This made me laugh it was so stupid:
An activist was arrested while he was feeding homeless people in a public park.
Eric Montanez, 21, a member of Orlando’s Food Not Bombs, violated a city ordinance against feedings in the park Wednesday evening, police said.
Each group is allowed to feed only 25 people, but undercover officers saw Montanez feed 30, police spokeswoman Barbara Jones said.
Food Not Bombs and Montanez are plaintiffs in a federal lawsuit against the city, claiming that the ordinance is unconstitutional, the Orlando Sentinel reported.
Montanez was charged with a misdemeanor count of prohibited activity in a park and was released from jail on a $250 bond.
Compared to the activity in the park we discussed yesterday, this seems rather benign. And I understand there are health regulations and all that, but is Orlando (or any major city in Florida, for that matter) really best served using undercover agents to stop excessive food distribution?
That has to be a pretty serious waste of resources. The only example I can come up with that would be as dumb is one I have to make up, like, say, your society is in the middle of the “GREATEST STRUGGLE OF OUR TIMES,” and rather than devote all the resources to the cause, you spend your time busting Tommy Chong, cracking down on porn, and kicking interpreters out of the service because they are gay. You have to dig pretty deep and be pretty creative to make something that stupid up.
Oh, wait.
ThymeZone
It’s Florida, folks. Bizarroland.
Move on, nothing to see here.
Yes, it is the great clash of civilizations, that’s why we need the Flag Burning Amendment.
Marcus Wellby
Come on John, you start feeding the homeless and they lose their fear of humans. They will become more bold, and eventualy begin stealing pic-a-nic baskets.
Anyhow, feeding the homeless is way too much like something that commie guy Jesus would do. Nothing we should be doing in a great Christian nation like America.
chopper
well, at least he wasn’t feeding them food w/o bread in it. then he’d be a real loon.
Red State Jesus
Number 1: Montanez. Montanez? Is this dude even a citizen?
Number 2: Food Not Bombs??? THats the stupidest fucking thing I’ve ever heard!
demimondian
No, no, no. You don’t limit the number of homeless for ignorance, you do it to give yourself the chance to experience death by starvation at second hand. If you feed them, they survive, instead of lying there slowly succumbing to the frailty and wasting of starvation.
Some Other Brian Guy
Eric Montanez was breaking the law! He should be punished!
What you want is an ANARCHY! Where anybody can go around and do anything. Men can masturbate in the parks, or feed excess numbers of homeless individuals! Or have sex with farm animals!
And I’ll bet some of these homeless people this guy was feeding were Illegal Immigrants!
The police should have deported the lot of them! That’s the real travesty here!
dave
Wow. I… wow.
Tsulagi
Our parks are under attack! From pot bellied firemen in water balloon tit filled bikinis to homeless getting a free meal in them. Not to worry, our crack Homeland Security department will adjust their priorities to meet this challenge.
John S.
True, Florida has some bizarre happenings, but Arizona has some pretty weird shit that goes on, too.
People in glass houses and all…
tde
The “food not bombs” people are assholes.
They don’t give a crap about feeding people, they just want to stir up trouble and fritter away their lives with courtroom pissing matches.
There are soup kitchens, coops, and home delivery programs that feed thousand of people every single day of the year here in San Francisco (and no doubt in other major cities as well.) They provide a real service.
Compare that with the “food not bombs” people who set up their tables in front of city hall so they can make their “political” statement.
ThymeZone
Yes, in 2006 we reelected a gay woman governor by a huge landslide and became the only state in the Union to reject a Defense of Marriage bill by popular vote.
Tossed an obnoxious righty congressman and replaced him with a Democrat.
Yeah, we be weird.
28 Percent
Well he was breaking the law wasn’t he? You liberals are so soft on crime you think you can pick and choose what laws count and do not. You evidently didn’t notice that he is from FOOD NOT BOMBS (so called) so he was only feeding homeless to try to embarrass the Commander in Chief and demoralize our troops. He probabaly only fed the five extra to make them arrest him because that will make Bush look even worse and then LIBERALS will be able to scream “free speech.” Is this what you want the brave soldiers overseas to hear about? Did you ever stop to think that it might hurt morale if they thought that while they are sacrificing for our freedom that people say that freedom is under attack at home? No you do not think about our soldier’s morale at all do you you will say anything that embarrasses the President no matter how much that hurts the troops. For shame!
PeterJ
So if Jesus came back and did his magic with the fish and bread, he would get arrested?
BTW, there should also be a law against donating too much of your money. Since just giving away things you have earned or inherited is stupid.
gex
Compassionate conservatism at work. Government shouldn’t help people. Let the marketplace… get busted for helping people.
gex
Only if he exceeds the 25 person limit.
cd6
Who were these worthless, lazy cops who let this man feed 30 people?!
The second he gave a sandwich to a 26th person, his ass should have been on a plane to Egypt for torturing.
First the police refuse to enforce illegal immigration, now they let this guy break the law 5 times. I’m disgusted.
mrmobi
28 Percent:
Explain to me why “FOOD NOT BOMBS” is a bad idea, please.
Also, what effect does feeding the homeless have on the troops? Are you saying that the troops will be demoralized because someone back home committed a decent, human, Christian act?
I’m back to thinking you are an extremely bad spoof. No one could be as backward as the character you write.
Nice try, though. Your portrayal of a demented, learning impaired religious psychopath does have a certain air of truth to it.
Baby Jane
This policy really needs a two-prong effect. Besides arresting people for supplying food to the homeless, we should also arrest the homeless for being food users.
demimondian
We prefer to refer to it as “managing the demand side of the illicit food problem.”
DougJ
Rule of law, bitches. It’s all that stands between us and Islamofascism.
What if he had set off 30 dirty bombs instead of 25? You’d be upset about that, wouldn’t you? Oh, I forgot, you hate America.
mrmobi
I have the perfect solution to this problem. We should arrest and, uh, process the criminal over-feeders and feed the homeless the resulting “Soylent Pacifist.”
It’s a simple and elegant solution with the side benefit of eliminating all these demislamunofascists who are emulating that Communist “Jesus” guy. Have you read any of this guy? “Consider the Lilies of the Field…” indeed. We don’t need no stinkin’ Lilies, we’ve got a Global War on Something or other to win and Democracy to spread. Fuck your Lilies!
Paid for by Newt Gingrich for President.
Richard 23
I don’t understand where the 25 number came from. “Sorry lady, you’ll have to move along. I already fed 25 people. No peeps for you.”
And there’s economies of scale to consider. The price per unit goes down as production ramps up. Another stupid law to discourage free enterprise.
What if the Food Not Bombs guy was selling meals at 1 cent apiece? Could he then feed more than 25 people? (assuming he has a business license and a permit of course).
This is just too stupid. My head hurts.
Rome Again
The illegals are mostly in Miami. Orlando is Mouse territory. The Mouse doesn’t hire illegals.
Pb
I think Bill Hicks said it best:
Rome Again
Back to thinking he’s an extremely bad spoof? You mean you actually took him seriously once? Oh, mrmobi, please tell me it ain’t so.
Pb
Oh, and John…
All Your Food Are Belong To Us. You Have No Chance To Survive. Make Your Time.
DougJ
For some reason, the autorities really hate Food Not Bombs. I was briefly a member of the Berkeley chapter (a cliche I know). I stopped going because a lot of people didn’t wear clothes to the meetings.
Richard 23
Actually 28 Percent makes a good argument. Feeding the homeless is fine and good but if this is just a stunt to make a political statement throw the book at the guy.
I wonder how likely it is that anyone was even aware of this ordinance. Is it posted at the park? Is there somewhere else that homeless could be fed in Orlando. Probably.
Yeah. He could’ve volunteered to help out at a local shelter or whatever instead of breaking the law and attracting more homeless to the park. Clap him in irons.
cdc
Yeah, fuck those FNB assholes for serving food week after week, year after year in the same public place. People should only be fed free food behind closed doors where sensitive citizens don’t have to see such subversive activities, and where there’s no risk of a “political” statement about poverty or hunger being made.
mrmobi
Well, in a thread a while back I sort of came to the conclusion that 28 was an actual, very closed off, possibly learning disabled person after he/she responded to a scathing post of mine. I felt bad.
I don’t anymore.
mrmobi
See, this is another excellent argument for “Soylent Pacifist.” You don’t even have to undress these folks before you process them. Someday you guys will thank me for this idea.
28 Percent
That is just like you mrmobi always the ad hominems. You can not argue on merits so you just call me stupid.
But if I am a “bad” spoof and I fool you what does that say about you I do not thin it says anything good.
Dan Lewis
I think they talked to the Orlando politicians for this NPR story, when Las Vegas passed a similar ordinance.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5643494
I’m having trouble opening it again to listen to, YMMV.
If I recall correctly, the supposed issue was that regular meals for homeless people in the parks attracted transients from far and wide, which caused an increase in crime, while there are other ways to get homeless people fed.
Rome Again
Wow, really? Did Jesus (not TZ’s yard man) attract an increase in crime too?
Some Other Brian Guy
Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
mrmobi
I thin you are makeeen fun of me, senor!
But you didn’t answer me. What is so bad about the concept FOOD NOT BOMBS? Is it un-Christian? And how does someone feeding the homeless in Florida undermine the troops morale in Iraq? Do acts of kindness hurt the troops?
You are the one who is busy making ad hominem attacks. By the way, I’m not a LIBERAL, I’m a Demislamunofascist, GOT IT?
Jake
This frightens me.
RSA
We need laws against people who make political statements! I think I’d try to catch people who give to charity to get a tax break rather than from the goodness of their hearts, too.
mrmobi
We are working on this, RSA. We have had people kicked out of Presidential events for wearing T-Shirts (a known crime), and have harassed others for using the F-word to viciously attack Vice President Cheney (wait till that guy hears from the IRS!).
However, since I am cursed to be the only one here who understands the depth of this problem, I must point out that this group of “people who make political statements” probably includes a number of nudists, who could be easily processed into “Soylent Strident.”
Can I get an amen?
Perry Como
It reminds me of this show I saw in Tijuana one time, nevermind.
Jill
John…feeding the homeless might make them become Demcrats and register and then vote and those are the real reasons to spend money on undercover stings.
Vladi G
I can think of one that’s worse. How about sending a 150,000 people overseas to get bogged down in a civil war in a country that was no threat to us, all while spending a few billion dollars in the process? That seems like a bigger waste of resources to me.
Jake
A long-haired dude from the Middle East? He’d be picked up and extraordinarily rendered to Egypt, thus providing a final and ironic bookend to the story of the Exodus.
srv
As Darrell would say, what part of Classical Liberalism do you people not understand?
Florida, the Wang of America.
Pb
Well, he is practically indistinguishable from Darrell, EEEL, and friends, so I guess I can see why you might make that mistake… and note that there are surely a lot of actual, very closed off, possibly learning disabled people out there who aren’t also incredible douchebags.
Richard 23
Blam! That’s what I call a smackdown. mrmobi can’t take it there.
Well played, 28 Percent. You won that round.
mrmobi
Good point, PB.
mrmobi
Yes. Another smackdown of Demislamunofascists. We are such cowards.
But I must point out that the learning disabled 28 Percent has still not addressed my questions:
Please, 28, grace us with another stream-of-consciousness, cleverly capitalized, punctuation-free trip into the end-times. We just can’t get enough.
Chad N. Freude
28, I must say
is a masterpiece.
Chad N. Freude
On a slightly more serious note, Santa Monica, long satirized by Harry Shearer as the home of the homeless, was for years not only tolerant but protective of homeless people. Over the last few years, the homeless of SM increased in number, intrusiveness (like using people’s lawns for toilets), and aggressiveness in panhandling. The very traditionally liberal citizenry started to get angry and the city cracked down. (I don’t know the current state of the law and how it’s being enforced, but I could look it up.) The problem is how do you define the boundary between compassion for the homeless and the right of the non-homeless to be free of intrusive and hostile behavior?
Chad N. Freude
An additional point: I think arresting the guy for exceeding the government-mandated quota of feedees is beyond brain-dead. Even if his motivation was to embarrass the government. (If that was the case, should the people he fed be forced to vomit it back up?)
Baby Jane
We could giv’em a job testing food imports.
two birds, one stone
Pb
In some cases, fairly easily–soliciting is illegal in a lot of places, and I think “using people’s lawns for toilets” is always illegal without permission (as is trespassing). Anyhow, if Santa Monica really has a problem, then they should do something about it–and I’m sure Michelle Malkin has some suggestions…
Chad N. Freude
I think they did a 180, tougher laws and strict enforcement. The citizenry hasn’t complained very vociferously. You’re right about soliciting, trespassing, etc., but I think there’s a whiff of NIMBYism here: “They should be treated with great compassion, but not here.”
srv
You mean pet food?
Tax Analyst
hmmm…still haven’t quite got the hang of those “block quote” thingee’s…well, maybe someday.
Pb
Chad N. Freude,
Well, they are homeless, so really they could live anywhere. Perhaps the Bush administration has a solution–I’ve heard some very nice things about Gitmo (what with the lemon chicken with two types of fruit and all) but if that isn’t an option, they’ve also been telling me that Iraq has been getting better all the time, and of course Afghanistan is a huge success! I mean, we’ve already sunk hundreds of billions of dollars into those projects, so I’m sure it’d be a virtual paradise for the homeless by now.
Andrew
WHO WANTS TO SEX MUTOMBO?!?
Baby Jane
If they’re still standing after checking everything else, you betcha.
And, uh, on second thought lets not limit it to imports, either.
(Like toys for guns: a jar of pb for a jar of pee.)
lard lad
Too bad Ebenezer Scrooge is a fictitious character… these days he could be drawing a fat-ass paycheck hosting a Fox opinion show.
Pb
Ebenezer Scrooge, an original Glibertarian. Oh how the Wall Street Journal opinion page could use his steady hand and sage advice now.
Perry Como
Mmmarrrgh, soylent green.
Rome Again
Yes, the workhouse is such a wonderful place to live…
Especially when they rip children out of the arms of incapacitated parents and send them off to CANADA to be slaves to farmers instead, such as what happened to my grandfather in the 1890’s. See that porter Mr. Barnard? He became the Head Master by the time my grandfather was sent there.
Tax Analyst
Better than “Toilent green”, though…
lard lad
Ever read Neil “POOR PEOPLE WANT TO STEAL MY MONEY!” Boortz? A living, breathing embodiment of Scroogism. He probably thinks of “A Christmas Carol” as a tragedy… in which a man of sound conservative principles is converted into a liberal milksop.
Tsulagi
Speaking of which, this video made me laugh a bit too. Two of the Bush altar boys on Fox pointing and screeching at each other. Brains implode. Spittle flies.
Gex
So was he in the park, or grandstanding in front of city hall?
James Cape
Yeah, next thing you know some anarchist will start talking about how the government is failing at it’s responsibility to provide for the common welfare.
Punchy
If Jesus really did come back, who’d wanna hang with him? He’d HAVE to snag a studio in Madison or Berkeley to have any chance at all of getting laid, with all that hair and Birks and hairy-ass legs.
And with all the “laying of the hands” he does, how long until someone nails him for sexual harrassment? Does he go plastic surgery to remove the scars from his wrists, or are those his “yeah, but you shoulda seen the marks on Tyson when we were through” convo starters with the Pi Phis during happy hour?
And when surprised, does he just express it by saying “Me H. Me…”?
jake
This place was on Robin Hood Court? What sort of sick fucking joke is that?
I say old chap, let’s steal children from the poor and give them to the rich!
Jolly good, haw, haw, haw!
People sicken me.
Rome Again
Yes, Jake, my grandfather was moved to Canada without his family after being placed in this workhouse, and he never saw any of his family again. He moved to the US after his servitude was finished, and met and married my grandmother.
jake
Damn. I’d heard of the children sent to Australia & NZ, I didn’t know they were also sent to Canada.
And the RC wonders why people don’t attend Mass like they used to.
No thanks padre, I don’t want the Spanish Inquisition to send my kids to Siberia.
28 Percent
mrmobi I can not be here to post every time you want me to it is something called free will maybe you have heard of it?
Giving food to people who need it is good except that it hurts them to do it. Ever hear of “give a man a fish he eats for a day teach a man to fish he eats for a lifetime?” Jesus fed the multitudes but that was to perform a miracle and besides ancient Jerusalem wasn’t a socialist state with a welfare cycle, so it probably didn’t hurt them much to get food from him. Besides, I think the ancient Judeans pretty much all knew how to fish already.
This guy who was arrested though was not just trying to give food to hungry people his group was not calle “Food for the Hungry” it was called “FOOD NOT BOMBS” so it was political. He was just trying to make a political statemetn so you can not say that it was an act of Christian charity or agape it was done for selfish reasons to feed his BDS and make the President look bad. That is what is wrong with it if you can not see it I guess you just have blinders on and can only see what confirms your liberal worldview.
carpeicthus
Florida hates Jesus. Wow.
Richard 23
Exactly. Round 2: 28 Percent. Well done.
Baby Jane
Last night at the local meatmarket, my girls and I got to talking about this story and, man oh man, if we were wearing panties they would’ve all been in a bunch. We decided that tonight we’d forgo the boozing and use our lush fund to Stick It To The Man!
Suzanne, the quickest one in the bunch, said, “Hey yeah, let’s give 26 baloney sandwiches to one homeless guy and make him eat every last bite. We can yootoob it, too.” Then she added (a little too loudly), “I wanna fuck the man!” She really does mean well.
Molly, the single mom, said, “Let’s drive a whole bunch of homeless people to A&P and giv’em each $5 gift cards. That place’ll be ripe with humanity.” We all liked that idea, but it lost it’s zing after discussing who’s car we’d use.
Leslie, the cynic, said, “After each night of dancing, we all buy hot dogs and shit from the street vender guy, right? So, let’s just go fuckin’ dancing and get our hot dogs after, but don’t eat the whole dog. Throw the rest in the trash can. They’ll know where to look.” We all loved it and cheered, “Stick it to the man!”
Chad N. Freude
28 percent provides the Deconstruction of the Day:
Or “Give a man a shelter and he sleeps for one night, teach him to find a cardbord box and he sleeps for a lifetime.”
Comic relief. Not quite Lewis Black, but pretty good.
And we conclude what, that it’s morally superior to let people go hungry than to give them food for political reasons?
The President is quite capable of doing that himself without any outside help, thank you.
Just about everything does.
demimondian
Or “Give a man a fire, and you’ll heat him for a nifhttime. Set a man on fire, and he’ll be warm for as long as he lives.”
Rome Again
OUCH!
W.B. Reeves
Back in the eighties I had the misfortune to be stuck in South Florda as something other than a well heeled tourist. While I was there, the city council of Fort Lauderdale took up the problem of the homeless raiding dumpsters for food. One of the council members proposed spraying dumpster contents with rat poison to solve the “problem.”
Meanwhile, they had 14 year old girls peddling their asses for coke all along the beach front.
Perry Como
So what you are saying is the beach front was frequented by older, Republican gentlemen?
G. Weightman
For many of the homeless, free food acts as an enabler of their dysfunctional condition, i.e., they have more money to spend on drugs and alcohol.
Any ideas out there for helping the homeless make themselves productive members of their communities?
jenniebee
With an all fish diet that lifetime’s going to be pretty short, what with all the mercury poisoning and lysteria these days.
jake
Let me guess. This knuckle dragging son-of-a-bitch called it the final solution to the garbage theft problem.
Gotta protect the nation’s landfill supply.
Well come on. A man has to do something to unwind after a hard day of trying to make mass murder part of the city’s ordinances.
Grrr
Do they still have those drive-through liquor stores in Florida? Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
Not at all.
mrmobi
POTD. Admit it Demi, you are Lewis Black.
Richard 23
Spam. You’re soaking in it. It’s what’s for dinner. It’s the other white meat. You’re in good hands so why not have some cheap viagra and cialis and finish the night with a little generic xanex?
Richard 23
Louis Cypher, more likely.
28 Percent
Chad N. Freude you may be pleased with how smart you think you are but you should be ashamed. He was not giving away houses how silly but if he was teaching people to build houses yes that would be better than just giving them “three hots and a cot” because then they would have a house and a construction job.
You ask if it is better to let people go hungry than to give them food for politics. That is not the question here the question is whether there is any virtue in giving food to prove a point. If it is virtuous to give away food for political gain then people who run $1000 a plate fundraising dinners are the most virtuous people their are.
Thanks for playing!
Richard 23
Oh, I forgot to mention Halcyon. Greatest electronic/techno song evah! If you don’t like it, just a bit, you’re probably broken.
scarshapedstar
You feed 30 = terrorists win
scarshapedstar
Sorry, but I’m gonna have to say that Shpongle wins.
There’s a whole lot of music that people say you have to be high or tripping to understand. And then there is Tales of the Inexpressible. And that’s really all there is to say.
mrmobi
I know you are not real, but just in case you are… Selling dinners at a fund-raiser for $1000 a plate is not the same as giving away food to the homeless. Different audience, different price, different objective. If you are pretending to be very, very stupid, you have achieved your goal. You really need to try a little harder here, or go see someone about that concussion you suffered.
You have made your position quite clear, for someone who can neither spell nor reason. You believe that children should starve to keep the President from suffering any discomfort. You must love him more than Jesus, because clearly Jesus was bent on feeding the poor and comforting the sick, despite all of your ridiculous platitudes about teaching a man to fish (he wants feed his children, not learn to fish, you ignorant fuck).
You believe in the value of the suffering of the poor and their innocent children to teach them a lesson. You are a Good Republican. Jesus has reserved a special place in Hell for you and your Nazi friends. You might want to consult with Ann Coulter, who, apparently, thinks that the genocide in Darfur is not proceeding quickly enough. She’s just like you, only famous and not incoherent. Thanks for playing!
jake
Yes, because if the terrorist hear we’re giving away free food they’ll follow us home, eat the food, and thereby save money and gain strength for acts of mayhem and murder because THEY WANT TO KILL US!
Chad N. Freude
Only it wouldn’t give its beneficiaries construction jobs. That can be done only a building industry supported by a stable mortgage industry that doesn’t destroy its customer base and cannibalize itself. But the point here is that feeding the hungry is a positive and charitable thing to do, whether the feeder is motivated by religion or politics. I read your position as being if it isn’t religiously motivated, it shouldn’t be done. I disagree.
This analogy is so off the mark I’m almost at a loss to respond. The people who attend the $1000-a-plate fundraiser are not hungry, nothing is being given to needy people, nothing is being given away.
I’m curious about how your spelling, punctuation, and diction have improved. Are you more than one person? Are you so serious about charitable motivation that you forget to maintain your spoofy persona? I think your last post has blown any credibility that you might have had (not much) as anything other than a spoofer and provocateur.
Chad N. Freude
Except for the use of commas.
Zifnab
I’m going to respond to 28% like he is a rational, intelligent, honest human being. Please, Lord, on this Holiest of Sundays, don’t prove me wrong.
You’re absolutely right. The foundation of the Earned Income Credit (EIC) is that poor people who work deserve a leg up, while poor people don’t, don’t. The government effectively pays you to get paid, up until it considers you self-sufficent (typically above the poverty line). And, frankly, compared to the welfare-system, I think this system works well.
Likewise, the 40s era Roosevelt “make-work” projects employed hundreds of thousands of people in public works projects not because they were essentially necessary but because giving people jobs was better for society and the economy than giving people food or money. The Hoover Dam, the national highway system, and other national improvements were merely icing on the cake.
Ultimately, however, this has absolutely nothing to do with the “FOOD NOT BOMBS” protest, because you can’t expect a college student protestor to have the time, resources, or energy necessary to create and manage a full-blown economic revitalization effort. The guy was handing out sandwiches in a park, not running the “Greater Downtown Sandwich Distribution Center”.
One could argue that this protest had absolutely nothing to do with charity and instead was a political protest, simple and true. But then one would be confronted with the issue of free speech. If handing out sandwiches can be considered a political statement, then blocking said sandwich distribution would be violating his 1st Amendment priviledges.
One could argue that his act was devoid of charity because it carried a political message, but then its you who’ve got your blinders on, Mr. 28, when you assume that a single act cannot have multiple meanings or ramifications. If he named his organization “STARVATION NOT BOMBS” and was running through the park taking sandwiches from the homeless, I doubt you’d say “that’s not thievery, its a political statement”. Just because he is “embarassing the President” doesn’t mean he is precluded from being charitable. He could just as easily marched through the park with a picket sign chanting “Down with Bush”, which would have been significantly less charitable than handing out sandwiches.
I’m not even going to address the point he was trying to make, as this conversation clearly divered from that topic a long, long, long time ago. And I applaud you if you gave enough time to read this whole damn thing on a beautiful Easter Sunday. But I’m stuck at work – because 2nd jobs suck almost as much as first jobs – so … suck.
Rome Again
Wow, you’re right, whoddathunkit?
Chad N. Freude
That was excellent.
Rome Again
It was, wasn’t it? I agree. I sure do like the way some people around here think.
The Conservative Deflator
Jesus would be arrested and sent to Gitmo, if her returned today. Pretty subversive, wanting to feed hungry people…
28 Percent
Would somebody else here please explain “satire” to the masses?
Chad N. Freude
Long suspected, now confirmed.
Dude, your act is to good for your own good.
Zifnab
Eat’n babies.
Chad N. Freude
I modestly propose that you look at this.
Chad N. Freude
We seem to have swiftly come full circle, from feeding the poor to eating babies.
BIRDZILLA
Looks like those jerks from FOOD NOT BOMBS is showing their ugly mugs again just like they did when dictator clinton was in office
mrmobi
ALL BOW TO THE MIGHTY BIRDZILLA!
ALL BOW TO THE MIGHTY BIRDZILLA!
mrmobi
Shit, you can form a thought? Good for you. I’ve been afraid you really were a middle-aged woman who keeps the mummified corpses of Abortion doctors in her basement.
You have been putting out some seriously fucked up spelling, grammar and punctuation. Congrats! Truly, you are at least the equal of BIRDZILLA, possibly the best of the lot.