

    can I say that Nancy Pelosi IS the leader of the party without fear of getting some man- or youngsplaining?

    Is it mansplaining (I am, after all. a male of the human species) to say ANYONE WHO WANTS HER OUT IS SENTENCED TO LISTEN TO WILMER SPEECHES OR A WEEK.
    Fucking purity pony assholes

    Fuckem

    ReplyReply
  102. 102
    Ohio Mom says:

    @WaterGirl: Also, please stop chasing her. You want to stay as far away as possible from her, especially since she has shown herself not just to be crazy and sbusive, but a criminal.

    ReplyReply
  103. 103
    Roger Moore says:

    @debit:
    Yeah, the IRS is much more worried about underreporting income than overreporting. If you say you earned more than is reported on your 1099, they’re unlikely to ask too many questions.

    ReplyReply
  104. 104
    Lyrebird says:

    @efgoldman: No that is not mansplaining, that is some TRUTH from Grandpa of Amazing Pixie…

    Thank you!

    ReplyReply
  105. 105
    🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka The Hope of the Universe) 🗳 🌷 says:

    @efgoldman:
    But that wouldn’t be a punishment.

    ReplyReply
  106. 106

    @🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka The Hope of the Universe) 🗳 🌷: I assume you mean for the people we’re talking about, since I’d tear off my own ears.

    ReplyReply
  107. 107
    Jim, Foolish Literalist says:

    Kaitlan Collins‏Verified account
    @ kaitlancollins
    Senior White House officials became aware in detail about the allegations made against Rob Porter last fall, as his stock in the West Wing continued to rise.

    Last fall. When did Empty Barrel John Kelly declare that Frederica Wilson had caused women and religion to be no longer held sacred in this country? And that the Khans had forfeited their status as Gold Star Parents?

    ReplyReply
  108. 108
    WaterGirl says:

    @debit:

    Wait, she put 23,000 less on your 1099 than what you actually earned?

    Yep. They listed 30,000 and it was really 53,000. I have no idea how they could have arrived at that number.

    I’ll definitely report the real income from her – part of me wonders if she’s evil enough to go with 30k in the hopes that I won’t report the real amount, and then when they file an amended 1096 I look like I’m cheating the IRS (which I would be doing if I didn’t report the real amount).

    You don’t need to have it on a 1099, there’s another form for reporting cash income s/he can use.

    I don’t do taxes – are you saying I don’t need to submit a1099 for my consulting income?

    ReplyReply
  109. 109
    magurakurin says:

    @🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka The Hope of the Universe) 🗳 🌷:

    I wish I could deport you

    why would you want to deport them from Russia?

    ReplyReply
  110. 110
    WaterGirl says:

    @Ohio Mom: I’m just trying to get a corrected 1099. To me, that seems like the right thing to do. I always try not to call attention to myself with the IRS. I mean, who wants an audit?

    ReplyReply
  111. 111

    @WaterGirl:

    I have no idea how they could have arrived at that number.

    You gotta admit, it’s nice and round.

    ReplyReply
  112. 112
    TenguPhule says:

    @debit:

    When/if she files the corporate return, that 23,000 will be pure profit and will be taxable. Weird.

    Assumes CEO didn’t diddle the internal books. A $23,000 1099 difference is almost certainly going to trigger at a minimum an automatic computer audit by the IRS and possibly Watergirl’s state tax agency when she reports the correct numbers.

    ReplyReply
  113. 113
    WaterGirl says:

    @Roger Moore:

    If you say you earned more than is reported on your 1099, they’re unlikely to ask too many questions.

    Hearing that makes me happy.

    ReplyReply
  114. 114
    Jim, Foolish Literalist says:

    @efgoldman: The only House D’s I’ve heard go after Pelosi are Ryan, Moulton and a younger woman from, I believe, Long Island?– who are all pretty much the “we need to stop worrying about race and reach out to white people” types. Other than Ellison, are there any Wilmerites in the House?

    ReplyReply
  115. 115
    Emma says:

    @Amaranthine RBG: You are so impressively one of the Great People — you know, the cynics, the hipsters, the real leftists — you know, the ones who crap on the ones who are actually doing the work.

    ReplyReply
  116. 116
    WaterGirl says:

    @Major Major Major Major: In all truth, it was 30,392.50, I was rounding for ease of conversation. :-)

    ReplyReply
  117. 117
    Baud says:

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:

    Raul Grijalva

    ReplyReply
  118. 118
    MisterForkbeard says:

    @🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka The Hope of the Universe) 🗳 🌷: Notice he completely ignored my question about what Dems should be doing instead. What a tool.

    ReplyReply
  119. 119
    TenguPhule says:

    @Roger Moore:

    If you say you earned more than is reported on your 1099, they’re unlikely to ask too many questions.

    The thing is she’s got to let them know, otherwise the computers might “correct” it when she files to the lower amount thanks to the damn automation of the filing system they have going now. They check and match against the official documents, i.e. the 1099 forms.

    ReplyReply
  120. 120
    Chet Murthy says:

    @debbie: Haters gonna hate, debbie. Haters gonna hate.

    ReplyReply
  121. 121

    @WaterGirl: there goes that theory!

    ReplyReply
  122. 122

    @🐾BillinGlendaleCA: Did you see the news about a high tech broom for curling? Canadian, of course.

    ReplyReply
  123. 123
    debit says:

    @WaterGirl:

    I don’t do taxes – are you saying I don’t need to submit a1099 for my consulting income?

    Not to report it, no. I can’t recall the name/number of the form, but it is possible to report additional income not listed on a 1099. Again, a tax person should be able to add it to your return without any issues.

    And you’re smart. I deal with a lot of businesses that come back after filing and decide that they really can’t live with that profit and would I amend some 1099s to show a higher income? I point out that these recipients will have already filed, have to amend and pay penalties and it’s a dick move. But since it’s not going to hurt them (the issuers) beyond a small penalty for filing late they kind of don’t care.

    ReplyReply
  124. 124
    Mnemosyne says:

    @WaterGirl:

    Seriously, talk to a tax lawyer, not just an accountant. I wouldn’t be surprised if she’s trying to screw you in some way, so get a lawyer’s advice for how to prevent that from happening.

    ReplyReply
  125. 125
    Nicole says:

    @WaterGirl: Since you’re reporting more income than what the 1099 shows, you should be fine. The IRS is concerned with folk underreporting income. Which you’re not doing.

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2017/02/01/hey-my-irs-form-1099-is-wrong-maybe-intentionally/#69a1c75a2516

    ReplyReply
  126. 126
    afanasia says:

    I cried when I read this post – I’m so proud of her. My 13 year year old daughter rolled her eyes. At least she knows who Pelosi is.

    ReplyReply
  127. 127
    debit says:

    @debit: Also, too, a lot of business don’t deal with 1099s. They pay/get paid off invoices. Could be your former employer is going to report the expense that way.

    At any rate, don’t let it fuss you. You’re doing exactly the right thing and have all your ducks in a row. You’re golden.

    ReplyReply
  128. 128
    Chet Murthy says:

    @Immanentize: The Dreamers, like other California immigrants, are part of our community, part of our polity. For Der Trumper to send in his Gestapo to take them away, is an attack against our people.

    I think that’s what Martin meant. Every Californian, every day, interacts with immigrants. With people who clearly learned English as a second language, with interesting names and interesting histories. And these people are *our* people. Attacking them is an attack against us all.

    ReplyReply
  129. 129
    Sab says:

    @debbie: Tim Ryan has cleaned up his act on immigration. He was furious about the House folding on DACA on the last vote, and he is very publicly upset about a constituent with an American wife, four American children and a successful small business being deported.

    That guy referring to him is out of date.

    ReplyReply
  130. 130
    oldgold says:

    Watergirl do this:

    1) Send certified letter to return address on the envelope the 1099 came to you in. Request the 1099 be corrected.

    2) Keep copy of letter and proof of certified mailing.

    3 Report 100% of the income you received on line 1 of Part I of Schedule C.

    ReplyReply
  131. 131
    WaterGirl says:

    @debit: Boy, that is a dick move! But if they can’t show they paid the increased amount to their consultants / contractors, wouldn’t they just get themselves into trouble with the IRS? I mean, if someone tried to claim they paid me more than they did, I would dispute it with the IRS. But then I actually track what I am paid. :-) Maybe they get by with it because some people have no idea and just use the number on the 1099?

    ReplyReply
  132. 132
    WaterGirl says:

    @debit: I did their 1099s last year :-) so I know that’s how they do it. But I could care less about them, sounds t me that her non-profit crashed and burned. I’m just worried about me! :-)

    edit: I wonder if a non-profit can declare bankruptcy?

    ReplyReply
  133. 133
    Sab says:

    @Immanentize: I can’t believe I am defending Tim Ryan tonight, but I am. He was raised by an Italian American single mother he is very proud of. The comment was unfortunate, but certainly not intended as an ethnic slur.

    ReplyReply
  134. 134
    TenguPhule says:

    @Nicole:

    Since you’re reporting more income than what the 1099 shows, you should be fine.

    Again, the short staffing and automation of the system can still screw this up. The IRS is relying more and more on auto correction by the computers via matching because they don’t have nearly enough manpower.

    So are state agencies, for that matter.

    ReplyReply
  135. 135
    debit says:

    @WaterGirl: So, the majority of my clients are Somali and are in a particular business where subcontractors can and do negotiate what they’ll accept on a 1099. It’s a cultural thing and I don’t judge. The business owners care about what the rather tight knit community thinks of them, so they tend to give in to the sub’s rather than look bad. Until the tax bill hits. Then things can change.

    ReplyReply
  136. 136
    WaterGirl says:

    @Nicole: Interesting article, thanks!

    ReplyReply
  137. 137
    WaterGirl says:

    @debit: Oh, interesting. Very interesting!

    ReplyReply
  138. 138
    debit says:

    @WaterGirl:

    I wonder if a non-profit can declare bankruptcy?

    Google says they can file Chapter 11 for reorganization, but can’t be forced in 7 by creditors. I do payroll for a few non profits, but they all seem to be doing okay, if a running a little lean these days.

    ReplyReply
  139. 139
    Amaranthine RBG says:

    @Emma:

    Oh no, you misunderstand. I am all in on Team Nancy. She really made a concrete contribution today.

    ReplyReply
  140. 140
    gene108 says:

    @WaterGirl:

    Contact a front pager and see if they can put you in touch with Yutsano. He works for the IRS and maybe able to give some info on how the IRS will handle this.

    Otherwise contact the IRS and let them know income is under reported on your 1099, and the employer seems to have gone out of business, thus you cannot get a corrected 1099.

    The IRS isn’t going to have a problem, if you report more income, in my opinion.

    ReplyReply
  141. 141
    Mnemosyne says:

    @Amaranthine RBG:

    Yawn. Misogynist troll is misogynist. Wake me when you come up with a new schtick.

    ReplyReply
  142. 142
    Amaranthine RBG says:

    @🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka The Hope of the Universe) 🗳 🌷:

    It wasn’t just virtue signaling- Nancy Smash made some real progress today!

    ReplyReply
  143. 143
    Amaranthine RBG says:

    @Mnemosyne:oh look person who works for Disney while they employed Grab-ass Lassiter and continued to take on millions from their past association with Fun Uncle Harvey Weinstein is here to explain misogyny to folks

    Pull up a chair- there is just so much to learn.

    ReplyReply
  144. 144
    Chip Daniels says:

    God bless Nancy Pelosi.

    That is all.

    ReplyReply
  145. 145
    efgoldman says:

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:

    The only House D’s I’ve heard go after Pelosi are Ryan, Moulton….

    Even though I no longer live in MA, and i wouldn’t have been i his district anyway, Moulton disappoints me terribly. No check that. He just plain pisses me off.
    Anne Laurie, if you’re around, isn’t that your district?
    Time to build the wall – against Wilmer and all his acolytes.

    Fuckem

    ReplyReply
  146. 146
    WaterGirl says:

    @gene108: Good idea. I’ll look to catch up with him if I see him on a thread.

    ReplyReply
  147. 147
    Aimai says:

    @Amaranthine RBG: im pie’ing you.

    ReplyReply
  148. 148
    Jim, Foolish Literalist says:

    @efgoldman: from the couple of interviews I’ve heard and read, there’s not a lot of there there beyond a resume. I’m a dumb guy on the internet, just waiting for certification, but it seems to me if you want to win back the white working class, focus on the last two words. Pretty sure working people from all demographics like the social safety net and don’t want to work till their eighties so that Donnie Jr can inherit more. Assuming there’s any there there, also too.

    ReplyReply
  149. 149
    Mnemosyne says:

    @Amaranthine RBG:

    It must be nice to work in Sacramento where no legislators or lobbyists have ever sexually harassed anyone. What’s it like working among such paragons of manhood?

    ReplyReply
  150. 150
    Miss Bianca says:

    @Amaranthine RBG: Oh, look, asshole troll who routinely contributes nothing, absolutely nothing, of value to any discussion here ever, pops back up to sneer at and crap on women who do. In the process of crapping on women leaders who, again, accomplish far more for far more people in one fucking day than he ever has in his fucking life. Jesus Chicken-Fried Christ, you sad sack of fatberg – just shut up already. Not even your mother wants to hear anything you have to say.

    ReplyReply
  151. 151

    @Aimai: I was going to express surprise that you hadn’t done so already, but… evidently I hadn’t already pied him on my desktop. Don’t know how I missed that. Fixed now. (I pied him months ago on my phone, of course.) Christ, what an asshole.

    I should probably just copy my phone’s pie filter list over to my desktop and my laptop. For some reason I seem to do about three times more browsing here on mobile, even though it’s way faster to post on a computer. This holds true even when I’m actually at home, and I have no explanation for why in most cases. I mean, “the dog wants attention and I can’t pet him while I’m using a computer” accounts for some of the time, but it isn’t all of it.

    Speaking of whom, the vets think the dog will get better. They gave him some medications that seem to be helping somewhat. He’s still sick, but overall, he seems to be in a better mood and to have more energy overall, and we’re hoping that, after the medication side effects wear off, he’ll be fine again.

    ReplyReply
  152. 152
    Mnemosyne says:

    @Miss Bianca:

    I have to admit, it makes me laugh to see the level of freakout caused by a mere woman-creature like myself actually knowing more about a topic than he does. It drives him up the wall every. single. time.

    Also, I will definitely be in Denver for the RWA conference in July — I did my registration and bought my plane ticket today since Southwest was having a sale.

    ReplyReply
  153. 153
    Cowboy Diva says:

    @WaterGirl: Do you have records (invoices, billable hours, expenses, receipts, etc.) that match your numbers and not hers?

    ReplyReply
  154. 154
    Omnes Omnibus says:

    @WaterGirl: Report what you earned. Not all self-employment income is reported on 1099-MISCs. You are unlikely to have any issues.

    ReplyReply
  155. 155
    WaterGirl says:

    @Cowboy Diva: Yep. I have invoices with billable hours. Matched them up yesterday to deposits from that client in my business account. I’m confident that I can make my case if anything is questioned. I am just trying to avoid having to do that.

    @Omnes Omnibus: It would have been better if she hadn’t issued one at all than to issue one that was for a ridiculously inaccurate amount.

    ReplyReply
  156. 156
    Omnes Omnibus says:

    @WaterGirl: You are worrying too much. If you report income that is higher than your 1099-MISC reported income, the IRS computers will assume that you had other income from the self-employment that was invoiced not 1099ed. You will be fine. Think of it from the IRS’s POV. Why would they care about someone who reported more income than they knew about?

    ReplyReply
  157. 157
    GregMulka says:

    @hueyplong:
    You’re jib is cut in a manner I find most pleasing.

    ReplyReply

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *