• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Screw the Judean People’s Front. Splitters.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

A last alliance of elves and men. also pet photos.

We still have time to mess this up!

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

No one could have predicted…

Mission Accomplished!

This is how realignments happen…

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

Reality always wins in the end.

Shelter in place is one thing. Shelter in pants is quite another.

Good luck with your asparagus.

Where tasty lettuce and good mustard aren’t elitist.

Gastritis broke my calculator.

Trump is going to draw a dick on that dog with a sharpie, isn’t he?

Today in our ongoing national embarrassment…

Militantly superior in their own minds…

I did not have this on my fuck 2020 bingo card.

I can’t take this shit today. I just can’t.

This blog is Obama’s Katrina.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

… down to kool-aid drinkers and next of kin at the trump White House

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

Shock troops for the Unitarian Jihad.

Mobile Menu

  • Look Forward & Back
  • Balloon Juice 2021 Pet Calendar
  • Site Feedback
  • All 2020 Fundraising
  • I Voted!
  • Take Action: Things We Can Do
  • Team Claire, and Family
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • BJ PayPal Donations
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Nature & Respite
  • Information As Power
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • On The Road
  • Garden Chats
  • Nature & Respite
  • Look Forward & Back
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Wyden waivers and the CBO scores

Wyden waivers and the CBO scores

by David Anderson|  March 13, 20157:18 am| 7 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance, The Failed Obama Administration (Only Took Two Weeks)

Facebook0Tweet0Email0

The Wyden Waiver (Section 1332 of PPACA) is an extremely interesting dare built into the Affordable Care Act that if the Republican Party was interested in policy, we should be hearing a lot about early prep work.  The dare is simple:

If a state can do as well or better in providing as good coverage to as many people at the same or lower cost as provided through the Exchanges but can do so in a different model, they can build out an Obamacare alternative effective 1/1/17.

The feds would kick in the entire expected sum of premium subsidies, cost sharing assistance subsidies and small business subsidies to the state.  The state could tweak benefit packages, get rid of the mandates, change essential health benefits and pay for those changes with the federal block grant.  Vermont had planned on a Wyden Waiver for its single payer plan that fell apart on the issue of transition costs.

The big constraints on a Wyden Waiver is that it had to be deficit neutral for the federal government and it had to be as good or better than the current Exchange model.

When PPACA was first scored by the CBO (March 20, 2010 report, Table 3), the CBO expected the Exchange and small business tax credits to cost $78 billion dollars in 2017.  That estimate has been steadily decreasing.  Now, the March 2015 baseline has an estimate of $73 billion dollars for direct coverage expansion costs on the Exchange.  Premium costs are still growing slower than expected and the CBO is starting to model that there has been a real and sustained slow down in medical inflation that is somewhat disconected from general economic conditions.

Innovating programs that can do the better with the same level of resources are far easier to pull off when the budget is fat.  My question is what does the declining net cost of coverage expansion through both lower unit cost and higher employer sponsored insurance uptake do to the feasibility of states that want to go the Wyden Waiver route?  A cheaper PPACA means the success zone’s lower boundary got higher and the entire zone got narrower.

 

Facebook0Tweet0Email0
Previous Post: « BuzzFeed Exploits Unsuspecting Cats for Political Propaganda Purposes
Next Post: I Woke Up Alarmed »

Reader Interactions

7Comments

  1. 1.

    Baud

    March 13, 2015 at 7:29 am

    Expect the waiver to be broadly interpreted beyond all recognition if the GOP wins the White House next year.

    Oh, and all those concerns about executive branch lawmaking to evaporate as quickly as deficit concerns.

  2. 2.

    WereBear

    March 13, 2015 at 7:45 am

    I recently read a book that was published a few years back. It described the then-current pitiful state of our health care system, and the last chapter outlined all the things that needed to be done to turn it around.

    I was thrilled to note that ACA hit almost all of them. That President Obama! He knows how to write legislation too, I suspect.

  3. 3.

    MomSense

    March 13, 2015 at 8:18 am

    if the Republican Party was interested in policy,

    Ha.

  4. 4.

    Jinchi

    March 13, 2015 at 8:59 am

    Keep in mind that the Republicans just replaced the head of the CBO with Keith Hall, chief economist for the White House Council of Economic Advisers under George W Bush. They did it, in part, because they didn’t like how the CBO scored the health care law.

    Republicans were frustrated by some of the CBO’s analyses of the Affordable Care Act. The agency could play a key role in scoring Republican Obamacare replacement plans, such as the blueprint put forward by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and two other GOP legislators.

    http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20150227/NEWS/150229910

  5. 5.

    Tom Levenson

    March 13, 2015 at 9:43 am

    Just a bit off topic: What drives me utterly crazy about elite media right now is the way the GOP gets away with hammering the mantra of Obamacare’s failure. Every single time one of those folks say that, it’s the job of a journalist to press home on the claim. They don’t. Ever…and hence the implications of what Richard’s saying never reach the world of off-K St. political discourse.

  6. 6.

    WaterGirl

    March 13, 2015 at 10:53 am

    I thought this was going to be an action post.

    Wyden waivers and the CBO scores

    I read “waivers” and “scores” as verbs.

  7. 7.

    benw

    March 13, 2015 at 2:23 pm

    Richard, thanks again for some expert level posting. It seems to me that the Wyden waivers are a good thing for those of who support a more progressive health care system in the US, as long as the Federal exchanges will always remain in place as a backstop. Most states that are resisting the PPACA are doing to basic things: declining the Medicare expansion thanks to the Supreme Court ruling, and refusing to set up their own exchanges. So the Federal exchanges serve the people in those states.

    If Republicans win the Presidency and maintain control of Congress in 2016, they can try to change Federal law to interpret “good coverage” broadly enough to allow states with working exchanges to eliminate them via a Wyden waiver with nothing to really replace them. But this will simply push people onto the Federal exchanges. And in order to get into the narrower zone of the cheaper ACA, states will have to be more aggressive with plans like single-payer to be better than the exchanges.

    So the pressure provided by the waivers seems to push toward more progressive health care legislation at the state level. I didn’t know that VT’s plan failed the waiver; that’s too bad because the VT plan seems perfect for the Wyden waiver test. What would be really disastrous in the current system is for a Republican government to eliminate the Federal exchanges.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Biden-Harris Inauguration

Biden-Harris Inauguration Website

Official events – watch at top link

Kakistocracy
I believe In My Fellow Americans
Defeat Them
Turning Bystanders Into Activists
First Up, COVID

Do Something!

Call Your Senators & Representatives
Directory of US Senators
Directory of US Representatives
Letter to Elected Officials – Albatrossity
Letter to Elected Officials – Martin

I Got the Shot!

🎈Ways to Support Our Site

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal
Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice ⬇  

Recent Comments

  • Kent on Here Comes The Sun (Jan 21, 2021 @ 2:21am)
  • Kent on Here Comes The Sun (Jan 21, 2021 @ 2:10am)
  • VOR on Here Comes The Sun (Jan 21, 2021 @ 2:07am)
  • Brachiator on Here Comes The Sun (Jan 21, 2021 @ 2:05am)
  • Kent on Here Comes The Sun (Jan 21, 2021 @ 1:45am)

Team Claire, and Family

Help for David’s Niece Claire
Claire Updates
Claire update for the holidays 12/23

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year

Featuring

John Cole
Silverman on Security
COVID-19 Coronavirus
Medium Cool with BGinCHI
Information Is Power

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Submit Photos to On the Road
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Meetups: Proof of Life
2021 Pets of Balloon Juice Calendar

Culture: Books, Film, TV, Music, Games, Podcasts

Noir: Favorites in Film, Books, TV
Book Recommendations & Indy Recs
Mystery Recommendations
Medium Cool: What If (Books & Films)
Netflix Favorites
Amazon Prime Favorites
Netflix Suggestions in July
Fun Music Thread
Longmire & Netflix Suggestions
Medium Cool: Places!
Medium Cool: Games!
Medium Cool: Watch or Read Again

Twitter

John Cole’s Twitter

[custom-twitter-feeds]

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!