This classic goes out to Steve King:
In a sign of the potential trouble for the president, Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), an immigration hard-liner and early Trump supporter, wrote that if reports of a potential immigration deal are accurate, the president’s “base is blown up, destroyed, irreparable, and disillusioned beyond repair. No promise is credible.”
And this:
Ryan is already facing growing pressure from House conservatives who have begun to question his leadership and have even floated names of possible replacement as speaker. An agreement between Trump and Democrats on a bill to protect dreamers could potentially put Ryan in the position of having to decide whether to bring it for a vote with the prospects that it might pass with more Democratic support than among the GOP.
Am I the only one who thinks that Ryan wants to be thrown into that briar patch? Instead of spending weeks/months kissing Freedumb Caca ass, he can just say that Daddy Trump cut a deal and his hands are tied, and one more turd moves through the House and Senate colon before Christmas.
Also: Trumplestilskin is doubling down on DACA rhetoric this morning, so maybe this will actually happen.
Served
Love watching Pelosi and Schumer lead from the minority, simultaneously rolling Ryan, McConnell, and Trump.
Congressional Rs are still intransigent because they have the numbers, but they don’t have the discipline to make them mean anything. It’s like they’re billionaires, but live alone on Mars. It’s beautiful, golden. It gives me life.
Boatboy_srq
@Served: The Herding of The Cats has officially begun.
More popcorn, please.
Doug!
When conservatives throw these kinds of fits and do nothing, all I can think of is this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0Y7brwz6fA
Served
@Boatboy_srq:
All those people who were screaming for Pelosi to step down are gonna put crow on the endangered species list.
Cermet
For Dolt 45 this is a win; he does not want to deport those teens/kids and said so in the past (so, confused why his base thinks he is doing something he ever said he wouldn’t.) He gets mark’s for working in a bi-partisan fashion and gets something he wants. I say he is acting (for now) in a manner that achieves goals he wants; he might back track/change but this is something he has said for some time as I’ve read his statements the last few months. But with tRump, who knows until it happens but he did sign the dem design budget compromise.
Major Major Major Major
Immigration reform is the graveyard of Speakerships, apparently.
Betty Cracker
I think Marshall’s take (linked in OP) is exactly right:
Yep. It will be puke-inducing to watch Beltway pundits laud Trump’s nonexistent political courage, but the hot, salty MAGAt tears will be a soothing tonic.
bystander
The ongoing warfare ripping the repub party apart has to be counterbalanced with Dems in Disarray! Litmus test! The repubs are splitting into purity factions and trying to rip power from their leaders, but some Dems joined an independent to promote healthcare as a right and party leadership has secured the debt ceiling and shown Trump that with a coalition, Dreamers get at a minimum a return to the sense of security they had under Obama’s EO and Trump gets to say he had a win and his base gets pissed off.
Lee
People also forget how Trump likes to negotiate.
He asks for what he wants x10. Then when he backs down to just what he wants he scores one in the win column. .
The wall just got thrown under the bus so he can count a win.
randy khan
@Betty Cracker:
I think Marshall’s take on the Dems’ play is exactly right – they would like to save the Dreamers, but if it isn’t possible, they still get a good political result.
Elizabelle
Johnny Cash is way too classy and humane for the likes of Steve King.
Major Major Major Major
@Betty Cracker: OTOH, per a piece I saw going around yesterday, Democrats’ main attack may be based on the fact that their best polling advantage is around which party “looks out for people like me.” A clear accomplishment trump could point to, especially if it’s done in a way that distances him from the vultures, might undermine this.
Not that it isn’t the right thing to do, just saying that it complicates the 2018 message. Maybe this will be offset by having his base in disarray.
randy khan
@Lee:
I agree. And it’s a win that his core constituency will hate.
Jim, Foolish Literalist
Trying to remember, the Kochs are pro-immigration, the Mercers against? Is that right?
Cermet
@bystander: And remember, once congress votes such an act into law, they are not just safe but secure relative to their future; they are now permanently protected.
Major Major Major Major
@Jim, Foolish Literalist: pretty much.
Hunter Gathers
@Doug!: You shoot me in a dream, you better wake up and apologize
Jim, Foolish Literalist
I think one of the few things trump actually believes in, and the thing making Ryan eat all this shit, is tax cuts for the rich, and they both think those cuts are so wonderful and beneficial they can sell them. And maybe they can, but I have a feeling anything that gets out of the House especially is gonna be a bounty for Dem ad makers.
Major Major Major Major
@Jim, Foolish Literalist: good point.
indianbadger
“Freedumb Caca Ass”.
This has made my summer!
rikyrah
Seriously?
They think they have a replacement for the ZEGK?
Uh huh
Uh huh
Because, the pedophile rule is ridiculous.
It’s the reason they never brought up Immigration Reform or 44’s Jobs Bill – both would have passed with a majority of Republicans – just not ALL Republicans.
rikyrah
@Jim, Foolish Literalist:
The Kochs are for cheap labor.
While the Mercers are White Supremacist Bannon’s Financial Patrons….understand?
Major Major Major Major
@rikyrah: isn’t the hastert rule originally just that it needs the support of a majority of the majority; and now it’s been perverted (ha) into passage only with votes from the majority?
Barbara
I think Pelosi and Schumer realize in a very up close and personal way just how divided the Republican Party is, and probably no more so than around the issue of immigration. All these people who are hiding from reporters and from their constituents and wringing their hands will vote for this legislation if it gets to the floor. They might not be a majority of Rs, but they are enough. McConnell doesn’t care, and Ryan will basically pay any price if it helps him get his beloved tax cuts.
schrodingers_cat
So I have a question, why is Russia trying to host anti-immigrant rallies on American soil in addition to spreading scary memes about immigrants.
Doug!
@Hunter Gathers:
I bet you’re a big Lee Marvin fan.
Major Major Major Major
@schrodingers_cat: To sow chaos and confusion? Because they have a natural affinity for nativist white supremacists? ¿Porque no los dos?
geg6
@schrodingers_cat:
My best guess is that, first, Putin is probably just as racist as your bog standard Freedumb Caucus member. And second, and more importantly, it sows fear, uncertainty and chaos throughout the entire US. And that’s his main goal.
Duane
I’d like to be opptimistic about all this, but that requires believing what Trump says.
Pelosi and Schumer are going to discover what so,so many others have. You can’t trust Trump.
Hunter Gathers
@Doug!:
You ever listen to K-Billy’s “Super Sounds of the Seventies” weekend? It’s my personal favorite.
Gretchen
Hillary Clinton drew attention to Mitch McConnell’s “unpatriotic and despicable act of partisan politics” in threatening Obama about going public with Russian meddling: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/clinton-mcconnell-threatened-obama-announcing-russian-meddling
germy
@schrodingers_cat:
In order to drum up more support for his preferred, anti-immigrant candidate?
schrodingers_cat
@germy: That was before the election, why now that the preferred candidate is the President.
Jack the Second
@Major Major Major Major:
If the reason Democrats lose in 2018 is because too much good, progressive legislation is passed in the next year to rile up the progressive base, GOOD.
I’m not particularly worried that that’s going to happen, but getting Democrats elected is a means to an end, and that end is good, progressive policy that helps make the world less shitty.
CAinCA
And what do I see in the Sacramento Bee this morning…
California Democrats growing tired of Nancy Pelosi
I thought better of the McClatchy chain.
Frankensteinbeck
The Freedom Caucus has a name to replace Ryan? Tell me, do these delusional idiots have any support for this person from the rest of the caucus that outnumbers them six-to-one?
@Lee:
Trump asks for what he wants x10, gets nothing, and whines and begs. He is the perfect example of why the famous haggling strategy does not work except under very special circumstances. Of course, Trump is used to negotiating with either marks or people vastly weaker he can bully.
@Major Major Major Major:
And Hastert barely used the rule himself. This deranged situation is all on Boehner’s head for throwing in with McConnell on total war against the black man.
Humboldtblue
The Sugar Daddy may leave but at least ICE still has Motel Six to act as a corporate Narc
Frankensteinbeck
@Duane:
They already know, and you can bet they’ve figured it in. The thing is, Trump doesn’t make the deal. They’ve already won by getting him to say he has, because it puts a gun to Ryan and McConnell’s head, even if Trump backs out tomorrow. And thankfully, Trump has shown he’s too chickenshit to veto anything, even if he hates it.
EDIT – They may not get the bill, but civil war in the Republican Party? Mission already accomplished. It’s only a question of how big a win this is.
schrodingers_cat
This is what I am talking about. Russian-made anti-immigration FB page
Tilda Swintons Bald Cap
@Betty Cracker:
and vice versa.
Humboldtblue
@CAinCA: That story contains absolutely nothing except some sketchy poll results from a Berkeley poll. However, the Bernie Democrats in the state are vociferous and it may be time for Feinstein to retire (although we lose her massive seniority) but this looks from my seat like the normal swing-left push from younger voters taking their first chops at national politics. I bet if you ask the Democratic candidates in 13 CA house races if Pelosi is a help or hindrance they’ll point to their war chests and smile because the woman can raise money.
Terry chay
@Major Major Major Major: Yes, it is a “majority of the majority” but the jury is still out if it has warped into “passed by majority only.” The latter occurs only in the cases where the minority is unified which is on issues like repealing ACA and the like the first two Obama years (though Pelosi doesn’t follow and did “violate” it a number of times). Its origin comes from a demonization “everything a democrat did must be bad” of the Tip O Neil/Reagan years.
The reality is that it was easy for the Republicans to ahdere to it for a time so they end up thinking it was a real rule.
The Hastert Rule and immigration specifically have an interesting history. It was the first use of it for example. It’s because of it congressional democrats know they have nothing to fear with respect to DACA. This is one case where adherence to this rule or even expected adherence to this rule breaks the GOP as it has every time in the past. Fiscal cliff, shutdowns, etc. are relatively new, but tactics due to Obama era obstructionism, but this is really about the GOP coalition.
Jim, Foolish Literalist
@Humboldtblue: most political observers are commenting on how multimillionaire old lady Pelosi and Wall St hand-holder Chuck Schumer (and I admit I’ve been in that camp) just rolled Ryan and McConnell twice in a week. But Tim Ryan, Nina Turner and the Berkeley DSA have found something they think they agree on.
I’m conflicted about Feinstein. She was godawful during the Bush years– still can’t believe she never faced a serious primary–, and she sometimes displays a remarkable tin ear, but she’s been pretty damn good on the Russia probe, and I think she’s got a lot of clout in the Senate and in the Beltway that she’s using for the good in that case.
rikyrah
@randy khan:
I happen to agree with him. As it is, the Dems are behind the 8 ball because they control nothing. So, whatever they push for and maybe get is a bonus. As it is, they look rational and what they want sounds normal.
Jeffro
@Served:
That is such a great way to put it.
catclub
@Cermet:
No law is permanent, all can be changed. But a law IS much more permanent than an Executive Order.
rikyrah
@Frankensteinbeck:
this this this
Amir Khalid
@Major Major Major Major:
That would be consistent with the Republican Congressional strategy since the George Walker Bush years: cutting Democrats out of the legislative process as much as possible.
Amaranthine RBG
Trump got rolled? Hahahaha
Two weeks ago there was DACA and no enhanced border security
Today there is no DACA
If this “deal” passes there will be DACA and enhanced border security
That’s a win?
Roger Moore
@schrodingers_cat:
I think the most plausible explanation is that Putin and company hate brown people as much as American white supremacists do. That and authoritarianism are the unifying traits of the international scary right-wing movement.
Jeffro
@Jim, Foolish Literalist: @Major Major Major Major: @rikyrah:
Billionaire food fight! May they spend their pretty little selves into oblivion and have nothing to show for it but the smoking rubble of the GOP.
Humboldtblue
@Jim, Foolish Literalist:
Midterm results will be very interesting because if Dems do well (there is very tentative excitement Cali Dems might sweep seven GOP seats, very tentative but it’s there) that will mean they got a lot of help from Pelosi and they won’t turn on her. I agree with your Feinstein assessment completely.
catclub
@Frankensteinbeck:
So far, he has been too chicken shit to revoke the parts of the Iran agreement he has control over, or the ACA Cost Sharing reductions payments.
WE just wonder how long it goes on.
Feebog
@Jim, Foolish Literalist:
DiFi needs to gracefully bow out. We have a shitload of solid candidates for that seat.
Jeffro
@schrodingers_cat: Because at a minimum, it adds to our domestic friction/fighting and chaos.
And because it helps them ‘prep the battlefield’ for when they move to back candidates like Trumpov who see the world the way they do, who will help them wreck the institutions that are keeping them in check.
catclub
@Jeffro: Eating crow implies to me publicly admitting error. That never happens.
James Powell
@Cermet:
Yeah, I’m reading a lot of praise for Dems, but this will be another reason for the Beltway Courtiers to declare another Trump pivot to post-partisan independent maverick glory.
catclub
Remember: Don’t feed the troll.
Fair Economist
@Jim, Foolish Literalist: Dianne Feinstein is – OK. Not great, just OK. She has good and bad aspects. Given she’s representing a very liberal state, she’s pretty disappointing. But I don’t think anybody can honestly promise to be in the Senate doing high-caliber work until age 90. It’s time for her to retire.
If she does run, it will be a wild primary. The main question is whether her main opponent will be a Berner, a standard Democrat, or a Republican. All are possible.
rikyrah
@Gretchen:
GO HILLARY
Jeffro
@catclub: It seems like conservatives from King to Coulter are already essentially admitting publicly they’ve backed a duplicitous moron.
I wonder if there are crow-shaped cookies we could send them?
Amir Khalid
@Feebog:
Is there some reason, other than age, that Diane Feinstein should not run for the Senate again?
JGabriel
WaPo via DougJ @ Top:
Really, Steve? You’re just figuring out now that any promise Trump makes is conditional based on how much praise or money it nets him?
catclub
@James Powell: The president is NOT Hillary Clinton, so it is baked in that lots of bad things will happen.
If it takes giving mavericky credit to stop some of those things from happening, that is the price to be paid. It could be worse. A week ago posters were saying that if keeping DACA involved also paying for the wall, they would still do it. Now it is keeping DACA but not much in the way of walls.
The associated dismay of people like Steve King is gravy.
rikyrah
THE RACHEL MADDOW SHOW 9/13/17
Sen Warner slams Facebook for slow response on Russia cyber op
Senator Mark Warner, ranking member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, criticizes Facebook for its slow response to being used as a platform for Russian propaganda against the U.S. and using insufficient resources to root out Russia’s full operation.
rikyrah
THE RACHEL MADDOW SHOW 9/13/17
Are congressional Trump Russia probes getting in Mueller’s way?
Senator Mark Warner, ranking member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, talks with Rachel Maddow about whether Special Counsel Robert Mueller is having trouble getting cooperation from the myriad congressional investigations into Trump camp collusion with Russia.
rikyrah
THE RACHEL MADDOW SHOW 9/13/17
New revelations deepen Flynn legal jeopardy
Rachel Maddow rounds up a collection of new reporting in the Trump Russia investigation, including new revelations about former Trump NSA Mike Flynn and Special Counsel Robert Mueller looking into Flynn’s son.
Frankensteinbeck
@James Powell:
Which as always, will last about five minutes. Maybe ten, with Kelly playing Mary Poppins, humorless Victorian nanny*. Trump can’t help himself.
*As always, the Disney movie directly betrays the author’s vision. There’s a whole ugly story about how Walt betrayed her.
Roger Moore
@catclub:
Sure, but the point is that the DREAM act would give them a path to permanent residency and citizenship that the vast majority of them are likely to take. If it gets rescinded in a few years, it will be too late because the DREAMers will have moved from being undocumented to having green cards and/or citizenship. I don’t think a bill that revoked their legal status would fly, so the best it would do is to close the barn door on stragglers.
rikyrah
@Amir Khalid:
To be honest, Can’t stand her.
And, if I could get someone, say, like the Attorney General of California as her replacement, I’d be willing to throw her over in a nanosecond.
But, then, we might get someone like Gavin Newsome..which would be a lateral trade, IMO, except for age.
SiubhanDuinne
@Amir Khalid:
Amid, O/T but was just reading about the deadly fire this morning at a Kuala Lumpur school. What a horror for your city and nation. I can’t imagine the pain for the families of those 21 students.
Roger Moore
@Amir Khalid:
She’s too far to the right. California could elect somebody a lot more liberal than DiFi if they were on the ballot instead of her.
Amir Khalid
@Frankensteinbeck:
I saw the movie about that. But it was a Disney movie, and I came away wondering just how the studio had messed with the facts to make itself look better.
Major Major Major Major
One of the reasons this will be pissing off the people who know how the charade works, like Ryan and Mitch, is because ‘enhanced border security’ was always fake policy (I think its last iteration was some fencing and more officers) and this takes that away as a nice-sounding pound of flesh to demand, in addition to the hostages.
Roger Moore
@rikyrah:
Newsome would also have a much higher chance of being indicted. I can’t look at the guy without wondering what really nasty skeletons are lurking in his closet. In any case, though, he’s looking far more likely to run for governor than senator.
rikyrah
What Would Donald Do?
How evangelical Christians got to the point where they could embrace a Hugh Hefner–like president.
by Samuel Buntz
During the 2016 presidential campaign, it became common for some evangelical leaders to defend Donald Trump by comparing him to King David. Sure, King David may have committed adultery and arranged the death of his mistress’s husband in battle, but despite these considerable failings he had still retained the full favor of God. (Liberty University President Jerry Falwell Jr. first made the David comparison after revealing that he’d enjoyed a pleasant repast of Wendy’s cheeseburgers with Trump.) The then candidate, according to this line of thought, was not what he so baldly appeared to be—a personality cut from the same cloth as Hugh Hefner and Larry Flynt. Rather, he was a warrior for righteousness tragically beset by unpredictable appetites. (Perhaps these apologists also recalled King David’s penchant for insulting disabled reporters and accusing debate moderators of being premenstrual?)
This strained analogy certainly raises questions about the state of evangelical Christianity in America today: how could evangelical authorities pound such a resolutely square peg into such an obviously round hole? After a campaign season marked by unusual theological justifications for supporting Trump (with some notable exceptions), King David the Second won 81 percent of the white evangelical vote, more than any other presidential candidate in history. Coming at exactly the right time, Frances FitzGerald’s mammoth history of the evangelical movement in America, The Evangelicals, helps shed light on conservative evangelicalism’s transformation into a quasi-political institution.
FitzGerald, who won the Pulitzer Prize for her classic study of the Vietnam War, Fire in the Lake, provides an immense chronicle of fundamentalism and evangelicalism in America, delving into the movement’s anti-intellectualism, narrow literalism, and focus on sexual restrictions—characteristics with which we’re all familiar. At the same time, she highlights oft-overlooked evangelical history and figures who far transcend the more familiar “religious right” mold. There is, for example, the great nineteenth-century evangelist Charles Finney, who made abolitionism a central part of his mission; we also have William Jennings Bryan, whose brilliantly awakened social conscience was undercut by his misguided opposition to Darwinism and cultural defeat during the Scopes Trial; and then there’s Billy Graham, whose political moderation and essential decency seem like ancient history next to his son Franklin’s more aggressive conservatism. (Graham was a southerner who befriended Martin Luther King Jr. and opposed segregation before the 1950s were over.) Additionally, FitzGerald discusses the historical countermovement away from fundamentalism—liberal Christianity—in a way that kindles admiration for theologians like Horace Bushnell and Reinhold Niebuhr.
Humboldtblue
@Roger Moore:
He’s the frontrunner for the Dem nomination
And yup, he just oozes a serious financial/sexual/bribery scandal risk.
catclub
I am sure Obama’s anger translator would be saying: “You racist fuckers sure didn’t look at this problem this way when I was President.”
randy khan
@Amaranthine RBG:
Yes. As somebody noted above “enhanced border security” is a fig leaf. More important, it’s not The Wall.
scav
@Jeffro: The US looking like an overt shambling disfunctional racist xenophobic mess on the international stage is also likely counted a win by the Russians. A systemic overt shambling disfunctional racist xenophobic mess at all levels and not just in its theoretically temporary choice of leader — not exactly the poster child for leader of the free world hyperpower blahblah (not that the place was as universally and uncritically loved and admired as many assumed).
Gelfling 545
@rikyrah: Well, not exactly. Gingrich and Santorum were mentioned. I honestly could not remember for a bit who Santorum is. I was going to Google, but then I thought “Google? Santorum? Ohhhhh, that guy.”
Humboldtblue
@Fair Economist:
There were no Republicans on the ballot for national races in 2016 and that won’t change immediately. the California GOP is in deep trouble and it’s actually shocking to see how quickly its lost any sort of influence. Hell, we elected Arnold and then re-elected him (03-11), and while he isn’t your Beltway standard GOP man he was still a Republican. Since he left office Dems have obtained a supermajority in the legislature and dominated the open primaries.
Amir Khalid
@SiubhanDuinne:
Unfortunately, these private religious schools have a way of being firetraps. When something like this happens, it’s usually a Muslim religious school. I suspect something in the institutional culture encourages laxity in safety practices. I remember another school fire some years back, which started in a girls’ dorm where, if I remember, the school also stored cooking fuel. I find myself wondering who the hell is in charge of conducting safety inspections at these places, since neither the Ministry of Education nor the Fire and Rescue Services Dept seems to be on top of it.
Frankensteinbeck
@Amir Khalid:
I haven’t seen that movie, but in the books Mary Poppins is a loving but hard-nosed, stone-faced, arrogant disciplinarian. Travers signed with Disney under the agreement she be directly involved in production and have veto rights. She told him no way on the musical numbers, because they showed Mary Poppins being silly. The moment Travers left the country because the movie was supposedly finished, Walt put back in all that silly stuff. She only found out at the premier, and was enraged.
This is 100% consistent with Walt’s style, and Disney as a company followed in his footsteps. Peter Pan, Rescuers, Fox and Hound, pretty much every Disney movie adapted from a book is the opposite of the book. When he wasn’t rewriting the books to match his syrupy conservative morals, he was screwing the IP holders out of their money, ala Winny The Pooh.
Major Major Major Major
@Humboldtblue: helps that they got rid of partisan redistricting.
Gelfling 545
@Duane: This will not come as a surprise to them. There are still advantages to having done this. Sowing discord in the GOP is a fine thing in itself.
Humboldtblue
@Major Major Major Major: Makes a huge difference.
The Moar You Know
@Humboldtblue: I understand the NeverTrump Republicans, because Newsom is someone who I simply will not vote for. Period. I lived in SF while he was mayor. He’s a black hole of self-serving bullshit, useless grandstanding, and his behavior towards/with women is so awful that if given a choice as to who to leave my little sister with for an hour was between Trump or Newsom, I’d happily leave her with Trump.
I also suspect he’s a phenomenal blackmail risk without any of the strength of character you’d need to effectively counteract that.
Gelfling 545
@schrodingers_cat: At a guess, I would say that the more internal conflict exists here, the less attention is paid to any international nefarious doings by Putin.
catclub
@rikyrah:
Not exactly
Amaranthine RBG
@randy khan:
If you compare the deal with the status quo ante, it’s not a win
Esp since there’s nothing -preventing- the wall In the future
Trump gave up nothing.
Take something other side already has (or will get anyway) off the table and then give it back to get a concession–classic negotiation technique
Humboldtblue
@The Moar You Know:
You’re not the only person who feels that way. The open primary may lessen his chances because there are some talented people in California.
Duane
I do enjoy the turmoil this is causing the Repubs. Feathers for the caps of Pelosi and Schumer. Perhaps they should have dinner with Trump more often.
Tom
@Served: What a beautiful metaphor (uh – well, simile. I always get those two mixed up).
Bruce K
@Amaranthine RBG: The Democrats in Congress are kind of limited in what they can accomplish; policy-wise, about all they can do is somewhat mitigate the damage that Trump and the Capitol Hill GOP can do.
And I suspect – and I doubt I’m the only one – that Pelosi and Schumer’s primary objective in negotiating these deals was to catalyze an internecine fight on the other side of the aisle, making it easier to slow down the march of evil in the short term and quite possibly improving the odds of at least one chamber of Congress flipping in ’18.
So it may not be a solid win, but it’s a step in the right direction, and I, for one, am rather glad that Pelosi and Schumer have figured out how to take advantage of the fact that the President of the United States is suffering from advanced late-stage Dunning-Kruger syndrome.
Mandarama
@The Moar You Know: This thread may be dead, but I am interested in the story on Newsom from Californians. Here in a galaxy far far away, I taught Jennifer Siebel’s documentary in a women’s studies course I was teaching–and Newsom appears in it, espousing feminist ideals. (I did not initially realize he is the director’s husband.) I can’t say I’m surprised to hear that his real self might be different– I have been a Democrat long enough to know about the zipper problems –but y’all are vehement here and I trust you. What’s the scoop, and should I be looking more askance at Siebel as well? (Other than the obvious criticisms of her work, common to all of our contemporary texts.)
SiubhanDuinne
@Amir Khalid:
Sad and infuriating, nevertheless.
P.S. Sorry I either mistyped your name, or my autocorrect decided to play with it.
Amaranthine RBG
@Bruce K:
Agreed. It’s better to have DACA then to not have it. But, the unspecified enhanced border provisions are worrying – we’ll just have to wait and see if there is an teeth there.
The thing I object to is the inane triumphalism – its no better than WINNING type rhetoric.
Amaranthine RBG
@Mandarama:
He has Bill Clinton’s moral compass without his intelligence.
Greg
@Amaranthine RBG:
Not true. The difference between an executive order DACA and passed legislative DACA is _enormous_. A huge win.
rikyrah
@Mandarama:
Newsome had an affair with the wife of his campaign manager, if I remember correctly.
Texasboyshaun
@Amaranthine RBG: здравствуйте, товарищ. Как погода в Москве? Ты говоришь хорошо по-английски.
Amaranthine RBG
@Amaranthine RBG:
On second thought, I should have said Newsome has Bill Clinton’s moral compass without his intelligence and compassion.
NorthLeft12
I dunno guys. If this means more money and resources for the modern American gestapo [ICE], I don’t know if this is much of a bargain.
But yeah, I get that there are +800K people who are facing a potentially disastrous fate if something is not done.
I keep waiting to wake up and learn that for the last ten months I was in some kind of coma.
Origuy
Johnny Cash’s family and record labels have forced Stormfront Music to stop using Cash’s cover of Tom Petty’s “I Won’t Back Down” as its intro music. They did back down.
Origuy
Never forget about Putin’s primary audience — the Russian people. One of his purposes in stirring up trouble in the USA and EU is to be able to say to the Russian people, “See, these Western countries aren’t so great. You like stability and strong government, don’t you? Don’t get involved with my opposition. They’ll only cause disruption.”
The Moar You Know
@Mandarama: Although Newsom is most famous for carrying on an affair with the wife of his best friend/campaign manager, the bigger picture is that she was not the only one by a longshot. He did a quiet stint in rehab for “sexual addiction” (also pills of many sorts, because he had/has a whopping multi-drug addiction issue) after getting caught with her, but there have been many others. If any wife of Newsom’s is pimping him in a film as some sort of feminist, in my opinion that woman is just as much a dishonest sack of crap as Gavin is. He’s a user and a sociopath who has no business being in politics at all.
Matt McIrvin
@Amir Khalid: There was a review of “Saving Mr. Banks” that pointed out that Disney was both the only studio that could have made it, and the last studio in the world that you’d want making it.
catclub
@The Moar You Know:
I suspect you have not figured out where sociopaths belong – career wise.
Waratah
Trump wants bragging rights on this and the Republicans know they will lose minority’s support. Ryan knows he cannot pass this without the Democrats.
Bitter Scribe
As much as I dislike Paul Ryan, I can’t forget that he pretty much got drafted into the speaker job after John Boehner just couldn’t deal with the idiocy anymore and there was no one–at least no one who could walk and chew gum at the same time–who wanted it. If Ryan were obliged to send me a dollar every time some version of “Why do I need this insanity?” has gone through his mind, I’d probably have half his salary. I can’t believe that he wouldn’t react to a real revolt with “Fine, fuckers, put in whoever you want. I’m done with you.”