• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Shocking, but not surprising

This is how realignments happen…

Han shot first.

What fresh hell is this?

There’s some extremely good trouble headed their way.

Trump is going to draw a dick on that dog with a sharpie, isn’t he?

We can agree to disagree, but i’m right.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

I’d try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

I thought we were promised Infrastructure Week.

Deploy the moving finger of emphasisity!

They traffic in fear. it is their only currency. if we are fearful, they are winning.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

We still have time to mess this up!

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Consistently wrong since 2002

The willow is too close to the house.

No one could have predicted…

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Women: they get shit done

Mobile Menu

  • Look Forward & Back
  • Balloon Juice 2021 Pet Calendar
  • Site Feedback
  • All 2020 Fundraising
  • I Voted!
  • Take Action: Things We Can Do
  • Team Claire, and Family
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • BJ PayPal Donations
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Nature & Respite
  • Information As Power
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • On The Road
  • Garden Chats
  • Nature & Respite
  • Look Forward & Back
You are here: Home / Politics / Domestic Politics / “Better Than Expected” Is the New “No One Could Have Predicted”

“Better Than Expected” Is the New “No One Could Have Predicted”

by John Cole|  April 9, 20093:27 pm| 41 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics

Facebook0Tweet0Email0

Am I missing something here, or are these paragraphs at odds with each other:

For the last eight weeks, nearly 200 federal examiners have labored inside some of the nation’s biggest banks to determine how those institutions would hold up if the recession deepened.

What they are discovering may come as a relief to both the financial industry and the public: the banking industry, broadly speaking, seems to be in better shape than many people think, officials involved in the examinations say.

That is the good news. The bad news is that many of the largest American lenders, despite all those bailouts, probably need to be bailed out again, either by private investors or, more likely, the federal government. After receiving many millions, and in some cases, many billions of taxpayer dollars, banks still need more capital, these officials say.

Exactly how bad did they think things were that they in better shape than they thought they would be, but STILL need hundreds of billions of dollars? And why aren’t the results being made public so people outside of government can discuss them?

*** Update ***

The more I read about this, the more the stress tests sound like a t-ball game rather than an inspection of the bank’s viability. Everyone gets credit for playing the game, we’re all winners, but we never kept score.

Facebook0Tweet0Email0
Previous Post: « Best WaPo chat question ever
Next Post: Fortunate one »

Reader Interactions

41Comments

  1. 1.

    bago

    April 9, 2009 at 3:29 pm

    I believe that "Nobody could have predicted…" is the phrase in operation.

  2. 2.

    schrodinger's cat

    April 9, 2009 at 3:29 pm

    They are not telling us everything. This sounds very fishy indeed.

  3. 3.

    Evinfuilt

    April 9, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    Remember they just changed an Accounting rule so they don’t have to report the losses on their junk assets right now.

    So yes, things are looking up!!! And they’ll need a bailout when reality returns.

  4. 4.

    edmund dantes

    April 9, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    And why aren’t the results being made public so people outside of government can discuss them?

    Remember illusions are more effective and impressive when you can’t see how they are done.

  5. 5.

    max hats

    April 9, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    Thank god! I was afraid I might not get to transfer more of my wealth to the financial sector.

    The real hedge fund is us.

  6. 6.

    Zifnab

    April 9, 2009 at 3:41 pm

    @schrodinger’s cat: They are, in fact, telling us everything. They’re just hoping we don’t notice.

    Regulators say all 19 banks undergoing the exams will pass them. Indeed, they say this is a test that a bank simply will not fail: if the examiners determine that a bank needs “exceptional assistance,” the government, that is, taxpayers, will provide it.

  7. 7.

    Zoogz

    April 9, 2009 at 3:42 pm

    The bad news is that many of the largest American lenders, despite all those bailouts, probably need to be bailed out again, either by private investors or, more likely, the federal government.

    Is anyone else getting a mental image of a bank vault with two broken saltine crackers on the floor and a moth fluttering nearby?

  8. 8.

    The Moar You Know

    April 9, 2009 at 3:44 pm

    Your kids have been taken with you and placed with a foster parent.

    It’s not Phil Spector, as you were originally told. It’s Michael Jackson.

    You kids are doing "better than expected", right?

  9. 9.

    The Moar You Know

    April 9, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    Is anyone else getting a mental image of a bank vault with two broken saltine crackers on the floor and a moth fluttering nearby?

    @Zoogz: There are no crackers and the moth is dead.

  10. 10.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    April 9, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    Prolly just floating the idea of another bailout to see how it goes over. Banks can stay in business as long as too many people don’t want their money at the same time. But 1) the government wants to reinflate another bubble to spur the economy and this requires copius lending that banks are reluctant to do now and 2) banksters are greedy fuckers that like free money from the government that can’t be tracked or accounted for. (see: TARP)

  11. 11.

    Jay in Oregon

    April 9, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    And why aren’t the results being made public so people outside of government can discuss them?

    To prevent runs on the banks in question, most likely.

    It’s the same reason the FDIC walks in at 5:01 pm on a Friday to close a bank down. This American Life had a reporter follow an FDIC-led bank closure; they are very hush-hush about their operations, to the point of using fake names when checking into hotels, staggering arrival times in rental cars to avoid notice, and swooping in on a bank with military precision.

    And yes, "better than expected" is probably the new "safer, but not yet safe.".

  12. 12.

    Zandar

    April 9, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    Exactly how bad did they think things were that they in better shape than they thought they would be, but STILL need hundreds of billions of dollars? And why aren’t the results being made public so people outside of government can discuss them?

    Because then you would have people publicly discussing the fact the the banks need trillions of dollars still to stay solvent, and then wondering where the hell that money is actually coming from.

    After that you devolve to the shotguns and canned goods part pretty rapidly.

  13. 13.

    justme

    April 9, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    And why aren’t the results being made public so people outside of government can discuss them?

    Because it’s bullshit.

    This installment of "stupid answers to simple questions" brought to you by…

    Wait,

    There are no crackers and the moth is dead.

    Fuck the crackers. What bugs me at this point is everybody in DC doing their level best to hose off the trail of muddy footprints leading out of said vault and merrily skipping down the street to…?

  14. 14.

    Brick Oven Bill

    April 9, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    The reason that the results are not being disclosed is because the administration is transparent. We have previously been informed of this.

    And he did now bow. And all smokers make more than $250k/yr. And there will be no lobbyists. And combat troops would be drawn down 1-2 brigades per month starting in January. And legislation would be posted online 5 days before it is voted on.

    This is unless, of course, after it is voted on, it will sit on a desk for four days before being signed into law. This is because he was born in Hawaii, but is really busy.

  15. 15.

    anonevent

    April 9, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    I think what it means is that the banks would be solid if they could get rid of the "toxic assets." There’s not a lot to restructure, and the only thing we gain by taking a bank over is that the mess has the government’s name on it rather than the banks. So, if we’re not willing to let the bank collapse under the weight of the assets, then the only thing that really has to be done is throw money at it.

    Whether that’s what we want to do is a different question.

  16. 16.

    The Moar You Know

    April 9, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    @Brick Oven Bill: You are not even trying anymore, and it hurts my feelings. Aren’t I worth the effort? I’m still special, right?

  17. 17.

    bago

    April 9, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    @Brick Oven Bill: What?

    I have done enough Ketamine and LSD to play fast and loose with the boundaries of reality, but… WHAT?

    Smokers are getting tax hikes because someone was born in Hawaii? What?

    Dude, you are hurting my brain way more than any chemical short of formaldehyde could.

    P.S. What?

  18. 18.

    Zoogz

    April 9, 2009 at 4:08 pm

    BoB may have just read the report sideways. Turn the monitor, Bill.

  19. 19.

    DanSmoot'sGhost

    April 9, 2009 at 4:09 pm

    Exactly how bad did they think things were that they in better shape than they thought they would be, but STILL need hundreds of billions of dollars?

    Oh gee, I don’t know, er, um, could they possibly be talking about two different things? Two different problem sets?

    (That immediate liquidity, ability to withstand the effects of a recession, credit availability …. might be tied to different sets of criteria and imperatives? Just sayin.)

    Sure, call me crazy for suggesting this (you know, since it seems pretty obvious from the context, and I’ll give you that the piece is not well written). But you’re a guy whose main approach to this whole story (bank bailouts in general) since last fall has been "I don’t know anything about this stuff, but …."

    So pardon me if I don’t bark like the trolled hyenas on cue here. Sorry. Really, I am. I like to bark as much as the next hyena. It clears out the throat and gets the lungs going.

    Well, I saw Lon Chaney walkin with the queen, doing the werewolves of London.

    I saw Lon Chaney Jr. walkin with the queen, doin the werewolves of London

    I saw a werewolf drinkin a pina colada at Trader Vic’s
    And his hair was perfect.

  20. 20.

    gypsy howell

    April 9, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    Really makes me want to write that check to our government next week.

    Meanwhile:

    Wells Fargo jumped 27% after the bank said it expects to report record net income of approximately $3 billion, or 55 cents a share, for the first quarter.

    After they took $25 billion (or was it more?) in our tax dollars. Which they said they didn’t want.

    I’m just too astounded and disgusted to even react anymore.

  21. 21.

    blogenfreude

    April 9, 2009 at 4:12 pm

    Someone on NPR said this morning that the stress tests were like Lake Wobegon – every child is above average.

  22. 22.

    srv

    April 9, 2009 at 4:12 pm

    Cartoon from 1934.

    Good thing we have helicopters now.

    h/t reddit

  23. 23.

    Bill H

    April 9, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    Anybody see Paul Krugman on The Maddow Show last night. His gist was that if the "stress testors" came out with some sort of generalized statement that things were basically okay that it would mean we should all run for the bomb shelters. I am looking for the nearest bomb shelter.

    His blog is overloaded at the moment – I think everybody wants to know what he thinks.

  24. 24.

    srv

    April 9, 2009 at 4:18 pm

    FYI, banks more sophisticated than others are going to retroactively apply Mark-to-Market for Q1. So they’ll have fabulous reports.

    I’ll give you the same advice I gave some republican golf partners during the CA natural gas shakedown: "Buy all the Enron you can".

    BOB, Atta, buy all the financials you can. They can only go up.

  25. 25.

    DanSmoot'sGhost

    April 9, 2009 at 4:22 pm

    @gypsy howell:

    Well, once you pull yourself together, you could google this in about ten seconds:

    Wells Fargo got $25 billion from the bank bailout plan known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Atkins said the bank would like to repay TARP "as soon as practical" but that "the government will decide ultimately when that can be done."
    The bank said its tangible common equity ratio is about 3.1 percent, lower than many analysts prefer.
    Fox-Pitt Kelton analyst Andrew Marquardt nevertheless wrote that the bank may be ready to pay back TARP by year-end.

    But, you know, why confuse ourselves with facts?

  26. 26.

    Brachiator

    April 9, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    @Brick Oven Bill:

    The reason that the results are not being disclosed is because the administration is transparent. We have previously been informed of this.

    You’re more fun when you are making up stories about the Obama Administration and gun sales to Mexican drug lords.

    The more I read about this, the more the stress tests sound like a t-ball game rather than an inspection of the bank’s viability. Everyone gets credit for playing the game, we’re all winners, but we never kept score.

    There’s a lot of quotes of people in the background in this story, but (for some good reasons) not much reporting on the actual stress tests. But this piece of the story is very telling:

    Some investors wonder if the new tests are rigorous enough, given the potential problems lurking inside the banking industry.

    Again, the financial markets are trying to have it both ways. After years of playing with no rules and phony securities ratings, they are now balking at the government’s evaluation of their books, and are also trying to flex some muscle, resisting some of the government’s proposals about how they should take on some of the banks’ toxic assets.

    In short, they want the best side of the deal, and are threatening not to free up as much capital as Treasury would like if they don’t get their way.

    And it may be a coincidence, but the story about investor resistance is coming out at the same time as the interview in which George Soros is claiming that Obama and Treasury did not go far enough in dealing with the financial industry.

    I wonder if a threat of nationalization might finally be put on the table to scare the bejeebus out of reluctant bankers and investors.

    Good cop/bad cop, Obama style.

  27. 27.

    anticontrarian

    April 9, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    are there trophies?

  28. 28.

    cyntax

    April 9, 2009 at 4:46 pm

    @srv:

    Cartoon from 1934.

    Good thing we have helicopters now.

    Meh. There are some constructive criticisms to be made about the bailout and the stimulus (though not the same ones), but that cartoon so obviously didn’t come true that I’m not sure trotting out that chesnut is worth much.

  29. 29.

    NonyNony

    April 9, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    @Jay in Oregon:

    To prevent runs on the banks in question, most likely.

    It’s the same reason the FDIC walks in at 5:01 pm on a Friday to close a bank down.

    This.

    I imagine that if even one of these banks needs to be nationalized, in public it’s going to get a clean bill of health from the Treasury. Nothing will happen until 6pm on a Friday and then the takeover will be announced.

    And if multiple banks need it, they’ll all be announced at the same time in toto. With assurances that "these are all the banks with problems this severe" and whatnot. Because the previous Treasury screwed up with Bear Stearns and almost caused a total collapse, and the current Treasury is too spooked to do anything.

    (That Times story is completely nonsensical, BTW – it basically amounts to "here’s a bunch of contradictory rumors I’ve heard that I’m going to pass along unsourced. Enjoy!" Even reading between the lines is mostly meaningless – I’d say I’m not sure why the Times published such a piece of nonsense, but then I’d have to admit that I’m not sure why the Times publishes about half the things it does.)

  30. 30.

    gypsy howell

    April 9, 2009 at 5:26 pm

    @DanSmoot’sGhost:

    Atkins said the bank would like to repay TARP "as soon as practical" but that "the government will decide ultimately when that can be done."

    I don’t think I’ll hold my breath.

  31. 31.

    valdivia

    April 9, 2009 at 5:33 pm

    I found the NYT piece very vague and not sourced at all and also: completely contradictory all banks have been said to pass the tests but banks will have to fail. Huh? If anything I want a really well sourced (quotes from actual people) piece that confirms what s going on or not because based on the NYT–I really cannot judge (and all the commentary I have seen on it does not do any new reporting, which is what is missing)

  32. 32.

    Ricky Bobby

    April 9, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    I think I could put together a "stress test" for our banks that would achieve similar results via gmail chat.

    Me (Gub’ment): u guyz ok?
    Bank: yeah
    Me: kk
    Bank: we needs moar moneyz plz
    Me: kk

    DONE! Onto the next bank. I should have this shit nailed down by the end of the week.

  33. 33.

    guest omen

    April 9, 2009 at 5:38 pm

    from nyt:

    For the last eight weeks, nearly 200 federal examiners have labored inside some of the nation’s biggest banks to determine how those institutions would hold up if the recession deepened.

    nakedcapitalism is suggesting 200 examiners isn’t sufficient:

    When Citi nearly went under in the early 1990s, it took 160 examiners to go over its US commercial real estate portfolio

    if we don’t even have sufficient enough manpower deployed to do a proper stress test, how do people expect an ability to nationalize the banks?

  34. 34.

    ThatLeftTurnInABQ

    April 9, 2009 at 5:53 pm

    if we don’t even have sufficient enough manpower deployed to do a proper stress test, how do people expect an ability to nationalize the banks?

    I’ve been asking the same question in various corners of pitchfork-and-torch-land and never seem to get anything other than blank stares back in response. I guess you take over a large chunk of the global financial system with the FDIC and Treasury staff you have, not the staff you wished you had.

    Also, the financial weapons of mass looting are located somewhere north, south, east or west of lower Manhattan. Or in London. Maybe.

  35. 35.

    Xanthippas

    April 9, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    The more I read about this, the more the stress tests sound like a t-ball game rather than an inspection of the bank’s viability. Everyone gets credit for playing the game, we’re all winners, but we never kept score.

    Honestly, I’d be surprised if that’s NOT what’s going on.

  36. 36.

    Comrade Dread

    April 9, 2009 at 6:34 pm

    And why aren’t the results being made public so people outside of government can discuss them?

    We live in a new age of government transparency?

    Is anyone else getting a mental image of a bank vault with two broken saltine crackers on the floor and a moth fluttering nearby?

    No, I’m imagining more like the end of Trading Places, except the Dukes won and they’re laughing and opening another bottle of champagne at the news that the government is going to send them another check for a hundred million.

    Some investors wonder if the new tests are rigorous enough, given the potential problems lurking inside the banking industry.

    Considering that I read that on a typical mid-sized bank, they usually have over a hundred investigators, yeah, it seems a bit less stringent when you’ve got 200 investigators covering 19 behemoths.

    I think the test probably consisted of the same dutiful reporting our media provides.

    Investigator: So, Bob, how’s the bank doing?
    Bob: Fine and dandy.
    Investigator: Great. Can I see your books?
    Bob: No. Will a spreadsheet and PowerPoint I had our PR guys draw up for CNBC suffice?
    Investigator: Sure. If you can’t trust a bank CEO, who can you trust?

  37. 37.

    Patrick

    April 9, 2009 at 8:35 pm

    The two paragraphs make sense if most of the largest banks are solvent. However, that still leaves room for Citi and maybe BOA. The "source" wouldn’t want to say, ‘all but one’, because everyone would know which one. Buying was much more subdued today in C than the other banks.

    Citi is probably okay also, if the economy picks right up from here. But, nobody expects that, so the quote, "probably…need more bailout".

    Krugman is working under the thesis that the business cycle is no more. That is pretty radical, since the business cycle has been around for eons.

  38. 38.

    Jonathan

    April 9, 2009 at 9:43 pm

    This is the ‘pump and dump’ phase. Expect massive insider selling immediately followed by Dow 4000.

    Read the FOMC minutes to see how bad the wider economy is, and hence the banks balance sheets.

  39. 39.

    Eric Etheridge

    April 9, 2009 at 9:59 pm

    Here’s a roundup of not-very-respectful opinion on the assertions reported in the NYT article.

  40. 40.

    Tax Analyst

    April 9, 2009 at 10:16 pm

    Regulators say all 19 banks undergoing the exams will pass them. Indeed, they say this is a test that a bank simply will not fail: if the examiners determine that a bank needs “exceptional assistance,” the government, that is, taxpayers, will provide it.

    (Sigh)…if they’d only had this rule when I went to Med school I’d be a surgeon today. Anybody want their gall bladder out? Don’t worry, if I screw it up somebody else will come by and fix you up.

    But if an ordinary person who has lost their job goes to try and get Food Stamps they’d better not own a car worth more than a few bucks, ’cause that means they ain’t poor enough yet to qualify. "Come back when you’re a little more destitute, OK?"

  41. 41.

    Elie

    April 10, 2009 at 10:38 am

    Well its clear that including Krugman, we should all expect a detailed report on the status of every bank. And we should know that independent of whether it affects anything abou next steps – Transparency is the only virtue.

    Naw — we need to know and that is the only value. Liars and thieves — thats all they are! Knew it all along…

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Biden-Harris Inauguration

Biden-Harris Inauguration Website

Official events – watch at top link

Kakistocracy
I believe In My Fellow Americans
Defeat Them
Turning Bystanders Into Activists
First Up, COVID

Do Something!

Call Your Senators & Representatives
Directory of US Senators
Directory of US Representatives
Letter to Elected Officials – Albatrossity
Letter to Elected Officials – Martin

I Got the Shot!

🎈Ways to Support Our Site

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal
Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice ⬇  

Recent Comments

  • David 🎅🎄Merry Christmas🎄🎅 Koch on Here Comes The Sun (Jan 21, 2021 @ 3:24am)
  • vhh on Inauguration Night Open Thread (Jan 21, 2021 @ 3:21am)
  • opiejeanne on Here Comes The Sun (Jan 21, 2021 @ 3:11am)
  • FelonyGovt on Here Comes The Sun (Jan 21, 2021 @ 3:10am)
  • Mary G on Here Comes The Sun (Jan 21, 2021 @ 3:01am)

Team Claire, and Family

Help for David’s Niece Claire
Claire Updates
Claire update for the holidays 12/23

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year

Featuring

John Cole
Silverman on Security
COVID-19 Coronavirus
Medium Cool with BGinCHI
Information Is Power

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Submit Photos to On the Road
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Meetups: Proof of Life
2021 Pets of Balloon Juice Calendar

Culture: Books, Film, TV, Music, Games, Podcasts

Noir: Favorites in Film, Books, TV
Book Recommendations & Indy Recs
Mystery Recommendations
Medium Cool: What If (Books & Films)
Netflix Favorites
Amazon Prime Favorites
Netflix Suggestions in July
Fun Music Thread
Longmire & Netflix Suggestions
Medium Cool: Places!
Medium Cool: Games!
Medium Cool: Watch or Read Again

Twitter

John Cole’s Twitter

[custom-twitter-feeds]

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!