Hopefully They Will Grow Out of This

The only thing you can do when you see things like this is A.) wonder where the rest of the faculty are and B.) hope they grow out of it.

It does raise some interesting questions, though. Do the kids not realize they are also white, and should probably not be there because they are de facto violating the rules via their whiteness? And why are they mostly only interviewing only white kids. And third, when did snapping take the place of clapping, or is that just something else I missed?

At any rate, they are kids, and college is where they are supposed to do stupid things, so they are at least in the right place. This made me laugh, though:

I guess if you are a Republican, and this is the face of the left to you, it could be problematic. I think the best lesson they could learn from this is not the message they are trying to send, but the organizational skills that can be later put to use rallying around more solid causes and discovering that when it comes to change, showing up is 90% of the battle. As long as they are not violent or actually get someone fired for no reason, just let them be, I say.

Which automatically gives them a leg up for me, because protests = crowds = lots of people and that shit ain’t happening for me. Also related:

There is going to be a long hot night because of the Castile verdict, which has even right-wingers scratching their heads.

*** Update ***

Good piece here.






163 replies
  1. 1

    Can we shut off Larry King on the rhs? Its distracting.

    ETA: Used NoScript to block ora.tv, Larry King is gone.

    ReplyReply
  2. 2
    debbie says:

    I can’t agree with the ACLU on this.

    ReplyReply
  3. 3
    John Cole says:

    @debbie: I agree with it.

    ReplyReply
  4. 4
    Schlemazel says:

    @schrodingers_cat:
    If you are only seeing Larry you are lucky. I see him alternating with that fat, phony fucking POS, Jesse the boobie. I should get noscript

    ReplyReply
  5. 5
    SiubhanDuinne says:

    @schrodingers_cat:

    the rhs

    When I google “RHS,” I get stuff like Royal Horticultural Society and Riverside High School, neither of which makes much sense in context. What do you mean?

    ReplyReply
  6. 6
    the Conster, la Citoyenne says:

    At this point I’m only going to listen to black women, and follow them if they want to lead. White people are crazy.

    ReplyReply
  7. 7
    wallace winfrey says:

    oh hai i made it to the front page of balloon-juce!

    ReplyReply
  8. 8
    JPL says:

    @John Cole: First of all I agree with the ACLU, but also agree that it could send a strong message that bullying is wrong. Words do matter. I assume the verdict will be overturned, because of the law cases the judge cited. His interns had to dig deep to come up with one that was 200 years old.

    ReplyReply
  9. 9
    Gelfling 545 says:

    @debbie: I kind of do agree. Having known someone who was trying to get put of a relationship where the guy kept threatening suicide, I know that people get to the point at which saying “go, ahead, then if that’s what you want” is the only way to save their own sanity.

    ReplyReply
  10. 10
    the Conster, la Citoyenne says:

    @wallace winfrey:

    It’s not much of a step up, tbh.

    ReplyReply
  11. 11
    Schlemazel says:

    @John Cole:
    It is an ugly choice and there is plenty of room to argue but I do see the ACLUs point as the decider for me. If this stops legitimate end-of-life discussions that is not a positive result. In this case I don’t get the impression that was what was happening so we have to wait for further, more germane rulings but this one is dangerous.

    ReplyReply
  12. 12

    @SiubhanDuinne: Right Hand Side, its an abbreviation used while proving mathematical theorems. If
    LHS = RHS (left hand side = right hand side), then you have proven your assertion.
    For example, Newton’s second law says that Force = rate of change of momentum.

    ReplyReply
  13. 13
    Gelfling 545 says:

    @Gelfling 545: thats supposed to read don’t. I hate the ipad.

    ReplyReply
  14. 14
    Schlemazel says:

    @SiubhanDuinne:
    NM already answered

    ReplyReply
  15. 15
    the Conster, la Citoyenne says:

    @JPL:

    The judge was pretty clear that it wasn’t her bullying, it was her criminal negligence by not contacting anyone once she knew he was back in the toxic truck.

    ETA: re end of life decisions don’t really have to do with this case – he was a healthy 17 year old.

    ReplyReply
  16. 16
    JPL says:

    @the Conster, la Citoyenne: What do think will happen? From what I’ve read, which is not enough, it sounded like she was just as much troubled as he was. The get back in, though was troublesome.

    ReplyReply
  17. 17
    SiubhanDuinne says:

    @Schlemazel:

    Who is NM?

    ReplyReply
  18. 18
    wallace winfrey says:

    i think the point i was trying to make was i think the original message is OK, but the college kids come across as unserious with the ironic goth makeup, goofy attire and general freak show atmosphere (yes, john, the snapping is some new hipster shit) which all adds up to the rather beautiful turn of phrase “performative wokefulness”. also, weinstein for being “very progressive” sure seems eager to be used as a bit player by the most obvious of obvious propaganda outlets.

    ReplyReply
  19. 19
    SiubhanDuinne says:

    @SiubhanDuinne:
    @Schlemazel:

    HAHAHA, n/m, figured that one out!

    ReplyReply
  20. 20
    the Conster, la Citoyenne says:

    @JPL:

    She’ll spend time in prison, but not the maximum, as she should. She’s a psychopath. Will probably get a lot of probation, community service, and court ordered counseling.

    ReplyReply
  21. 21
    🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka Junior G-Man) 🗳 🌷 says:

    Haven’t followed this too closely but here I go:

    It does raise some interesting questions, though. Do the kids not realize they are also white, and should probably not be there because they are de facto violating the rules via their whiteness? And why are they mostly only interviewing only white kids. And third, when did snapping take the place of clapping, or is that just something else I missed?

    1. I’m assuming white students in the movement would be ok with this. It would only be for a day and is voluntary. So not violating anyone’s rights. I don’t think what Weinstein said is a fireable offense, but students are free to call for said firing, which likely won’t happen. Weinstein claimed to being stalked. If true, that’s illegal and wrong.

    A RW friend on Facebook in college is freaking out over of it. He was mad that protesters interrupted Weinstein’s class. Yawn

    ReplyReply
  22. 22
    wallace winfrey says:

    @the Conster, la Citoyenne: it’s not often you see your name in an image on a site you’ve been frequenting daily for 10+ years

    ReplyReply
  23. 23
    the Conster, la Citoyenne says:

    @wallace winfrey:

    Him going on Fox is the tell. Apparently “deeply progressive” means alt-right curious.

    ReplyReply
  24. 24
    Roger Moore says:

    I think a lot of these people have the same underlying problem as Evangelical Christians. They both want very much to be righteous, and they’ve been taught that persecution is proof of their righteousness. Unfortunately, they’re living in environments where they aren’t being persecuted. That’s why they blow the tiniest thing- people saying “Happy Holidays” instead of “Merry Christmas” or whites refusing to leave campus for a day- out of proportion. They can either pretend that people not going along is the equivalent of being fed to lions, or they can act like complete assholes about it and treat the inevitable backlash as persecution.

    ReplyReply
  25. 25
    Davis X. Machina says:

    @wallace winfrey:

    And third, when did snapping take the place of clapping,

    (yes, john, the snapping is some new hipster shit)

    Via, IIRC, the slam poetry community. It’s not to show approval of the performance, per se, but appreciation for the truth of an utterance.

    ReplyReply
  26. 26
    SiubhanDuinne says:

    @schrodingers_cat:

    Okay, thanks. Had not come across that, but then I barely scraped through high school algebra. Not sure what it has to do with Larry King (FWIW, I do not see any sign of Larry King lurking around my Balloon Juice), but is apparently an issue for some.

    ReplyReply
  27. 27
    Schlemazel says:

    @SiubhanDuinne:
    Never mind,

    sorry fpr not being clearer

    ReplyReply
  28. 28
  29. 29
    JPL says:

    @the Conster, la Citoyenne: thank you. I do hope that its the verdict scares some teenagers though.

    ReplyReply
  30. 30
    MobiusKlein says:

    The problem with traffic blocking in a medium to large city is that folks merely 2 blocks away see none of the messsge, only the traffic.

    They hop off muni and walk, never seeing a thing.

    ReplyReply
  31. 31

    @Roger Moore: Husband kitteh’s uncle thinks he is being persecuted too. He lives in India, retired as a high ranking govt official and is a brahmin by birth, so pray tell what the persecution is? That he can’t foist his beliefs on everyone else. Needless to add is a Modi bhakt. Evangelical or not, RWNJs of the religious kind have a high degree of persecution complex.

    ReplyReply
  32. 32
    SiubhanDuinne says:

    @wallace winfrey:

    the snapping is some new hipster shit

    Hate to tell you this, but in 1959-60, we Would-Be Beatniks were snapping like mad instead of clapping, at jazz and folk music concerts, comedy shows, etc. in coffee houses all around Chicago. I was a senior in High School and remember feeling very hip. Or back then we might have called it “hep.”

    ReplyReply
  33. 33
    satby says:

    @the Conster, la Citoyenne: @JPL: she didn’t just tell him to get back into the truck, she listened to him die and then bragged about it to her friends. She was convicted because she had a duty (in the eyes of the court) to notify someone (his family, the police) during the suicide. The egging him on was repugnant, but it’s not the main factor in the conviction, at least according to the judge’s statements convicting her (as reported).

    ReplyReply
  34. 34
    SiubhanDuinne says:

    @Schlemazel:

    Yeah, got that about two seconds later :-)

    ReplyReply
  35. 35

    @SiubhanDuinne: Larry King’s mug was on the right hand side of my screen, playing as a gif.

    ReplyReply
  36. 36
    Baud says:

    I feel persecuted.

    ReplyReply
  37. 37
    SiubhanDuinne says:

    @schrodingers_cat:

    Okay. Not on mine, so I couldn’t figure out at first what you were talking about.
    It still seems a bit odd to me that we don’t all see the same stuff at the same time. I’m not used to all this individualized personalized algorithmized marketing.

    ReplyReply
  38. 38
    the Conster, la Citoyenne says:

    @JPL:

    13 Reasons Why is a big controversial deal because of all the issues it raises with that age group. My kids are grown, but for parents of teenagers this case raised a bunch of issues and listening to them talk about the things that go on off their radar screens due to social media accounts is hair raising. What a minefield.

    ReplyReply
  39. 39
    Baud says:

    @SiubhanDuinne: Sounds boss.

    ReplyReply
  40. 40
    JMG says:

    College kids always seem weird and kinda dumb to everyone but themselves and high school kids. It was like that when i was in college and LBJ and Nixon were Presidents. I assume it was that way when Francois Villon was at the Sorbonne. It takes the experience of life and the wisdom of age to realize EVERYONE is weird and kind of dumb.

    ReplyReply
  41. 41
    Swannie says:

    I guess if you are a Republican, and this is the face of the left to you, it could be problematic.

    If you are the parent of college-bound kids this should terrify you.

    ReplyReply
  42. 42
    Aleta says:

    “There is this issue of what I can say or what I can’t say, and who’s going to dismiss me or demean me for saying it. And that is new in the American discourse.” New for him and his dad maybe.

    ReplyReply
  43. 43
    Baud says:

    @JMG:

    It takes the experience of life and the wisdom of age to realize EVERYONE is weird and kind of dumb

    QFT.

    ReplyReply
  44. 44
    JPL says:

    @satby: Finch’s dog walker is entering middle school next year, and the one advice I gave him was if some one says dare you, walk away. I’m not sure that any sentence will reform Carter, but it’s the only thing the verdict allows.

    ReplyReply
  45. 45
    🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka Junior G-Man) 🗳 🌷 says:

    @Swannie: Why? I’m more afraid of alt-reichists causing trouble on campus

    ReplyReply
  46. 46
    sdhays says:

    Ugh. The kids are being silly. But I instantly felt that part of the story is missing when Brett decided to do an interview with the Confederate Pravda channel. He should have known that would inflame the situation. Confederate Pravda had him on for one reason and one reason alone and that was to show their old, racist audience how dangerous “the left” is and how colleges are destroying our values. That showed, at best, hubris (a belief he could get past their desire to use him for their own propaganda) and poor judgement, and perhaps something else that isn’t addressed.

    FWIW, I thought the report was terrible. It didn’t even touch upon where this idea of having white students and faculty remain off campus for a day came from; it just sprang forth from Zeus’ head. What has happened that have the campus so riled up in the first place? Were there escalating local events, or is it basically coming from something in the national discourse? Seven plus minutes, and basically the only interesting story here, as far as Vice/HBO is concerned, is that students there are being as assholish as Newt Gingrich or Mitch “Yet, she persisted” McConnell on one of their nice days. I still have really no idea of what the hell is actually going on at Evergreen State College.

    And, yes, what the hell is with everyone interviewed being white? Bizarre…

    ReplyReply
  47. 47
    the Conster, la Citoyenne says:

    @satby:

    Right, that’s what I got out of it too – the judge pointed out she had the names and numbers of his mother and his sister on her phone, and the truck was a short way away from an emergency vehicle which could have saved him. I think the judge made the right call.

    ReplyReply
  48. 48
    sdhays says:

    @Aleta: Yeah, I caught that too. Wow…

    ReplyReply
  49. 49
    wallace winfrey says:

    @SiubhanDuinne:

    Hate to tell you this, but in 1959-60, we Would-Be Beatniks were snapping like mad instead of clapping, at jazz and folk music concerts, comedy shows, etc. in coffee houses all around Chicago. I was a senior in High School and remember feeling very hip. Or back then we might have called it “hep.”

    Everything old is new again. I’m sure you’re right, but I noticed a resurgence a couple years back of snapping in conversations and exclamations of “sahi ho” at gatherings of people who like to talk about how the Democratic Party has nothing to offer them as they float in their pools of privilege in/around the Boulder, CO area where I reside.

    ReplyReply
  50. 50
    SiubhanDuinne says:

    @Baud:

    Groovy as fuck.

    ReplyReply
  51. 51
    🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka Junior G-Man) 🗳 🌷 says:

    @sdhays: A Day Without Whites is based on having a day without any minorities on campus. It was like A Day Without Immigrants. It’s meant to show how important non-white students and faculty are. All of the above were completely voluntary as I understand it.

    ReplyReply
  52. 52
    debbie says:

    @Schlemazel:

    Manipulating someone into killing themself should not be protected speech.

    ReplyReply
  53. 53
    Aleta says:

    @SiubhanDuinne: And you are a gas.

    ReplyReply
  54. 54
    Baud says:

    @🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka Junior G-Man) 🗳 🌷: I would think involuntary would be illegal.

    ReplyReply
  55. 55
    SiubhanDuinne says:

    @wallace winfrey:

    Makes me wonder now how long ago (centuries, probably) finger-snapping first became a signal of approbation. Some social historian PhD candidate needs to get cracking on a dissertation about this.

    ReplyReply
  56. 56
    wallace winfrey says:

    @debbie:

    Manipulating someone into killing themself should not be protected speech.

    I agree, and think some of my midwestern relatives and ex-coworkers should be brought up on attempted murder charges for subjecting me to both the Mark Levin show and the Michael Savage show for whole minutes at a time.

    ReplyReply
  57. 57
    🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka Junior G-Man) 🗳 🌷 says:

    @Baud: Obviously, which is why I don’t understand what the big deal is

    ReplyReply
  58. 58
    Baud says:

    @🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka Junior G-Man) 🗳 🌷: Don’t matter to me none.

    ReplyReply
  59. 59
    sdhays says:

    @🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka Junior G-Man) 🗳 🌷: My confusion is mostly on the lines of what precipitated this specifically on this campus, but I admit I still don’t get the logic for this particular demonstration. In the case of “A Day Without Immigrants”, the idea is to demonstrate how different life would be without immigrants in the lives of non-immigrants. As for “A Day Without Whites”, I have to say that if you dropped that on me out of the blue, I’d assume it was an alt-right response to “A Day Without Minorities”.

    I’m clearly missing something.

    ReplyReply
  60. 60
    Baud says:

    @SiubhanDuinne: Probably Benedictine monks.

    ReplyReply
  61. 61
    SiubhanDuinne says:

    @Aleta:

    :: nods ::
    I am one gone chick.

    ReplyReply
  62. 62
    SiubhanDuinne says:

    @Baud:

    I was thinking Aristophanes’ audiences.

    ReplyReply
  63. 63
    🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka Junior G-Man) 🗳 🌷 says:

    @sdhays: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/05/30/escalating-debate-race-evergreen-state-students-demand-firing-professor

    This should help

    Apparently, minorities leaving campus for a day is a tradition or happened in the past. That’s what the idea is based on. That whites should cede the space of the campus for a day for non-white minorities

    ReplyReply
  64. 64
    Kathleen says:

    @Davis X. Machina: “Beatniks” used to do this in coffee houses back in the day.

    ETA SD beat me to it.

    ReplyReply
  65. 65
    Baud says:

    For the record, A Day Without Balloon Juice would be a bad idea.

    ReplyReply
  66. 66

    @SiubhanDuinne: Actually it was geometry that required proofs. Don’t you remember, you either prove something directly, by proving LHS=RHS, or do a proof by contradiction.

    ReplyReply
  67. 67
    Nora says:

    Without some clearer laws, I kind of agree with the ACLU, though I didn’t when I first read about the verdict. The question is what your duty of care is to someone else. You do not have a duty to save a random stranger you see dying in the street. You do not have a duty to stop someone who’s trying to commit suicide if you have no connection with that person. There are situations in which you DO have a duty to act — if you’re a police officer, say, or if you’re in a position where you have assumed responsibility for that other person. Did she really assume responsibility for him by talking to him via cell phone? If we want to make that the rule, okay, but I think we need to change the laws in order to make that the rule, because it doesn’t necessarily follow that she had that responsibility under the law that existed at the time of the actions.

    Understand, I am not condoning her actions, especially her telling him to get back in the truck when he’d changed his mind. I think that was horrible behavior and I think she should regret that for the rest of her life and have that on her conscience for the rest of her life. I’m just arguing about whether it was CRIMINAL, not whether it was wrong.

    ReplyReply
  68. 68
    Ruviana says:

    @SiubhanDuinne: Ooh, maybe you can answer my weird question! Did you say “pale green” as an indication of approval or agreement (like someone might say sweet or awesome)? I knew about the finger snapping though.

    ReplyReply
  69. 69
    debbie says:

    @the Conster, la Citoyenne:

    I think that’s what ticks me off the most about ACLU’s position. This had zero to do with end of life issues.

    ReplyReply
  70. 70
    Kathleen says:

    @Baud: Right on.

    ReplyReply
  71. 71
    ArchTeryx says:

    Apropo of nothing (probably should have looked up an open thread for this).

    Yeah, it’s just one person on the interwebs, but I got pretty heavily tone-policed over at Lawyers, Guns, and Money in comparing the silent slaughter the Republican Congress is about to foist on us to Nazi death camps. (Out of sight, out of mind, pretty much).

    Until people (who didn’t yet know I have a job and health insurance through it now) did point out that it was my own ox about to get slaughtered. They also pointed out that the Jews weren’t the first ones shipped to the death camps – that would be the disabled and the intellectuals, of which I am both. That finally shut up the tone policemen.

    The thing is, I am no less enraged if it ISN’T my ox about to get gored. It just replaced naked, blind fear with HULK SMASH! Mass murder is mass murder, whether it’s being committed by the Nazis, the Khmer Rouge, Stalin’s KGB, or the Republican party.

    We’re way too outraged about OTHER regimes’ mass murder and willfully blind about our own. That’s why Black Lives Matter got started in the first place. I wonder what movement will arise in the face of hundreds of thousands of deaths from lack of health care?

    ReplyReply
  72. 72
  73. 73
    Uncle Cosmo says:

    @the Conster, la Citoyenne:

    Him going on Fox is the tell.

    It may only be a “tell” that he was way too confident of his ability to navigate a den of snakes like Faux Noise. Maybe he thought this was a way to get publicity for his position – forgetting that in this case “the medium” would only twist things around to support their preferred narrative. And overlooking the fact that no matter how intellectually accomplished he might be, the staff at Faux Noise are in no way stupid & are very skilled & experienced at doing exactly that.

    TL;DR version: Appearing on Faux is like mudwrestling with a pig – you get filthy & the pig enjoys it!

    ReplyReply
  74. 74
    Is Our Children Learning? | The Crawdad Hole says:

    […] Hopefully They Will Grow Out of This […]

  75. 75
    sukabi says:

    @John Cole: i get where the ACLU is coming from with their statement, but what that girl did wasn’t “an end of life” conversation. It may have started out that way in the months prior to the boy committing suicide, but in the day of and in particular in the moments before he did it she was coercive.

    ReplyReply
  76. 76
    Davis X. Machina says:

    @Baud: Nah, the sign language used instead of speech by Cistercians of the Strict Observance.

    ReplyReply
  77. 77
    Baud says:

    @schrodingers_cat: Civilization.

    ReplyReply
  78. 78
    Patricia Kayden says:

    @debbie: What she did by egging on her boyfriend to commit suicide was awful but was it criminal? I can see arguments from both sides.

    ReplyReply
  79. 79
    JPL says:

    @the Conster, la Citoyenne: The ACLU is against the verdict because of right to free speech, which I agree with. For me it’s the case law that judge used. Her action is nothing like the warehouse fire in Worcester where the homeless couple might not have had the mental capacity to understand they should have notified the fire department they were okay. There’s no doubt though that Michelle Carter is evil, and I’m not excusing her actions.

    ReplyReply
  80. 80
    🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka Junior G-Man) 🗳 🌷 says:

    @ArchTeryx: I completely agree and have been at this position for awhile now; at least for 3 or 4 months. Often, policymakers and other leaders like the President inadvertently get innocent people killed. In most situations, with most normal people, they wouldn’t know ahead of time that their actions and policies would hurt or kill people, at least not intentionally.

    Today’s GOP (and I call then that for a reason to avoid confusing them with actual republicans) is the exact opposite. They know full well what the impact of their policies are. The AHCA will kill thousands and lead to early deaths over the next several years. Murder by proxy is still murder. It bothers me that McConnell will likely either be retired or dead by the time this starts. Consequently, he and most other GOP pols who vote for this mass murder will face no real (legal) consequences

    ReplyReply
  81. 81
    Patricia Kayden says:

    @sukabi: Coercive? She encouraged him to take his life. She’s an evil person but I don’t see how she coerced him into doing anything. She simply pushed him to do something he seemed to want to do. She should have got him some help but she has no heart and didn’t care one whit for his wellbeing.

    Strange that she’s facing jail time for what she did when people who deliberately kill others get away scot free.

    ReplyReply
  82. 82
    Uncle Cosmo says:

    @the Conster, la Citoyenne: It might mean nothing more than he stupidly thought he could control the messaging because he’s sooooo much more intelligent than the staff at Faux Noise. Forgetting that they are past masters at twisting an appearance to suit their own purposes. College professors (like MDs, like engineers) often get ambushed by their own intellectual arrogance.

    “Never mud-wrestle a pig – you just get filthy, while the pig enjoys it!”

    ReplyReply
  83. 83
    JPL says:

    @Patricia Kayden: If the verdict stands, it will be interesting case law. I do think that Conster is correct in his opinion that she’s a psychopath though.

    ReplyReply
  84. 84
    J R in WV says:

    @wallace winfrey:

    Wallace,

    Welcome to the Balloon Juice Universe!!! IT is different here, a little strange, but mostly nice.

    Keep in touch!

    JR

    ReplyReply
  85. 85
    Baud says:

    @J R in WV:

    I think you meant a little nice, but mostly strange.

    ReplyReply
  86. 86
    debbie says:

    @Patricia Kayden:

    Yeah, I think it was criminal. I think she put in a great deal of effort to get him to kill himself.

    ReplyReply
  87. 87
    rikyrah says:

    Thread

    Clint Smith‏Verified account @ClintSmithIII

    Something to keep in mind today is that showing statistics of racial disparities in crim justice might have the opposite effect we intend 1/

    https://twitter.com/ClintSmithIII/status/876112575490121730?

    …………………………………………………

    Before the statistics were kept, Black folk were told that what we knew about the criminal justice system and US – was all in our imagination.

    Well, then, we went about the time to get the statistics to prove what WE already knew.

    About OURSELVES…..

    and, this thread just confirms what we thought White folks thought about us and the criminal justice system.

    THEY SAY that White folks got mad about BLACK LIVES MATTER.

    I call that bullshyt.

    what they got mad about, is that Black Lives Matter, and other social media presence groups, proved, with video, about what the statistics said .
    they put the bodies in their face, and then dared to tell White folks, who comfortably ignored the black and white statistics…
    WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO NOW.

    How DARE Black people actually think that their EXISTENCE shouldn’t mean a DEATH SENTENCE.

    HOW DARE US.
    So, they go out, and do the bullshyt of All Lives Matter, and Blue Lives Matter, and try and find every reason possible to excuse summary executions of Black folks by police…

    And, think that Black folks will just shut up about it.
    That time has passed.

    And, even though we have that phucking racist in the White House

    And Attorney General White Citizens Council….

    We are not going back to the time where Black folks could be killed and folks wouldn’t speak up because they were scared. That was our grandparents.

    That shyt’s over. Period.

    ReplyReply
  88. 88
    🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka Junior G-Man) 🗳 🌷 says:

    @rikyrah: 👏👏👏👏👏

    ReplyReply
  89. 89
    J R in WV says:

    @wallace winfrey:

    Oh, so you’ve been lurking. Welcome to the world of typed speech!! You know what we are, raving jackels!! or is it ravening jackels??? I dunno. Enjoy!

    Regarding Michelle Carter and her egging her “boyfriend” into committing suicide, that’s really sick, and on the evil side of sick. So I’m with the court, she has a duty to not push someone into doing something she HOPES will kill them.

    Imagine if she was convincing him to take a huge overdose of smack? Or play Russian Roulette for the 3rd or 4th spin of a revolver? Or stop using that evil insulin, which we all know comes from murdered livestock? To not vaccinate his children when an epidemic is raging in China?

    Somewhere there you run from free speech to evil… and I’m nearly a free speech absolutist, personally. But Ms Carter crossed the line when he died. I guess that’s the bright line, when you kill someone, it isn’t speech anymore.

    Hope she isn’t a psychopath, that isn’t curable. Other pathologies may be, and I hope she can be cured. Evil isn’t amenable to a cure either – look at the Rs… and the people who claim to be xtian, but are full of hate… how do you balance that with the teachings of the carpenter?

    ReplyReply
  90. 90
    Omnes Omnibus says:

    @Nora: I agree with this.

    ReplyReply
  91. 91
    Diana says:

    @Kathleen: but according to West Side Story snapping your fingers at someone was a threat. And that movie came out at the same time as the beats.

    ReplyReply
  92. 92
    JPL says:

    @rikyrah: There are no words. The verdict last night was a kick in the gut.

    ReplyReply
  93. 93

    @Diana: Really? I thought it was just to call someone’s attention or as beat to music, like clapping.

    Finger snapping and whistling used in one of my favorites from the late 80s, from Tezaab (Acid). A Hindi movie about Mumbai’s underworld with a young Anil Kapoor (game show host from Slum Dog).
    Its about Mumbai at night, how it is a haven for people who have nothing to lose and no place to call home, who no one cares about.

    ReplyReply
  94. 94
    sdhays says:

    @🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka Junior G-Man) 🗳 🌷: Thanks. That’s a much better overview of what’s going on than the video.

    I now sort of get the logic, but it still seems torturous. The idea was to basically get white involvement in what had previously been a minority-driven activity, which seems a worthwhile goal. But it still seems ill-conceived to me. The only white people who would do this would be people who are already supportive, and they would go off campus and take the day off or hold all-white meetings off campus discussing diversity, which just seems weird. And, presumably, if a significant portion of the white people on campus participated, the campus would essentially come to a halt. I guess that’s the goal?

    I feel the lessons that people are supposed to draw from this are too complicated. But I’m terrible at organizing people, so what do I know?

    ReplyReply
  95. 95
    J R in WV says:

    @JMG:

    I wrote a paper about Francois Villon, comparing him to the leader of the Doors, Jim Morrison, who was as much a libertine as Francois was. Though I don’t think Jim ever stole the entire gold coinage poor fund of a major cathedral, nor pimped in taverns. But there isn’t that much money in that now-a-days, compared to being a rock singer.

    Francois was a performer in taverns, which was a big as you could get before amps wer invented. But there wasn’t much money in that. And no one is sure if Villon died at the hand sof the aristocracy, or just faded into the countryside. And come still say Jim Morrison lives.

    Their poetry was similar too, for a couple of guys centuries and an ocean AND an industrial revolution apart. And the end of Royalty ruling most of us, so far, which along with the Church was Francois’s biggest problem. But still, I got a A on the paper

    ReplyReply
  96. 96
    Swannie says:

    @🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka Junior G-Man) 🗳 🌷: If your kids are gonna receive a useless education why not send them to a local cow college? Why waste money you could spend in your golden years? Better yet, why not just send them to truck driving school so they can learn a useful skill?

    The alt-right is a fringe movement of losers.

    ReplyReply
  97. 97

    @Baud: A day without Baud is even worse.

    ReplyReply
  98. 98
    Schlemazel says:

    @debbie:
    yeah but, as the ACLU says, it could affect conversations about end of life issues. I thought I had pointed out both sides there

    ReplyReply
  99. 99
    J R in WV says:

    @Baud:

    Well, yeah, maybe… It varies quite a bit from time to time and event to event.

    If she’s been browsing for 10 years, she knows all about us, there’s no hiding it for more than a couple of days!

    ReplyReply
  100. 100
    🌎 🇺🇸 Goku (aka Junior G-Man) 🗳 🌷 says:

    @Swannie: Why is it useless? This stuff doesn’t happen everyday, everywhere. It likely never will. Truck driving is not a good industry to get into. Assuming self-driving cars get off the ground, human drivers will be replaced.

    The alt-right may be losers, but they’re far more mainstream these days. There have been violent clashes across the country, involving, not always them but other reactionary groups

    Over the past months, several murders and mass murders have happened because of alt-rightists or those inspired by their rhetoric

    ReplyReply
  101. 101
    Sab says:

    @ArchTeryx: I missed that you got a job and insurance. Congrats!

    Agree with your comment otherwise that it’s not somehow benign to kick a bunch of people off health insurance knowing it will kill them just because the person voting for that result doesn’t actually pull the trigger. I know so many people who may be affected by this who “followed the rules” all their lives and then found that it’s a whole different set of rules if you develop a health problem: no job, no income, no insurance, minimal treatment.

    Glad you’ll be around for a while. We need your voice.

    ReplyReply
  102. 102
    eclare says:

    @JPL: I just don’t understand why anyone would encourage someone to kill themselves. When I was in middle school, there was a rash of suicides among the moms, it was awful. I remember being stupid and 18…but this is weird.

    ReplyReply
  103. 103
    debbie says:

    @Schlemazel:

    Look, I fully support the right to end one’s life. I have my copy of Final Exit just in case. But it should totally be a person’s choice and that decision should be made freely, with no coercion or bullying, which is what Michelle Carter did. She sent more than 1,000 texts to him about this! If you read my second link, she crashed and took over a fundraisier for her dead “boyfriend.” That’s psychopathic.

    ReplyReply
  104. 104
    Omnes Omnibus says:

    @eclare:

    I just don’t understand why anyone would encourage someone to kill themselves.

    Because s/he is an asshole.

    ReplyReply
  105. 105
    bupalos says:

    @rikyrah: What the hell does it matter if you speak up when everyone else has already subliminally decided they aren’t going to listen? Who says your grandparents weren’t speaking up? Seems to me that generation DID speak up. The reaction of white culture was to do a lot of window dressing and formal recognition and things to make the guilt more deniable, while the underlying attitudes just burrowed deeper into its sick soul. It’s a much subtler fight now, it has very little to do with ‘being brave enough to speak out.’ I’m not sure really what it does take.

    I’m a little tempted to say that America is simply over. The crimes were too great, and committed right in the face of the highest ideals. Like a murder in church.

    ReplyReply
  106. 106
    bupalos says:

    @Omnes Omnibus: There’s this thing, you know, it’s called mental illness.

    I think it’s kind of darkly hilarious that someone urging someone else to kill themselves would be called “an asshole.”

    Pol Pot was SUCH a jerk!!

    ReplyReply
  107. 107
    Omnes Omnibus says:

    @bupalos: I am glad that I could “darkly” amuse you.

    ETA: And Pol Pot? Come on.

    ReplyReply
  108. 108
    Smiling Mortician says:

    @wallace winfrey: I’m late to the conversation, but I live here: you were looking at a perfectly typical Evergreen student.

    ReplyReply
  109. 109

    @Omnes Omnibus: Pol Pot was an asshole, definitely an asshole.

    ReplyReply
  110. 110
    Smiling Mortician says:

    @SiubhanDuinne: Everything old is new again. Greeners are kinda into the neo-Beatnik scene.

    ReplyReply
  111. 111
    Omnes Omnibus says:

    @Smiling Mortician: The Antioch College of the PNW?

    ReplyReply
  112. 112
    Omnes Omnibus says:

    @🐾BillinGlendaleCA: I agree. I just thought Mr Pot was a bit of a jump.

    ReplyReply
  113. 113
    Anne Laurie says:

    @Gelfling 545:

    Having known someone who was trying to get out of a relationship where the guy kept threatening suicide, I know that people get to the point at which saying “go, ahead, then if that’s what you want” is the only way to save their own sanity.

    Been there, agree it can go that way. On the other hand, when you’re texting back & forth with a suicide in progress, and they say they’ve just decided maybe it wasn’t a great idea, the proper response is not “get back in that truck right now.”

    It’s a local story here & avoiding hearing about the details is just about impossible. On the one hand, the ACLU gotta ACLU; on the other hand, girl in question seems to have had enough of her own issues that getting her out of the general population has to be considered a net social positive, IMO. Hard cases make bad law, but even the most sympathetic observers seem to be arguing she’s got borderline personality disorder and figured that being The Girl Whose Boyfriend Tragically Died would *finally* make her popular like she deserved to be. And she certainly achieved ‘celebrity’ status, so there’s that…

    ReplyReply
  114. 114
    lollipopguild says:

    @bupalos: Our right wing friends have been busy defining down what is acceptable behavior in America. The shooting near Washington D.C. was a warning to them, but they do not listen to anything that they do not want to hear. It’s utterly amazing that they feel that the pain and suffering that they inflict as a matter of course on others will never come back on them. I am not advocating violence here just saying that if you sow the wind , you reap the whirlwind.

    ReplyReply
  115. 115

    @Omnes Omnibus: Mao, on the other hand, was a jerk.

    ReplyReply
  116. 116
    jl says:

    I am a slob and probably missed the link, but I couldn’t find anything that explained what this day of absence was about.
    Whatever it was about, if it was a voluntary gesture, it seems like the prof is wildly over reacting to it. Just as much so as any of the goofy things the students did. But he wildly over reacted in a more socially acceptable way.

    I teach. If thought the ‘day of absence’ was about something worthwhile, and I had a class that day, I’d probably discuss it with the class and decide with them. Depends on how important the lecture was that day. More often than I like to admit, my lectures, and many others I have had to endure as a student and a teacher are dispensable It’s not hard to find a substitute for one or two of them that will be just as useful to the students.

    If the students and I decided to go ahead and ignore the day of absence, and we were harassed for it, then I would make a huge fuss.
    So, I have doubts about what the prof is up to. He shouldn’t be fired for it, though.

    ReplyReply
  117. 117
    Bill E Pilgrim says:

    I’m rescinding my acceptance to be Emperor of thls blog.

    No, I’ve made up my mind, don’t try to talk me out of it.

    ReplyReply
  118. 118
    tybee says:

    @Baud: rAmen

    ReplyReply
  119. 119
    Omnes Omnibus says:

    @🐾BillinGlendaleCA: But Hitler was nice to his dog.

    ReplyReply
  120. 120
    eclare says:

    @🐾BillinGlendaleCA: Something we can all agree on.

    ReplyReply
  121. 121
    Smiling Mortician says:

    @sdhays: Evergreen is a weird place. It’s like a nature preserve for hippies (idealists, artists, stoners, nonconformists) but because this is the Pacific Northwest instead of NYC, it’s really white in Olympia. The prof didn’t want to be told by a (mostly white) student group that he wasn’t allowed on campus because he’s white. The administration whiffed. The (mostly white) students dug in.

    ReplyReply
  122. 122

    @Omnes Omnibus: True, until he killed them.

    ReplyReply
  123. 123
    Sab says:

    @ArchTeryx: VOX has a photo of Barrasso, Grassley and McConnelL that is priceless. Looking all determined and congressional while they blow up our worlds.

    ReplyReply
  124. 124
    Evergreen Alum says:

    Why are only white kids interviewed? Because Evergreen is a very white school, something that has frustrated it for a very long time. The problem is that is a liberal arts school in a state with minority population percentages below the national average. Attempts to increase both student and faculty recruitment without fundamentally altering the school’s educational distinctiveness has been an ongoing and relatively futile project. Attempts to alter (and reduce) that distinctiveness have been met with resistance by the relatively powerful faculty governance group. That’s some of the backdrop here.

    There have always been some students that are more demonstrative than others, and it looks like the HBO segment features the same group of “performatively woke” (gawd I love that, can I please borrow that forever?) that I’ve been seeing in other videos and photos accompanying stories about the controversy. They have a look that is about as good at capturing media attention that pairs rather well with Weinstein’s flirtation with right-wing outlets.

    ReplyReply
  125. 125
    Smiling Mortician says:

    @Omnes Omnibus: You’re familiar, I see?

    ReplyReply
  126. 126
    Mary says:

    Evergreen State College, while it is one of the most liberal politically colleges is ,yes, Antioch of the Northwest. There are many special snowflakes attending classes with no grades and an individually constructed curriculum. As my working class husband used to say during the hippie era, they really need to experience real life for a while. The students of color know more about it than most but even they are coming from upper income families. ESC ain’t cheap.

    ReplyReply
  127. 127
    Aleta says:

    Six members of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS (PACHA) have resigned.

    “As advocates for people living with HIV, we have dedicated our lives to combating this disease and no longer feel we can do so effectively within the confines of an advisory body to a president who simply does not care,” they wrote.

    “The Trump Administration has no strategy to address the on-going HIV/AIDS epidemic, seeks zero input from experts to formulate HIV policy, and—most concerning—pushes legislation that will harm people living with HIV and halt or reverse important gains made in the fight against this disease.”

    Scott Schoettes, the HIV project director for Lambda Legal, said the administration has shown itself to be anti-science…. “It was my sense that I did not have any real say with this administration and that’s in part because it’s not an administration that wants to deal in facts, wants to deal in science.”

    “I think HIV was never a priority for this White House. The Trump campaign refused to even meet with HIV advocates,” he said.

    -Buzzfeed

    ReplyReply
  128. 128
    Omnes Omnibus says:

    @Smiling Mortician: Daughter of one of my mom’s friend’s went there. She now lives on an island with a methane powered car and self-composting toilets. I believe they farm mushrooms.*

    *Details may be hazy, but the general image is valid.

    ReplyReply
  129. 129
    Viva BrisVegas says:

    Those mostly white Evergreen kids seem to have very little difficulty with the application of authority, just with who is allowed to dispense it.

    That said, what was Weinstein doing with Tucker Carlson? He is either extremely naive, desperately ignorant, or trying to provoke something. None of those are a good thing in a Prof.

    ReplyReply
  130. 130
    jl says:

    @Omnes Omnibus: Is that a bad thing?

    ReplyReply
  131. 131
    Anne Laurie says:

    @eclare:

    I just don’t understand why anyone would encourage someone to kill themselves.

    Remember Romeo & Juliet? I sorta understand why it’s become the standard American high-school Intro to Shakespeare, but obviously “Let’s kill ourselves & be together forever & also famous for 400 years!!!” is a message some teenagers… misinterpret.

    ReplyReply
  132. 132
    Omnes Omnibus says:

    @jl: No.

    ReplyReply
  133. 133
    D58826 says:

    ap is reporting that the Navy has found the bodies of the missing crewmen in a flooded compartment.
    Not really a surprise.
    RIP

    ReplyReply
  134. 134
    jl says:

    @Omnes Omnibus: Methane powered car sounds a little funky, but it might go nicely with the self composting toilets. But a mushroom farm sounds interesting. Some neighbors had one near one of my family CA farms. I thought it was so cool to go visit the weird mostly underground mushroom sheds as a kid. And when it was over 100 degrees outside in the summer, literally ‘very cool’.

    ReplyReply
  135. 135
    zhena gogolia says:

    @SiubhanDuinne:

    When the students here were doing it a few years ago, all I could think was, “Maynard G. Krebs!”

    ReplyReply
  136. 136
    Smiling Mortician says:

    @Omnes Omnibus: Pretty sure I know her.

    ReplyReply
  137. 137
    Omnes Omnibus says:

    @Smiling Mortician: There is a type.

    ReplyReply
  138. 138
    Davebo says:

    @Baud: Actually a day without Balloon Juice every now and then is a very very good thing.

    ReplyReply
  139. 139
    efgoldman says:

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    I believe they farm mushrooms.*

    In the toilets?

    ReplyReply
  140. 140

    @jl:

    literally ‘very cool’.

    So I take it, you sampled the product

    ReplyReply
  141. 141
    J R in WV says:

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    I attended Antioch College back in the 70s, it was nice. I argued with one professor that I respected a lot, claiming that as the best student, I deserved an A instead of a Pass, but he wasn’t into giving grades, so I got a pass. That was OK, it transferred OK when I enrolled in a computer science program. Interesting people, especially the better professors.

    ReplyReply
  142. 142

    Yeah, you have it about right. College is where you do dumb shit. I did all kinds of dumb shit in college, though none of it got televised. I know that Sean Inanity will weep and wail over this shit, but really, who gives a fuck? These are 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 year old kids making dumb mistakes that many of them, if not most, will learn something from. I’m not going to lose any sleep over what happens to the teacher. I will say, I think the college president seems to be going about dealing with it the right way. He isn’t sobbing about how people are saying mean things to him, and he understands that he’s lucky enough to hold a rather rarefied position. In the meanwhile, Black guys minding their own business are going about their lives in fear that the police will shoot them for no reason. It seems like maybe the kids could make more of a stink about that, or some other big thing than who teaches at their school. I’ll put forth the usual disclaimer that this is something I won’t ever truly understand, since it doesn’t happen to me.

    ReplyReply
  143. 143
    Omnes Omnibus says:

    @efgoldman: Do I look like I know fuck-all about mushroom farming?

    ReplyReply
  144. 144
    Omnes Omnibus says:

    @J R in WV: I am not criticizing Antioch. It is was it is. Not a school I would have chosen to go to. So I didn’t apply. Evergreen State is the same way.

    ReplyReply
  145. 145
    sukabi says:

    @Patricia Kayden: where’s the line between “encouragement” and “coercion” when you’re knowingly dealing with someone with mental health issues? She knew him and knew which buttons to push. Encouragement, manipulation and coercion…it’s in the details and intent.

    ReplyReply
  146. 146
    Temporarily Max McGee (Phase II) says:

    @Mary:

    I think Bennington College might be the better match. I have friends what tended Evergreen State and others who attended Bennington, and their experiences, both socially and academically, seemed very similar.

    ReplyReply
  147. 147
    efgoldman says:

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    Do I look like I know fuck-all about mushroom farming?

    You look JUST like some mushroom farmers I knew in Pennsylvania, years ago.

    ReplyReply
  148. 148

    @Omnes Omnibus: I have never even heard of those two schools. Is ignorance bliss?

    ReplyReply
  149. 149
    J R in WV says:

    That’s too bad about the sailors. As soon as I learned that the collision below the waterline was in two berthing compartments – read dorms/barracks – I suspected they were asleep until the water hit them.

    Being below the water line in a ship underway is interesting. You can hear the water, if there aren’t too many layers between you and the ocean.

    ReplyReply
  150. 150
    Omnes Omnibus says:

    @schrodingers_cat: They are both well-regarded schools with strong cultural leftist cred.

    ReplyReply
  151. 151
    Older says:

    @Smiling Mortician: The whole time I was watching the Evergreen College video, I was thinking, “That girl is about the whitest person I have ever seen. How can she be calling other people “white people”?

    ReplyReply
  152. 152
    Johannes says:

    @debbie: For what it’s worth, as a near First Amendment absolutist I don’t think in this case that it is, for reasons given here (Part One) and here (Part Two). (Sorry; it’s long.)

    ReplyReply
  153. 153

    @Omnes Omnibus: I figured out why I hadn’t heard about them, because they are not in my neck of the woods.

    ReplyReply
  154. 154
    Omnes Omnibus says:

    @schrodingers_cat: Do you venture outside of New England?

    ReplyReply
  155. 155
    Kent says:

    Evergreen is nearly all-white because it is way out in the suburbs of Olympia which is nearly all-white small city half way between Seattle and Portland, the two whitest major cities in the country. I teach HS in the Vancouver WA area to the south and Evergreen just isn’t on the radar of the occasional minority students that I get, despite being the closest residential 4-year state school (there is a closer WSU branch campus that’s a commuter school). Mostly the smart ones want to go to UW in Seattle where they can learn actual marketable skills and develop career contacts. Some in the hard sciences want to head out to WSU. The really really bright ones think places like Stanford or the east coast Ivys.

    ReplyReply
  156. 156
    Omnes Omnibus says:

    @Kent: Nice shade.

    ReplyReply
  157. 157
    AnotherAlumni says:

    alumni here.

    Yeah, these are students doing dumb things, and they’ll hopefully learn from it. Some students did dumb things when I was there, also.

    But aside from attracting some overwrought students, the uniqueness of the school attracted very motivated, interesting people. The majority of my friends went onto PhDs & university or research careers. Others went to work for Microsoft and made bank. One retired and another is with Yahoo. Another has a career writing romance fiction.

    It’s a public school, and significantly cheaper then Antioch. I paid for my tuition with 2 trips to the ATM. It’s more expensive now, but, I believe, the cheapest public school in the state.

    It’s too bad this aspect of the school has gone viral. The current president does not seem to have a handle on the situation. The last 2 presidents were much better suited to the school and their jobs.

    ReplyReply
  158. 158
    schrodingers_cat says:

    @Omnes Omnibus: Not to Ohio.

    ReplyReply
  159. 159
    Kent says:

    Yeah. Evergreen really isn’t comparable to Antioch or Bennington or other small private liberal arts schools on the east coast. As a state school it’s more like a small version of UC Santa Cruz or perhaps Humboldt. State. It’s not very selective (I think the acceptance rate is close to 98%) so it’s your basic small regional state school with a more liberal or experimental approach to education.

    I agree, the college president looks out of his depth, which might be part of the problem

    ReplyReply
  160. 160
    Omnes Omnibus says:

    @Kent: How different is the end result? And Antioch is in Ohio.

    ReplyReply
  161. 161
    Shalimar says:

    @schrodingers_cat: I have been getting the Larry King video here and even more annoyingly on the bottom of every post at RawStory, despite having AdBlocker set up to supposedly block everything. Thank you for reminding me to go in and try to see if I could block the video individually. It worked. :)

    ReplyReply
  162. 162
    AnotherAlumni says:

    @Kent: How different is the end result? And Antioch is in Ohio.

    Because it’s a state school tuition is a lot less. There are more students from different income brackets. One of my friends had served in the military. Some students were locals. Others were people who were in-state (like me) and not your typical vegan or trust fund-y student.

    When I was comparing schools, Bennington was one of the most expensive schools in the country. (Hasn’t it shut down?)

    ReplyReply
  163. 163
    lethargytartare says:

    @Smedley Darlington Prunebanks (Formerly Mumphrey, et al.):

    It seems like maybe the kids could make more of a stink about that, or some other big thing than who teaches at their school. I’ll put forth the usual disclaimer that this is something I won’t ever truly understand, since it doesn’t happen to me.

    I don’t mean to be a dick, but consider the possibility that the issues are more connected than you think.

    i.e. maybe when you’re reading about cops getting away with murdering minorities on a monthly basis, the supposedly “small” thing of having your school, or even just one professor, imply your ideas are not worth hearing may grate a bit more than it would otherwise.

    ReplyReply

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Is Our Children Learning? | The Crawdad Hole says:

    […] Hopefully They Will Grow Out of This […]

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *