• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

There will be lawyers.

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

Fuck if i know. i just get yelled at when i try it.

An almost top 10,000 blog!

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

False Scribes! False Scribes!

‘Forty-two’ said Deep Thought, with infinite majesty and calm.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Deploy the moving finger of emphasisity!

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

There’s some extremely good trouble headed their way.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

My years-long effort to drive family and friends away has really paid off this year.

People are complicated. Love is not.

I swear, each month of 2020 will have its own history degree.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Historically it was a little unusual for the president to be an incoherent babbling moron.

I did not have this on my fuck 2020 bingo card.

Mobile Menu

  • Look Forward & Back
  • Balloon Juice 2021 Pet Calendar
  • Site Feedback
  • All 2020 Fundraising
  • I Voted!
  • Take Action: Things We Can Do
  • Team Claire, and Family
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • BJ PayPal Donations
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Nature & Respite
  • Information As Power
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • On The Road
  • Garden Chats
  • Nature & Respite
  • Look Forward & Back
You are here: Home / The Golden Mean in a Pair of Florsheims

The Golden Mean in a Pair of Florsheims

by Four Seasons Total Landscaping mistermix|  June 12, 20126:54 am| 50 Comments

This post is in: Both Sides Do It!, DC Press Corpse

Facebook0Tweet0Email0

Angus King gets a warm front-page DC tonguebath in today’s Post:

PORTLAND, Maine — Angus King, a popular former Maine governor and the favorite to become the state’s next U.S. senator, thinks the way to win an election in 2012 is to stake out the middle ground, crusade against partisanship and present himself as a devout independent.

It is a bold strategy in this hyperpartisan age, and the depths of his moderation are captured by two photographs positioned side by side at his campaign headquarters: one of Ronald Reagan, the other of Robert F. Kennedy.

King’s moderation is so “deep” that he has a dog and a cat, he’s a fan of the Red Sox and the Yankees, and he’ll be changing his name to “August Mid-Level-Manager” once the election is over. He will truly be every man and woman after his post-election vaginaplasty makes him our first hermaphrodite Senator. Just don’t ask this motherfucker how he’s going to vote:

With the balance of power in the Senate decided by a close margin, King’s unwillingness to commit to one side or the other has scrambled the calculus in Washington and brought him a lot of attention.

Facebook0Tweet0Email0
Previous Post: « Dem a loot, dem a shoot, dem a wail
Next Post: Google Blew It »

Reader Interactions

50Comments

  1. 1.

    donovong

    June 12, 2012 at 6:59 am

    He is obviously non-partisan. Which simply means he will sell his vote to the highest bidder.

  2. 2.

    JPL

    June 12, 2012 at 7:02 am

    @donovong: That was my thought also. Show me the money!

  3. 3.

    Baud

    June 12, 2012 at 7:09 am

    WaPo sucks, but we need King to win.

  4. 4.

    owlbear1

    June 12, 2012 at 7:16 am

    I’m sure once Fox finishes hacking his phone we’ll know more.

  5. 5.

    Waynski

    June 12, 2012 at 7:19 am

    It’s frustrating, but it behooves Senators from states with small electoral votes to be fence sitters, unless you’re from a state that insists on voting against it’s own interests (i.e., almost every Southern state, Kansas, etc.). Republicans don’t put up with that crap. They let Olympia Snowe play footsie with the Dems long enough get what they wnated and then she’d vote against us, every time. They’d better remember that.

  6. 6.

    Anya

    June 12, 2012 at 7:20 am

    I think he’ll caucus with the Dems. He said as much to Tweety. When tweety tried to press him to state that he will not ally with any party, he said that will make him ineffective. I think he’s reasonable and he will be much better than the senator from West Virginia.

  7. 7.

    c u n d gulag

    June 12, 2012 at 7:21 am

    Oh, goody!

    Now Joe Manchin will have someone to him help sharpen the Democrat back-stabbing knives.

  8. 8.

    Zandar

    June 12, 2012 at 7:28 am

    Maverick!

  9. 9.

    Ken B.

    June 12, 2012 at 7:39 am

    King supports Obama in 2012, Bush in 2000.

  10. 10.

    Ben Cisco

    June 12, 2012 at 7:41 am

    @Anya: That’s no low bar, that’s a sewer pipe.

    Besides, in a tight economy one looks for grift patronage tribute income where one can. That latinum ain’t gonna earn itself, you know.

  11. 11.

    MattF

    June 12, 2012 at 7:44 am

    I’m on the “It’s called ‘politics’, son,” side on this one. King is, in fact, a moderate. He is, in fact, from a small state. Positive coverage from national media is to his advantage. He’d be an idiot not to court attention from the Post. The fair question to ask now is what the Dems should do.

  12. 12.

    Baud

    June 12, 2012 at 7:48 am

    @MattF:

    The fair question to ask now is what the Dems should do.

    Many of the Dem front-runners in Maine declined to run once King got in because of concerns about splitting the vote. That’s how they ended up with their current tea party governor. Last I heard, King was really popular in Maine.

  13. 13.

    Groucho48

    June 12, 2012 at 7:57 am

    Guess we can pencil him in to the Evan Bayh slot.

  14. 14.

    mistermix

    June 12, 2012 at 7:57 am

    @MattF: I think King is shrewd to do what he did, it’s the Post’s kissing up to King that turned my stomach.

  15. 15.

    Linda Featheringill

    June 12, 2012 at 8:01 am

    OT:

    WaPo is crying [chortling?] over Obama’s terrible month. I don’t think it’s been that bad.

    The economy is big and bad and we don’t know what Europe is going to do. On the other hand, 2% growth is a lot better than 2% contraction, like SOME countries I could mention. Besides, Obama has Krugman on his side.

    Nobody says all the right things all the time. That’s not always politically fatal. Look at Bush.

    Administrations are large, complex beasts. Good happens and bad happens. The current administration is pretty scandal free. Little storms will come and go and people will just move on.

    And on and on. No, I cannot yet assess the affect of Wisconsin, but I don’t believe anyone else can, either. And there’s some other stuff that I’m not sure about but the entire WaPo staff is not omniscient, either.

    Perhaps all the noise at WaPo is just wish fulfillment.

  16. 16.

    Raven

    June 12, 2012 at 8:05 am

    @Linda Featheringill:

    h
    o
    r
    s
    e

    r
    a
    c
    e

  17. 17.

    MattF

    June 12, 2012 at 8:09 am

    @Linda Featheringill: It’s irritating, but they have to put words in all the political news columns. Otherwise they’d have to run a “Romney Lies” headline every day, and that would be impolite.

  18. 18.

    Linda Featheringill

    June 12, 2012 at 8:09 am

    @Raven:

    You’re probably right.

  19. 19.

    JPL

    June 12, 2012 at 8:19 am

    @Linda Featheringill: How much coverage will the Post give if Gabby’s seat remains in democratic hands? hmmm

  20. 20.

    Lurking Canadian

    June 12, 2012 at 8:19 am

    “Principled centrists” always vote with te GOP. They just agonize over it first.

  21. 21.

    keestadoll

    June 12, 2012 at 8:50 am

    King’s moderation is so “deep” that he has a dog and a cat, he’s a fan of the Red Sox and the Yankees, and he’ll be changing his name to “August Mid-Level-Manager” once the election is over. He will truly be every man and woman after his post-election vaginaplasty makes him our first hermaphrodite Senator. Just don’t ask this motherfucker how he’s going to vote

    Nice!

  22. 22.

    SteveM

    June 12, 2012 at 8:57 am

    This is why I never laughed at Americans Elect — if AE had managed to come up with a plausible candidate, he’d be getting tongued even harder right now by the press. If AE announced today, “Fuck our stupid process, we’re declaring Jeb Bush our candidate by fiat,” he’d be in a horserace with Romney and Obama by the 4th of July, just for all the adoring press he’d be getting, even if (or perhaps because) he’s a wingnut in centrist clothing.

  23. 23.

    Booger

    June 12, 2012 at 9:08 am

    Angus King is like a 40 degree day…

  24. 24.

    Horrendo Slapp (formerly Jimperson Zibb, Duncan Dönitz, Otto Graf von Pfmidtnöchtler-Pízsmőgy, Mumphrey, et al.)

    June 12, 2012 at 9:10 am

    It is a bold strategy in this hyperpartisan age…

    What really irks me isn’t King, or King’s politics (he’s better than Snowe, but worse than a real Democrat would be, but as long as he’s running we’re stuck with him), it’s that some asshole got paid for writing the sentence above.

  25. 25.

    redshirt

    June 12, 2012 at 9:10 am

    King’s great, and will be better than many of you think. Closer to Bernie Sanders than Manchin.

  26. 26.

    kd bart

    June 12, 2012 at 9:23 am

    He’s Tom Friedman’s Dream Senator

  27. 27.

    handsmile

    June 12, 2012 at 9:27 am

    @redshirt:

    Good to have input from an actual Mainer, who has knowledge of King’s actions as Governor and his post-gubernatorial career. From what I understand, the state Democratic party was satisfied with King’s bona fides in the scramble for a candidate following Olympia Snowe’s resignation announcement.

    As to the House elections, are Democrats Chellie Pingree and Michael Michaud comfortable in their reelection bids or is the GOP/Tea Party brewing up some knuckle-dragger who could plausibly put that in jeopardy?

  28. 28.

    Patricia Kayden

    June 12, 2012 at 9:30 am

    “King’s moderation is so “deep” that he has a dog and a cat”

    Now that’s hilarious!

  29. 29.

    Davis X. Machina

    June 12, 2012 at 9:32 am

    @redshirt:

    Closer to Bernie Sanders than Manchin.

    The hell he is. Only true in the sense that a ham sandwich is closer to Bernie Sanders than Joe Manchin.

    Resolutely pro-business, if not quite in a Baldwin-Felts kind of way. A kinder, gentler enemy than Walker of public employee unions.

    A paid-up member of the panacaea of the month club, especially in education — the Maine one-kid-one-laptop initiative is one of his signal accomplishments as governor.

    He even has Tom Friedman’s moustache. Have you ever seen them together in a photograph?

    Two men, one moustache.

  30. 30.

    Davis X. Machina

    June 12, 2012 at 9:40 am

    @Davis X. Machina: I blew my link…. Try here, from Digby.

  31. 31.

    redshirt

    June 12, 2012 at 9:40 am

    @Davis X. Machina: I only meant the reference in regards his “Independent” candidacy. He’s going to be a better, more reliable Democratic vote than Manchin is.

  32. 32.

    handsmile

    June 12, 2012 at 9:48 am

    Davis X. Machina:

    I was hoping you would weigh in on this subject, as the other resident Mainer hereabouts (at least that I’m aware of.)

    Setting aside the matter of cold cuts, if Sanders and Manchin represent the polar opposites of Democratic (or Democratic-caucusing) Senators, where would you place King on that continuum? There is no shortage of “pro-business” Democrats in the Senate.

    And if you’d care to reply, any answer to my question to redshirt re House elections?

  33. 33.

    redshirt

    June 12, 2012 at 9:55 am

    @handsmile: I believe both congressional Dems are comfortably in the lead. But I have not been able to find any polling to back that up.

  34. 34.

    The Republic of Stupidity

    June 12, 2012 at 9:55 am

    King’s unwillingness to commit to one side or the other has scrambled the calculus in Washington and brought him a lot of attention.

    Sounds like the 2nd coming of Joe Lieberman to me…

  35. 35.

    SteveM

    June 12, 2012 at 10:03 am

    @Davis X. Machina:

    Two men, one moustache.

    Ewww. Some mental images you can’t unsee.

  36. 36.

    Davis X. Machina

    June 12, 2012 at 10:08 am

    Re the House, Pingree wins in a walk.

    Michaud gets a scare — everything comes late to this state, we had the ’70’s in the ’80s and the Tea Party is still strong-ish. Michaud’s ties to the unions — he’s still paying dues as a paper-mill worker, so far as I know — plays right into one of the Tea Party’s bugaboos.

    King will be good on every non-economic issue. And terrible on all the others.

    Social Security and Medicare are financial disasters. Everybody knows it’s coming and instead of preparing for it, saving, putting money aside, we’re building up enormous deficits and doing things like fighting wars that we’re not paying for. You know, they talk about the greatest generation?

    Sen. Tom Friedman.

  37. 37.

    Bulworth

    June 12, 2012 at 10:39 am

    It is a bold strategy in this hyperpartisan age

    Bold!

  38. 38.

    Mnemosyne

    June 12, 2012 at 10:48 am

    @Davis X. Machina:

    I dunno, that sounds like the kind of thing that every Democrat (myself included) was saying from 2003 on — why are we wasting money on these stupid wars in Iraq and Afghanistan when we need it for programs here at home?

  39. 39.

    Horrendo Slapp (formerly Jimperson Zibb, Duncan Dönitz, Otto Graf von Pfmidtnöchtler-Pízsmőgy, Mumphrey, et al.)

    June 12, 2012 at 10:52 am

    To harp a little more on my point about the coverage King gets… So I don’t know much of anything about King. I don’t live in Maine, and never have. But I do get the Washington Post, so I know a little about that, and from what I can see, King fits right into their beliefs about how partisanship is what’s taking down the country, and if only both sides could come together in comity and amity, then all would be well and all out troubles would be behind us.

    But, as so many here have pointed out, they don’t care what the policies themselves are, only that both sides should meet in the sensible middle. I guess Broder was the worst, but he seems to have infected everybody at the Post before he died, or at least everybody but maybe Eugene Robinson and Harold Meyerson.

    And, as others have brought up, bipartisanship for its own sake is meaningless. It only has meaning to the degree that you know–or care–what the policies themselves are.

    Here’s an example. It would surely bring bitter tears to the eyes of Fred Hiatt and Richard Cohen, and somewhere, I swear, I can hear David Broder moaning piteously from beyond the grave, but it’s an example that makes my point, so I’m going with it. Back before the 50’s, congressmen were bringing up anti-lynching bills fairly often. They always went down. Now, I can only guess that Broder and Hiatt would have deplored lynching; but, on the other hand, it was unseemly for these presumptuous congressmen to always be trying to tell southern states how to handle their serious problem with lusty, well-endowed, oversexed colored folk.

    Now, no doubt, since white southerners wanted to lynch blacks at their every whim, and since busybody northerners and uppity black people wanted to outlaw lynching altogether, the answer must have lain somewhere between, preferably halfway between. I caan only guess that Hiatt would have commended any bill setting the quota for yearly lynchings at half of what white southerners would have wanted; or maybe, a good bill would have mandated only maiming innocent blacks, rather than them. The point is, though, that neither side should get what it wants. That is fair; that is bipartisan; that is sensible.

    To bring up an even more uncivil example, I can only guess that Hiatt and Broder and Cohen would have bemoaned the incivility of those dreadful people who were saying all those nasty, nasty things about Hitler in the early 30’s in Germany. Sure, Hitler was a little uncouth, but he understood how dangerous the unions were, with their budget-breaking pensions and 40 hour workweeks and all; and he had the right idea about the communists, after all, even if he was a little, well, tactless in his choice of words. And later on, well, Hitler said he wasn’t killing any Jews; opponents said he was slaughtering them. Sureley that means he was only inconveniencing them a little; after all, inconvenience is about halfway between being left alone and slaughter.

    I can’t believe that the writers at the Post ever let that piece by Ornstein and Mann see the light of day…

  40. 40.

    ThresherK

    June 12, 2012 at 10:59 am

    @Linda Featheringill: I read every month there as a terrible month for Obama.

    Right below the WaPos coverage of our chocolate ration being increased from 30 grams to 25 grams a day.

  41. 41.

    feebog

    June 12, 2012 at 11:09 am

    I know this thread is focusing on the WaPo article, but as far as I am concerned, Angus King is good news for the Democrats. The Republicans need four seats to flip the senate. If King wins, that takes it up to 5. If Elizabeth Warren wins, that’s six. Republicans won’t make that number.

  42. 42.

    MomSense

    June 12, 2012 at 11:23 am

    Pingree is fine in the first district. Michaud is in a tough fight in the 2nd District especially now that Democratic stronghold Waterville (home of Colby College) was redistricted to the 1st CD.

    King will be great on environmental issues, choice, education, marriage equality, pay equity for women, and immigration.

    I think he will be fine on veterans issues and foreign policy. I was troubled by his treatment of public sector unions while governor so I would not be optimistic about EFCA.

  43. 43.

    MomSense

    June 12, 2012 at 11:28 am

    Oh and when it comes to Social Security and Medicare I wouldn’t worry about it.

    You can say what you want about them when you are not in office, but when you represent the oldest state in the Union you would be a fool to threaten Social Security and Medicare. He is no fool.

    We do need to bring Medicare costs down as we all know and ObamaCares was the first step in that direction. I don’t see King endorsing a voucher system. I do think he would endorse more provider side cost containment.

  44. 44.

    Davis X. Machina

    June 12, 2012 at 12:05 pm

    @MomSense: I suspect King would endorse vouchers if they’re not too stingy. He loooooooves ‘market-based solutions’.

  45. 45.

    Daulnay

    June 12, 2012 at 1:41 pm

    Obama attracted some voters because he talked favorably about bipartisanship and cooperation. Few citizens think hyperpartisanship helps our country, so King’s stance helps him.

    We’re all aware that bitter partisanship brings down republics and democracies, that’s why Washington warned against it, and the Federalist papers discuss it so much. People like King can help bring both sides — or the crazier side — back towards moderation.

    Much as we may not like it, the Dems don’t command a large majority in the electorate even though the Repubs have gone off the deep end. We need more people like King to peel those non-Democrats away from the Republicans; many of those voters are more anti-Democrat than pro-Republican at this point (or anti-black, in the South), and would jump ship the instant an alternative shows up.

  46. 46.

    FlipYrWhig

    June 12, 2012 at 1:56 pm

    Even with DXM’s unflattering descriptions, King sounds like at least as good a Democrat as Mark Warner or Tom Carper.

  47. 47.

    FlipYrWhig

    June 12, 2012 at 2:01 pm

    @Daulnay: Or, to put it another way, if Democrats are to have any kind of majority, it’ll have to be by including politicians with the profiles of King et al, because liberal and populist Democrats can’t get to 50%+1 on their own. Take the Democrats, add what used to be the “liberal Republicans,” then add the budget-balancing technocrats on top of that, and you’re almost there. Bad for ideological consistency, but good for thwarting the Republican Götterdämmerung.

  48. 48.

    handsmile

    June 12, 2012 at 2:20 pm

    Late in returning here (European football beckons), but thanks MomSense, DXM, and redshirt for your insights. Informed opinion makes fulminating less fun, but perhaps is more helpful.

  49. 49.

    MomSense

    June 12, 2012 at 2:32 pm

    @Davis x Machina

    I highly doubt it. He already stated his support for ObamaCares and called the GOP budget plan “a disaster”. He has stated his opposition to defunding Planned Parenthood.

    Doesn’t sound like he supports Ryan’s voucher scheme to me.

    We have to be careful about vilifying all business people.

  50. 50.

    MomSense

    June 12, 2012 at 2:56 pm

    http://www.boston.com/news/politics/articles/2012/04/09/in_senate_race_maines_king_is_critical_of_gop/

    This is what he said about the Ryan budget.

    He saved his most heated comments, however, for the Republican budget plan — often known for its architect, Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis. — that would effectively transform Medicare into a voucher program.

    “It’s a disaster. In a finite number of years, seniors will be back to where they were in 1955, which is sick and unable to get treatment,” King said. “I don’t know what they’re thinking. Except, I think that proposal represents a strain of thinking that goes back to — they want to get rid of Social Security and Medicare.”

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Do Something!

Call Your Senators & Representatives
Directory of US Senators
Directory of US Representatives

Vaccine Venting Here!
I Got the Shot!  (Month 2)
I Got the Shot!

 

🎈Ways to Support Our Site

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal
Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice ⬇  

Recent Comments

  • prostratedragon on Late Night Open Thread: Our Failed Media Mudlarks (Mar 5, 2021 @ 4:04am)
  • Keith P. on Late Night Open Thread: Our Failed Media Mudlarks (Mar 5, 2021 @ 3:44am)
  • SectionH on I Think You Need Some Respite (Mar 5, 2021 @ 3:32am)
  • opiejeanne on Late Night Open Thread: Our Failed Media Mudlarks (Mar 5, 2021 @ 2:59am)
  • joel hanes on Late Night Open Thread: Our Failed Media Mudlarks (Mar 5, 2021 @ 2:49am)

Team Claire, and Family

Claire Updates
Claire is Home!

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year

Featuring

John Cole
Silverman on Security
COVID-19 Coronavirus
Medium Cool with BGinCHI
Furry Friends

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Submit Photos to On the Road
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Meetups: Proof of Life
2021 Pets of Balloon Juice Calendar

Culture: Books, Film, TV, Music, Games, Podcasts

Noir: Favorites in Film, Books, TV
Book Recommendations & Indy Recs
Mystery Recommendations
Netflix Favorites
Amazon Prime Favorites
Netflix Suggestions in July
Longmire & Netflix Suggestions

Twitter

John Cole’s Twitter

[custom-twitter-feeds]

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!