I would say this bums me out but Ezra Klein continues to do good work inside the belly of the test prep beast (Michael Calderone via Weigel):
David Weigel, who’s been covering the right for the Washington Independent, will soon be heading to the Washington Post.
Weigel joins the Post on April 5, and will be launching a blog focused on the conservative movement, tea party activists, and how the GOP’s preparing for November.
National editor Kevin Merida confirmed the news to POLITICO and said that Weigel will be “a voice on our politics page online and a presence that will add to our robust coverage of the 2010 midterm elections.”
kindness
Oh, him. I’ve written comments under his bylines bunches. Funny thing though. They get wiped off the screen at the Independent almost as quickly as my posts to the Washington Times. Can’t blame Rev. Moon for everything I guess.
On Fred Hiatt…..I have to think this wunderkind has taken out insurance on the death of the WaPo. He’s doing everything he can to stick a knife in it and push it into the grave.
freelancer
What’s Breitbart gonna say now?
Oh, wait, he thinks the WaPo is liberal because it said mean things about O’Keefe.
Nevermind.
Polish the Guillotines
Could this be an indication that the beltway press has figured out the butter is actually on the other side of the toast?
Brian J
On a somewhat related note, one of the supposedly better reporters at Kaplan, Binyamin Appelbaum, is headed to The New York Times. I say supposedly because I rarely read The Post but know that lots of people here seem to like him.
slag
Oh great. They’re going to steal all our good pundits and then go out of business leaving them all without jobs. Luckily, Ezra, Dave, and Greg will now at least have healthcare afterwards.
Warren Terra
This is off topic, but John Scalzi has a (predictably) great essay on the bill; an excerpt:
LT
Can someone tell me why I’m s’posed to hate Dave Weigel? I forgot.
arguingwithsignposts
Just curious: Since we don’t get the Kaplan Post out here in the flyover ‘murka, do they actually run any of Ezra Klein’s stuff in the newsPAPER? Or is it just online. Will they do the same for this new guy, whom I’m unfamiliar with?
Ah, the village young pundits reach around society continues apace.
WereBear
I bear a grudge, since a testing service only kept them for twenty years, and I needed them just a bit after that.
If you can’t show a piece of paper right now, request it, before your time is up.
DougJ
@LT:
I love Dave Weigel.
slag
@LT: Jane Hamsher hates him because he repeated a mean thing somebody said about her one time. However, whenever I’ve read Weigel, I’ve found his stuff both enjoyable and informative. To each his own.
The Main Gauche of Mild Reason
@LT:
You’re supposed to be sad that he’s moving from a reasonable liberal publication like the WIndy to the beast that is the WaPo. DougJ just worded it a little strangely.
Ash Can
Thank goodness, because God knows the WaPo ignores all those guys now.
r€nato
Brace yourselves for a spasm of right-wing anti-HCR violence:
Bill E Pilgrim
Speaking of Beltway journamalism, this is the part that almost no one is really looking at, from TPM:
One way of looking at those numbers is that a healthy majority (39%+13%) are on the Democrats’ side in this thing.
Sure, 13% wanted it to be even more liberal (I’m one of them) but there’s no way in the world those 13% would vote for Republicans, for what, to get more liberal results? Some will go third party or sit it out, but that’s pretty small and part of that is already reflected in the 3% undecided.
This may seem obvious to a lot of us but I see people all the time even on the Democratic side in the Villager press seeming to just admit “Okay polls show that people are against this health care reform” but “once they see the benefits, they’ll come around”.
They already are around. At least in terms of a solid majority seeing this more the way the Democrats saw it than the way the Republicans saw it.
mantis
When the librul media decided they needed to pay more attention to teabaggers and other wingnuts, if I knew they were talking about hiring people like Weigel to do it I would have been much more positive about the idea.
carlos the dwarf
Weigel’s got integrity. More reporters like him, please.
freelancer
@arguingwithsignposts:
That’s the second reference I’ve seen today wrt Weigel being a “conservative”. How so? He’s a sane journalist!
Ailuridae
As long as Weigel gets the same leeway Ezra does I can’t see the downside of him going to a more widely read (and sadly more respected) publication.
And on a good note for Dave he’s likely both going to get paid more upfront from WaPo and his appearances on MSNBC will garner him more cash too. Like Ezra though, something tells me he won’t be a regular on Morning Joe.
Clark
Interesting footnote about David Weigel. I was a big John Edwards guy in 2007-2008 (yeah, I know,) and I helped man the Edwards booth at Yearly Kos 2007. We had a really friendly set up, with lots of comfy chairs and extra outlets so bloggers could hang out and charge their laptops in between panels. We also had a lot of schwag to give to people who stopped by, and we had a dry eraser board where supporters could write something clever about how they supported Edwards, and then have their picture taken so that they could put it up on Facebook or something.
So anyway, Weigel hung out there quite a bit, even though was there with Reason Magazine (yeah, I know.) He was really friendly and funny, though, and I couldn’t quite bring myself to shoo him away when he started writing sarcastic comments on the dry erase board and asking to have his picture taken with them. The only comment I can remember was something like “There is possibly one JRE supporter at Reason Magazine” which I took (and still take) as a badge of honor.
carlos the dwarf
@freelancer:
His personal views are libertarian. But he keeps his politics out of his work, and he’s good about presenting the TPers honestly.
freelancer
@r€nato:
See also, “DORKS“.
Mike Kay
but, but, but…
Hanoi Jane Hamsher says Weigel is a “smear merchant”.
Mike Kay
Man, Hanoi Jane picked the wrong week to give up sniffing glue.
LT
@DougJ: Oh – hard to get from the post, I guess. I’ve always liked him myself.
Anya
@LT: Hamsher says he lacks journalistic ethics. Of course at BJ, we follow Hamsher religiously.
Keith G
Dave Weigel in his own words:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=113087233
arguingwithsignposts
@freelancer:
Read the story DougJ linked to.
The paragraph was from Politico, and it didn’t say he *was* conservative, but that he “covered” the conservative movement. He worked for Reason Magazine, though, so I doubt he’s a DFH.
I have no idea what his politics are because I’ve never read him previously (unless I accidentally clicked on a link to him from here), but I’d be curious to read some of his stuff to see if he’s “giving a voice” to these nutjobs without providing a context like, i don’t know, “reality” or “truth” or something.
Ailuridae
@freelancer:
He wrote @/for Reason for a while, I believe.
Cain
@carlos the dwarf:
You mean he’s a real journalist. wow.
cain
freelancer
FUCK
YOU
WORD
PRESS.
.|..
(Seriously, 4th try now. Also, Oh Noe3smah buttens R gone! Oh Hai buttons! They R Back)
liberty60
Saw this from Politico – Randy Barnett (who I don’t know from Adam, but if this is an example of his work, he promises to be a comedy goldmine):
If John McCain had been elected, we would have had something like this bill enacted last year in a bipartisan fashion – as was Social Security and Medicare.
Yeah really! Thats our story and we’re stickin’ to it!
Bill E Pilgrim
@liberty60: Exactly.
“If WE had proposed this exact same bill, then we’d have voted for it!”
Kind of what we’ve all been saying.
freelancer
@arguingwithsignposts:
I think you have read him. He’s been on Maddow a few times, and he is sometimes the source for material posted here.
arguingwithsignposts
@Cain:
This is a misperception. It’s possible to be a “real” journalist without keeping your politics out of your work – Rachel Maddow, among others, is proof of that.
What is not a “real” journalist is presenting yourself dishonestly as an impartial observer (a la Ron Fournier at the AP) or practicing “he said/she said” shoddy scribery without a bias toward the truth.
JGabriel
@r€nato: (in shrill teabagger bellow) WE WILL MAKE YOU PAY FOR THAT VOTE … in, uh, the form of window repairs!
.
Litlebritdifrnt
I love Dave, he has done stellar work on the birfers and baggers (he is also a member of Politijab and comes there for the scoops on the latest dismissals of Orly’s cases etc, he has even appeared on the Politijab Blogtalkradio Show “Reality Check Radio” how many main stream journos would have done that?) I hope that he is allowed to continue his brilliant work. We shall see.
Allan
Weigel deserves a medal or a Pulitzer or something for his coverage of Oily Taint.
cs
He was one of the best things about Reason and approached the libertarian movement from the left, thus reliably pissing off at least half of their commentators on a daily basis as he relentlessly attacked many of their sacred cows. Probably not a DFH but obviously not a conservative either.
This gig will mean the teabaggers and their ilk will get daily ridicule from a mainstream news source. Glad he’s moving up in the world.
jamie
Randy Barnett is a Con Law professor, and blogs (sometimes) over at Volokh. He is libertarian, in the Reason sense, but more so. To be fair, he took the medical marijuana case to the Supreme Court – he was Raisch’es attorney, which wins him points, to me. And I think he’s sincere, not glib. But I think some of his arguments are profoundly weird to anyone who that maybe things are a bit different today then when the Constitution was signed. And I think he gets quite clouded by Republican sympathies, to the point he make really strange arguments. (I traded mail with him after he posted Obama-critical remarks right after the undie bomber thing failed to explode, and he was trying to argue that this was Completely Different than the shoe bomber because the undie bomber plane was over the continental US at the time.)
BruinKid
Good for Dave. Met him at NN’09 in Pittsburgh last year, and we talked briefly about the birthers. He provided very good coverage of the birther movement early on, and knows more about the conservative movement than most of us.