• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

We still have time to mess this up!

How do you get liars to care about the truth?

Deploy the moving finger of emphasisity!

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Militantly superior in their own minds…

This is how realignments happen…

‘Forty-two’ said Deep Thought, with infinite majesty and calm.

Something seems odd about that, but i have been drinking.

Naturally gregarious and alpha

How does anyone do Gilligan’s Island as trump world and not cast Jared as Gilligan?

The willow is too close to the house.

We need fewer warriors in public service and more gardeners.

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

Good luck with your asparagus.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

My years-long effort to drive family and friends away has really paid off this year.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

Tick tock motherfuckers! Tick fucking tock!

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if I ever tried to have some of you killed.

I’m going back to the respite thread.

This really is a full service blog.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

Mobile Menu

  • Look Forward & Back
  • Balloon Juice 2021 Pet Calendar
  • Site Feedback
  • All 2020 Fundraising
  • I Voted!
  • Take Action: Things We Can Do
  • Team Claire, and Family
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • BJ PayPal Donations
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Nature & Respite
  • Information As Power
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • On The Road
  • Garden Chats
  • Nature & Respite
  • Look Forward & Back
You are here: Home / Politics / Domestic Politics / Let ‘Em Own It

Let ‘Em Own It

by John Cole|  April 29, 20106:42 pm| 21 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics, Politics

Facebook0Tweet0Email0

Democrats introduced some new legislation today:

Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) said the bill would “shine a light on the flood of spending unleashed by the Citizens United decision.” The influential senator hopes to win passage of the bill by July 4, in time to curb any flow of corporate money into the 2010 midterm congressional elections. Sponsors have dubbed the bill the “Democracy Is Strengthened by Casting Light on Spending in Elections Act” – for “DISCLOSE.”

The bill would require the CEO or head of an organization that is the primary financial sponsor of a political ad to claim responsibility for the ad by appearing on camera. Corporations and advocacy groups would be required to create traceable campaign accounts and disclose within 24 hours the source of donations that exceed $1,000.

“I welcome the introduction of this strong bipartisan legislation to control the flood of special interest money into America’s elections,” President Obama said Thursday. “Powerful special interests and their lobbyists should not be able to drown out the voices of the American people.”

The bill also would ban expenditures by any corporation with at least 20% of its stock owned by foreign nationals, or if foreign nationals play a dominant role in the corporation’s leadership.

While it is a little amusing listening to Schumer talk about the disparate impact of powerful special interests a week after he bashed the administration’s Israel policy, these bills at first glance sound pretty good. Let ’em say whatever they want, but make ’em own it.

Facebook0Tweet0Email0
Previous Post: « A Couple More Friedman Units
Next Post: Lightning Strikes. Twice! »

Reader Interactions

21Comments

  1. 1.

    General Egali Tarian Stuck

    April 29, 2010 at 6:45 pm

    But but BUT ACOOOOORN!!

  2. 2.

    Americanadian

    April 29, 2010 at 6:46 pm

    What’s to keep this bill from getting overthrown by John Roberts and his conservative, corporatist activist True American Originalist™ buddies on SCOTUS?

  3. 3.

    Mark S.

    April 29, 2010 at 6:47 pm

    I like this idea, so I’m sure there will be a Republican filibuster.

  4. 4.

    fourlegsgood

    April 29, 2010 at 6:52 pm

    That actually sounds like useful legislation.

    And just think, when most americans see what weasels the corporate leaders are… well, that’s a win too.

  5. 5.

    Mike Kay

    April 29, 2010 at 6:57 pm

    I’m not sure if this will work. they’ll just set up dummy corporations and pacs to launder the originating donation.

    murdoch could set up a dummy corporation/pac called “the foundation of feedom” with a large slush fund endowment. That mother ship then donates to intermediate terrorist groups like family research council, who then fund PACs set up for a specific issue like “Patriots for Feedom” who then swiftboat Mother’s Day as a commie front.

  6. 6.

    Bnut

    April 29, 2010 at 7:03 pm

    @General Egali Tarian Stuck:

    You know, I worked for the Working Families Party in Brooklyn for awhile, and they were located in the same building as ACORN. If people could really see the offices, people and things that went on in there, they would be a lot less inclined to see it as THE DEVIL. I’ve seen more corruption and thuggery from roadkill.

    As it pertains to this bill, if it originates from a NY politician I’ll hold my breath.

  7. 7.

    KRK

    April 29, 2010 at 7:07 pm

    Sponsors have dubbed the bill the “Democracy Is Strengthened by Casting Light on Spending in Elections Act’’ – for “DISCLOSE.’

    While I commend the sponsors for correctly capitalizing “Is” in the title (unlike some bloggers I know), this cutesy bill naming tendency of the past couple decades is so bizarre and so prone to Orwellian turns. How many staff hours were spent coming up with that?

  8. 8.

    Steve

    April 29, 2010 at 7:09 pm

    I miss Dave Thomas. He wouldn’t have minded appearing on camera.

  9. 9.

    Bnut

    April 29, 2010 at 7:13 pm

    @Steve:

    Yeah, Wendy’s makes good chili for a ff place.

  10. 10.

    Brandon

    April 29, 2010 at 7:23 pm

    I like it, but the foreign national requirement is insufficient. If you are a foreign national, you cannot give money to candidates. However, you can find four other Americans to share stock in a company that you have created for the express purpose of political speech? 0% foreign stock ownership and 0% foreign control (i.e. board members, directors, snr management). That should be the rule.

  11. 11.

    BDeevDad

    April 29, 2010 at 7:39 pm

    I am sure Fox News is going to hate this.

    The bill also would ban expenditures by any corporation with at least 20% of its stock owned by foreign nationals, or if foreign nationals play a dominant role in the corporation’s leadership.

  12. 12.

    Brandon

    April 29, 2010 at 7:52 pm

    @BDeevDad: I dunno, as Mike Kay points out, since money is fungible, there are innumerable ways that a rich jerkoff can get around this requirement using dummy corporations and the like. And what about this scenario? A company created for the sole purpose of political speech with “investors” from every company that is a member of the Chamber of Commerce, appoints a politician as CEO? Imagine how many ads we are going to see featuring Dick Armey? You think people that spend millions on lawyers to evade taxes through cute schemes and lobby are not savvy enough to find an easy workaround?

  13. 13.

    Anton Sirius

    April 29, 2010 at 7:54 pm

    @Americanadian:

    What’s to keep this bill from getting overthrown by John Roberts and his conservative, corporatist activist True American Originalist™ buddies on SCOTUS?

    Nothing. But if it’s passed in July, there’s almost no chance it’ll get up to the Supremes by November.

  14. 14.

    Brandon

    April 29, 2010 at 8:02 pm

    @Anton Sirius: I dunno, they can work pretty fast when the goal and outcome is highly partisan. See e.g. Bush v. Gore. 13 U.S. 666 (2000) (holding that those partisan fuckwits can do whatever the hell they want in record speed if the Republicans need to win elections).

  15. 15.

    Sly

    April 29, 2010 at 8:25 pm

    @Mark S.:

    I like this idea, so I’m sure there will be a Republican filibuster.

    Which is what Schumer wants, because he can play the game as good or better than anyone else.

    Back in 2006, when Dubai Ports World was set to take over operations of several U.S. ports, Schumer added an amendment to a Republican-led lobbying reform bill that prohibited any company, owned or controlled by any foreign government that recognized the Taliban’s authority in Afghanistan (which includes U.A.E, which owns DPW), to own, lease, operate or manage U.S. port facilities facilities. Schumer said that the “Taliban provision” was there to get around the prohibition on bills of attainder, but everyone knew what it was for: to scare Republicans into voting for it.

  16. 16.

    Phoebe

    April 29, 2010 at 9:21 pm

    me likey

  17. 17.

    Wilson Heath

    April 29, 2010 at 10:20 pm

    If the corporation inverted for tax purposes and it’s corporate parent is a shell company at a P.O. box in a tax haven, that’s also a company more than 20% owned by foreign nationals. I hope they pick that up.

  18. 18.

    racrecir

    April 29, 2010 at 10:25 pm

    Somewhat on topic, I was amused by this Forbes.com article by Teabagger Galt, host of “Washington Watch” on PJTV, from March 2009 wherein he suggests that if Wall Street expects to profit from the political protection racket, they’d be wise to direct donations to candidates not of the Democratic Party, because you can’t trust Democrats to stay bought.

    But if–as is generally the case with political donations–they were more in the order of protection money, then Wall Street donors may instead feel duped. They might want to ask themselves what protection, exactly, they got for their investment. … If so, maybe it’s time to shut off the funding. Politicians are already gearing up for the 2010 election season. That means many of the same members of Congress who are currently running with the lynch mob will be back in search of more contributions soon enough.

    In typical fashion, the word ‘Republican’ is nowhere to be found in the article so he’s obviously not suggesting that Republicans are easy to get into the pocket. Heh. Indeed, he’s talking about “candidates who believe in free markets–and who possess a bit of backbone–instead.” Perhaps he’s suggesting that the financial industry has a friend in the Tea Party.

    At any rate, it’s fun watching Glenn Reynolds feign brass-tacks realism with mealy-mouthed conviction. It’s a style with wide appeal, and he’s got the backbone to own it.

  19. 19.

    victory

    April 29, 2010 at 10:28 pm

    I’m sorry, but acronyms suck.

    “Is” counts for the acronym, “by” does not, “on” counts”, “in” does not.

    I mean, come on.

  20. 20.

    slightly_peeved

    April 30, 2010 at 1:42 am

    @BDeevDad:

    Why would they care? Rupert’s an American citizen.

  21. 21.

    Hypnos

    April 30, 2010 at 4:29 am

    @slightly_peeved: yeah, but News Corp second shareholder is one Prince Alwaleed bin Talal al-Saud, of Saudi Arabia, who has boasted of being able to change Fox News coverage of things he doesn’t like.

    http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/10/right-rebels-foxnews/

    I wonder if real murkins know that a towelhead weilds discrete amounts of power on their favorite network?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Do Something!

Call Your Senators & Representatives
Directory of US Senators
Directory of US Representatives

Vaccine Venting Here!
I Got the Shot!  (Month 2)
I Got the Shot!

 

🎈Ways to Support Our Site

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal
Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice ⬇  

Recent Comments

  • Dan B on I Think You Need Some Respite (Mar 4, 2021 @ 11:00pm)
  • Mike G on Open Thread: *All* Repub Officials Are Corrupt, No Exceptions: Elaine Chao Edition (Mar 4, 2021 @ 11:00pm)
  • Another Scott on I Think You Need Some Respite (Mar 4, 2021 @ 10:58pm)
  • Steeplejack on Open Thread: *All* Repub Officials Are Corrupt, No Exceptions: Elaine Chao Edition (Mar 4, 2021 @ 10:58pm)
  • Jeffro on Open Thread: *All* Repub Officials Are Corrupt, No Exceptions: Elaine Chao Edition (Mar 4, 2021 @ 10:58pm)

Team Claire, and Family

Claire Updates
Claire is Home!

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year

Featuring

John Cole
Silverman on Security
COVID-19 Coronavirus
Medium Cool with BGinCHI
Furry Friends

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Submit Photos to On the Road
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Meetups: Proof of Life
2021 Pets of Balloon Juice Calendar

Culture: Books, Film, TV, Music, Games, Podcasts

Noir: Favorites in Film, Books, TV
Book Recommendations & Indy Recs
Mystery Recommendations
Netflix Favorites
Amazon Prime Favorites
Netflix Suggestions in July
Longmire & Netflix Suggestions

Twitter

John Cole’s Twitter

[custom-twitter-feeds]

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!