So earlier today, I took to twitter to taunt Glenn Kessler for his idiotic assertion that the SEC documents are somehow less relevant because a former Democratic SEC member discussed them, and this is what happened:
Got it? He attacked the GOP earlier, so when he puts the finger on the scale to ignore the SEC documents, it’s just an example of him being “nonpartisan.” When numerous people pointed out to our brave fact checker that the source of a fact doesn’t change whether something is factual or not, our super genius doubled down:
You see- for “nonpartisans,” the SEC filings would magically become more truthy if a GOP SEC commissioner discussed them.
Is it not now clear to everyone, even maybe Fred Hiatt, that the Washington Post fact checker couldn’t pass an undergraduate introductory course on logic?