Bob Herman is looking the slow withdrawal from the Exchanges by United Healthcare and makes a very good point about the overall book of business for UHC:
UnitedHealth Group's Q1 profit jumps 14% to $1.6 billion. Given #ACA losses, insurer must've made bank on Medicare, Medicaid, employer. $UNH
— Bob Herman (@MHbherman) April 19, 2016
One of the areas that insurers have been making good money on in the past couple of years has been on Medicaid expansion managed care.
Not all states use third party insurers to run their Medicaid programs. Some will use an insurer solely for administrative support and other states run basically their entire program in-house with state employees. However most states will use at least some Medicaid managed care companies to run at least some of their Medicaid program.
These companies get a fixed fee per covered individual per month and are told to cover them. This system works fairly well when the populations are reasonably stable and reasonably predictable. Legacy Medicaid is reasonably stable and reasonably predictable as it covers the very sick, the poor, the working poor pregnant and low income kids. When an insurer is working off of a large enough sample, the conclusions drawn from 2012 data and applied to 2013 data will be close enough.
However there has been a massive discontinuity in the data in the form of Medicaid Expansion. The population being covered by Expansion is healthier than the adult population covered by Legacy Medicaid. But the question in 2014 and 2015 when states were setting their managed care rates was by how much healthier?
No one had a great clue. So quite a few states set their per capita monthly rate fairly high with risk corridors to capture most of the overpayment.
Setting rates high made sense for state Medicaid entities for two reasons.
First, Medicaid expansion in 2014, 2015, 2016 is 100% federal money. Overspending by $30, 40, or $150 million dollars won’t get a Medicaid director hauled in front of her state Senate’s oversight committee. Instead, it pumps money into the state and builds vested constituencies that want to push for continued expansion. Risk corridors would capture most of the over-payment back over the long run and allow for a slow glide path to actuarially fair rates informed by real data.
Secondly, there was significant concern about how much catch-up care would be needed. Twenty eight months into Medicaid expansion, most of the catch-up care probably has worked its way through the system, but a high initial rate was needed to cover the probability of high catch-up care costs.
High rates with partial clawbacks meets clinical needs and it meets political needs of quite a few states with Medicaid Managed Care models. A side-effect of that is companies with significant MCO exposure should be making serious money on Medicaid for the first few years of Expansion.
Scout211
UHC was awarded a long term contract for TriCare for the western region a couple of years ago. I have often wondered if this contract was affecting their decision about withdrawing from the exchanges.
TriWest Health Alliance ran the TriCare western region for many years and was very vocal about losing the contract to UHC.
I wondered at the time why there would be so much competition for a government insurance program. Now I know.
Germy
Once a week I wander over to Kunstler’s rant to see what he has to say. This week:
Brendan in Charlotte
UHC always makes bank on employer plans. I had them at a previous job, and their rates weren’t bad. I’ve got Cigna now, and often wish I had UHC again…
dr. bloor
@Germy:
Things would be a lot simpler and cheaper if UHC could just total Grandma and send along a few thousand bucks to the family to buy a new grandma.
Yutsano
@Brendan in Charlotte: Cigna was my old insurer at my old job before the IRS and they sucked massive donkey balls. Then halfway through my tenure there we switched to a Blue and it was a night and day difference. I don’t think they’re on FEBHP in my state but the Blues in WA are a so good I’m not sure I’d switch.
Brendan in Charlotte
@Yutsano: Don’t I know it. Already hit my dental limit for the year, and my dentist wants to see me 3 more times…Gonna need to get them to dial it back to once more…It’s also no coincidence that I had UHC while I was married, and they complained because my wife and stepson (age 7 at the time), were using the insurance, like they should.
HRA
My son works for a public transportation authority in a supervisory position and funded by the state. He has Blue Cross and Blue Shield. Although it’s not the same Blue Cross and Blue Shield I had in my 1st job. They give him a card for $3,000 that can only be used at a certain time. Yes, it is not something I fully understand. He went to pick up his meds at the pharmacy and told he had to pay $700. He left them at the pharmacy. He also told me he received a bill for thousands when his daughter has surgery last year. He got that straightened out and now he has to do the same for his meds. As he was explaining these to me, I asked him if it was somehow the ACA before he told me no and stated his provider. I already have Dad here ranting each day after ACA and have kept this to myself. We are not on ACA.
Roger Moore
@Germy:
[Citation Needed]
Joel
@Germy: The problem with the “rare cancer” argument is that, even sold at cost, those drugs would be insanely expensive. That’s the problem with rare diseases. The other problem is that it’s very hard to develop drugs for common diseases.
Steeplejack (phone)
@Roger Moore:
There’s one just downstairs.
Berial
Naked Capitalism takes shots at Obama and ‘obamacare’ every chance they get. You’d almost think they preferred the ‘system’ we had before it.
Richard Mayhew
@Berial: Lambert is useless and trying to discuss anything requiring technical knowledge gets you screamed down.
lahke
Hi: sorry, I’m not tracking on why United is leaving the exchanges if they are hauling in all of this dough.
Richard Mayhew
@lahke: Their losing money in some states on Exchange but they are making money in other departments…
christopher murphy
@Roger Moore: http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-americans-with-no-emergency-savings-0108-biz-20160107-story.html
Does this fact suprise you?
Socialistfeminazi
I work for the HCE market at UHC. Today, as I have been predicting for 2 months now, they pulled us in a room and basically told us to look elsewhere for jobs, or be fired. From my tiny view, UHC did not adequately predict what would happen on the HCE. They were understaffed and continue to be so to service customers’ billing and claims, and a whole host of other issues that I really can’t go into in a public forum. Suffice to say, a glass of wine or two is probably is going to be dinner tonight.
pseudonymous in nc
It’s going to be a pain in the a-hole to have to jump through the same hoops over prior authorizations and referrals and the usual shit with a new insurer next year that we did with UHC this year — that is, if there’s any insurer in NC actually offering ACA plans.
This is what happens when private corporations who live and die by stock prices and quarterly profits dictate terms to states. If you get to make bank from Medicare and Medicaid, you should have to take your lumps and offer ACA exchange plans. Everybody knew there’d be a treatment deficit that needed to be addressed.
This does not surprise me.
Germy
@Roger Moore: Citation needed? Are you serious?