Oy.
Taiwan’s ruling party passed a resolution Sunday asserting the island’s separate identity from rival China and calling for a referendum on Taiwan’s sovereignty, the latest in a series of moves aimed at strengthening the island’s de-facto independence.
The resolution — passed after heated debate at a boisterous party congress — calls for making the island’s formal name ”Taiwan,” without specifically abolishing its current official name, the ”Republic of China.” It also calls for the enactment of a new constitution, but gives no specific deadline for either that or the referendum.
China has grown a superpower’s sense of “backyard” (e.g., Burma) but it never had much interest in empire per se, preferring investment, trade and convenient vetoes at the Security Council to direct intervention. China hasn’t had a Vietnam war, an Iraq war or an Afghanistan, its first aircraft carrier remains years off at best. When it comes to territorial border security, however, China comes very close to fanatic. For many the bitterness at Japan, for example, remains fresh, vivid and raw.
While it is a relief to see that Chinese Taiwan policy has moved perceptibly from threats to diplomacy, don’t mistake that for a softened stance in general. If and when Taiwan pulls the trigger China stands ready to do everything in its considerable power to subdue the island. As I recall Lincoln took about the same position.
Maybe it’s a bad thing that Iraq has downgraded our military to the point that we could do little more than sit back and watch. Then again, at this point only our ground forces are broken and, after all, who in their right mind thinks that we should engage the Chinese army on the ground? From the start our only best option was to park a couple of carrier groups in the Taiwan Strait and hope the Chinese don’t show up to dance, and as far as I know we can still do that. Complicating a complicated picture, China and Taiwan both own sizable chunks of our national debt, which happens right now to be leveraged farther over a cliff than a NINJA loan. As a fun little bonus, bolstering the Taiwan Strait would force us to give up pretensions of threatening Iran. And in the best of cases we might still lose that carrier group if China wants to push the issue badly enough.
In general I see a bloody mess with no good options for us. But hey, that just means I’m plagued with non-neoconservative concepts like nuance and worst-case-scenario planning. How do you suppose moral clarity would deal with the situation?
Jackmormon
Taiwan seems like a nice place and all, but I’ve never understood why it’s any of our business to get between it and China.
Andrew
Um, yes they have, in the quite literal sense of the phrase.
demimondian
Umm, Tim? You need to rethink your history. China was (quite literally) the first Imperial power. The Son of Heaven was meant to rule ALL men, not just the Han Chinese.
Tim F.
Andrew, while you’re technically right (and China did contribute materially to our actual Vietnam war), I have a very hard time analogizing that month-long border skirmish with our engagement there.
Tim F.
Demi, you know that I mean modern China. Unlike their SOviet neighbors the Chinese reds have never shown interest in expansion or colonizing.
Also, don’t forget Zheng He. Chinese attitude towards expanding its horizons beyond China proper has always been love-hate at best. That doesn’t count the Mongolian emperors who obviously had their own perspective on things.
The Pirate
The nice thing (comparatively speaking) about the situation you suggest is that it at least plays to our strengths. You’ve got a clear, limited objective (“defend Taiwan”) and a battleground (sea and air) in which America is overwhelmingly superior, and you’ve also got a means to compel the other side to come to terms (punitive bombing- sure, it didn’t work in Vietnam or Germany, but those were wars of annhilation, which a war for Taiwan definitely won’t be).
But I doubt it will ever come to that because the Chinese economy is just as closely tied to the American economy as the our economy is tied to theirs.
As for having to give up threatening Iran…well, that’s probably not such a bad idea anyway.
Enlightened Layperson
Don’t forget, before 9-11, while one neocon faction was pushing for us to invade Iraq, another was doing its best to start a war with China, preferably over Taiwan. Maybe they will have their way yet.
Enlightened Layperson
PS: On the subject of Chinese imperialism, don’t forget Tibet.
Tim F.
I haven’t. The Tibet campaign was prefaced on a claim that Tibet lies within China’s territorial borders. The historical paperwork is pretty shaky (I believe it rests on a thousand-year-old mutual defense treaty with a Dalai Lama) but at least from the leadership’s perspective it does not involve territorial expansion per se.
Dan the Man
This is just a party congress vote, not a Taiwanese Parliament vote – since the Taiwanese Parliament is controlled by the opposition. It’s not that big of deal since that’s been the position of the “pan-Green” coalition for a long time.
But even if war happens, the US doesn’t need to fight the PRC (mainland China) to have China defeated. All the US has to do is let the PRC invade and take over Taiwan, and then the US (and Japan) funds and arms an insurgency among the native Taiwanese population who would kill thousands, maybe tens of thousands, of PRC soldiers. There’s no way the PRC could defeat the insurgency. If a war happens, this would actually be the best option for the US, even though it would be horrible for Taiwan.
demimondian
I would argue that China’s involvement in North Korea during the Korean Conflict is absolutely a case of direct imperial action within its sphere of influence, and its continued support is intended as a direct threat to South Korea. I’d argue that the Chinese support for the Khmer Rouge was a classic imperial proxy war. I’d argue that the current subjugation of Mongolia…you get the picture.
The PRC is a modern post-imperial hegemonist, just as the United States is.
craigie
Easy. We bomb Iceland tomorrow!
poppinfresh
China simply cannot take Taiwan yet, not without losing hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions, of troops (which would probably topple the PRC). The fact that America has a foreward-deployed carrier group in Okinawa specifically for this purpose doesn’t help matters- China is a long way off from being able to fight that kind of firepower. They have no navy with which to get troops onto Taiwan, especially given how well trained the RoC army is in shore defense.
When I was in Hualien in 2005, I got a big kick out of watching Taiwanese F-16s fly fully-armed CAPs pretty much 24 hours a day, and wondering what shitty post-Soviet MiG could compete with that.
Answer: none.
Justin Slotman
I kind of think this is exactly the right time for Taiwan to start pushing these kinds of issues, China has much less room to do something violent with the Olympics coming up.
And reading this thread, especially what poppinfresh just said, it seems like it would be idiotic for China to do something violent at any point in the near future. And Taiwan probably knows this, they’re just choosing not to poke the bear too much because who knows what will happen if they do. The Taiwan independence-in-name forces (Taiwan is already de facto independent, after all, they just have to pretend they’re not during international sporting events) seem to be doing the smart (and patient) thing by chipping away at the status quo.
TenguPhule
Doesn’t matter how shitty the MIGs are, China can simply throw them at Taiwan until the F16s run out of ammmo.
Quantity can trump quality, and China is *very* good at that.
TenguPhule
Shorter Jackmormon: I don’t know jack!
TenguPhule
Uh, not really. Our military has demonstrated time and again that it sucks at playing defense. And sending carrier groups into an area the enemy knows they *must* defend is asking for a lot of sunken hulls.
We have the best offense in the world, but playing in China’s backyard is asking for a bloody spanking.
Provided you move to the US base in Japan for a front row seat to the counterattack….or did you forget that kind of thing works *both* ways?
Tim F.
China’s naval strategy centers around essentially one circumstance: the US parks a carrier in the Taiwan strait and the PRC needs to make it go away. They would suck at taking Midway, for example, but the one thing they equipped and trained for (check that wikipedia link from the post) is not the situation in which we want to find ourselves.
The Pirate
Tengu, what are you talking about? The Chinese air force is absolutely outclassed in every conceivable way against the United States, let alone against a USAF-Taiwanese tag-team. If they attacked Japan, they would also have to deal with the JSDF.
The Chinese will never, ever risk a military confrontation over Taiwan because they know they would be raped.
The Pirate
Anyway, we might lose a carrier, but ask yourself- what’s more important, a carrier, or Taiwan? This isn’t Vietnam War ambiguity. In this situation we basically have a choice between acting or letting a stable, prosperous democracy be destroyed.
And, again, it would never happen, because even if we lose a carrier the Chinese know they’d lose much, much more.
TenguPhule
And this shows you know absolutely nothing about the situation.
China has enough rockets to turn large parts of Japan into smoking craters. Should US forces bomb China, they *will* retaliate with enough firepower to reduce our regional forces there to ash. China’s airforce that we know about is outclassed in terms of quality, but quantity is a quality of its own. Coordinated with bombardments on military sites, they have the potential to inflict horrific damage even if they take heavy losses. Do you really think people on both sides don’t know this? Why do you think we’ve been playing this balancing act for so long? Your dreams about ‘easy’ are as stupid as the Neo-cons on Iraq. Respect the Chinese military or it will eat you alive.
You know nothing about the concept of face. Taiwan is to China what Iraq is to Bush, its stupid but they’ll do it anyway. Our only consolation is China at least isn’t completely fucking insane.
China can afford to lose more then the US in a fight over Taiwan and would still come out ahead. Their entire military has been spending decades building for this, and while I agree we won’t have a choice but to honor our defense treaty with Taiwan, I also have no illusions that it will be anything but a bloody mess when we do.
J. Michael Neal
To be honest, China’s legal claim to Taiwan isn’t that great. Until 1683, it was ruled by the Dutch, with almost no Han population at all. The Qing Dynasty then took it over, and China ruled until 1895, when they lost Taiwan to Japan. For almost a hundred years after that, it was illegal for Han Chinese to emigrate to Taiwan.
It’s been 112 years since mainland China was the government of Taiwan. Before that, it had only been 212 years that they did control it, and only about 130 years during which they actually populated it.
Now, I realize that legal claims are often irrelevant to the behavior of countries in these sorts of situations, and China sure as hell isn’t going to let any of this sort of analysis get in their way. Still, it’s worth keeping in mind as we think about it. It is absolutely the case that any analogy between Taiwan independence and the secession of the Confederacy is silly.
TenguPhule
Not when it comes to the lengths China will go to make sure Taiwan doesn’t get away.
The Pirate
Tengu, you clearly know nothing about military technology. “Quantity has a quality all its own” is a concept which has been slowly going out of date since 1914. Why do you think we’ve sunk so much money into the F-22? It doesn’t matter how many planes the Chinese throw at it, they’ll never hit it.
I am well aware of the Chinese missile emplacements lining the straits of Taiwan. It doesn’t change the fact that the USAF-Taiwanese air force would have absolute air supremacy, which is absolutely critical in a conflict like this.
I am also well aware that the Chinese insist Taiwan is an indivisible part of the mainland. I am well aware that it is a “point of honor” or “face” or whatever you want to call it. That’s totally irrelevant. They want it, but they know they can’t have it.
Who knows how the balance of power will shift in the future, but it’ll be at least 20 years before China has even the ghost of a hope of conquering Taiwan.
poppinfresh
What he said. The Japanese military could also utterly crush the Chinese in the air and on the seas (the only places that matter in this conversation) for the forseeable future, let alone with the U.S. and Taiwan helping. The JSDF is quite capable of turning all those shiny coastal factories and towns into so much rubble.
As Pirate says, this will doubtlessly change in the coming decades, but right now China can do very little to project power towards Taiwan or Japan that wouldn’t be met with a disasterous response.
JWW
Am I allowed a comment? Just checking.
grumpy realist
Actually, I remember back in the late 90s when one of the Japanese ministers made some comments about Japan having an even better right to Taiwan….
J. Michael Neal
From my reading on the subject, the Chinese military has advanced to the point that they will sink some of our ships if it came to war. It won’t be a bloodless victory any longer. It will be a victory. The question China will be asking itself is whether the US is willing to pay the price it would take to win the war.
Justin Slotman
Well–at least we’ve convinced China we have no problem getting involved in incredibly stupid wars, so maybe they’ll stay on their toes.
But I can’t imagine two nations as tied economically as we and they are coming to blows. Bluster isn’t just their best weapon, it’s their only weapon.
JWW
Tengu,
Could you give me a phonetic on that. I will agree with most of the above against your pitiful argument. You really haven’t the slightest idea of what you are talking about. It is really sad that you choose too make such a fool of yourself.
Tim,
Your comment (Maybe it’s a bad thing that Iraq has downgraded our military to the point that we could do little more than sit back and watch. Then again, at this point only our ground forces are broken and, after all, who in their right mind thinks that we should engage the Chinese army on the ground?)
Our ground forces are broken, you should really get a grip. Our ground forces could sweep that nation in 120 days from Kuwait to Turkey if given the order. Do not not act a fool and underestimate what they can do, if given the order too do so.
China,
Taken by air or sea alone, not without a current revolution within. Going back to the ground forces, they would be the deciding factor in a war with a nation, not just its leader. If we went to war as a nation against a nation, you would be suprised at how good we really are.
TenguPhule
I’ll refrain from the obvious point that the Raptor is a military boondoogle used to make contractors lots of money.
The kind of quantity China throws around can negate quality because the Taiwan/US airplanes would run out of missiles before the Chinese ran out of planes in an attack. And what will our planes return to? Bombed out airfields and sunken carriers. Our forces are better, but they can only be in one place at one time and playing defense gives them the worst of both worlds. When the balloon goes up China will be ready, we won’t. There will be no steady Kuwait buildup, and reinforcing the area will be bitch.
Planes are only as good as long as they have someplace to return to rearm and refuel. Think about it.
Perhaps you should tell them that, because China seems to disagree with you.
TenguPhule
JWW’s Irony of the Day! Round of Applause for the BJ Jester!
TenguPhule
Never Underestimate Human Stupidity.
Or national pride.
Justin Slotman
That’s also good to keep in mind.
TenguPhule
We are talking about the same post-WW II Japanese SDF, aren’t we? The one that exists in reality, not happy-fun-time world?
JWW
Tim,
Not that I totally disagree with the point of view. In our own country, around 1993 or 1994 we had a president that had a notion of recognizing gangs in CA and WA. They were recocnized by name and allowed to have representative speakers meet with federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. The law enforcement agencies cited the law, the gangs cited their law. We’ve found no solution to gang violence. The gangs have found no reason but too do business as usual. Seems as though that pours over to the current conflict. If we all knew what it takes to win a war, and agree that it’s not pretty, but something we will have to live with. It would have been done some time ago.
TenguPhule
Shorter JWW: Clenis! Look at my big distracting Clenis!
JWW
Tengu,
You being a jester and all, I understand. The Russian’s for years out numbered our military, man for man, tank for tank, jet for jet. They also planned to have the war on thier own ground. You have no real spine. Just a mouth of polluted water, a glimpse of a mind, and a heart so shallow the sun couldn’t cast a shadow on it from any angle.
TenguPhule
Shorter JWW: I use words, but I don’t understand what they mean.
JWW
Tengu,
I don’t know what I should say. You have so impressed me. Should I bow, step to the side and be ever so humble? Maybe I should seek assistance by hiring a military advisor. No, that would be a waste of my money, especially when addressing the likes of you. Common sense and a decent upbringing and education has by far surpassed anything you can say.
TenguPhule
We know, JWW. We know.
JWW
K, Phule(aka, Fool)
You really have no point. Just want to be an ass and it shows. You run your mouth, spew shit and can’t give an answer to anyone who opposes you. You haven’t a mind of your own, your mind is brought and payed for. But it bought with somebody else’s money, and paid for with your sole. I really would like to see your face in person, have a good debate of matters. But, I fear your would run, the same as you have run with each post entered with your name as the intended reader. You have as yet, too respond with other than BS. Find your balls, no, go look in the mirror and check your lipstick and eye lashes.
TenguPhule
We know JWW, we know.
TenguPhule
Corrected for FOX viewers.
MNPundit
I’d be more open to fighting China over Iran because China is actually more of a god damn threat to us.
JWW
Oh Tengu,
You really are quick, and so funny. That does not give you an excuse to avoid having too own up to your own statements. Maybe you will just continue and evade. You are giving everyone the impression that you have been talking BS. Own up or keep your mouth shut. Just be yourself and throw BS.
poppinfresh
Good god, you really don’t have any idea what the fuck you are talking about. The F-22 can’t be HIT by any modern competitor, making infinite numbers of Chinese planes(or anyone else, for that matter) FUCKING IRRELEVANT. This is the lovely thing about gross technical superiority in matters military. Those of us who exit our own rectums now and again for fresh air are familiar with this as the “Cortez in the Americas” Doctrine.
Quoth wikipedia on the subject:
“In June 2006 during Exercise Northern Edge (Alaska’s largest joint military training exercise), the F-22A achieved a 144-to-zero kill-to-loss ratio against F-15s, F-16s and F/A-18s simulating MiG-29 ‘Fulcrums’, Su-30 ‘Flankers’, and other current front line Russian aircraft, which outnumbered the F-22A 5 to 1 at times.[21][34] The small F-22 force of 12 aircraft generated 49% of the total kills for the exercise, and operated with an unprecedented reliability rate of 97%.[30]”
As for Japan… I mean, just… wow. I guess the fact that they’re spending something like $50 billion a year on defense spending versus China’s 65-some, without a need to maintain a giant army or refit ancient equipment on a huge scale, makes them total rollover pussies. And, I mean, its not like the Japanese are known for their technological sophistication or nothin’, I bet they’re using sticks and rocks over there.
Ass.
Justin
I’m not overly impressed with Tengu’s appraisal, but this is just a mind-bogglingly stupid thing to say. Tengu’s correct that the F-22 (and the F-35) fires missiles and needs a place to land now and then, neither of which are limitless. The Chinese understand saturation warfare very well.
poppinfresh
Oh, and as for the ‘Taiwanese and Americans having nowhere to land’ meme you spouted (presumably from all those well-tested, highly accurate Chinese cruise missiles), the Taiwanese practice landing their F-16s on the highways inland, and the American air force is based out of Okinawa, which is slightly more secure than a nun’s undies and would require Japan being totally beaten into submission while America sat back and did nothing.
Try again?
TenguPhule
And what you seem to fail to grasp is the Chinese airforce *DOESN’T* *NEED* to be able to hit one in the air.
They simply need to throw enough planes that the Raptors RUN OUT OF AMMO and get bombed to hell on the ground when they land to reload.
Yes, the Raptor has no equals in the air, but in this kind of warfare, that doesn’t matter one little bit if its killed on the ground.
Justin
What happens if they’re outnumbered 20 to 1?
TenguPhule
Landing on highways is all well and good, and you plan to reammunition and refuel them there too?
As for Okinawa, China can hit it. I’d like to think they wouldn’t be crazy enough to use nukes, but enough of the regular stuff will still be enough to turn the runways and hangers into large holes in the ground.
poppinfresh
I…
You…
Words fail.
I could talk about how Taiwan is basically the world’s largest SAM installation, from underground installations right up to shoulder-fired missiles, or how the support of a non-enraged military is the cornerstone of the Communist party’s dominance and would be irreparably harmed if they took severe casualties, or even about how an amphibious assault with little to no naval support would absolutely NEED unmolested air cover, but I feel like maybe one of us is having this conversation while huffing modeling glue.
I mean, its just a guess. Could be kerosene.
Justin
I wonder what the refuel/re-arm turnaround time is in this case.
You’re all arguing this like it’s going to be a series of gentleman’s duels in the air where some F-22s just hang around defeating all comers. I suspect that Chinese generals understand things a little differently.
Justin
Of course, those of you beating up on Tengu could simply point out that China doesn’t have much an air force at all, if Wikipedia’s numbers are to be believed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PLAAF
TenguPhule
You’ve stated it right there, Japan’s forces are a DEFENSE force, we helped design it that way. They’re purposely not built for offensive operations.
As for China’s military spending, everyone lies about their own. So color me unimpressed by the official numbers. They’ve got a lot of junk from the Russians, but need I remind you what a lot of even older junk is doing to our best and brightest in Iraq?
TenguPhule
And China has enough missiles and rockets pointed at it to render a lot of that hardware so much rubble. Taiwan can hurt China badly, but their game plan has always been to try and hold out long enough for a rescue before they’re overrun.
After all the spindoctoring you see in the US, you don’t think China can blame it on someone else? The first wave of Casualties tend to get nations deeper into wars, not out of them.
If I can see how China can neutralize a lot of our advantages in a no holds barred fight for Taiwan, they can too. Assuming we can take them without getting the buzzsaw treatment in return is the same kind of stupid thinking that helped contribute to the mess in Iraq. Do not underestimate the Chinese military.
TenguPhule
Maybe if you read the label before you sniff it next time….
The Pirate
Tengu, you need to stop posting because you are shooting your mouth off about things you know nothing about. There is no way the PRC air force makes it past the F-22s, the carriers, the rest of the USAF, the Taiwanese air force, the JSDF, the Taiwanese antiaircraft defenses, and the Japanese antiaircraft defenses to “bomb the runways into craters” and destroy every basing location for allied aircraft. Period
You’ve stated it right there, Japan’s forces are a DEFENSE force, we helped design it that way. They’re purposely not built for offensive operations.
This doesn’t even make sense. How is stopping Chinese aircraft from bombing American bases in Japan or Taiwan NOT a defensive operation? America will lose because it’s geared towards offense, Japan will lose because it’s geared towards defense…you aren’t even bothering to reconcile your arguments.
TenguPhule
Well I’m trying to humor them.
Personally, I’d expect a couple hundred missiles hitting the Taiwan airfields at Mach 2 to kill the planes on the ground first, followed by anti-ship missiles taking out any carrier group in the area launching in support.
By the time anything else got there, the invasion force would already be on the ground and too closely engaged for accurate airsupport. Anything getting too close to the ground would be greeted by portable SAMS.
And then possession becomes 9/10ths of the law.
JWW
Sorry but an aircraft that never gets off the ground is not an aircraft. Don’t think for a moment, not even a fleeting thought that this area of operation has not been covered. ICBM and BM does not always mean nuke. Targets are targets. Military aircraft have a limited number of places to land, refuel, and most of all rearm. Targets are targets. Every nations has the same issue. We have carriers, they don’t, we have Europe, they don’t, we have portions of Asia, they don’t. They may own or rule parts of Asia, but they trust and support themselves only from the homeland. That means, China proper has all the targets.
The Pirate
What is wrong with you? Do you think the Chinese will teleport across the straits?
Pile onto magical ghost ships that will sail THROUGH the carriers?
I don’t even understand the world you’re living in….where there’s no such thing as radar…or early-warning systems…or surveillance…where a PRC invasion force can just materialize without anyone noticing it was being put together…
TenguPhule
I was referring to popinfresh’s silly idea that the JSDF was an offensive force. I have no doubt that Japan’s SDF can hold its own on the ground against an enemy plane attack.
Missile attacks are a different story.
Enough long range missiles will do the trick, *then* the planes start coming in. When you have about 35 seconds from contact to impact, there’s not really much you can do. Killing planes on the ground is always the best way to get rid of them.
TenguPhule
What carriers? You mean the ones sinking into the ocean after eating a couple of anti-ship missiles?
Tell me how many craft we can get into the air in under a minute before the missiles hit.
Stranger things have happened.
TenguPhule
JWW says the words, but the meaning still escapes him.
TenguPhule
Fixed.
rachel
I’ve something like that before. What was it? Oh, yes:
From IS WAR IMPOSSIBLE?; The Conclusions Arrived At After Elaborate Study by the Late Jean de Bloch.*(pdf). This was written in 1902, twelve years before WWI got off to a rousing start in Sarajevo.
Justin Slotman
Well then. Time to dig out that army surplus gas mask…
BIRDZILLA
What will CHINA do now send in its starm troopers to take over china and what will this rotten UN do about it?
Gary Farber
“China hasn’t had a Vietnam war,”
Tim, this is a triumph of metaphor over reality. You’re saying they didn’t have our metaphoric experience.
But what they did have — and perhaps you’re too young to remember it, was an invasion of Vietnam that had people in hysterics that WWIII would be beginning the next week.
They had an actual Vietnam War.
I recall the day China invaded Vietnam extremely vividly, and I recall many folks who pay attention to geopolitics in an absolutely panic. Many Americans were running around like chickens with their heads cut off, at what it seemed to portend. OMG! OMG! was the theme of the day.
That in retrospect, we know it ended after a month, doesn’t mean anyone had a clue it would play like that at the time, and that it would not proceed into the full-scale Soviet-Sino War that had been feared as looming for a number of years, and thus an all-out nuclear exchange.
Instead, though, Vietnam kicked China’s butt, and that was also a geopolitical revelation to many: the clearest possible demonstration of the fact that the theory under which America fought the Vietnam War for all those years was wrong: there was no monolithic Communist bloc, and instead, nationalism trumped ideology. Morever, the world’s largest country (by population), could be stopped in its tracks by an even lower technologically/economically capable, vastly smaller, power.
This was a huge thing to the world. Even if it wasn’t an “analogy” to the American experience. Not everything is actually about the American experience.
Maybe you don’t remember this, and can brush it off. It’s a staggering phrase to read, though, given how shocking the actual Sino-Vietnamese War was to Americans at the time. That it was brief is irrelevant. Hiroshima took only a moment, but it mattered more than anything.
It’s like reading “France never actually fought Germany.” Stops one in one’s tracks to read that “China hasn’t had a Vietnam war,” and pops one’s eyes out, and causes one to write a comment, it does.
grumpy realist
Heck, China doesn’t have to drag out any of its military hardware. It can simply say “by the way, the next time you put out all those crappy US gov’t bonds for sale? We’re not going to buy them.”
Don’t forget that if China wanted to get really nasty–it could demolish most Japanese production and populace with 7 nukes. Heck, just dropping a large nuke on Tokyo takes out millions of people. You forget how compact the place is.
JWW
Tengu,
Sorry but an aircraft that never gets off the ground is not an aircraft.
Military aircraft have a limited number of places to land, refuel, and most of all rearm.
JWW says the words, but the meaning still escapes him.
I didn’t think I needed to start with “See Spot Run”
China, like every other nation has known airbases, the aircraft on the tar or returning will be under constant fire. Within 48 hours the tar is disabled.
TenguPhule
Fixed for illiterate JWW.
Because China can deploy faster in that region then anyone else, and if JWW tries to claim ICBMs are going to be used without provoking a nuclear war, I’m going to laugh at JWW yet again.
Combat works both ways.