For the record, I think it is his kid:
The family of John Edwards’ former mistress, Rielle Hunter, is challenging the former senator to take a DNA paternity test after his claim that he did not father Hunter’s 6-months-old child.
There really is no other reason for him to have been in that hotel. If it was not his kid, he would make sure he was never in the same state as Hunter anymore. If there was no baby, only a complete and total moron would be caught DEAD anywhere near a former mistress, particularly after admitting to the affair to your wife and knowing the tabloids are chasing after you.
In fact, the only thing that would surprise me about this whole affair would be if it is NOT his kid. Everything else- the affair, the denials, the fact Elizabeth was told, the money spent relocating her, and so on- none of that surprises me. Visiting the woman and her newborn again in a hotel late at night when the press is on your tail and the kid is not yours? That would be surprising.
Incertus
Did you hear that the US women swept the medals at the Olympics?
Chris
Given her age I wonder if she, um, kept a sample and then went off and did IVF. That would be just slightly less preposterous than the alternatives.
Jorge
I think Edwards went back for more after telling Elizabeth and is still lying…
DougJ
Who knows if it’s his kid or not? And who cares?
Richard Bottoms
>There really is no other reason for him to have been in that >hotel.
Except to go ask the woman to keep quiet? A legit move if he knew the affair might come out and there’s a child involved.
My bet is on he’s not the father and the photo’s a fake though the affair did occur. Otherwise why drag it out by demanding a paternity test? That’s Jessie Jackson level stupid.
evie
First, I doubt it is his baby. It’s possible he’s still in deep denial about the situation, or still somehow thinks he can escape it if it’s true, but it’s more likely that the baby is not his. It’s just too easy to prove.
Second, I don’t believe he told Elizabeth in 2006. It seems to me she’s trying to give him a bit of cover on it now. How else to explain that once he told Elizabeth, Hunter CONTINUED to work for the campaign? It’s perfectly reasonable to assume Elizabeth would forgive John an infidelity; it’s highly unlikely she’d also be OK with the woman still attached to the campaign. My guess is she found out last fall when the first story ran.
Either way, she’s complicit in his lies.
Brachiator
This would not necessarily be the case if he was strongly attracted to Hunter either emotionally or erotically.
Edwards’ statement that he did not love Hunter was an odd addition, totally unnecessary, and seemed to be a bone tossed to those women who think that emotional betrayal is worse than a physical affair. The fact that he tossed it out there suggests that Edwards doth protest too much.
Edwards has already shown himself to be reckless, so whether he is a total moron or only a partial one, may not make much difference. The Enquirer had been after him years ago on the adultery thing, and his running for president only renewed the scrutiny.
But if he is lying about the kid after appearing to come clean about the affair, he would not only be a total moron, but one who couldn’t even wait for his enemies to finish him off, but instead decided to self-destruct.
iluvsummr
I guess a Sarkozy or Mitterand could never be elected president in today’s US (and a Carla Bruni would never survive the scrutiny). Edwards is an ex-Senator and not running for anything right now. His wife has decided to forgive him. Why don’t we just leave him be?
cleek
Thanks, Edwards! Thanks for putting yourself into the race while you knew this was out there ready to explode.
— GOP
shmo
The baby is a dead ringer for Kucinich. ‘Nuff said.
Stan
Edwards said he met with her to talk her out
of going public; that makes at least a little
sense. He’s not the nominee, and hasn’t looked
like the nominee for a long time. VP is out. This
is “news”, but its not News. BFD.
(I hope Mickey Kaus is happy)
Brachiator
Edwards can no longer be an effective campaigner for Obama and other Democrats.
His political future is in doubt now. A strong, honest apology might still have kept Edwards in the running for Attorney General in an Obama administration. If he is lying about the child’s paternity, he has effectively ended his political career.
Church Lady
I think Evie is right. According to reports, Hunter continued to receive campaign funds until April 2007. The story didn’t see the light of day until October 2007. I’d hazard a guess that that is when Elizabeth found out about the affair.
I also doubt that it is his baby, only because paternity is so easy to prove. It just wouldn’t make sense to admit to the affair, but deny paternity, if the baby was his.
Egypt Steve
Billie Jeane is not my lover … she’s just a girl who says that I am the one … but the kid is not my son …
Why can’t I get that song out of my head?
Punchy
If I cared about fencing, I’d go out and put a layer of wood sealer on the one in my backyard.
Andrew
What’s really important is that we stay focused on Edward’s love child instead of the potential start of WW3 in Georgia.
Thom
No way. After all this you think he’s going to try another lie? No way in hell. It’s not his kid. Freaking Elizabeth even said so in her post at DKos.
Andrew
Oh, who am I kidding. I’m watching women’s beach volleyball.
southpaw
After all this you think he’s going to try another lie?
You have much to learn about the ways of men, young grasshopper.
PeterJ
Whatever I think about John and Elizabeth Edwards right now, John Edwards at least did something good in his ABC interview. Hopefully that’s not the last time he’s going to do that.
KC
I for one am happy to see Edwards exit the political scene. He just never really inspired me and always seemed a bit phony. That said, I think Obama has a lot to answer for in this case. Clearly, he needs to be asked if he thinks the Edwards affair will affect the race, and if so, what kind of effect will it have. And, he needs to be asked this repeatedly, over and over.
donovong
“I still really don’t care, as I have mentioned before, and realize this is one of those issues that is just going to be a total pain in the ass for me. – John Cole”
One should stop hitting oneself in the head with the hammer when one realizes that it hurts, shouldn’t one?
harlana pepper
My final word on the subject. I can’t say it any better than this.
John Cole
What channel?
Please tell me it is HD.
Just Some Fuckhead
Hahah.
shera
I’m watching it in HD on my local NBC affiliate.
Dug Jay
Well, Edwards was right after all. There are two Americas. He had a wife in one and a girlfriend in the other. What’s the big deal?
Andrew
Is the airport bathroom stall a third America, then?
dmsilev
Speaking of Olympic Beach Volleyball, check out our classy President.
Can we amend the Constitution to require a certain minimum level of mental maturity to run for President?
-dms
Montysano
I love beach volleyball.
Sorry about the unfortunate distraction in the photos. But Kerri Walsh? Yowza……
call me crazy
Do these people know what condoms are? Edwards you ever heard of AIDS?
Why ride raw when you have a wife at home? Exposing her and your stupid ass to disease. Oh I guess she looked clean– What a dumb fuck!!!
Screw all you want but don’t risk your wife and her life.
Not surprised just sick of the stupidity and lack of responsibility.
DonnaInMichigan
AHA! Now I understand what John Edwards meant by his “There are 2 America’s” statement.
One America where his wife and kids live with him, and the other America where he visits his mistress and child!!
Got it.
Nick
It amazes me that his followers, after falling for his old lies, are willing to fall for these NEW ones. You would think they would be wise by now, but no. Hopefully journalists will start doing their job and expose these new falsehoods instead of letting themselves be used by Edwards yet again for his own personal ambitions with no regard for his party or the country.
I’ve always loved Elizabeth, but I have lost some respect for her. How in the world can she call what he did yesterday an example of COURAGE? He was literally forced to make an admission after being caught and running away for weeks, and the one he made, was the absolute LEAST he thought he could get away with (a short affair in 2006). Nothing he is saying makes any sense- and it’s time people stopped letting him get away with it.
tim
Hey Nick, are you enjoying clutching that “pearl necklace” around your delicately offended throat while masturbating to women’s beach volleyball and news reports of Edwards’ “riding raw” with his mistress? lol
The very bestest part of a good old fashioned American sex scandal is following the reaction of the retarded puritans in our midst. Perhaps such a controversey gives them the pleasurable excuse to talk about EEEEEEEEEVIL SEX out loud instead of just to the voices in their heads.
Myself, I think Edwards is hot. Heck, I’d hit it. Don’t blame the woman at all. My main concern is: couldn’t John have done a lot better?
gil mann
Turns out $400 isn’t that bad a deal for a full haircut, considering the price of trim on the side.
Joshua Norton
Why won’t the press report on McCain’s affair with Joe Lieberman? I mean it’s not like they’re even trying to hide it or anything.
Just Some Fuckhead
Hey, maybe Elizabeth Edwards is a Lesbo like Hillary???
/Rush
Dave_Violence
What he should do is simply tell the world that this skinny bitch is his concubine and the child is his. He is providing material goods for the woman and kid and that’s it. Hell, he should take lessons from Strom Thurmond.
American politicians would make such lousy royalty, it’s no wonder they’re so bad at these things.
DonnaInMichigan
Well for a guy who shells out 400.00 per haircut,like it’s nothing, doesn’t surprise me in the least that he would shell out 114,000 for a piece of a**.
The Moar You Know
The desperation on the part of the trolls here is quite telling; Edwards never made any headway in the primaries and was never in any serious contention for a spot in either a Clinton or Obama administration, and yet they are behaving as thought this will finally be the incident that brings Obama to his knees.
This is more like Fred Thompson being caught fucking a woman sixty years younger than him…oh wait, he is? Gross. Oh well, no matter. You get the point. No one gives a flying fuck what Sleepy Thompson does, he’s yesterday’s news. And so is John Edwards.
But as I said, the angst is quite telling. They’ve got nothing on Obama save that he has a funny name and is black, and the polls are saying loud and clear that is not enough to cost him the election.
Ella
Hahaahahahhahha! Loves it!
jake
I really hope people want to make a big deal about Edwards being an Obama supporter and therefore Obama is somehow responsible for the vagaries of the JEP.
I still don’t think Str8TalkXpress rider Bob Allen got all of the attention he deserved.
Andrew
Geez, imagine if one of the presidential candidates had cheated on his wife and then dumped her after she became hospitalized!
El Cid
I supported Edwards in the early primaries, but not as an individual — rather as a political figure supporting certain rhetoric and policies.
Not just myself, but a lot of people concluded (perhaps wrongly, but I think correctly) that Edwards was for a time in this primary a very effective representative for a certain approach and a certain challenge to the ultra-stagnant center-right fetishism of much of the party’s bigwigs, and that his interventions helped push much of the campaigns’ agenda in a much more progressive direction than it otherwise would have.
I never once thought he was the perfect, or even close to the best person to embody (via his person or his record) those goals, but, he did, and it worked nonetheless. That’s why it feels to me to be absolutely no skin off my nose when people point out his contradictory record, his personal hypocrisy, or whatever — I was supporting a political move, not some cult of an individual.
Knowing that, I probably benefited the most I could have from Edwards’ run, even without this scandal; I just didn’t feel he was the best candidate to go the distance, and even then I was quite nervous about his capacity to stick to that high-minded approach & rhetoric should he somehow have beaten very high odds to get in the White House.
Would I have preferred to have the rhetoric and policies I wished in the person of not only a better individual candidate but someone more likely to attract massive popular support?
Sure.
But reality isn’t what I wish it, otherwise things would be much, much better off.
Tsulagi
Can’t stand the little dipshit, and there is certainly an “eww” factor having Bush near these fine Olympians in the photo, but I just can’t find it to fault him. I’d dap that too.
Just Some Fuckhead
That “challenge” being to vote for said center-right fetish and then apologize for it and claim to support a populist fetish now?
John Cole
The Olympics aren’t as much fun without Inge de Bruijn.
El Cid
Just Some Fuckhead: I don’t quite understand which ‘more progressive / truly radical than thou’ point you were trying to make, or if even that was the point at all; I only made the point that other people than myself agreed that the Democratic campaign was made much more progressive than it was or seemed that it would be, not that it was transformed by Edwards’ golden touch into my preferred wonderland.
GSD
Bush meets with military advisers to discuss the grave and deteriorating situation in Georgia and Ossetia.
-GSD
Just Some Fuckhead
Oh give me a fucking break with the Edwards hagiography. He didn’t make the primary any more progressive than the other Democratic candidates that were running. If he was tickling yer personal fancy with his fightin’ rhetoric it was because you were too obtuse to see it was contrary to everything he’s ever done in his political career. If he’d had an actual progressive background, he could have walked the walk, like Obama for example, instead of just talking about it.
JL
Recent Presidents not rumored to have an affair, Carter, Ford and GW. This group of presidents not only had low poll numbers, they were ineffective in office. Should we be concerned about Obama?
dbrown
Finally! We now really know who fathered Tom Cruise’s baby! Tom can come out of the closet and Edwards can come clean about all his affairs …
w vincentz
It’s quite clear that John Edwards was there for only one reason, to abduct the baby and sell it so he could pay off the hair stylist. Too bad Mr Smiles got caught.
oh really
Thank goodness this important story is available to dominate news coverage during this time when nothing else of importance is happening in the world. Obviously, everyone should now vote for John McCain because someone who isn’t the Democratic nominee for president had an affair AND endorsed Barack Obama.
Further, if the baby is his, voters should never again vote for any Democrat, because we all know that Republicans would never do anything like this.
In addition to that, I can’t thank John enough for assuring us that he’s sure the baby is Edwards’ because that opinion is invaluable in helping the world put everything else in perspective.
Nonsense. Only a complete and total moron would have had an affair under these circumstances, but most people, at one time or another during their lives, behave like complete and total morons. Some do it once and learn. Others, like our current Dear Leader, are incapable of learning and complete and total idiocy is a way of life.
Only a complete and total moron would have gotten himself into the mess that Clinton created for himself, but high intelligence and complete stupidity often occupy the same body simultaneously.
If running for political office attracts narcissists and fosters narcissism, maybe having one’s own blog does too. For my part, I can’t think of any good reason why John felt he needed to share these thoughts with the world.
Edwards sucks. He did a despicable thing and should now disappear. Once again, it’s time to move on.
El Cid
That’s certainly an argument, but not one that convinced a lot of pretty intelligent observers.
Stop arguing that everyone who finds something positive in the apparent effects of a candidate’s candidacy is some sort of star worshiper. I’m not, and you’re not one fucking iota more realistic, insightful, wizened, progressive, or anything more than me. Not one tiny, little, slight little bit. It’s not some moral lapse that someone capable of seeing in crystal clarity the shit situation that we’re in can yet occasionally will himself to find some satisfaction in even a slight improvement in the shittening. There was plenty of cause for a clear eyed observer to dismiss each and every candidate on the stage as laughable, a joke, including Barack Obama, including Hillary Clinton, including Chris Doss, including Joe Biden, including Dennis Kucinich, but such is the world that what we get is what we get.
And why is it you keep reading me stating that John Edwards could not walk the walk and your rejoinder is that he couldn’t walk the walk?
Why does this appear to you as some sort of contradiction? Why is this some sort of questionable suggestion that candidacies of people who are inherently weak candidates and who lose might still measurably impact a campaign? What sort of infantile analysis of elections has to begin with the premise that such is implausible because, you know, it just is?
You see this in elections throughout the nation and the world. You see it in county commission races and races in other countries.
Geejo
My Letter to Sam Stein, Huffingtonpost.com in response to headline “Edwards False Assertion During ABC News Interview”
Sam,
Thank you so much for this incredible attention to detail and accuracy you are applying to this most important news story. Actually, I’m being sarcastic.
I really don’t understand why this story is more important than all the other stuff going on in the world today. I guess it’s easier–funner?–to ignore all the really hard stories out there. After all, why are we not going after George Bush and his merry gang of torturing lawbreakers with the same amount of commitment to the “truth” the you all are applying to the Edwards Love Child story?
Ironically, this “get John Edwards” mentality is resulting in some really sloppy, shoddy journalism being done. You guys, in your lust for the salacious, are missing out on a huge angle in this story.
More and more this woman is starting to sound to me like some kind of weird predator in the way this thing has played out. How do you folks in the media know this isn’t a case of “Fatal Attraction” or something? I mean, really, why is a 42 yr-old behaving (as evidenced by her breathless emails) the way she did in regards to such a fleeting risky, pointless relationship? She knew the situation with Edwards, with Elizabeth’s recent cancer, their life stories. Then, apparently, she jumped into yet another relationship with a married man after the one with Edwards ended–and somewhere along the line, got herself PREGNANT? Then threatens to go public with the whole thing?
I really think that there is far more here than meets the eye in terms of this woman’s motives, and quite frankly, she should be held to the same standard of “forced truth” as Edwards. For God’s sake, he and his wife have practically stripped themselves naked for the press on this stupid story which should have been a private matter between them in the first place. And this Hunter woman? She’s no innocent victim here. Stalk her for a change.
Just Some Fuckhead
I’m not suggesting you are a star worshipper. I’m questioning your judgment.
I’m clearly more realistic and insightful than you based on the fact I saw through Edwards schtick pretty early THE FIRST TIME HE RAN IN 2004. You still haven’t figured it out. If you Edwards fanbois had prevailed in striking out the rest of the candidates for made-up Naderite bullshit like using “rightwing frames” or secretly being a Republican or being controlled by corporatists and/or GE, we’d have presumptive Democratic nominee Edwards, a corporate DLCer with a center-right record pretending to be a leftwing populist now running to the center for the general election and embroiled in a major fucking sex scandal. A recipe for disaster.
No, actually there wasn’t any reason to dismiss those candidates as “laughable, a joke” unless yer a Republican. Rather, it can be argued that each of them brought a certain amount of baggage to a Presidential candidacy. None of them except Edwards brought the baggage of being a complete phony whose rhetoric never matched his record. And now you can add incorrigible liar to his political resume. Maybe serial apologizer too.
Beth in VA
Well that’s just it, isn’t it? We have to pick and choose what we believe John Edwards says is true.
jake
So wait. Hunter is refusing to allow DNA testing of the kid. I’m not sure how to react here. Should I be angry at her for trying to cover for JE and defying her family. Angry at her for covering for JE but pleased she’d defying her family? And what about Elizabeth, am I angry at her for not divorcing JE, more or less angry than I am at Hunter?
I’m sooo confused. How do I react to women who make their own choices?!
El Cid
Just Some Fuckhead: In addition to making shitty, unconvincing arguments, you really are just a pompous dick, and I apologize for having wasted both of our time engaging you. Again, I’m not an Edwards fanbois, you’re a silly little dick for thinking that it hurts me in the slightest for Edwards to be insulted — it doesn’t — and again, I don’t give a shit what you think you saw through, the fact is Edwards at the early stage of the campaign was the most effective advocate for any openly progressive policies — certainly not Dodd or Kucinich who could at least honestly embody them — on the stage of the entire Democratic candidates’ list, despite being absolutely one of the weakest and hypocritical possible people to pretend to embody that role. Do I wish that one of the more likely candidates like Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama had done so from the beginning? Sure, but they didn’t. Do I wish we lived in some magical land in which it was likely that a real liberal candidate might have had a snowball’s chance in hell of getting somewhere, say, Dodd? Okay, but we don’t. And for thinking that I like Nader? Extra fuck you. I supported Edwards while simultaneously being pretty sure he wouldn’t make it, and also being pretty sure he shouldn’t.
Admittedly, I was a cynical person who thought the effect he in his new identity might have on the campaign would be positive, and thankfully I was right on both counts — his effect was positive, and he was weeded out. I not only still get it, I got it then.
And “we’d have presumptive Democratic nominee Edwards, a corporate DLCer with a center-right record pretending to be a leftwing populist now running to the center for the general election and embroiled in a major fucking sex scandal?” Well, we almost got Hillary Clinton, who was exactly that minus the sex scandal, entering an election with some of the strongest negatives of any candidates.
ThymeZone
I have no idea why the fuck this blog is wasting space on a second-rate sex scandal, pimping the idea of Edwards’ paternity when facts on the table refute the allegation of paternity …. unless BJ is angling to become the National Enquirer of the blog world?
Do you suppose we could wait for all the facts to be in before starting purely speculative thread topics?
If you want scandal that actually has relevance to the current political context, one doesn’t have to go much further than John McCain’s sordid tales of shitty politics and fat trail of improprieties.
John Edwards never had a prayer of being the Dem nominee. Not the remotest chance.
Just Some Fuckhead
El Cid Says:
Followed By:
I don’t think yer quaified to weigh in on the merits of someone else’s arguments based on your admitted incoherence. And for the record, I wasn’t calling you a Nader supporter. I simply pointed out that many Edwards supporters tactics had the stench of Naderism about ’em. Petey over at MY comes to mind.
At any rate it’s all water under the bridge now. Until the next good-looking Southern center-right demagogue tries to sweet talk real progressives into the sack again.
jbarntt
Hi ThymeZone
John Edwards never had a prayer of being the Dem nominee. Not the remotest chance.
Nice of him to accept the hard, (no pun intended), earned dollars of his supporters for a hopeless cause.
If you want scandal that actually has relevance to the current political context, one doesn’t have to go much further than John McCain’s sordid tales of shitty politics and fat trail of improprieties.
Given the vague and unsourced accusations you make about McCain, I’ll guess that the American public will prefer what they know to be true of him. I appreciate that you find those very things despicable, but I’m willing to let my fellow citizens be the judge.
bob
Who gives a shit? Why the fuck is this even a subject for discussion. What a load of shit.
nightjar
That’s a relief, since they did such a bang up job the last two prez election cycles.
Gemina13
I see it’s recipe time, since there’s nothing of importance being discussed:
Phaal Curry
Ingredients
* 1 1/2 lbs meat or poultry, chopped into 1-inch cubes
* 1 large onion, finely chopped
* 8 cloves garlic, finely chopped
* 1 ounce fresh ginger, finely chopped
* 3 tablespoons ghee or oil
* 14 ounces canned tomatoes
* 1 tablespoon tomato ketchup (or tomato sauce with
sugar to taste)
* 1 tablespoon tomato puree
* 12 fresh chili peppers or dried chilies (or more)
Spices
* 1 teaspoon cumin, ground
* 1 teaspoon coriander, ground
* 3 teaspoons chili powder
* 1 teaspoon dried fenugreek leaves (optional)
* 1 teaspoon garam masala
Fry the onion, garlic and ginger until golden in half of the ghee or oil. Mix the spices with a little water to make a paste; add to the onion mixture and cook for 10 minutes.
Add the tomatoes (canned, ketchup and puree) and chilies. Cook for another 10 minutes. Meanwhile, fry the meat in a separate pan in remaining ghee or oil, until sealed (5 to 10 minutes).
Combine all ingredients in a casserole dish and cook in a pre-heated oven at 400 degrees for 45 to 60 minutes.
Note: I usually use 6 habanero peppers or 8 jalapenos in this dish. Otherwise, I find it too hot to eat.
ThymeZone
Wow, mighty magnanimous of you, mister Spoof-ass fuckhead nobody cares what you think guy.
Go fuck yourself.
Just Some Fuckhead
Whoa there, nellie. Don’t be a playa hata.
jbarntt
nightjar Says:
That’s a relief, since they did such a bang up job the last two prez election cycles.
They did OK, given the choices. Gore would have been OK by me, and he only lost by the narrowest of margins. Kerry, Ughh. Not to say Bush is any prize.
Personally I prefer a conservative rather than a liberal like Bush with his big government education and socialized medicine, not to mention his Wilsonian ideas about the world.
But we take what we can get I guess. Like this year.
jbarntt
ThymeZone Says:
Wow, mighty magnanimous of you, mister Spoof-ass fuckhead nobody cares what you think guy.
Go fuck yourself.
Hi TZ,
Thanks for the thoughtful comment I will certainly give it all the consideration it merits.
nightjar
The same could be said about spoofing trolls here at BJ.
ThymeZone
Give it whatever you want, butthead.
ThymeZone
Kiss my ass, Mr. Fuckhead.
harlana pepper
What a collection of hypocritical, faux-Puritans. Everyone who supported him wants to disown him now because he had an affair and lied about it. Admittedly, he handled it very poorly. Sounds familiar.
The ‘seamy sex in public restrooms/ass dildo’ right sure has scared the piss out of some of you lilly-livered cowards. Get some balls, fellas.
arnott
I cannot believe I liked Edwards in 2004. Voters need to forget Edwards, and elect Obama.
harlana pepper
I DIDN’T. I didn’t like Edwards in 2004 because he voted for the war. I was a Dean supporter. I gave Edwards a pass, however, for coming forward and saying he’d made a mistake, long *before* it was popular to criticize the war and because his message was the most populist. People that want to bitch about his voting record need to take a look at Obama’s (‘The Most Liberal Senator in History’) and stick that in their pipe. Of course, I’m an Obama supporter now and I’m dealing with it just fine. It’s called being a ‘realist.’
harlana pepper
Of course, Obama did not vote for the despicable ‘Kyl-Lieberman’ amendment like Hill did. He just didn’t show up.
Corner Stone
Somebody call whatever nursing home they stuck Thyme Zone in and tell them he’s been spitting out his daily meds again.
jbarntt
Give it whatever you want, butthead.
Hi TZ,
Get back to me when you graduate from Jr. High School.
brendancalling
who fucking cares.
I can name a dozen things going on in the world RIGHT NOW that are hundreds of times more important than whether John Edwards stuck his ding-a-ling in a twat that belonged to someone other than his wife.
However, given the panty-sniffing going on all over blogtopia, maybe every A-list and B-list blogger is applying for a job on the Washington Post’s editorial page.
It’s funny: people say I’m tasteless and irrelevant. Fascinating!
binzinerator
Edwards? Who the fuck cares. I’m still looking Kerri Walsh’s ass.
Thanks, montysano!