• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

This fight is for everything.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

How do you get liars to care about the truth?

My years-long effort to drive family and friends away has really paid off this year.

This blog will pay for itself.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

‘Forty-two’ said Deep Thought, with infinite majesty and calm.

There’s some extremely good trouble headed their way.

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

Han shot first.

Just a few bad apples.

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

People are complicated. Love is not.

I’d try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

I really should read my own blog.

They are all Michael Cohen now.

Good luck with your asparagus.

I did not have this on my fuck 2020 bingo card.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

Deploy the moving finger of emphasisity!

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

All your base are belong to Tunch.

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn – Nancy Pelosi

Mobile Menu

  • Look Forward & Back
  • Balloon Juice 2021 Pet Calendar
  • Site Feedback
  • All 2020 Fundraising
  • I Voted!
  • Take Action: Things We Can Do
  • Team Claire, and Family
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • BJ PayPal Donations
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Nature & Respite
  • Information As Power
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Nature & Respite
  • Look Forward & Back
You are here: Home / Science & Technology / Loving Big Brother, just this once

Loving Big Brother, just this once

by Erik Kain|  November 18, 20101:11 pm| 44 Comments

This post is in: Science & Technology

Facebook0Tweet0Email0

Julian Sanchez was burgled and thinks that possibly law enforcement can track down his stolen PS3 using its built-in tracking software that flags a stolen system’s IP:

In part because I spend my days thinking about the creepy potential of modern surveillance technologies—and warning against the potential harms of going too far with them—I now find myself hoping the DC police are prepared to go further down that avenue than seems to be customary for a garden variety burglary. If it does manage to get my PS3 back, though, I’ll be willing to love Big Brother just this once.

Sanchez does yeoman’s work exposing and analyzing the use of surveillance technology and the rise of surveillance architecture in modern society, so it’s certainly ironic to see him turn the whole thing on its head for a moment. The whole thing is worth a read.

Facebook0Tweet0Email0
Previous Post: « Open Thread
Next Post: Health Insurance Giants Wanted to Push Michael Moore Off A Cliff »

Reader Interactions

44Comments

  1. 1.

    mistermix

    November 18, 2010 at 1:17 pm

    I’ll bet he recovers his 360, but it won’t be from the thieves, who have almost certainly sold it already, or have it stacked in a pile somewhere waiting to sell it.

  2. 2.

    rufflesinc

    November 18, 2010 at 1:21 pm

    There’s already cell phone sized GPS tracking devices so it’s really only a matter of time for the miniaturization to a thin patch sticker. Then you can track your own stuff without going through SONY and the police. In other words, JS’s gripe is that he’s relying on police surveillance to find his PS3. If he knew exactly where the PS3 was, he would merely have to tip off the police.

    http://www.amazon.com/Zoombak-ZMBK200-Advanced-Family-Locator/dp/B0014J61GI/ref=pd_cp_e_2

  3. 3.

    liberal

    November 18, 2010 at 1:22 pm

    Doubt the cops will “waste” their time with that.

    They couldn’t be bothered catching the thief who stole my wife’s credit card from her office by simply running some store tapes, so why would they be bothered with this?

  4. 4.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    November 18, 2010 at 1:23 pm

    And that, EDK, is why I can be against government intervention in general and still be OK with things like regulating alcohol with caffeine in it. Not everything is as cut and dry as “Government bad” or “Government good” because people aren’t either.

  5. 5.

    MikeJ

    November 18, 2010 at 1:25 pm

    Uh, somebody thinks a MAC address is tracking software?

  6. 6.

    cleek

    November 18, 2010 at 1:27 pm

    i’ve seen this story on a few blogs today, and i’m still puzzled by the “surveillance” angle. it’s not surveillance, it’s just basic TCP/IP + using the PS3’s MAC address as a unique ID on gaming networks, right ?

  7. 7.

    catclub

    November 18, 2010 at 1:31 pm

    @rufflesinc:
    “Then you can track your own stuff without going through SONY and the police.”

    Ha, ha. That would be like letting you know how to access the blackbox in your car. nah gonna happen. It is not for you.

  8. 8.

    MattR

    November 18, 2010 at 1:32 pm

    @cleek: This was my understanding as well. I guess if you want to expand the definition of “Big Brother” to include companies monitoring how their products are used then maybe you can justify calling it surveillance but that is a stretch (EDIT: And Sony is not really actively monitoring the network for all PS3s. Just ones that are flagged by its users)

  9. 9.

    Judas Escargot

    November 18, 2010 at 1:36 pm

    @cleek:

    it’s not surveillance, it’s just basic TCP/IP + using the PS3’s MAC address as a unique ID on gaming networks, right ?

    Each Xbox360 has a unique identifier, which can’t be just the MAC address (since the console supports multiple interfaces, and the MAC address is an attribute of the ethernet/wireless interface, not of the machine itself).

    This ID is used to tie Xbox Live accounts (and purchased content) to specific consoles: And Microsoft does have the ability to ban any specific console from their Xbox Live network for life (one of many reasons you should never buy a used 360 from eBay). Get caught cheating at Halo a few times too many, and boom, your console’s banned.

    Don’t know the details for the PS3, but I’d be shocked if Sony didn’t have a very similar setup.

  10. 10.

    A Duck

    November 18, 2010 at 1:46 pm

    Really? That’s his price? His PS3?

    What a douche.

  11. 11.

    MikeJ

    November 18, 2010 at 1:47 pm

    @Judas Escargot: The article is about PS3, and they specifically mention tracking it by MAC.

  12. 12.

    Zifnab

    November 18, 2010 at 1:50 pm

    If it does manage to get my PS3 back, though, I’ll be willing to love Big Brother just this once.

    The police surveillance system isn’t for you, though. It’s for protecting the folks that funded the system. If SONY loses a PS3, they’ll get it back. If you lose the PS3, you should buy another PS3 from SONY.

    That’s how the game has always worked.

  13. 13.

    jrg

    November 18, 2010 at 1:57 pm

    Not the IP address, the MAC address. Hardware MAC addresses are unique and fixed. IP addresses are not fixed.

  14. 14.

    uila

    November 18, 2010 at 1:59 pm

    So what do you call a libertarian who has been mugged by reality?

  15. 15.

    Judas Escargot

    November 18, 2010 at 2:03 pm

    @MikeJ:

    The article is about PS3, and they specifically mention tracking it by MAC.

    I did get that part… but as I said, the MAC address identifies network interface hardware (ie a particular ethernet or wireless chip), not the console motherboard. That’d be true for Xbox, PS3, Wii, or your PC.

    My Xbox, for example, has only been attached to the network via ethernet cable. If you stole it and re-hooked it up to the net via wireless and never plugged in that ethernet cable again, I’d never be able to track you via MAC.

    Hell, if that system was behind the right kind of router, the ethernet MAC might not even be visible outside of the thief’s home network. Bastard.

    MS, however, can still identify that console uniquely, regardless of where it is or how it happens to be connected. Therefore, there must be another identifier in the system, somewhere (probably something as simple as having the unique serial number burned into its firmware).

    Since Sony can also lock content to a particular console, they must have a similar setup.

  16. 16.

    JK

    November 18, 2010 at 2:09 pm

    Maybe I am missing something but why don’t the police just go get a warrant (assuming this is a priority), which in my non-expert opinion they should be able to get as they have probably cause that the item was stolen (how is this different than low-jack or something like that). Then with a warrant they can track the system and arrest the person. The issue is not with legal surveillance it is with illegal surveillance. Get a warrant and it is legal! Funny how that works.

  17. 17.

    Ash Can

    November 18, 2010 at 2:10 pm

    @A Duck: While I wouldn’t put it that harshly, I have to say I agree with your basic idea. There’s something shallow and disingenuous going on here. I’d have far more respect for him if he were to use his experience as a teaching point and say something to the effect of “this is the price we’d have to pay for a surveillance-free society, and I have to be willing to pay it.” It’s only natural for people to change their tunes when it’s their own oxen on the spit, but it’s extra noticeable when a prominent crusader does it. We applaud it when the change is from bad actions to good, but I don’t think that’s what’s happening here.

  18. 18.

    rufflesinc

    November 18, 2010 at 2:20 pm

    @catclub: Toyota, Ford, etc. built and installed the black box. You would buy a GPS tracker from some third company and install it yourself. Free market FTW?

  19. 19.

    catclub

    November 18, 2010 at 2:39 pm

    @rufflesinc:
    1. They put it in MY car. Why can’t I access it?

    2.I was wrong about the Zoombak, it does NOT go through the police, but it still goes through the company that sold it, which does not give me particularly warm fuzzies.
    Maybe I am more worried than I need be.

    If I had it my way, I would want the zoombak to be able to essentially dial in to an ethernet address that I specify to tell its location – not to the Zoombak people.

    Remember DWBH?

  20. 20.

    pragmatism

    November 18, 2010 at 2:44 pm

    OH NOES TEH SLIPPPERY SLOPE TO GODWINISM HAS BEGUNNED!!!

  21. 21.

    tbogg

    November 18, 2010 at 2:48 pm

    You know what they call a libertarian who needs government assistance?

    A Socialist.

    Find it yourself Sanchez, you looter.

  22. 22.

    russell

    November 18, 2010 at 2:54 pm

    I’m with A Duck.

    This guy does “yeoman’s work” researching the dark underbelly of electronic surveillance, and he’s ready to throw in the towel for a freaking PlayStation?

    If that’s our Bulwark Against Big Brother, we might as well line up for the tattoos and RFID chip implants right now.

  23. 23.

    Schad

    November 18, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    @A Duck:

    Disagree, because Sanchez has what the true disciples lack: self-awareness. And as such, he frames the issue in such a way that it doesn’t undermine his thesis…which is that electronic tracking software might lead to positive results in some circumstances (like tracking down his stolen stuff), but taken as a whole the balance of effects is negative. Even if I disagree with that thesis, it’s an intellectually honest and reasonable argument.

  24. 24.

    va

    November 18, 2010 at 3:07 pm

    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA.

    HA.

  25. 25.

    rufflesinc

    November 18, 2010 at 3:16 pm

    @catclub: Sorry I haven’t personally used one of these. I had previously looked for them on amazon and found one that lets you put a GSM SIM card in and texts you with coordinates when you call it. Obviously this isn’t it but my point is that such devices exist that cut out both another company and the police.

    try this ?

    http://www.amazon.com/Gprs-Tracker-Tk102-2-Wired-Charger/dp/B0043PH0QA/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1290111469&sr=8-1

  26. 26.

    Socraticsilence

    November 18, 2010 at 3:30 pm

    @Judas Escargot:

    A PS3 is a bit different- with its built in Wifi capability its connected directly to the net via. Cable is far, far less likely than it is with a PS3.

  27. 27.

    Julian Sanchez

    November 18, 2010 at 3:34 pm

    I hope it was clear that the last line there was tongue-in-cheek. I was amused that, as a result of spending a lot of time thinking about the potential dangers technological surveillance, I ended up quickly thinking of a couple ways the criminals could be tracked that the police didn’t seem familiar with. But it’s not like I’m suddenly changing any of my substantive views: I’ve never thought or argued there was anything inherently wrong with the methods I suggest in the post when they’re done with proper judicial oversight.

    As I note in an update to the post, I do think the standard for linking an IP address to a user ought to be higher than the mere subpoena currently required—but in this case even if the standard were the “probable cause” required for a full-blown warrant, it would pretty clearly be met. I think high-tech tracking needs to be targeted and supervised by courts, not that it should never be used.

  28. 28.

    cleek

    November 18, 2010 at 3:37 pm

    @Judas Escargot:

    I’d never be able to track you via MAC.

    it’s possible that all the other interfaces use the ethernet interface’s MAC address to identify the box on the network. it’s just a sequence of bytes, after all. so, if a unique ID is what you need, the MAC addr can do the job perfectly well.

    /speculating

  29. 29.

    someone

    November 18, 2010 at 3:37 pm

    I looks like Zifnab and maybe other have already got this but the police state does not work for citizens, it works against them, always.

    Before people waste time in trying to find stolen electronics or, worse, get fleeced by some company offering to “track your laptop in case of theft” realize that even if you have something stolen and it *is* trackable, the police *will not* recover it for you. If you have a GPS device the only way it helps you is if *you* are willing to confront the thief. And yes, this is from an experience helping someone recover a stolen laptop which had a software check-in mechanism. Stupid thief booted up the laptop, we got the IP, gave it to the police, asked them to get the address from the ISP (Comcast), and they did nothing, as expected.

  30. 30.

    pragmatism

    November 18, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    @Julian Sanchez:
    i’m past the point of being surprised by anything the IGMFY crowd says so i take it at face value. maybe you should invent a sarcasm font.

  31. 31.

    pragmatism

    November 18, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    @Julian Sanchez:
    i’m past the point of being surprised by anything the IGMFY crowd says so i take it at face value. maybe you should invent a sarcasm font.

  32. 32.

    Ash Can

    November 18, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    @Julian Sanchez: Thanks for stopping by and clarifying. Maybe it’s because I live in a large urban area myself, but I’ve never been able to dismiss the potential and actual benefits of surveillance out-of-hand, and regard those who do (or at least appear to) with a jaundiced eye. And I absolutely agree that there should be judicial supervision — not a perfect arrangement, since then the professionalism and purity of purpose is only as good as the judges are, but better.

    And that’s a bitch that you were broken into. Good luck with it all.

  33. 33.

    pragmatism

    November 18, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    @pragmatism:
    also, FYWP. too and as well.

  34. 34.

    Alwhite

    November 18, 2010 at 4:38 pm

    how do you define an authoritarian?

    A libertarian that had his PS3 stolen

  35. 35.

    Bill Murray

    November 18, 2010 at 5:04 pm

    This seems like a lot of trouble just to get one’s saved games back

  36. 36.

    Julian Sanchez

    November 18, 2010 at 5:34 pm

    To get my saved games back? It certainly would be. For a shot at tracing it back (directly or indirectly) to the person or group behind an ongoing spree of burglaries, muggings, and car break-ins around my neighborhood? I think it would be worth it.

  37. 37.

    Bill Murray

    November 18, 2010 at 5:44 pm

    @Julian Sanchez: a 1% shot?

  38. 38.

    pragmatism

    November 18, 2010 at 5:46 pm

    after a long day of providing rhetorical cover for the right, its good to relax with a little gaming. its all fantasy, all the time for the glibs.

  39. 39.

    Dave

    November 18, 2010 at 7:01 pm

    @Julian Sanchez: Oh god, fuck you.

  40. 40.

    silentbeep

    November 18, 2010 at 7:10 pm

    @russell: lol. I like reading Julian’s work, and I’m a big time libertarian sympathizer, but your comment is funny!

  41. 41.

    silentbeep

    November 18, 2010 at 7:11 pm

    @Dave: I take it you don’t own a PS3 and this part “I think high-tech tracking needs to be targeted and supervised by courts, not that it should never be used. ” didn’t catch you huh

  42. 42.

    E.D. Kain

    November 18, 2010 at 7:24 pm

    @Belafon (formerly anonevent): And nor is anyone suggesting otherwise.

  43. 43.

    NobodySpecial

    November 18, 2010 at 8:15 pm

    Why not just track your own PS3, grab your gun, and go all Dirty Harry on said perpetrators? Cut out the government entirely from the operation.

  44. 44.

    wengler

    November 18, 2010 at 9:55 pm

    This looks like it will work until you have the cops search someone’s house who has been accidentally giving the neighborhood free Wi-Fi.

    I’m pretty sure the police don’t care enough or have enough resources to follow any leads on a missing Playstation anyways.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Do Something!

Call Your Senators & Representatives
Directory of US Senators
Directory of US Representatives

Vaccine Venting (latest)
Vaccine Venting (all)

I Got the Shot (latest thread)
I Got the Shot! (all)

Take Your Shot – Explain the %

🎈Ways to Support Our Site

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal
Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice ⬇  

Recent Comments

  • The Moar You Know on Friday Evening Open Thread: The Peasants, They Are REVOLTING! (Apr 16, 2021 @ 9:50pm)
  • Doc Sardonic on Recipe Open Thread: Foolproof English Muffin Toasting Bread (Apr 16, 2021 @ 9:48pm)
  • Ken on Friday Evening Open Thread: The Peasants, They Are REVOLTING! (Apr 16, 2021 @ 9:47pm)
  • dexwood on Recipe Open Thread: Foolproof English Muffin Toasting Bread (Apr 16, 2021 @ 9:42pm)
  • Steeplejack on Recipe Open Thread: Foolproof English Muffin Toasting Bread (Apr 16, 2021 @ 9:40pm)

Team Claire, and Family

Claire Updates
Claire is Home!

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year

Featuring

John Cole
Silverman on Security
COVID-19 Coronavirus
Medium Cool with BGinCHI
Furry Friends

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Submit Photos to On the Road
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Meetups: Proof of Life
2021 Pets of Balloon Juice Calendar

Culture: Books, Film, TV, Music, Games, Podcasts

Noir: Favorites in Film, Books, TV
Book Recommendations & Indy Recs
Mystery Recommendations
Netflix Favorites
Amazon Prime Favorites
Netflix Suggestions in July
Longmire & Netflix Suggestions

Twitter

John Cole’s Twitter

[custom-twitter-feeds]

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!