• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Shelter in place is one thing. Shelter in pants is quite another.

I’m going back to the respite thread.

Four legs? good! two legs? we’re not so sure…

Screw the Judean People’s Front. Splitters.

Good luck with your asparagus.

This is a big f—–g deal.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

Almost as fun as hiking the Appalachian Trail

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

I’m only here for the duck photos.

It’s not even safe to go out and pick up 2 days worth of poop anymore.

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

Dinky Hocker shoots smack!

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

Let there be snark.

… down to kool-aid drinkers and next of kin at the trump White House

All your base are belong to Tunch.

We need fewer warriors in public service and more gardeners.

Mobile Menu

  • Look Forward & Back
  • Balloon Juice 2021 Pet Calendar
  • Site Feedback
  • All 2020 Fundraising
  • I Voted!
  • Take Action: Things We Can Do
  • Team Claire, and Family
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • BJ PayPal Donations
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Nature & Respite
  • Information As Power
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • On The Road
  • Garden Chats
  • Nature & Respite
  • Look Forward & Back
You are here: Home / Politics / Activist Judges! / Another One-Sentence Fix Situation

Another One-Sentence Fix Situation

by Zandar|  July 6, 20159:13 am| 18 Comments

This post is in: Activist Judges!, An Unexamined Scandal, Austerity Bombing, Republican Venality, The Brown Enemy Within, Jump! You Fuckers!

Facebook0Tweet0Email0

While Europe is trying to spin giving in to Greece’s no vote on austerity as a sudden need for “humanitarian aid” and China is ordering investment firms to buy stocks to shore up its markets, here in the States we’ve got a $72 billion debt problem with Puerto Rico. Democrats in Congress say the time has come to fix 30-year old bankruptcy legislation to cover US territories and to get the island into bankruptcy courts.

Earlier this week, Puerto Rico’s governor declared that the nation’s $72 billion pile of debt was too much for it to handle. To avoid a “death spiral,” Gov. Alejandro Garcia Padilla said the commonwealth would have to break its promise to pay back some money owed.

But a quirk in the nation’s bankruptcy code is throwing Congress into the middle of the matter, as lawmakers will need to quickly pass a new law if Puerto Rico is going to gain access to the nation’s bankruptcy courts.

Puerto Rico’s nonvoting representative, Resident Commissioner Pedro Pierlusi (D) is working to build support for legislation that has simmered in Congress for months, but has taken on new urgency following the governor’s declarations.

Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) are working to build support for similar legislation in the Senate.

A 1984 update to the nation’s bankruptcy laws left Puerto Rico out of the picture, apparently by accident. Chapter 9 of the bankruptcy code gives states the power to allow agencies or municipalities to declare bankruptcy, as happened most recently in Detroit. But the law is silent on territories like Puerto Rico, leaving it on the outside looking in when it comes to public bankruptcies.

“As best we can tell, it’s a typographical error in the bankruptcy code,” said John Pottow, a bankruptcy expert and legal professor at the University of Michigan. “It should be noncontroversial.”

Hmm, where have we heard that before?

Oh yes, Republicans literally made a Supreme Court case out of the last typographical error in the law they could have fixed with one sentence. Of course, there’s two differences this time: one, the GOP just lost that Supreme court case, and two, the people affected by this fix won’t be those people getting evil socialist health insurance, but the island’s creditors in the banking community.  Somebody’s got to make money off this mess, and given the sums involved, it sure as hell isn’t going to be the people of Puerto Rico.

Somehow I’m betting that this one-sentence fix gets passed pretty quickly as a result.

Facebook0Tweet0Email0
Previous Post: « Cash flow of rejecting free money
Next Post: It’s got a groove, it’s got a meaning »

Reader Interactions

18Comments

  1. 1.

    Belafon

    July 6, 2015 at 9:21 am

    Only if Obama comes out against it.

    You seem to be under the misguided belief that Republicans are operating under some rule other than Cleek’s law.

  2. 2.

    OzarkHillbilly

    July 6, 2015 at 9:25 am

    Earlier this week, Puerto Rico’s governor declared that the nation’s $72 billion pile of debt….

    Huh? When did they declare independence? A clearer indictment of today’s media I have never read. I don’t think even FOX News reported on that.

  3. 3.

    Amir Khalid

    July 6, 2015 at 9:28 am

    @OzarkHillbilly:
    I blame the firing of the copy editors.

  4. 4.

    Frankensteinbeck

    July 6, 2015 at 10:01 am

    the people affected by this fix won’t be those people

    Puerto Ricans are definitely ‘those people.’ Only the most informed conservatives will see this as anything but bailing out lazy brown people.

  5. 5.

    Grumpy Code Monkey

    July 6, 2015 at 10:15 am

    Somehow I’m betting that this one-sentence fix gets passed pretty quickly as a result.

    Zandar, you’re such a cynic.

  6. 6.

    boatboy_srq

    July 6, 2015 at 10:41 am

    @OzarkHillbilly: @Amir Khalid: I blame the shredding of education budgets and over-reliance on Texas-Board-of-Education-approved textbooks.

  7. 7.

    boatboy_srq

    July 6, 2015 at 10:43 am

    @Frankensteinbeck: I’d actually watch for some wingnut pundit to suggest selling PR back to Spain to settle the debt – assuming Spain either wants it or has the euros to buy it back. Assuming of course the wingnutosphere is educated enough to want to “sell it back” to Spain and not to Mexico…

  8. 8.

    Lizzy L

    July 6, 2015 at 11:02 am

    What Belafon said. There will be no fix if the Republicans decide that not fixing this will embarrass, inconvenience, or otherwise cause problems for the Obama administration. Or they may just not fix it because brown people, or because not fixing it will piss liberals off.

  9. 9.

    nanute

    July 6, 2015 at 11:15 am

    So what, if anything, has Puerto Rico pledged as collateral for the debt? If there’s no collateral what leverage do the creditors have? I am guessing future tax revenue is the source of collateral. If Puerto Rico says we ain’t paying, then what happens?

  10. 10.

    Lee

    July 6, 2015 at 11:28 am

    I might be misremembering but wasn’t there an article about how all of this in PR is self inflicted?

    They went full Austrian and SURPRISE it didn’t work.

  11. 11.

    KG

    July 6, 2015 at 11:36 am

    um, technically, since Puerto Rico is a territory and (again, technically) under the control of the federal government, their debt is our debt. what confuses people (like calling Puerto Rico a country) is that they have relative autonomy for a territory and rather than the president appointing a governor, we’ve delegated day to day governing to the locals so it runs more like a state than a traditional territory.

    Personally, I’m for statehood, the feds can absorb some of the debt as part of the statehood process (the statehood bill could also include something to cover restructuring the outstanding debt). the question is whether there is enough support for statehood in PR.

  12. 12.

    Origuy

    July 6, 2015 at 11:44 am

    In the referendum held in 2012, the vote for statehood won. Congress was supposed to act; unsurprisingly, they haven’t.

  13. 13.

    srv

    July 6, 2015 at 11:56 am

    Why not give them independence and let them join the EU? Then it’s not our problem.

  14. 14.

    NonyNony

    July 6, 2015 at 12:47 pm

    @Origuy:

    Congress was supposed to act; unsurprisingly, they haven’t.

    Puerto Rico would quite likely be a reliable Democratic state in presidential elections and would quite likely send two more Democratic Senators into the US Senate. They’d also get a number of House seats which, given how the House is apportioned, would be taken from other states (the size of the House is fixed by law, so delegates would need to be shuffled around to account for the new state), so it’s unclear what the impact on the House would be as it would depend on how the apportionment shuffled around to account for the extra 3.5 million voters.

    But yeah – there’s no upside for Republicans to admit another state into the country unless there’s another territory to admit that would be reliably conservative. Since there are no territories with a population of 3.5 million old white Fox News viewers asking for statehood, I suspect Puerto Rico is stuck until the Dems control the House and Senate again (and likely until either the filibuster is eliminated or the Senate has 60 Dems in it as well).

  15. 15.

    Arclite

    July 6, 2015 at 1:09 pm

    the people affected by this fix won’t be those people getting evil socialist health insurance, but the island’s creditors in the banking community.

    True, but remember that they reflexively oppose anything that helps the browns.

  16. 16.

    Matt McIrvin

    July 6, 2015 at 2:26 pm

    @Origuy: Whether statehood won is open to debate. Separating “should the status quo continue” and “which is the best non-territorial option” into two questions had the neat effect of making it appear as if statehood had majority support, which, my understanding is, it doesn’t: if, for instance, you offer a three-way choice between the status quo, independence, and statehood, the status quo has usually won a narrow plurality.

  17. 17.

    Matt McIrvin

    July 6, 2015 at 2:33 pm

    …However, it does look to me as if support for Puerto Rican statehood is increasing, and may have an absolute majority soon.

    It’d be an interesting state: not as small as you’d think, for one thing (it’s larger in population than many existing US states; in both population and area, it’s about the size of Connecticut and would have about the same number of representatives in Congress and electoral votes).

    Per capita, it would be the poorest US state by a considerable margin, though I suppose statehood might change that. In the short term, adding the requirement for its citizens to pay federal income tax would be a hit to the economy, though many would not make enough money to qualify.

  18. 18.

    OnkelFritze

    July 6, 2015 at 3:10 pm

    While Europe is trying to spin giving in to Greece’s no vote on austerity as a sudden need for “humanitarian aid”

    You’ve got that all wrong. While austerity has been harsh on the Greeks (and not necessarily the best policy, I agree with that) the Greeks did get emergency funds with which they were able to pay pensions and wages amongst other things. Europe did keep them afloat, albeit at a very low level. After the referendum there is a real danger that this stops altogether. Then they will actually need humanitarian aid, as in food and medication, or people will literally starve. That is a whole lot different from what’s happened before.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Biden-Harris Inauguration

Biden-Harris Inauguration Website

Official events – watch at top link

Kakistocracy
I believe In My Fellow Americans
Defeat Them
Turning Bystanders Into Activists
First Up, COVID

Do Something!

Call Your Senators & Representatives
Directory of US Senators
Directory of US Representatives
Letter to Elected Officials – Albatrossity
Letter to Elected Officials – Martin

I Got the Shot!

🎈Ways to Support Our Site

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal
Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice ⬇  

Recent Comments

  • Betty Cracker on Thursday Morning Open Thread: What A Difference A Day Makes (Jan 21, 2021 @ 6:45am)
  • OzarkHillbilly on Thursday Morning Open Thread: What A Difference A Day Makes (Jan 21, 2021 @ 6:43am)
  • NotMax on Thursday Morning Open Thread: What A Difference A Day Makes (Jan 21, 2021 @ 6:37am)
  • SiubhanDuinne on Thursday Morning Open Thread: What A Difference A Day Makes (Jan 21, 2021 @ 6:34am)
  • Cermet on Thursday Morning Open Thread: What A Difference A Day Makes (Jan 21, 2021 @ 6:32am)

Team Claire, and Family

Help for David’s Niece Claire
Claire Updates
Claire update for the holidays 12/23

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year

Featuring

John Cole
Silverman on Security
COVID-19 Coronavirus
Medium Cool with BGinCHI
Information Is Power

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Submit Photos to On the Road
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Meetups: Proof of Life
2021 Pets of Balloon Juice Calendar

Culture: Books, Film, TV, Music, Games, Podcasts

Noir: Favorites in Film, Books, TV
Book Recommendations & Indy Recs
Mystery Recommendations
Medium Cool: What If (Books & Films)
Netflix Favorites
Amazon Prime Favorites
Netflix Suggestions in July
Fun Music Thread
Longmire & Netflix Suggestions
Medium Cool: Places!
Medium Cool: Games!
Medium Cool: Watch or Read Again

Twitter

John Cole’s Twitter

[custom-twitter-feeds]

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!