• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Women: They Get Shit Done

Militantly superior in their own minds…

No one could have predicted…

This blog is Obama’s Katrina.

I showered with Rahm and all I got was this shitty blog.

Consistently wrong since 2002

An almost top 10,000 blog!

A snarling mass of vitriolic vicious jackals

Screw the Judean People’s Front. Splitters.

Good luck with your asparagus.

We still have time to mess this up!

Not all heroes wear capes.

An army of rabid, anonymous commenters

What fresh hell is this?

Just a few bad apples.

This Blog Goes to 11…

Usually wrong but never in doubt.

Too inconsequential to be sued

Gastritis Broke My Calculator

Shock troops for the Unitarian Jihad.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

Wetsuit optional.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

Mobile Menu

  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • Site Feedback
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • Pet Blogging
  • On The Road
  • Garden Chats
  • Pet Calendar Info
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Selling three ways across state lines

Selling three ways across state lines

by David Anderson|  February 21, 201710:01 am| 14 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

Facebook0Tweet0Email0

When I worked at UPMC Health Plan, our core business area was Western Pennsylvania with a slow amorphous growth to the eastern portion of the state. We were a Pennsylvania focused company but we would sell across state lines. Some years we sold Medicare Advantage in West Virginia and Ohio and other years, we would only be a Pennsylvania company. How does this happen and how do insurers sell across state lines?

UPMC filed its plans for regulatory approval in Pennsylvania. Commercial plans needed a different (and far lighter) approval process than Medicare plans which needed a different approval process than Exchange plans which needed a different process than Medicaid and CHIP. The state regulators would come back with questions and comments for our initial filings. We would respond to those questions and comments with more data, tweaked networks, clearer policy statements and whatever else was needed. After a few months of back and forth, our plans would be approved and someone who got paid a lot more than me would make the decision as to what we would sell.

The same process applied to Ohio and West Virginia. Unique plan submissions would be prepared, we would promise that our claim system could handle the unique to the state rules in Ohio and/or West Virginia and that we could produce the reports that they wanted to see on a timely and accurate basis. Their regulators would usually come back and ask for an update or a tweak, we would supply it to them and then we would go to market. West Virginia had a particular interest in primary care provider network adequacy so I had to prep a complex quarterly report for them.

In order to sell a plan in a different state, the claims payment system would have to be tweaked to allow for exceptions to be enforced (either additional benefits that had to be paid or benefits that Pennsylvania required and another state did not require at the same level.) The vast majority of the time, this was merely a matter of updating a set of reference tables. Occasionally, it meant doing a comprehensive code development cycle.

This is how insurers currently sell across state lines. They comply with the regulatory structure of each state that they sell in even if all of the work is done at a single central location. There are three other models for selling across states lines.

In the ACA there is the Section 1333 interstate compact model. States can choose other states that they share a common regulatory framework. They’ll form an opt-in compact so a plan that is approved in State A can sell in State B using State A’s regulations. This allows states to choose trusted regulators. Massachusetts might believe Rhode Island or Vermont offers sufficiently comparable regulation and Rhode Island might believe Massachusetts and Vermont are good partners and Vermont might believe that Massachusetts and Rhode Island are tight enough to have a common interest in slightly expanding market scope and minimizing insurer regulatory burden. But they all agree that Mississippi has a different intent that they don’t want for their state’s residents.

So far no state has gone this route.

Maine and Georgia have both passed laws that allow out of state carriers to use their out of state regulatory registration as the Georgia or Maine license. These laws have been around long enough that insurers would be able to get good data on the local markets.

No insurer has gone this route.

The final pathway is the opposite of the voluntary interstate regulatory framework of the 1333 ACA method. It is the traditional Republican plan of allowing a single state regulator be the de facto national regulator like South Dakota was the national regulator for credit cards pre-CARD ACT and Delaware is the national corporate law regulator. Here any plan that is qualified to sell in one state would be qualified to sell in all states. It would only need to meet a single state’s benefit requirements, network requirements and complaints and grievance requirements. It would be a race to the bottom.

Those are the three alternative methods of selling across state lines from the status quo. The first two operational examples have little uptake while the last is massively disruptive.

Previous Post: « Tuesday Morning Open Thread: Out of the Shadows
Next Post: One Month and a Day »

Reader Interactions

14Comments

  1. 1.

    Jerzy Russian

    February 21, 2017 at 10:11 am

    I thought “three ways” would be related to the hookers and blow theme. Boy am I disappointed.

  2. 2.

    David Anderson

    February 21, 2017 at 10:23 am

    @Jerzy Russian: I try, I really do try to know my audience :)

  3. 3.

    lgerard

    February 21, 2017 at 10:28 am

    This “solution” has never made sense to me. The first thing you are buying is entree into the local health care system.
    There are pretty substantial cost differentials between states, partly because of the differences in the cost of living, partly because of the greater investment in facilities, education and training. Health care in Massachusetts is more expensive then in Mississippi, it is also light years better.
    It is like saying you can solve the housing crisis in New York City by letting people buy houses in Arkansas.

  4. 4.

    Ned F

    February 21, 2017 at 10:32 am

    Thanks for that, I knew that Insurance companies already sell across state lines the way Blue Cross, Aetna, Humana and others sell all over the nation, but I didn’t really understand what the republican fetish of “selling across state lines” (sounds so simple) actually meant. But to do this, wouldn’t states have to relinquish their own regulatory control? What if you have a state with a large population of older, sicker and poorer citizens, would anyone really sell to them?

  5. 5.

    Roger Moore

    February 21, 2017 at 10:35 am

    Possibly stupid question: what’s in it for the state that becomes the regulator of choice? Delaware benefits because companies that incorporate there have to pay money for the privilege; South Dakota actually got banks to relocate there. Would insurance company headquarters actually have to move to Mississippi or wherever to take advantage of their regulations, or could anyone play? Because if companies don’t have to do something beneficial for the state where they’re regulated, it sounds like something the state would want to avoid: they have to pay a bunch of money for extra people to review applications but don’t get any tangible benefit for it.

  6. 6.

    David Anderson

    February 21, 2017 at 10:46 am

    @Roger Moore: 2 major benefits —
    a) Some number of jobs would be relocated there
    b) plenty of opportunity for state legislators to either personally become consultants to the insurers or recommend family/friends as consultants to insurers

  7. 7.

    tisalaska

    February 21, 2017 at 10:55 am

    Alaska has the highest healthcare costs in the country. We currently have ONE insurance provider in the state for the ACA and extremely limited options for private plans. Luckily a majority of residents are employee covered, have medicare (although its tougher and tougher to find a doctor that takes it), are covered by medicaid expansion for which our governor had to override the GOP legislature and a law suit or has federal native health benefits. Being a red state we hear the screaming of the echo chamber about selling across state lines but it’s very unlikely to help a damn thing. You can’t get anything for the same price here that you do in any other state here. Population, geography and good old american greed of the medical profession, hospitals, insurance companies will keep prices up (starting orthopedic surgeon $1.3M a year) until they break the ceiling or we get national healthcare which died the last election. Luckily climate change hasn’t melted all the ice flows to crawl on but that option will be gone soon too. I miss Obama.

  8. 8.

    FlyingToaster (Tablet)

    February 21, 2017 at 11:18 am

    @tisalaska: You’re at the end of the pipe, and not densely/heavily populated. There’s no way outside of federalism to reduce that overhead.

    I’m in Massachusetts, and we get the benefits (from Romneycare and then Obamacare) that up to now have slowed price rises and begun to drive some efficiency-based better practices. We’re still highly priced because a huge number of our physicians are medical-school affiliated (all of my family’s doctors are clinical instructors), but we reap the benefits by having fewer return visits and better chronic condition management.

    Massachusetts won’t give up our health system. We’ll spend the next four years in court.

  9. 9.

    MobiusKlein

    February 21, 2017 at 12:11 pm

    @Roger Moore: 3) cheaper to buy off one legislative body than 50?

  10. 10.

    tisalaska

    February 21, 2017 at 12:21 pm

    @FlyingToaster (Tablet): Exactly right about the population. It is the reality that we have and will for many years be dependent on the feds which makes it really annoying to hear the “federal over-reach” mantra so often. The lack of affordable health care is probably what will drive me out after more than 40 years here along with many others when the reality hits them.

  11. 11.

    jerri

    February 21, 2017 at 1:00 pm

    I worked for major corp ins co for almost 25 years. They administered ins for large corp clients with employees in multiple states. Tracking and applying the various state laws was reduced to simple programing. The reason none of the major ins co did not move into Ga or Ma….everyone who could afford ins was insurred. Ins co only operate in markets where they have developed the networks for their PPO/HMO products. Thus, the cost of developing a network was not going to generate the kind of profit they require.

  12. 12.

    laura

    February 21, 2017 at 3:52 pm

    Just my own opinion, but I have come to believe that the desire to sell across state lines was that it makes.it much easier to sell gross and inferior plans, and almost impossible for a consumer to get access to care.
    I’ve never seen any focus on venue or choice of laws and so am convinced that a consumer would have zero opportunity to effectively challenge the limitations of an out of state plan.
    I’d be very glad to be proved wrong in this assumption.

  13. 13.

    David Anderson

    February 21, 2017 at 4:00 pm

    @laura: No, you’re right. The Republican plan is to encourage a race to the bottom.

  14. 14.

    laura

    February 21, 2017 at 4:20 pm

    @David Anderson: I usually like being right. This just sucks and reinforces my belief that the desire to sell shit to people who believe they’re making an informed choice with their scarce health care dollars only to find out they’d be better off just burning that cash in the gutter makes me want to shiv a Tom McClintock.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Bill Arnold on Open Thread: Prezdint Snowflake Scampers Off to His Safe Space (Dec 5, 2019 @ 2:40pm)
  • Mousebumples on Great news with big risk adjustment challenges (Dec 5, 2019 @ 2:38pm)
  • WereBear on Watch This (Dec 5, 2019 @ 2:35pm)
  • Mary G on Watch This (Dec 5, 2019 @ 2:34pm)
  • mrmoshpotato on Watch This (Dec 5, 2019 @ 2:34pm)

Support Our Site


Shopping Amazon via this link helps Balloon Juice...a lot

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year

Featuring

John Cole
Silverman on Security
Impeachment Hearings
Anderson on Health Insurance
Dear WaterGirl

Calling All Jackals

Balloon Juice Meetups
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Site Feedback
Balloon Juice News

Johngcole avatarJohn Cole@Johngcole·
26m 1202667911820849152

Twitter feed video.
View on Twitter
Reply on Twitter 1202667911820849152Retweet on Twitter 12026679118208491528Like on Twitter 120266791182084915231Twitter 1202667911820849152
Johngcole avatarJohn Cole@Johngcole·
1h 1202652414035333120

Twitter feed video.
View on Twitter
Reply on Twitter 1202652414035333120Retweet on Twitter 12026524140353331208Like on Twitter 120265241403533312030Twitter 1202652414035333120
Johngcole avatarJohn Cole@Johngcole·
2h 1202650074586787841

New Post added at Balloon Juice - Watch This -

Balloon Juice | Watch This

Nancy usually keeps things pretty cool during her news conferences but James Rosen (a real asshole) got the full Nancy treatment this morning. Holy sh...

www.balloon-juice.com

Reply on Twitter 1202650074586787841Retweet on Twitter 1202650074586787841Like on Twitter 12026500745867878411Twitter 1202650074586787841
Johngcole avatarJohn Cole@Johngcole·
2h 1202641578436771841

New Post added at Balloon Juice - George Zimmerman Strives to Out Asshole POTUS -

Balloon Juice | George Zimmerman Strives to Out Asshole POTUS

Man, fuck this guy: George Zimmerman was acquitted in the fatal 2012 shooting of Trayvon Martin, but according to a lawsuit filed Wednesday in Florida...

www.balloon-juice.com

Reply on Twitter 1202641578436771841Retweet on Twitter 12026415784367718412Like on Twitter 12026415784367718415Twitter 1202641578436771841
Johngcole avatarJohn Cole@Johngcole·
3h 1202624134305464326

New Post added at Balloon Juice - SNAP -

Balloon Juice | SNAP Back

I grew up in a poor town next to a reservation, and I can’t tell you how many times people complained about the use of food stamps. It’s v...

www.balloon-juice.com

Reply on Twitter 1202624134305464326Retweet on Twitter 12026241343054643262Like on Twitter 12026241343054643263Twitter 1202624134305464326
Johngcole avatarJohn Cole@Johngcole·
5h 1202602949375135744

New Post added at Balloon Juice - Great news with big risk adjustment challenges -

Balloon Juice | Great news with big risk adjustment challenges

This is unabashedly good news: The FDA has approved elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor as a combination pill (marketed as Trikafta) for treatment ...

www.balloon-juice.com

Reply on Twitter 1202602949375135744Retweet on Twitter 1202602949375135744Like on Twitter 12026029493751357443Twitter 1202602949375135744
Johngcole avatarJohn Cole@Johngcole·
6h 1202587851315195906

New Post added at Balloon Juice - Speaker Pelosi's Statement -

Balloon Juice | Speaker Pelosi's Statement

Speaker Pelosi is scheduled to deliver an impeachment status update at 9 AM: Will Pelosi fast-track impeachment as expected according to the “ur...

www.balloon-juice.com

Reply on Twitter 1202587851315195906Retweet on Twitter 1202587851315195906Like on Twitter 12025878513151959062Twitter 1202587851315195906
Johngcole avatarJohn Cole@Johngcole·
6h 1202579810700156929

Stolen from someone on fb

Twitter feed video.
Image for the Tweet beginning: Stolen from someone on fb
Reply on Twitter 1202579810700156929Retweet on Twitter 12025798107001569291Like on Twitter 120257981070015692918Twitter 1202579810700156929
Johngcole avatarJohn Cole@Johngcole·
7h 1202570651736907776

I was this years old when I heard about Billie Eilish

Reply on Twitter 1202570651736907776Retweet on Twitter 12025706517369077761Like on Twitter 120257065173690777624Twitter 1202570651736907776
Johngcole avatarJohn Cole@Johngcole·
10h 1202528283776180224

New Post added at Balloon Juice - On The Road - Kelly - Bridge Over Quiet Water -https://www.balloon-juice.com/2019/12/05/on-the-road-kelly-bridge-over-quiet-water/

Twitter feed video.
Image for the Tweet beginning: New Post added at
Reply on Twitter 1202528283776180224Retweet on Twitter 1202528283776180224Like on Twitter 12025282837761802241Twitter 1202528283776180224

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2019 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!