NEW: DOJ discloses in court filing in @vicenews #FOIA case that Senate/CIA rpt w/be released "early next week." https://t.co/PWN9fC7Vid
— Jason Leopold (@JasonLeopold) December 4, 2014
Look back, not forward!… because you know what they say about those who don’t learn from the past. From the Vice link:
The Department of Justice (DOJ) provided the first official confirmation on Thursday that a long-awaited report prepared by the Senate Intelligence Committee on the CIA’s enhanced interrogation program will be released “early next week.”…
At Bloomberg View, Josh Rogin and Eli Lake have more detail on “the Battle Over the CIA Torture Report“.
At The Intercept, Dan Froomkin (whose skeptical Washington Post column got me through Dubya’s first term), shares “12 Things to Keep in Mind When You Read the Torture Report“:
… The report, a review of brutal CIA interrogation methods during the presidency of George W. Bush, has been the subject of a contentious back-and-forth, with U.S. intelligence agencies and the White House on one side pushing for mass redactions in the name of national security and committee staffers on the other arguing that the proposed redactions render the report unintelligible.
Should something emerge, here are some important caveats to keep in mind:
1) You’re not actually reading the torture report. You’re just reading an executive summary. The full Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report on the CIA’s interrogation and detention program runs upward of 6,000 pages. The executive summary is 480 pages. So you’re missing more than 80 percent of it.
2) The CIA got to cut out parts. The summary has been redacted – ostensibly by the White House, but in practice by officials of the CIA…
4) The investigation was extremely narrow in its focus. Committee staffers only looked at what the CIA did in its black sites; whether it misled other officials; and whether it complied with orders. That is somewhat like investigating whether a hit man did the job efficiently and cleaned up nicely.
5) The investigation didn’t examine who gave the CIA its orders, or why. The summary doesn’t assess who told the CIA to torture…
6) Torture was hardly limited to the CIA. In fact, the worst of it was done by the military….
Just before Thanksgiving, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s former lawyer, Jason D. Wright, told Politico “America Tortured—And We Need to Shed Some Light on It“:
… This report, set to be accompanied by a CIA response and review by former CIA Director Leon Panetta, is the backdrop for President Obama’s admission at a White House news conference in August: “We tortured some folks.”
Let’s be clear: President Obama is wrong on one point. There’s no collective “we” here. The American people did not torture these folks. The sin of torture is on the hands of those who directed the torture, those who contorted the law to justify the torture, those who applied the torture—and those who have attempted to cover-up the torture…
We, the American people, must not commit the sin of silence. We need a public debate about the American torture policy. We need this debate to obtain some measure of governmental accountability and ensure that we never repeat these mistakes again. We also need this debate to demonstrate to the world that the United States of America can once again be the shining beacon on the hill, that principle is more important than politics, and that the rule of law is greater than the rule of men…
There’s one more slim chance that we non-VIPs might get access to the full report:
… In his first interview since Election Day, Udall told The Denver Post that he would “keep all options on the table” — including a rarely used right given to federal lawmakers — to publicize a secret report about the harsh interrogation techniques used by CIA agents in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks…
“Transparency and disclosure are critical to the work of the Senate intelligence committee and our democracy, so I’m going to keep all options on the table to ensure the truth comes out,” Udall said.
That includes a little-used privilege of the U.S. Constitution called the “Speech or Debate Clause,” which has been suggested by civil libertarians to shake loose the information.
“I mean, I’m going to keep all options on the table,” said Udall when asked specifically about that method.
As written, the Speech or Debate Clause gives lawmakers near-blanket immunity from prosecution when speaking on the floor of the U.S. House or Senate — even if they reveal classified information.
The most famous example of its use came in the early 1970s when then-U.S. Sen. Mike Gravel of Alaska wielded its power to force the Pentagon Papers into the congressional record, an effort that supplemented reporting by The New York Times on the secret Vietnam War documents.
Reached by phone, Gravel urged Udall to chart a similar course…
That was in mid-November, but as of yesterday, Udall hadn’t publicly rejected the idea.
Omnes Omnibus
I hope Udall does it.
J
@Omnes Omnibus: Ditto!
the Conster
@Omnes Omnibus:
If he doesn’t there’s really no hope that anyone else will. Hillary won’t. Whatever is left of American democracy hinges on a small handful of jurists and legislators doing the right thing. It’s officially scary.
Omnes Omnibus
@the Conster:
All progress has always depended on a handful of people doing the decent thing. We have always been on a knife’s edge in some way or another. It is an integral part of the human condition. Recognizing this is one of the reasons I don’t fall into the the doom and gloom that can be a pandemic here.
the Conster
@Omnes Omnibus:
That’s the “great man” theory of history which I’ve never really subscribed to. But now, look around.
Omnes Omnibus
@the Conster: No, it isn’t the great man theory of history. The handful of people can be “nobodies” whose names are unknown.
gratuitous
How do you want to be remembered, Sen. Udall? Dozens of Senators leave that body leaving less of a trace than an ax cleaving water. Think Jesse Helms or Strom Thurmond or Bob Packwood. In their day, they were each considered giants of the body, but what are any of them remembered for now?
Think about it, Sen. Udall.
Yatsuno
@Omnes Omnibus: He’s not coming back in January. He has nothing to lose here. I hope he pulls the trigger & uses this as his last speech as a Senator. And the people of Colorado realise their complete idiocy for not re-electing him.
balconesfault
Let’s be clear: President Obama is wrong on one point. There’s no collective “we” here. The American people did not torture these folks. The sin of torture is on the hands of those who directed the torture, those who contorted the law to justify the torture, those who applied the torture—and those who have attempted to cover-up the torture…
Can we extend the “we” to everyone who voted for Bush/Cheney in 2004, by which time one had to be actively engaging in self-delusion to believe that the Administration wasn’t directing torture to take place?
mclaren
Here’s a sneak preview of the CIA torture report:
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Mistakes were made.
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Villago Delenda Est
We KNOW who did this.
The Dark Lord.
Who should be publically executed for his crime.
Mainly because the vile creature knows no remorse for these unspeakable acts.
mclaren
@the Conster:
There, fixed that for you.
mclaren
Oh?
Really?
Mike G
In other words, this will be like a police department “investigation” into whether one of its cops broke the law.
The Predator State really has nothing but contempt for us.
the Conster
@Mike G:
Udall hasn’t rejected the idea of releasing the report which I guess is what’s passing for courage now. [[spit]]
It really is time to burn a lot of shit down.
gmann
Important caveat #3 was so bad they don’t even mention it
Tree With Water
Open Letter To Senator Udall:
Eli Walli (aka Tuco) to Victim: “When you’re going to shoot, shoot”.
I don’t give a damn about you pondering your “options”, or any other such theatrics.. Just release the report, Mr. Udall, in its entirety. You’d be surprised how many Americans could handle it. Why, the sun might even rise the day after you do. So quit mucking about, pull the trigger, and do it. The American people are owed the truth of what was done in our name. It’s the least you can do for us now.
C.V. Danes
@Omnes Omnibus:
Well said. But note this works for the reverse, too. All “non-progress” has always depended on a handful of people doing the not decent thing. The vast majority of people are just along for the ride, one way or another.
kindness
Udall needs to do this. He lost but we didn’t. Read the report. Let the world know who ordered the torture and let the Times/Fox/wingnuts heads explode.
It’ll be a good step forward for this nation.
Howard Beale IV
@kindness: The CIA report needs to be read into the Congressional record with no redactions at all. Let the chips fall where they may-including any current/former back bag tam members.
Perhaps Udall needs to see the Star Trek: Deep Space 9 episode “In The Pale Moonlight”. and remember a prescient quote:
And what was it that Garak said?