• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Bark louder, little dog.

I would gladly pay you tuesday for a hamburger today.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

I desperately hope that, yet again, i am wrong.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

Let there be snark.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

The line between political reporting and fan fiction continues to blur.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

Museums are not America’s attic for its racist shit.

“In this country American means white. everybody else has to hyphenate.”

Too often we confuse noise with substance. too often we confuse setbacks with defeat.

Hey Washington Post, “Democracy Dies in Darkness” was supposed to be a warning, not a mission statement.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

The way to stop violence is to stop manufacturing the hatred that fuels it.

Text STOP to opt out of updates on war plans.

I am pretty sure these ‘journalists’ were not always such a bootlicking sycophants.

The unpunished coup was a training exercise.

Baby steps, because the Republican Party is full of angry babies.

Disagreements are healthy; personal attacks are not.

“Loving your country does not mean lying about its history.”

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

Hell hath no fury like a farmer bankrupted.

The fundamental promise of conservatism all over the world is a return to an idealized past that never existed.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Another Day, More Column Space for Cheney’s Lies

Another Day, More Column Space for Cheney’s Lies

by John Cole|  December 1, 20099:11 am| 136 Comments

This post is in: Assholes, Republican Crime Syndicate - aka the Bush Admin.

FacebookTweetEmail

It appears now the press is camping out at Cheney’s house in order to find the next quote to undermine current policy:

On the eve of the unveiling of the nation’s new Afghanistan policy, former Vice President Dick Cheney slammed President Barack Obama for projecting “weakness” to adversaries and warned that more workaday Afghans will side with the Taliban if they think the United States is heading for the exits.

In a 90-minute interview at his suburban Washington house, Cheney said the president’s “agonizing” about Afghanistan strategy “has consequences for your forces in the field.”

If you read on, he even gets to the “I don’t think he likes America” schtick.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Early Morning Open Thread: Shared Intentionality
Next Post: So much stupid »

Reader Interactions

136Comments

  1. 1.

    ploeg

    December 1, 2009 at 9:15 am

    We can always give Cheney the opportunity he never had as a young lad, issue him an M4 and send him out.

    Second thought, never mind, he’d get his squad killed and shoot his eye out.

  2. 2.

    Upper West

    December 1, 2009 at 9:16 am

    Further evidence of what an idiot Jon Meachem is.

  3. 3.

    Zifnab

    December 1, 2009 at 9:17 am

    To be fair, the media couldn’t get enough of Al Gore well into 2001 and 2002. Why, I remember the former Vice President plastered on every cable news outlet and Sunday Morning talk show all through the run up to the Iraq War. The news media was simply obsessed with… oh, no wait. I’m thinking of American Idol.

  4. 4.

    Wilson Heath

    December 1, 2009 at 9:18 am

    And none of these consequences were already rolling out prior to January ’09 on account of any of your Dick moves? Right.

    If Obama fails to fix a Bush-Cheney fuck-up, that doesn’t transfer ownership of the fuck-up to him. Sorry, Dick.

  5. 5.

    geg6

    December 1, 2009 at 9:18 am

    When will this evil fuck die already?

    He is the best evidence that there is no god or, if there is, he/she/it is not benevolent or worth any sort of reverence.

    I hate that mother fucker with a passion that burns.

  6. 6.

    soonergrunt

    December 1, 2009 at 9:18 am

    I find it sickly hilarious that Dick Cheney, of all people who never saw the forces in the field, about which he never cared for more than one cares for a wrench or a screwdriver, has any concern about the forces in the field.
    All of this posturing by him seems to me to be the kind of thing one might do if one was trying to set the narrative that he made policy decisions and didn’t run the White House as a criminal enterprise. Just in case some US Attorney decides to get frisky and enforce the law, you know.

  7. 7.

    Senyordave

    December 1, 2009 at 9:19 am

    The Dr. Strangelove image of Cheney when he was in the Wheelchair seems more and more appropriate. This is an EVIL MAN. He actively works to undermine a president’s policy.

    Cheney is the epitome of a politician who puts his own self-interest above the country. I know it’s too much to expect, but it would be nice to see a GOP politician tell him to shut his mouth, and go back to shooting old men in the face.

  8. 8.

    dmsilev

    December 1, 2009 at 9:19 am

    It’s OK. Soon, the GOP will have a new leader, one who truly embodies all of their ideals.

    -dms

  9. 9.

    Keith

    December 1, 2009 at 9:21 am

    And nothing says strength like a guy whose pacemaker battery goes out every few years.

  10. 10.

    John Ball

    December 1, 2009 at 9:21 am

    And once again, the Great White Scowl of the West shares with us his bountiful wisdom, that the New Guys is Doing It Wrong.

    Honestly, they could just put up a photograph, read the same quote over and over again, and the effect would be about the same.

  11. 11.

    JenJen

    December 1, 2009 at 9:22 am

    Well, Karl Rove says he will be the first to stand and applaud the President if he really is escalating troop deployment to Afghanistan.

    If that isn’t the biggest clue yet that we’re screwed, I don’t know what would be.

  12. 12.

    dmsilev

    December 1, 2009 at 9:23 am

    @Senyordave:

    The Dr. Strangelove image of Cheney when he was in the Wheelchair seems more and more appropriate. This is an EVIL MAN. He actively works to undermine a president’s policy.

    I got more of a Blofeld vibe from that image. Just give him the white fluffy cat, and it’d be a perfect match.

    -dms

  13. 13.

    gnomedad

    December 1, 2009 at 9:25 am

    Some confusion here on the job responsibilities of “reporter” vs. “Cheney’s personal stenographer”.

  14. 14.

    Persia

    December 1, 2009 at 9:26 am

    Having said all that, having one of the least popular people in the United States denouncing your policy might not be bad news for Barack Obama.

  15. 15.

    drag0n

    December 1, 2009 at 9:27 am

    “Every time he delays, defers, debates, changes his position, it begins to raise questions: Is the commander in chief really behind what they’ve been asked to do?”

    It’s called coming up with a “plan” Dick. Something you shitheads were never capable of doing.

  16. 16.

    John Ball

    December 1, 2009 at 9:29 am

    Hey, Cheney was great at coming up with plans. The problem was they all looked like this…

    1. Invade
    2. ????
    3. PROFIT!

  17. 17.

    Brick Oven Bill

    December 1, 2009 at 9:29 am

    The Russians were not weak as they retreated in late summer before Napoleon. Napoleon took their bait and General Winter polished him off.

    Same thing in Afghanistan. Just pull out and cut off aid. This would be a sign of strength. They will consume themselves. But Obama is not strong enough to embrace this winning strategy because of his underlying personal insecurities, rooted in his abandonment by two fathers and his own mother.

    Now let us consider lies. Cheney was expressing an opinion, not a lie. His opinion is likely based in the fact that ‘The Taliban’ (A group of guys who want to live an Islamic life) previously succeeded. This is a rational opinion.

    This is in contrast with the Afghan Constitution (‘Islam Shall Be The Law of The Land’), which our men are fighting and dying for, which will not succeed, as the Great Satan is backing it.

    This war is retarded.

  18. 18.

    SGEW

    December 1, 2009 at 9:30 am

    I hate that mother fucker with a passion that burns.

    This is an EVIL MAN.

    Actually, nowadays, philosophically speaking, I find Dick Cheney to be kind of fascinating. As a sort of real-life thought-experiment.

    Is Dick Cheney an historically typical tyrant, merely criminally deranged, or empirical evidence of evil in the material world? Are these separate categories superfluous? Discuss.

  19. 19.

    The Grand Panjandrum

    December 1, 2009 at 9:31 am

    Boy, didn’t see this one coming. Cheney criticizing the President as he is about to explain his new Afghanistan policy. Shocking. Almost as shocking as Goldman Sachs employees requesting concealed carry permits. No one could have seen that coming either.

  20. 20.

    moe99

    December 1, 2009 at 9:32 am

    Sully was right.

  21. 21.

    Brick Oven Bill

    December 1, 2009 at 9:36 am

    Here are examples of lies:

    ‘I will have no lobbyists in my Administration.’

    ‘I will post all legislation on the Internet for five days before it is signed.’

    ‘If you make under $250,000 a year, I will not increase your taxes.’

    ‘There is nowhere I would rather be on my birthday than Lansing Michigan.’ .

    ‘Harry, I have a gift.’

  22. 22.

    arguingwithsignposts

    December 1, 2009 at 9:37 am

    More column space? It’s politico, which is just pixels. Cheney and the Politico should just die already.

  23. 23.

    bago

    December 1, 2009 at 9:37 am

    Cheney only failed to get Osama and the Taliban for 8 years. The new guy has only had 10 months or so. We should respect Cheney’s commentary on this. After all, he’s an experienced failure, and knows of what he speaks.

  24. 24.

    arguingwithsignposts

    December 1, 2009 at 9:38 am

    @Brick Oven Bill:

    Oh, by the way. Fuck off BoB. have some pie.

  25. 25.

    PeakVT

    December 1, 2009 at 9:39 am

    Cheney can go die in a firefight.

  26. 26.

    Scott

    December 1, 2009 at 9:40 am

    There are going to be so many people pissing on Cheney’s grave when he dies, they’re going to have to make it a Superfund site.

    Hell, someone’s gonna be able to open a bar called the Cheney Pisser outside the cemetery selling nothing but cheap watered-down beer, and they’ll become millionaires in weeks…

  27. 27.

    SGEW

    December 1, 2009 at 9:40 am

    Additionally: Is Brick Oven Bill an archetypical troll/spoof (aka, “why the internets can’t have nice things”), merely criminally deranged, or proof that someone has created a Turing-level comment-bot?

    Also: It kills me to say it, but I tentatively agree with B.O.B.’s specific visceral conclusion (viz., the Afghanistan occupation is not a very good long-term idea), even though I vociferously condemn his batshit reasoning, his policy implications, and his specific use of certain language.

  28. 28.

    gypsy howell

    December 1, 2009 at 9:40 am

    What’s he bitching about? Isn’t Obama going to escalate the war just like they want him to?

    Don’t worry Dick. We ain’t leaving. Not for a long, long time. There’s still money to be profiteered over there, and all you douchebag politicians and war-mongers are going to get your piece of the action.

  29. 29.

    jrg

    December 1, 2009 at 9:40 am

    Cheney said the president’s “agonizing” about Afghanistan strategy “has consequences for your forces in the field.”

    Yeah, because tough talk, swagger, and quick, from-the-gut decision making worked so well for us in Iraq.

    Cheney is a complete sociopath, whose 8 years in the VP office were marked by epic failure. Why does anyone treat him like he has a shred of credibility?

  30. 30.

    Autboy

    December 1, 2009 at 9:42 am

    since vietnam the “image” of power and the ‘messages’ we send with our actions have mattered far more to these fascist hawks than the realities of politics and combat on the ground. It is all about PR. and it presumes we know how anyone interprets any of our “messages”. The message of Iraq/Afghan, as far as I am concerned, is that America is a stupid, belligerent country that refuses to stop rushing into unwinnable wars and ruining itself politically and financially.

  31. 31.

    JGabriel

    December 1, 2009 at 9:43 am

    JenJen:

    Well, Karl Rove says he will be the first to stand and applaud the President if he really is escalating troop deployment to Afghanistan.
    __
    If that isn’t the biggest clue yet that we’re screwed, I don’t know what would be.

    Bill Kristol standing up applauding. And predicting success.

    .

  32. 32.

    JohnR

    December 1, 2009 at 9:44 am

    BOB: “The Russians were not weak as they retreated in late summer before Napoleon. Napoleon took their bait and General Winter polished him off.”

    Bill, have you ever actually read anything more than comic books about the campaign in Russia? No offense meant, of course!

  33. 33.

    ellaesther

    December 1, 2009 at 9:44 am

    @Persia: There you go — the upside! I think you’re right about this. The people who already agree with Cheney aren’t going to become Obama lovers anytime soon anyway, and the folks who don’t agree with Cheney? Voted his policies out of office a year ago.

  34. 34.

    John Ball

    December 1, 2009 at 9:48 am

    Yeah. “We should go away so the heathens can all kill each other” is a–flawed statement. To put it mildly.

    As for BoB–I suspect real BoB is a criminally deranged wingnut, while the various fake BoBs are regular posters trolling for a lark. The problem is telling which is which can be quite difficult.

  35. 35.

    Senyordave

    December 1, 2009 at 9:51 am

    Looked at the comments at Politico, and I kind of liked this one. This one is short and says it all:

    Are you f’ing kidding me. Go sink your teeth into more babies.

  36. 36.

    ksmiami

    December 1, 2009 at 9:53 am

    Wait – As much as I think Afghanistan is a tribal, FUBAR shithole, I do think sending some men and women in to basically spy and seal off the Afghani border makes some sense and I think we really do have to care and make some effort to ensure that nuclear weapons in pakistan do not fall into the wrong hands. I believe in my heart and head that Obama has come to this conclusion and that it was not easy and will not be popular, but it is right. I have a client who heads the US-India PAC and it is good to see Obama recognize the importance of India in helping us achieve stability in the region. I think you will see more of this as time goes on.

    THIS DOES NOT EXCUSE DICKHEAD CHENEY AND CREW FROM BEING EVIL, HAVING NO PLANS AND STARTING A POINTLESS WAR IN IRAQ. CHENEY NEEDS TO SHUT UP LIKE YESTERDAY AND STOP THE GOLDFINGER IMPERSONATION NOW.

  37. 37.

    DCPlod

    December 1, 2009 at 9:55 am

    I for one, don’t particularly value the opinion of someone who left office with an approval rating of, um, thirteen percent. I wish Cheney’d go back to shooting his buddies in the face instead of shooting his mouth off.

  38. 38.

    Brick Oven Bill

    December 1, 2009 at 10:00 am

    The history of the world has been competing settled/agricultural communities which created surpluses of energy by harnessing the power of the sun, and tribal/nomadic communities, which, though force, fed off the solar energy surpluses of settled/agricultural communities.

    Islam is a tribal/nomadic religion which requires outside sources of energy to survive. Try eating poppies for dinner.

    In the absence of an outside energy source (welfare, foreign aid, ‘rebuilding’, Jizya to warlords), the threat of Afghanistan in particular, and Islam in general, will consume itself.

    Pull out.

    I do believe that Islam in time will reform and embrace the Seven Liberal Arts. With this simple compromise, Mohammed’s vision of a Dar al-Islam can be realized.

  39. 39.

    bago

    December 1, 2009 at 10:02 am

    Just so everyone knows. Cheney had a dinner at Union station a few weeks ago for energy executives. They shut down half of the place. This is also the place where he was given that award about a month ago.

  40. 40.

    sparky

    December 1, 2009 at 10:05 am

    @SGEW: i vote narcissist–he doesn’t seem to be a sociopath viz., his daughter is not estranged, and a narcissist would be more concerned about appearances and being “wrong.” also, he can’t really be a tyrannical leader having never really duked it out for office either via elections or combat.

    oh, and i must sadly concur wrt to BoB, or at least that particular post.

    as for the actual reason for this post, can we just admit that Politico was trolling? seems to have worked well. if the goal is eyeballs, i’d build a guesthouse for someone over there.

  41. 41.

    mk3872

    December 1, 2009 at 10:05 am

    Politico is such a joke. They just revisit Cheney time after time, reprint his rantings and do not DARE to question his assertions.

    Because, as we all know, Politico is nothing more than a GOP bulletin board.

    BTW, did you notice that Cheney found a new reason why Obama is weak?

    This time it is because he took so long to approve a new strategy. As anyone in the conservamedia will tell you, the commander in chief is expected to immediately approve any and all troop demands from field generals …

    He also used the Fox News “apology tour” line in today’s Politico love fest …

  42. 42.

    Bill H

    December 1, 2009 at 10:09 am

    I just hope all of you are pronouncing “Cheney” correctly. It’s “Cheeny,” you know, not “Chany.” Get it right or Chris Matthews will jump down your throat. Cheney himself doesn’t seem to give a shit how it’s pronounced, no one with that name has ever been known to correct another person’s pronunciation of it, but Chris Matthews has a massive hard on about the pronunciation. He lectures about it, and he corrects people who appear on his show and pronounce it wrong.

    So I don’t want to see anyong here pronouncing “Cheney” wrong. I am serving as Chris Matthews’ backup today.

  43. 43.

    jibeaux

    December 1, 2009 at 10:10 am

    Because if there’s one thing the American people value, it is the foreign policy opinions of Dick Fucking Cheney. It is right up there with the extent to which they value his opinions on hip hop, home decor, and being a halfway decent human being.

  44. 44.

    sparky

    December 1, 2009 at 10:10 am

    @ksmiami: um, two questions:
    1. how exactly is the US–which cannot seal off its own borders–going to seal off a much more difficult border with hostile people on both sides halfway around the world?

    2. how exactly does destabilizing Pakistan help the US? it might–might-help India, but that’s a pretty iffy assumption too.

    promising ponies is promising ponies whether Bush did it or Obama does it. wrapping it with a better-spoken ribbon doesn’t change the contents of the box.

  45. 45.

    John Ball

    December 1, 2009 at 10:12 am

    BoB–shut the fuck up. You don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about, you ignorant ball of crazy shit.

    Apologies to any innocent bystanders. My tolerance level for this kind of crap is–often quite low, especially before lunch.

  46. 46.

    Mike Jones

    December 1, 2009 at 10:13 am

    Maybe Obama should “project strength” by packing Cheney off to Gitmo for treason. After all, haven’t we gone through 8 years of hearing that criticizing the President during war was treasonous?

    OK, I’m not completely serious, but it’s nice to dream, eh?

  47. 47.

    DCPlod

    December 1, 2009 at 10:15 am

    @Bill H:

    But pronouncing Cheney’s name ‘Cheeney’ is unnatural in English, and insisting on an unnatural pronounciation is something we shouldn’t be giving in to.

  48. 48.

    Q

    December 1, 2009 at 10:15 am

    Cheney was asked if he thinks the Bush administration bears any responsibility for the disintegration of Afghanistan because of the attention and resources that were diverted to Iraq. “I basically don’t,” he replied without elaborating.

    Of course they don’t. They’re never responsible for anything.

    And gotta love the “…without elaborating.” You had 90 MINUTES with the tool, how bout a little follow up? Oh, yeah, I forgot. It’s Politico.

  49. 49.

    eemom

    December 1, 2009 at 10:16 am

    I give up. Never thought I’d say this, but let’s go back to talking about Palin. Lesser of two evils, you betcha.

  50. 50.

    bayville

    December 1, 2009 at 10:16 am

    I didn’t read the interview but I’m sure a couple of crack reporters like Vandenhei and Allen peppered Cheney with questions on the Senate Democratic report released on Saturday about Tora Bora and Osama Bin Laden in 2001.

    What was his response?

  51. 51.

    danimal

    December 1, 2009 at 10:17 am

    Wouldn’t Cheney merit news coverage if he did something unexpected? “Cheney supports Obama foreign policy” merits headlines. “Cheney steals souls and criticizes Obama” is just more of the same.

    Go back to your undisclosed location and wake us up when you have something useful to say, Dick.

  52. 52.

    Demo Woman

    December 1, 2009 at 10:18 am

    According to Halperin, Don Senor is going to have a phone conference at 11:30 am to announce whether or not the repubs will support the President’s plan. I’m guessing they won’t.

  53. 53.

    DCPlod

    December 1, 2009 at 10:18 am

    @Q:

    And gotta love the “…without elaborating.” You had 90 MINUTES with the tool, how bout a little follow up? Oh, yeah, I forgot. It’s Politico the liberal media.

    Fixed.

  54. 54.

    Rhoda

    December 1, 2009 at 10:18 am

    Awesome: Harris writes how Obama doesn’t believe in American exceptionalism on Monday and Cheney hits him for not believing in American exceptionalism on Tuesday. Totally forget the elogquent statement of belief in exceptionalism the President made at the G20 in London. The circle is completed.

    I loved Spencer Ackerman’s take on this.

    Politico reporters transcribe, you decide:

    Cheney was asked if he thinks the Bush administration bears any responsibility for the disintegration of Afghanistan because of the attention and resources that were diverted to Iraq. “I basically don’t,” he replied without elaborating.

    Right, and why follow that one up? It’s not like a high-profile Senate report demonstrated over the weekend that the Bush administration allowed Osama bin Laden to escape the battle of Tora Bora in December 2001, a crucial mistake that allowed al-Qaeda to regroup in Pakistan. It’s not like the Bush administration in 2002 refused to allow U.S. troops to perform peacekeeping operations that would have preserved the initial post-Taliban order, even as President George W. Bush issued an ultimately hollow promise for a new Marshall Plan in Afghanistan. It’s not as if later that year the Bush administration had its regional military commander focus intensely on an entirely elective second war fought for ultimately incorrect premises. It’s not as if security and governance deteriorated in Afghanistan for years while the Bush administration declined to increase troop levels or even focus on the Pakistani safe havens for al-Qaeda that the 2001 Tora Bora failure yielded, even as ground commanders publicly stated the war could not be won without dealing with them. And it’s certainly not like the Bush administration passed an unfinished war off to its successor in year eight amid record levels of insurgent violence.

    None of that happened. That’s why Politico knows Dick Cheney would never lie to the American people or demonstrate poor judgment.

  55. 55.

    Q

    December 1, 2009 at 10:20 am

    @DCPlod: Funny.

  56. 56.

    bemused

    December 1, 2009 at 10:21 am

    I think that there are few if any rightwingers that detest our “lefty” media as much or more than I do. That’s a question for rightwingers, if the media is so “liberal”, how do they explain liberals’ constant media criticism? Never mind. That would require using logic.

  57. 57.

    DCPlod

    December 1, 2009 at 10:23 am

    If Fox is an extension of the GOP, then Politico is an extension of Drudge. And it also has one voice of reason named Smith.

  58. 58.

    Chat Noir

    December 1, 2009 at 10:24 am

    @geg6: Agreed. Why this dirtbag isn’t currently on trial at the Hague — along with his wacky sidekicks Bush, Rumsfeld, Rice, Libby, Addington, Feith, Yoo, Bybee, etc. — defies comprehension. If there is any kind of a god, these folks will eventually pay for what they did to this country. However, I’m not holding my breath.

  59. 59.

    ChrisB

    December 1, 2009 at 10:24 am

    @drag0n:

    It’s called coming up with a “plan” Dick. Something you shitheads were never capable of doing.

    Thank you.

    @Zifnab:

    To be fair, the media couldn’t get enough of Al Gore well into 2001 and 2002. Why, I remember the former Vice President plastered on every cable news outlet and Sunday Morning talk show all through the run up to the Iraq War. The news media was simply obsessed with… oh, no wait. I’m thinking of American Idol.

    As I recall, the media was obsessed with Gore’s beard and waistline and that was about it. Typical.

  60. 60.

    SGEW

    December 1, 2009 at 10:25 am

    Ok, so let me get this straight, re: escalation in Afghanistan.

    On one side (roughly), you have: Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton (presumably), Spencer Ackerman, Michael O’Hanlon, Bill Kristol (probably), Matthew Yglesias, and Dick Fucking Cheney.[1]

    On the other side (kind of), you have: Michael Moore, John Cole, von at ObWi, Glenzilla, Larison, George Will, and Brick Oven Bill.

    Bedfellows, strange!

    [1] N.B.: Except for Obama, all of these people supported the invasion of Iraq.

  61. 61.

    Elizabelle

    December 1, 2009 at 10:26 am

    Another day. Another Politico story.

    Note the Politico “journalists” granted the Cheney interview: why’s it’s Mike Allen and Jim VanderHei. Imagine that!

    Mike Allen, Bush administration stenographer, and Jim VanderHei, whose wife worked for Tom DeLay.

    I don’t read Politico much because it appeals to rightwingers too much (or at least tries way too hard not to offend them).

    And has anyone noticed how thoroughly sick the comments on Washington Post stories have gotten? It’s like Red State legions are scrolling (trolling?) through the threads.

  62. 62.

    Harry Whittington

    December 1, 2009 at 10:30 am

    Oh, Dick doesn’t mean anything by it.

    It’s just his way.

  63. 63.

    Violet

    December 1, 2009 at 10:32 am

    @Senyordave:

    The Dr. Strangelove image of Cheney when he was in the Wheelchair seems more and more appropriate. This is an EVIL MAN.

    Agreed. He is evil personified. I can only hope that if the
    Devil is criticizing Obama’s plans, that might mean they have some merit.

  64. 64.

    wilfred

    December 1, 2009 at 10:32 am

    Cheney takes up the space that could have been given to opposition to this escalation. It certainly won’t be coming from the Deemocracts, who are already in full Ave Caesar mode, willing to go along with whatever Obomba wants, which is what the generals want.

    A smashing victory for militarism and neo-imperialism. I’m sure the public option was the quid pro quo for this nonsense.

    Finish the job, my ass. Let’s see if the Obomba hating press gives any space to real opposition.

  65. 65.

    ChrisB

    December 1, 2009 at 10:33 am

    @jibeaux: Cheney’s home decor. That would include a waterboard, a man sized safe, and matching prison cells (one in total darkness, the other with a naked light buld on 24 hours a day).

    All at a secluded, undisclosed location.

  66. 66.

    MattF

    December 1, 2009 at 10:33 am

    Cheney’s audience is that clan of journalists who made an embarrassing little mess when they first saw ex-Gov. Palin and are now working at proving their ‘seriousness’. The rest of us should ignore it.

  67. 67.

    bayville

    December 1, 2009 at 10:34 am

    I refer to retired U.S. Army officer, military historian and writer Andrew Bacevich who outlined in October as to why this decision by Obama is horrific and will almost certainly solidify his first term as his only term.
    Bacevich in Harper’s (subs. req’d).
    Sampling:

    Fixing Afghanistan is not only unnecessary, it’s also likely to prove impossible. Not for nothing has the place acquired the nickname Graveyard of Empires. Americans, insistent that the dominion over which they preside does not meet the definition of empire, evince little interest in how the British, Russians, or others have fared in attempting to impose their will on the Afghans. As General David McKiernan, until recently the U.S. commander in Afghanistan, put it, “There’s always an inclination to relate what we’re doing now with previous nations,” adding, “I think that’s a very unhealthy comparison.” McKiernan was expressing a view common among the ranks of the political and military elite: We’re Americans. We’re different. Therefore, the experience of others does not apply.

  68. 68.

    GReynoldsCT00

    December 1, 2009 at 10:34 am

    @John Ball:

    See Cleek about a pie filter, it really works wonders

  69. 69.

    El Cid

    December 1, 2009 at 10:35 am

    You libs don’t understand.

    Dick Cheney is a PATRIOT who loves and wants the best for America; as a former Vice President for a 2 term President, he should receive round-the-clock quotation — with none a yer dam ‘fack’ checkin’ neither, elitists!

    Al Gore is a self-promoting TRAITOR who wants the UN to take over America and make it into a SWEDISH GREEN PRISON, and since he has never held significant public office and never was associated with a popular and respected President, the press should avoid him at all costs, and should mainly ask why the emails prove that the last century’s studies of CO2 and global warming were all made up in the last couple of years.

  70. 70.

    Ash

    December 1, 2009 at 10:36 am

    @SGEW: When you lay it out in pretty lists like that, the whole thing is just really fucking weird.

  71. 71.

    flukebucket

    December 1, 2009 at 10:36 am

    I’ll never forget the interview I saw Cheney giving where he smugly stated that he had spent the overwhelming majority of his adult life in public service.

    At the time his net worth was estimated to be in excess of 100 million dollars.

    Don’t ever let anybody tell you that public service is a low paying gig.

  72. 72.

    RareSanity

    December 1, 2009 at 10:37 am

    The behavior of the press in this country is shameful.

    Instead of looking for someone that legitimately and thoughtfully disagrees with the President, these turds interview the Jackass from Jackson Hole.

    It’s just like putting a microphone in front of Terrel Owens after a loss. They know he’s going to give them a sound bite that can be discussed “with our panel” during the day.

    I’m afraid we’ll have to leave it there…

  73. 73.

    D-Chance.

    December 1, 2009 at 10:38 am

    So I guess the whole deference to a war president thing is kaput?

  74. 74.

    2th2nayle

    December 1, 2009 at 10:38 am

    @SGEW: A broken clock, etc… etc…

  75. 75.

    sparky

    December 1, 2009 at 10:39 am

    @SGEW: not so strange. once you are assimiliated into the National Security State, there is no escape.

    the “problem”, if i may use the term here, is that the Establishment (National Security State, et al) has yet to meet a war that is not a good idea for some reason or other. that means that if you oppose it you are definitionally fringe. thus there never was a serious debate about Afghanistan. what we had was a bunch of people in a room deciding what the correct-looking number of troops to send would be.

    Vietnam is the obvious analogy, but to paint a sharper picture, i think the nature of the non-debate is perhaps better analogized to debate in the South in the 1850s. in other words, since the premises were crazy, no matter how elegant the discussion, the outcome was foredained to be pernicious.

  76. 76.

    Svensker

    December 1, 2009 at 10:39 am

    @Rhoda:

    the Bush administration had its regional military commander focus intensely on an entirely elective second war fought for ultimately incorrect premises.

    Excellent analysis except for the above, IMNVHO. The Bushies fought the war for their own premises which, I believe, were laid out in the PNAC letter that Mr. Cheney signed a few years before. What they told the public was all crapola, but they really didn’t care — they figured they’d get away with it and they pretty much did. Their only miscalculation, I think, was that they were pretty sure there’d be some kind of WMD somewhere that they could point at to justify their warmongering. But, again, FOX and the propagandists did their jobs well enough that the lack of WMD didn’t make much of a difference in how the public felt about the war.

  77. 77.

    Ash

    December 1, 2009 at 10:40 am

    @bayville: I don’t know much about Bacevich (except I attended a few of his lectures in college and slept through them. I probably wouldn’t have if I was aware of how important he was and all that jazz) but I’m just wondering wtf is with all this talk about “one term president”….? How the hell is anyone in any position to judge that not even one year in? Opinions and situations in this country change on an hourly basis.

  78. 78.

    2th&nayle

    December 1, 2009 at 10:43 am

    It’s bad when you can’t even get your own user name correctly. It maybe the medication.

  79. 79.

    4tehlulz

    December 1, 2009 at 10:48 am

    @D-Chance.: Expired January 20, 2009.

  80. 80.

    wolfetone

    December 1, 2009 at 10:49 am

    @Zifnab: Difference is, of course, that Gore won the popular vote in 2000. But I don’t recall news outlets constantly seeking out his opinion, nor do I recall Gore continuously attacking the GWB administration. He was, I’d like to note, out front early (and entirely correct) on invading Iraq.

  81. 81.

    x

    December 1, 2009 at 10:50 am

    Cheney, a flea on the dog’s ass of the body politic.

    Speaking of dogs, I’ve been jonesin’ for some Lily love.

  82. 82.

    sparky

    December 1, 2009 at 10:52 am

    @Ash: there are several flavors.
    1. Rs trying to gin up antagonism/defeatism.
    2. pissed-off progressives (yours truly is in this camp but doesn’t buy into the one term stuff)
    3. people looking at decisions like health care, financial reform and a “surge” in Afghanistan who think that some or all of these are disasters that could have been avoided that will blow up in Obama’s face.

    as for me, i doubt that Afghanistan will be the death of the US empire until some time in Obama’s second term. by death i mean retreat ala Vietnam, not an actual change in thinking. the other two have the potential to blow up sooner, health care most noticeably.

  83. 83.

    Violet

    December 1, 2009 at 10:54 am

    @Zifnab:

    To be fair, the media couldn’t get enough of Al Gore well into 2001 and 2002. Why, I remember the former Vice President plastered on every cable news outlet and Sunday Morning talk show all through the run up to the Iraq War. The news media was simply obsessed with… oh, no wait. I’m thinking of American Idol.

    And there’s that little difference in that Al Gore actually ran for President as the nominee of his party in 2000. A better comparison would be to look at how much Dan Quayle was interviewed after GHWB lost. I don’t recall his opinions being solicited on everything Clinton did.

    I wonder if Dick Cheney has dirt on all the reporters and higher ups at the networks and they know it, and if they don’t show proper deference he’ll tank their careers and/or shoot them in the face.

  84. 84.

    kay

    December 1, 2009 at 10:59 am

    Cheney’s original rationale for weighing in on a weekly basis was that he was “defending his record”. Media pretended this was about “equal time”, so Cheney and his daughter had to be given a weekly forum to “defend”, although that wasn’t offered to any other former administration.

    What’s the excuse now?

  85. 85.

    Rhoda

    December 1, 2009 at 10:59 am

    @Svensker

    That was actually Spencer Ackerman’s analysis, I screwed up the blockquote and don’t have the edit feature.

    I have no idea about what really was behind the push for Iraq but the investigations going on in London and the news Blair supported it so early are giving rise to a lot of questions.

  86. 86.

    maye

    December 1, 2009 at 10:59 am

    If you look too deeply into the nature of evil, you will find madness.

    Dick Cheney is bat shit crazy – probably attributed (somewhat) to his arteriosclerosis.

  87. 87.

    sparky

    December 1, 2009 at 11:01 am

    i should have added that there is one outside (waaaay outside) possibility of something going seriously wrong in “Afghanistan.” that something serious is that we continue to destabilize Pakistan to the point where (a) India feels compelled to intervene or (b) the military gets sick of the US in the region and tells us to leave or it will “mislay” a nuclear weapon or (c) civil war breaks out in Pakistan. extremely unlikely, but given the US propensity to destroy an entire region (Cambodia, for example) it’s not impossible.

  88. 88.

    Pigs & Spiders

    December 1, 2009 at 11:05 am

    Dick Cheney is perhaps the most immoral man alive. He doesn’t give a flying fuck about the troops or our country. He cares about his profits and the profits of his friends. Full stop. My greatest hope for him is that he dies alone and in ambiguity. While it’s unlikely to unfold that way, I hope it happens soon.

    …and I guess we’ll have to leave it there.

  89. 89.

    kay

    December 1, 2009 at 11:07 am

    @maye:

    He’s just completely entrenched in every power base. Like Rumsfeld, he’s a self-promoter, from way back.
    And we all know how media worship the powerful.
    Do you remember the media slobbering over Rumsfeld? It was incredible.
    Who’s the current Secretary of Defense? Seen him grinning on any magazine covers? No. Nor will you.

  90. 90.

    bayville

    December 1, 2009 at 11:07 am

    Ash,

    wtf is with all this talk about “one term president”….? How the hell is anyone in any position to judge that not even one year in?

    Obama’s whole agenda since assuming the Presidency has been cynical. Catering entirely to huge campaign donors – the MIC, the insurance lobby, BigPhrma and banksters.
    Meanwhile, the anti-war crowd, single payer/public option advocates, environmentalists and the working class are suddenly dispirited and disinterested in his “Hope and Change” rhetoric. Hell, unemployment is going to be in double-digits for years unless something drastic is done (And I’m not talking about a “listening tour” sometime next year.
    This poll from Kos/Research 2000 last week highlights the growing lack of enthusiasm with Obama among Democrats.

  91. 91.

    Annie

    December 1, 2009 at 11:10 am

    I don’t blame Cheney. He is a mean, spiteful, and callous and will look to any forum to justify his record. I blame Politico, Fox, and any other media that give him a soapbox (and his daughter, too).

    He should be shunned. He should have to spend his days caring for all the US soldiers he so callously sent to Iraq and Afghanistan, without a plan and proper equipment, etc. He should be anywhere accept in the media.

  92. 92.

    kay

    December 1, 2009 at 11:19 am

    @bayville:

    To me, it’ s just reached the point of insanity. I listened to Keith Olberman last night and I don’t recognize this “America” he’s insisting Obama “restore”.

    I don’t know how Keith Olberman remembers the pre-Bush America, but it’s nothing like I remember it.

    Bill Clinton was no civil libertarian, and Reno and Patrick Fitzgerald were manipulating process way before Bush, up to and including taping discussions between terrorist defendant’s and their counsel, after the first World Trade bombing. They’ve been playing fast and loose with due process almost from the moment they identified terrorism as a threat.

    Bill Clinton was picking up people using rendition, we were starving Iraqis, we were signing trade agreements as soon as the ink dried, deregulating Wall Street, and on and on and on. Before the 2000 election.

    I feel as if Obama’s critics want to return to some “America” that never was, way prior to Clinton’s term, and they want to do it in a year.

  93. 93.

    D-Chance.

    December 1, 2009 at 11:25 am

    Looks like there will be no need for a trial… US justice, where the police exact revenge without need of a judge or jury.

  94. 94.

    bemused

    December 1, 2009 at 11:27 am

    I saw my Marine nephew on Thanksgiving. He will probably be going to Afghanistan, said they’ve just been waiting on Obama’s decision. He’s been stateside for awhile so now our family will have to start worrying again.

  95. 95.

    Mike in NC

    December 1, 2009 at 11:27 am

    America is a stupid, belligerent country that refuses to stop rushing into unwinnable wars and ruining itself politically and financially.

    About halfway through “Nixonland”, where Kissinger is advising Tricky Dick to bomb the shit out of North Vietnam to prove he isn’t “weak”. Good thing those guys didn’t dither and procrastinate, right?

  96. 96.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    December 1, 2009 at 11:28 am

    Cheney is so evil his own heart has been trying to slay the beast that enslaves it.

  97. 97.

    Ash

    December 1, 2009 at 11:29 am

    @bayville: Yeah, except the election is in, uh, three years. I don’t know, in my world three years is a REALLY LONG TIME.

  98. 98.

    bemused

    December 1, 2009 at 11:31 am

    OT but heard on Stephanie Miller Show that Rush Limbaugh is getting married again. 4th marriage on the 4th of July.

  99. 99.

    jwb

    December 1, 2009 at 11:32 am

    @bemused: Should we start a betting pool on how long it will last?

  100. 100.

    bayville

    December 1, 2009 at 11:35 am

    kay-
    I felt Clinton was arguably the second-best Republican President of the 20th century (next to TR). He gave the GOP everything they wanted – Welfare reform, deficit reduction, the Telecommunications Act of 2006, GATT, NAFTA, Robert Rubin, Greenspan, etc.
    Unfortunately for the masses the Phil Gramm/Jerry Falwell-wing of the party got greedier and crazier.
    Obama is just duplicating the Clinton playbook, but unlike the Clinton years there is an economic depression brewing and two ongoing wars that aren’t going to end anytime soon.
    At the very least I wanted to repeal the worst aspects of the Cheney/W. era. He hasn’t.

  101. 101.

    Ed Drone

    December 1, 2009 at 11:35 am

    @DCPlod:

    But pronouncing Cheney’s name ‘Cheeney’ is unnatural in English

    Actually, the vowel-consonant-vowel string should make the first “e” a long “e”, and thus “Chee-Knee” follows English pronunciation rules just fine. That, indeed, may be why Chris “the pedant” Mathews insists on it. Since Cheney — asshole enough to care — hasn’t insisted on that pronunciation, and answers quite quickly to “Chain-knee,” I’d say the latter is the proper way to say it.

    Although the alternate pronunciation (“Rat-Bastard”) is acceptable, and understood the world over.

    Ed

  102. 102.

    GReynoldsCT00

    December 1, 2009 at 11:36 am

    @bemused:

    Just eeeeeeeuuwwww

  103. 103.

    Ash Can

    December 1, 2009 at 11:36 am

    In other news, Politico is reporting that the ever-classy Washington Times is running a full-page birther ad, complete with chimpanzees (h/t GOS). Jeezus, hasn’t that shithole gone out of business yet?

  104. 104.

    bemused

    December 1, 2009 at 11:40 am

    @jwb:
    Just what is the proper length of time before cashing out these days?

  105. 105.

    Ash Can

    December 1, 2009 at 11:40 am

    @bemused:
    @jwb:
    Fifty bucks says she’s doing it only for the divorce settlement.

  106. 106.

    GReynoldsCT00

    December 1, 2009 at 11:42 am

    @Ash Can:

    still not worth it

  107. 107.

    TaosJohn

    December 1, 2009 at 11:46 am

    Sending troops to Afghanistan to fight the Taliban is like sending the army to Alabama to fight the Baptists. How much longer are we going to put up with this bullshit?

  108. 108.

    ksmiami

    December 1, 2009 at 11:47 am

    sparky – No we don’t want a destabilized Pakistan which is what is happening now as the Taliban takes over swaths of the country. Pak has friggin nukes and god forbid if the crazies get hold of them. We need a strongman central government in Pak unafraid to confront the fanatics, but we don’t need to be obvious about it. My guess is that we will help secure the cities of Afghanistan and do some trading in the rural parts, but I hope the footprint is light.

  109. 109.

    bayville

    December 1, 2009 at 11:48 am

    Ash-

    I don’t know, in my world three years is a REALLY LONG TIME.

    How long have we been in Iraq? Afghanistan?

    So in three years, you think unemployment drops to 7%, DOW hovers near 14K, gas levels off at $3 per gallon, the world -suddenly – decides to start buying those beautiful gas guzzling American-made cars three-at-a-time and the middle class will start to prosper once again?

    Can you e-mail me a pair of those rose colored glasses you’re wearing?

  110. 110.

    ksmiami

    December 1, 2009 at 11:49 am

    Also Sparky – whatever happens wrt to Pakistan will end up being India’s fight. You can take that to the bank.

  111. 111.

    J.D. Rhoades

    December 1, 2009 at 11:53 am

    @drag0n:

    It’s called coming up with a “plan” Dick. Something you shitheads were never capable of doing.

    Not only were they not capable of doing it, Rumsfeld threatened to fire the next general who asked about “phase 4” (i.e. post-combat) planning.

  112. 112.

    Hann1bal

    December 1, 2009 at 11:54 am

    What’s the Cheney equivalent of the tire swing? ‘Cause I think the press has really gotten to that level.

  113. 113.

    J.D. Rhoades

    December 1, 2009 at 11:55 am

    Sending troops to Afghanistan to fight the Taliban is like sending the army to Alabama to fight the Baptists.

    That’s actually not a bad idea. Teach the fuckers a lesson.

  114. 114.

    Elizabelle

    December 1, 2009 at 11:58 am

    Serious question, since some BJ readers probably know this and can offer up some good links:

    How did Herbert Hoover behave in the face of FDR’s attempted reforms?

    I am guessing he was more GWBush (silent for the most part) than Cheney (insufferable) but don’t know.

    Were there national Republicans who got the seriousness of the nation’s plight and worked to bring about reforms?

    I know, sheer laziness on my part in asking and not preliminarily researching. But counting on BJ to steer me to some interesting links.

  115. 115.

    jwb

    December 1, 2009 at 11:58 am

    @Ash Can: I would think she is doing it to save him.

  116. 116.

    kay

    December 1, 2009 at 12:00 pm

    @bayville:

    At the very least I wanted to repeal the worst aspects of the Cheney/W. era. He hasn’t.

    We see things a little differently. These issues had a long arc. All of them. The craven worship of the finance sector, the war(s), the War On Terror approach, hell, Democrats and Republicans are exactly the same on trade, and have been for forty years.

    Everybody knows at least the outlines of our storied involvement in Afghanistan. We’ve been meddling in that place for 30 years.

  117. 117.

    Irony Abounds

    December 1, 2009 at 12:09 pm

    My wish for the new year: a massive, very painful and prolonged fatal heart attack for Cheney. The man is utterly and completely without morals and he is the one that hates America and its institutions.

  118. 118.

    Shawn in ShowMe

    December 1, 2009 at 12:25 pm

    So in three years, you think unemployment drops to 7%, DOW hovers near 14K, gas levels off at $3 per gallon, the world suddenly – decides to start buying those beautiful gas guzzling Americanmade cars three-at-a-time and the middle class will start to prosper once again?

    Except for the gas guzzling cars thing, those other benchmarks are actually desirable and reachable. A lot is riding (literally) on Shai Agassi’s Better Place electric-car model.

    The price of an electric mile is projected to be 8 cents when the first electric cars hit the market next year, which is the equivalent of an $1.60/gallon car. Because battery life cycle and energy density improves over time that price will drop even further over the next few years. Anybody foolish enough to charge $3/gallon will only accelerate the rate of electric car adoption.

  119. 119.

    Maude

    December 1, 2009 at 12:31 pm

    @ksmiami: You have stated something that the msm has no concept of. They don’t know India’s history. They don’t understand that Pakistan is having a very hard time with fanatics. They have no idea about foreign policy as opposed to just kill people.

    Kay-and the Clintons are worth over $100 mil.

  120. 120.

    bayville

    December 1, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    The craven worship of the finance sector, the war(s), the War On Terror approach, hell, Democrats and Republicans are exactly the same on trade, and have been for forty years.
    Everybody knows at least the outlines of our storied involvement in Afghanistan. We’ve been meddling in that place for 30 years.

    Kay, are you saying that although the citizenry elected Mr. Hope & Change they shouldn’t expect any Hope & Change because the Dems/Reps are a lot alike?

    Sounds like Nader’s rationale to me?

  121. 121.

    kay

    December 1, 2009 at 12:38 pm

    @Maude:

    Kay-and the Clintons are worth over $100 mil.

    Yeah. I don’t have any real problems with the Clintons. They do what they do, and they’re better at some things than others.
    I do have a problem with liberals like Keith Olberman pretending we were living in some populist, peaceful shangri-la prior to Bush, or that all you have to do with a modern financial crisis is track the FDR approach, and it’s fixed!
    None of that is true.

  122. 122.

    Seanly

    December 1, 2009 at 12:47 pm

    @dmsilev:

    The only problem is that they can’t stop Cheney from snapping the cat’s spine in half & slurping on the sweet, sweet spinal fluids.

    Uggh, I think I just grossed myself out…

  123. 123.

    bayville

    December 1, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    Shawn you are an optimist and an idealist and I hope you are correct.
    But there isn’t one positive economic trend I see or one serious corrective solution being discussed by the political elite that would indicate, to me, this will happen.

    You can’t spend $5 billion per week on two neverending wars and then in the same breathe talk about deficit reduction (w/out massive tax increases) and seriously expect to stimulate job growth.
    It ain’t happenin’.

  124. 124.

    kay

    December 1, 2009 at 12:51 pm

    @bayville:

    No, not really. I don’t like the “hope and change” snark, though. I think it’s disrespectful to voters.

    I’m saying that we chose some of these directions over a period of decades, and the intensity of the Bush years was a departure, but the outlines were and are the same.

    Bill Clinton can make a perfectly reasonable argument that he was a populist who benefitted the middle class. Just in terms of how people did, his numbers are really unimpeachable.

    But he was also seduced by deregulation, promoted the finance sector, and like every other powerful person in the US, is a free trader.

    And, the idea that he was somehow concerned about civil liberties is a flat-out joke. The only reason he didn’t do extraordinary rendition is he wanted the protection of a court order. Reno was a horror, in my view. An authoritarian liberal who cloaked that impulse in concern for human rights. I hope she’s not Keith Olberman’s vision of “restoration”.

    We got here on an arc. Expecting to get back to some mythical place, where we “restore” America is going to take a while, if we get there at all.

  125. 125.

    ksmiami

    December 1, 2009 at 12:56 pm

    Maude:

    Because the MSM is made up of charlatans and infotainment people who are afraid of deep thought and reading international blogs and news, or at least talking to the Indian guy working in their tech department. I turned them off years ago (started with Bush II the lesser) and have never gone back. If the US survives this period I will think it has something to do with the internet and the availability of information from real sources

  126. 126.

    bayville

    December 1, 2009 at 1:00 pm

    Kay, I don’t consider Olberman a liberal: I consider him an opportunist and don’t watch his show much so I’m not really sure what he said.

    I didn’t (don’t) like Bill Clinton – although I voted for him once. Other than that, I’m not sure where you and I have a disagreement. I agree wholeheartedly with your post at 124.

  127. 127.

    SiubhanDuinne

    December 1, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    @Bill H:

    Chris Matthews has a massive hard on about the pronunciation. He lectures about it, and he corrects people who appear on his show and pronounce it wrong.

    This is right at the top of the long, long list of things I detest about Tweety.

  128. 128.

    trollhattan

    December 1, 2009 at 1:17 pm

    I’d call Cheney reptillian but that would be an insult to lizards everywhere.

    He’s truly somebody who sought power for power’s sake and misses it dearly. That there are so many willing enablers today uncritically giving him a platform and megaphone says as much about them as he.

    That said, he should fuck off. And take reptile junior with him.

  129. 129.

    kay

    December 1, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    @bayville:

    Oh, I like Clinton. I ended up with real affection for him. I like all the things other people hate: his excess, his willingness to wheel and deal, the fact that the douchebags in DC never quite thought he was good enough.
    I think he always had good intentions, he absolutely understood and identified with outsiders or marginal people, and I think he’s the hard ass in that family, not Hillary.
    He just looked at the general direction we were going followed that, but tried to spread some of the financial benefit around while mitigating some damage, and succeeded, to a certain extent.

  130. 130.

    noncarborundum

    December 1, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    @DCPlod: Well played, sir! Well played!

  131. 131.

    noncarborundum

    December 1, 2009 at 2:21 pm

    @Ed Drone:
    DCPlod was snarking. Look up Mark Krikorian’s comment on the pronunciation of “Sotomayor”.

  132. 132.

    Wile E. Quixote

    December 1, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    I really wish that President Obama would call Cheney on his bullshit. Have a press conference and say “Look, Afghanistan is a complex situation, and it was made more complex by the complete and utter incompetence of the Bush/Cheney administration who should be charged with either treason or at least malfeasance for letting Osama bin Laden escape at Tora Bora. I’m trying to get this right so it doesn’t turn into a total disaster like Iraq did due to the stupidity, arrogance and incompetence of Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld.”

    This would be unprecedented, but on the other hand the kind of bullshit that Cheney is engaging in is unprecedented as well, so go out there and accuse him of treasonous incompetence for letting Osama bin Laden escape and then let the evil old bastard defend himself. If President Obama doesn’t want to do it then have Biden do it. Hammer on the meme that Bush and Cheney screwed up and let a man who orchestrated the worst terrorist attack in American history escape. Hammer on the fact that thanks to the incompetence of Bush and Cheney the man who murdered 3,000 Americans on September 11th is still free. Make Bush and Cheney defend themselves.

    There’s a story, probably apocryphal, about Lyndon Johnson during the 1964 election. Johnson told an aide that he wanted to accuse Barry Goldwater of being a pigfucker. When the aide said “you can’t accuse Goldwater of being a pigfucker, we have no proof” Johnson replied and said “I know, I just want to make him deny it.” That’s the kind of thing President Obama needs to be doing to the Republicans.

  133. 133.

    Wile E. Quixote

    December 1, 2009 at 3:04 pm

    @J.D. Rhoades

    Sending troops to Afghanistan to fight the Taliban is like sending the army to Alabama to fight the Baptists.

    That’s actually not a bad idea. Teach the fuckers a lesson.

    Only after a long and protracted campaign of saturation bombing.

  134. 134.

    auntieeminaz

    December 1, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    @Just Some Fuckhead: Much more eloquent than my sentiment of eat shit and die.

  135. 135.

    Cynicor

    December 1, 2009 at 4:22 pm

    “President Obama projects weakness,” said Dick Cheney before being wheeled back to his car while sitting in his prop wheelchair.

  136. 136.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    December 1, 2009 at 4:38 pm

    @auntieeminaz: Right? How fucking awesome am I?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - MollyS - Monet's gardens at Giverny, the water garden and house 3
Photo by MollyS (3/1/26)

Election Resources

Voter Registration Info – Find a State
Check Voter Registration by Address

Recent Comments

  • WaterGirl on Saturday Night Open Thread (Mar 1, 2026 @ 1:15pm)
  • Kristine on Fun Facts That the Rest of Us May Not Know (Mar 1, 2026 @ 1:14pm)
  • Soprano2 on Sunday Morning Open Thread (Mar 1, 2026 @ 1:14pm)
  • emjayay on Saturday Late Night Open Thread (Mar 1, 2026 @ 1:14pm)
  • Matt McIrvin on Sunday Morning Open Thread (Mar 1, 2026 @ 1:13pm)

Mary Peltola Alaska Senate

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Outsmarting Apple iOS 26

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Order Calendar A
Order Calendar B

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Mary Peltola Alaska Senate

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!