• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Our messy unity will be our strength.

Donald Trump found guilty as fuck – May 30, 2024!

Jack Smith: “Why did you start campaigning in the middle of my investigation?!”

Stand up, dammit!

Marge, god is saying you’re stupid.

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

They think we are photo bombing their nice little lives.

Republicans: “Abortion is murder but you can take a bus to get one.” Easy peasy.

Speaker Mike Johnson is a vile traitor to the House and the Constitution.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

Text STOP to opt out of updates on war plans.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

They spent the last eight months firing professionals and replacing them with ideologues.

The current Supreme Court is a dangerous, rogue court.

Too often we hand the biggest microphones to the cynics and the critics who delight in declaring failure.

Well, whatever it is, it’s better than being a Republican.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Dear legacy media: you are not here to influence outcomes and policies you find desirable.

You are either for trump or for democracy. Pick one.

Sometimes the world just tells you your cat is here.

President Musk and Trump are both poorly raised, coddled 8 year old boys.

I am pretty sure these ‘journalists’ were not always such a bootlicking sycophants.

The Giant Orange Man Baby is having a bad day.

American history and black history cannot be separated.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!

Amazing Read: “He made a fake ICE deportation tip line. Then a kindergarten teacher called”

by Anne Laurie|  February 21, 20263:16 pm| 7 Comments

This post is in: Excellent Links, Immigration

New: A comedian set up a fake ICE tip line as a joke. Then 100 calls flooded in: neighbors ratting on neighbors, a teacher reporting a kindergartener. Fans say the viral TikToks revealed deportation's "banality of evil." Conservatives say he should be in prison wapo.st/4kM4qbF

[image or embed]

— Drew Harwell (@drewharwell.com) February 20, 2026 at 7:02 AM

Some of our fellow citizens may just be… irredeemable. Gift link:

Ben Palmer, a stand-up comic in Nashville, has built a following online with his signature style of elaborate deadpan pranks, stumbling his way onto court TV shows and pyramid-scheme calls to poke fun at the latent absurdities of American life.

Then in January of last year, he had an idea for a new bit: He’d set up a fake tip line that people could use to report anyone they thought was an undocumented immigrant. It was darker than his other stunts, but it felt topical, the kind of challenge he wanted to try. At the very least, he thought, he might get a few calls he could talk about at his next show.

Instead, his tip line has received nearly 100 submissions from across the country: people reporting their neighbors, ex-lovers, Uber drivers, strangers they saw at the grocery store. One tip came from a teacher reporting the parents of a kindergarten student at her school.

“I mean, they seem like nice people or whatever,” the woman told Palmer on the call. “But if they’re taking up resources from our county, I’m not into illegal people being here.”

What began as a comedy routine has become one of the most viral pieces of social satire during President Donald Trump’s mass-deportation campaign. The kindergarten video has been watched more than 20 million times on TikTok and exploded across Facebook, Reddit and YouTube, where one commenter called it “one of the most creative, nonviolent and effective acts of resistance” they’d ever seen…

A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said it was “aware of a fraudulent YouTube page falsely representing ICE” and that the agency “strongly [condemns] any actions intended to mislead the public or impersonate official government entities.”

But neither Palmer nor the websites claim to represent a government agency, and the sites’ privacy policies include disclaimers at the bottom saying they’re intended only for “parody, joke purposes and sociological research.” (Palmer spoke on the condition that The Washington Post not name the websites, so as not to ruin the bit.)…

Amazing Read: <em>“He made a fake ICE deportation tip line. Then a kindergarten teacher called”</em>Post + Comments (7)

How About a New Orleans Story for a Saturday Afternoon?

by WaterGirl|  February 21, 20262:28 pm| 17 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads

We’ve been talking about New Orleans recently – I wonder why! – and BretH found himself writing this story from when he lived in New Orleans for a time.

Thanks for sharing, BretH!

Recently in BJ there was an On The Road by frosty about New Orleans. Having lived there for a time after quitting college (for the first time) I started a comment but had to stop because I realized it’s really worth a story of it’s own…

How About a New Orleans Story for a Saturday Afternoon? 1

After I graduated high school in 1977 I still had no idea what I wanted to do with my life or what to continue studying outside of a vague idea I might be an English major since I was pretty good at writing. I know I would not be happy at a large state university (University of Maryland, I’m looking at you) so I sought out smaller schools like Bard College and Reed College before settling on Antioch University in Yellow Springs, Ohio. I guess of all the mistakes I could have made this one was the “best” but it was still a mistake.

My parents had promised to pay for a state school or the equivalent, and I had some scholarship money and Antioch offered a work-study program so it was affordable even for our barely middle-class family. However, the glory days of Antioch were well behind it, and expansion all across the country had left the main campus in Ohio severely neglected and with a declining student body. I joked about playing tennis on grass courts because the asphalt ones were in such bad shape. I also had not realized that someone like me would not do well in a school where you basically made your own curriculum. So I drifted from class-to-class without much focus, although to my credit, how much focus could I be expected to have in a class of “The Teachings of Don Juan in the Works of Carlos Castaneda”, where the professor said it was OK to fall asleep in class since he knew we would be absorbing information even in that state?

But outside of studies I had a great time.  I learned killer Ultimate Frisbee, had a wonderful Spring semester teaching at an outdoor education center in New Hampshire and had work study jobs that consisted of wandering the nature preserve in a gorge next to campus telling people to put their dogs on a leash and managing the college darkroom which meant I had 24/7 access to it and spent some wonderful nights there, alone with my negatives and prints.

Still, two years in I made the decision that I should leave school for a while until I had a better sense of what I wanted to do and could use my education money more effectively. But the idea of returning home to Maryland depressed me no end so when a friend down the hall asked if anyone was interested in going with him to New Orleans (where he intended to work in a stereo store), I jumped at the chance. My best buddy in college was also ready to leave and things fell into place amazingly well. The first friend had already hooked up with a graduate who rented a two-bedroom shotgun house near City Park and needed roommates while he worked offshore on oil rigs. So with a guaranteed place to stay my buddy and I headed South with the goal of working in a bicycle shop as we were both mechanics.

My first night in New Orleans was epic in ways I did not fully appreciate at the time. We arrived late in the day but the roommate who lived there insisted we all go out to a small club to hear this local band The Neville Brothers. Tired and wired we agreed only to be so seduced by the music and atmosphere and beer that when the first two guys left around midnight my buddy and I stayed to the end. At two-thirty or so we stumbled out to the street and stuck out our thumbs and within minutes were picked up by someone who not only drove us to our place but had us roll a huge joint from a bag of pot he had in the glove box.

We settled in reasonably well in the row house which was cramped but was cheap and we were in our early 20’s so it didn’t matter to us. I do recall one time my buddy said he witnessed me spontaneously levitate when a huge palmetto bug (American cockroach) dropped from the ceiling onto my bare chest while I was napping on the couch. And our friend did end up working in a stereo store, and the first guy had tons of money from working the oil rigs and wanted the best stereo money he could afford (even though he was home only a few days a month) so our living room ended up with the most amazing hi-fi equipment that a kid like me could have only dreamed of owning. To this day I feel sorry for the neighbors – we strictly respected a 10pm curfew on volume but up till then we put the stereo to hard use.

Our good luck continued as my buddy and I both found work at The Bikesmith, a little bike shop in a dicey neighborhood on Freret Street. The owner was a refugee from New York City who found the loose structure of life in New Orleans more to his liking. We had a good relationship with the locals too, as we were known to never turn away a kid who just needed something tightened on his bike and would price other repairs on somewhat of a sliding scale. The shop itself was a rabbit warren powered in part by a cord the owner had hacked into a city outlet, with a back room where the weed was plentiful. But the best part for me was the mobile bicycle repair van.

The Bikesmith van was a decrepit panel van painted yellow and stuffed with parts and tools to handle most repairs. In the morning I worked in the shop but we took appointments for repairs on location in the afternoons. So after lunch we would head out, me and a local mechanic who went by the nickname Bic (“like the pen”). Bic was a character himself, having worked at many other bike shops around the city but ending at the Bikemith due to incidents that were probably at least somewhat his fault. Bic loved Italian bicycles and his pride and joy was a Colnago frame fitted with all top-of-the-line Campagnolo parts.

I spent many memorable afternoons in that van with Bic. Some days when we had no appointments we would head over to the Tulane campus where Bic tried his best to pick up the ladies in between doing the odd repair job. On any given day we might be flagged down by someone with a flat tire or something small and Bic might not report that repair but we’d end up with a six-pack of Becks which we would finish by the end of the day. I remember one appointment in the French Quarter where we pulled up to a nondescript gate fronting a run-down building – and went inside to a Shangri-La of a fountained courtyard with a garden and balconies overlooking it on both sides.

The van itself was held together with baling wire and duct tape and just driving it was an adventure. One day we felt the van give a lurch and we watched our rear wheel pass us then hit a curb and get launched into the air over the sidewalk where thankfully no-one was walking. Another time I was driving when there was a huge BANG from below between the seats where the clutch assembly basically exploded in a spray of springs and other metal bits. As luck would have it we were actually descending from one of the few high points in the city – an overpass – and were able to coast into a gas station at the bottom.

I was in New Orleans for exactly one Mardi Gras – a historic one as it turned out as the police were on strike (https://www.wwltv.com/article/entertainment/events/mardi-gras/40-years-ago-the-police-strike-that-canceled-carnival-parades/289-f96f97c4-6459-41b3-87cc-66cea2987001). Thinking to hold the city hostage to their demands they even put up posters at the airport claiming that the prior month there were 31 murders in the city and did tourists really want to come there without the police on the job? Of course Mardi Gras happened anyway, without the big parades, because the residents simply came out in costume with the necklaces and beads and partied in the streets. My memories are not as clear as they might have been because, conscious of the ban on glass containers, we had filled gallon milk containers with a mix of Guinness and Heineken which we carried around with us throughout the afternoon.

Surprisingly we found ourselves mostly avoiding the French Quarter once we had visited a few times. We didn’t have enough money to hang out in the bars to hear the music (especially when you could hear it on the street). And under the façade of fun the Quarter was really a cramped, dirty and smelly place (especially early Sunday mornings). Our style would be to have beer at home then hit the Quarter very late and end the evening at the Cafe du Monde for coffee and beignets. But there was so much to do and see elsewhere in NOLA that we never missed it. Just walking or bicycling through the city was a sensory experience. My recollection is that it was a patchwork of blocks without much zoning so there would be a street with resplendent mansions like gilded Savannah, then a block or two of very modest shotgun houses. And little businesses everywhere – tailors, bars, salons and what have you.

One final memory was the night we decided to try and see the David Bromberg band (in it’s “How Late’ll ya Play ’Til” phase) in a club across the Mississippi River from the city proper. Arriving late there were no seats available and we were despairing and about to leave when an older guy right up front saw us and waved us to his table. He explained he was a record exec and preferred sharing his table to being alone and by the way, “anything you want to drink boys, it’s on me”. Dangerous words for two 20-somethings. Memorable night.

After a year and a half I was burnt out on New Orleans so the thought of living a while at home and even going to University of Maryland seemed less awful than before. I moved into the basement of my old house (my parents had split by then) and did attend a couple more semesters which proved equally fruitless as the first stint in Ohio. So I decided I wanted to become a motorcycle messenger – only I had never ridden a motorcycle and know next to nothing about downtown DC.

Full of confidence after making my way in New Orleans for a time that’s exactly what I did, becoming a motorcycle and bicycle messenger in DC before the fax machine, before personal computers and email when the absolute fastest way to get anything across town was by messenger…

…but that is a story for another time.

How About a New Orleans Story for a Saturday Afternoon?Post + Comments (17)

An Optimistic View of the Supreme Court Ruling on Tariffs

by WaterGirl|  February 21, 20262:05 pm| 25 Comments

This post is in: Breathtaking Corruption, Breathtaking Criminality and Lawlessness, Justice, Open Threads

Robert Reich says the Supreme Court tariff decision extends far beyond tariffs.  I sure hope he’s right!

A 6-3 majority of the Supreme Court decided yesterday that Trump cannot take core powers that the Constitution gives Congress. Instead, Congress must delegate that power clearly and unambiguously.

This is a big decision. It goes far beyond merely interpreting the 1997 International Emergency Economic Powers Act not to give Trump the power over tariffs that he claims to have. It reaffirms a basic constitutional principle about the division and separation of powers between Congress and the president.

On its face, this decision clarifies that Trump cannot decide on his own not to spend money Congress has authorized and appropriated — such as the funds for U.S.A.I.D. he refused to spend. And he cannot on his own decide to go to war.

“The Court has long expressed ‘reluctan[ce] to read into ambiguous statutory test’ extraordinary delegations of Congress’s powers,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for himself and five other justices in the opinion released yesterday in Learning Resources vs. Trump.

He continued: “In several cases involving ‘major questions,’ the Court has reasoned that ‘both separation of powers principles and a practical understanding of legislative intent’ suggest Congress would not have delegated ‘highly consequential power’ through ambiguous language.”

Exactly. Trump has no authority on his own to impose tariffs because the Constitution gives that authority to Congress.

But by the same Supreme Court logic, Trump has no authority to impound money Congress has appropriated because the Constitution has given Congress the “core congressional power of the purse,” as the Court stated yesterday.

Hence, the $410 to $425 billion billion in funding that Trump has blocked or delayed violates the Impoundment Control Act, which requires Congressional approval for spending pauses. This includes funding withheld for foreign aid, FEMA, Head Start, Harvard and Columbia universities, and public health.

Nor, by this same Supreme Court logic, does Trump have authority to go to war because Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the Constitution grants Congress the power to “declare War … and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water” — and Congress would not have delegated this highly consequential power to a president through ambiguous language.

Presumably this is why Congress enacted the War Powers Act of 1973, which requires a president to notify Congress within 48 hours of deploying troops and requires their withdrawal within 60 to 90 days unless Congress declares war or authorizes an extension. Iran, anyone?

The press has reported on yesterday’s Supreme Court decision as if it were only about tariffs. Wrong. It’s far bigger and even more important.

Note that the decision was written by Chief Justice John Roberts — the same justice who wrote the Court’s 2024 decision in Trump v. United States, another 6 to 3 decision in which the Court ruled that former presidents have absolute immunity for actions taken within their core constitutional powers and at least presumptive immunity for all other official acts.

I have held a much more pessimistic view than this, and I surely hope Reich is correct on this.

I think Roberts intentionally wrote yesterday’s decision in Learning Resources v. Trump as a bookend to Trump v. United States.

Both are intended to clarify the powers of the president and of Congress. A president has immunity for actions taken within his core constitutional powers. But a president has no authority to take core powers that the Constitution gives to Congress.

In these two decisions, the Chief Justice and five of his colleagues on the Court have laid out a roadmap for what they see as the boundary separating the power of the president from the powers of Congress, and what they will decide about future cases along that boundary.

Trump will pay no heed, of course. He accepts no limits to his power and has shown no respect for the Constitution, Congress, the Supreme Court, or the rule of law.

But the rest of us should now have a fairly good idea about what to expect from the Supreme Court in the months ahead.

 

An Optimistic View of the Supreme Court Ruling on TariffsPost + Comments (25)

Open Thread: Trump’s Tariff Tantrums

by Anne Laurie|  February 21, 202610:04 am| 139 Comments

This post is in: C.R.E.A.M., Excellent Links

The reporter makes an important point: Not only does this ruling undercut his economic agenda, it undercuts his entire foreign policy, which is based on threatening other countries with tariffs.

[image or embed]

— Patrick Chovanec (@prchovanec.bsky.social) February 20, 2026 at 12:42 PM

Mary Geddry, at her SubStack — “Tariff Messiah Meets the Supreme Court”:

… Months of Donald Trump treating tariffs like a divine right of kings, his favorite word, his favorite weapon, his favorite magic spell for turning economic complexity into campaign merch, the Supreme Court has delivered the simplest possible response: no.

“Our task today,” the justices wrote, “is to decide only whether the power to ‘regulate… importation,’ as granted to the President in IEEPA, embraces the power to impose tariffs. It does not.”

Three words that function, in context, as a legal guillotine. Trump’s sweeping global tariff regime, the economic centerpiece of his second term, the thing he has been screaming about at factories like a man pitching a miracle tonic from the back of a wagon, has been ruled illegal. Emergency powers, the Court reminded him, do not include the authority to tax the world by presidential decree. If you want tariffs of this magnitude, you go through Congress. You know, that quaint old building where laws are supposed to come from.

The timing could not be more perfect if it were scripted by a satirist. Just yesterday, Trump was in Georgia doing his greatest hits tour: tariffs resurrected steel, tariffs fixed affordability, tariffs brought cranes into existence, tariffs are the greatest thing that has ever happened to America, and also Democrats “cheated like dogs,” mail-in ballots are “crooked as hell,” voter fraud is lurking in the bushes, and Canada has apparently been running a decades-long con job against the United States, because sure, why not…

But the economic data was already undermining the sermon in real time. Commerce Department numbers showed the trade deficit hitting record territory. Forbes was out here politely asking what on earth Trump meant when he claimed the deficit had shrunk by 78 percent, because the actual deficit widened sharply in December. Justin Wolfers, doing the thankless work of Economics 101, reminded everyone that the trade deficit is not a morality play but an accounting identity, Americans buying goods abroad is not the same thing as America being “ripped off.” A country is not a company and deficit is not a national humiliation. It is, at most, a statistic being used as a prop in a political performance.

Then came today’s ruling, which is not just a policy setback but a structural rebuke. This was the Court saying: you do not get to declare “trade deficits” an emergency and then build a parallel tax system on the fly…

So the tariff miracle collapses on multiple levels at once: illegal, ineffective, and expensive. A trifecta of kakistocratic governance, the worst people doing the worst job, loudly insisting it’s genius.

Rep. Don Bacon: "The bottom line from the ruling is any tariff the president wants to do has to go through Congress and be approved. That's what the founders wanted. That's what Republicans should want."

[image or embed]

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) February 20, 2026 at 2:45 PM

show full post on front page

Politico, “‘I feel vindicated’: Anti-tariff Republicans cheer as Supreme Court checks Trump”:

Republican tariff skeptics on Capitol Hill celebrated Friday after the Supreme Court struck down the core authority behind President Donald Trump’s sweeping global tariffs — dealing a blow to a major plank of the president’s agenda but offering a welcome off-ramp to GOP lawmakers who viewed the levies as a political loser.

Retiring Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) broke with Trump and GOP leaders a week ago to help overturn Trump’s Canada tariffs. On Friday, he hailed the “common sense ruling” by the high court that essentially invalidates those and many other tariffs.

“The checks and balances our Constitution puts in place works,” Bacon said in an interview Friday morning shortly after the decision, adding, “I feel vindicated.”

Another Republican who backed the effort to overturn the Canada tariffs, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, also praised the ruling…

Speaker Mike Johnson sidestepped any praise or criticism of the ruling, saying that Trump’s tariffs had “brought in billions of dollars and created immense leverage for America’s trade strategy.”

Johnson later Friday postponed a trade briefing for a group of House Republicans, including tariff skeptics, that he had scheduled for Monday evening, according to three people granted anonymity to describe the private plans…

The ruling comes just four days before Trump is set to deliver his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress and an audience that will include the Supreme Court justices who rebuffed the cornerstone of his economic and foreign policy agendas. Trump said during his Friday news conference that the six justices who ruled against his tariffs were “barely” invited to the address and “I couldn’t care less if they come.”…

You can hear the midterm campaign ads being written right now:
@waysmeanscmte.bsky.social

[image or embed]

— Carl Quintanilla (@carlquintanilla.bsky.social) February 20, 2026 at 1:42 PM

Ars Technica, “Supreme Court blocks Trump’s emergency tariffs, billions in refunds may be owed”:

… It’s not immediately clear what the ruling may mean for businesses that paid various “reciprocal” tariffs that Trump changed frequently, raising and lowering rates at will during tense negotiations with the United States’ biggest trade partners…

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion and was joined by Justices Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. They concluded that Trump could not exclusively rely on IEEPA to impose tariffs “of unlimited amount and duration, on any product from any country” during peacetime…

Back in November, analysts suggested that the Supreme Court ruling against Trump could force the government to issue refunds of up to $1 trillion. This morning, a new estimate from economists reduced that number, Reuters reported, estimating that more than $175 billion could be “at risk of having to be refunded.”…

Yeesh, #BrokenTimes, contain yourselves. This is the same Supreme Court that made him an immune dictator except in this capitalist concern.
The Supreme Court’s Declaration of Independence www.nytimes.com/2026/02/20/u…

[image or embed]

— Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis (@jeffjarvis.bsky.social) February 20, 2026 at 3:33 PM

The NYTimes would very much like to have it both ways:

Starting with the 2024 decision that gave President Trump substantial immunity from prosecution and continuing through a score of emergency orders provisionally greenlighting an array of his second-term initiatives, Mr. Trump has had an extraordinarily successful run before the Supreme Court.

That came to a sudden, jolting halt on Friday, when Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing for six members of the court, roundly rejected Mr. Trump’s signature tariffs program. It was the Supreme Court’s first merits ruling — a final judgment on the lawfulness of an executive action — on an element of the administration’s second-term agenda. It amounted to a declaration of independence…

It could make for an awkward evening Tuesday, when, if history is any guide, Chief Justice Roberts and several of his colleagues will attend Mr. Trump’s State of the Union address, sitting in their robes within eyesight of the president.

On Friday, Mr. Trump may have provided a preview of his remarks, saying at a news conference that he was ashamed of some of the justices — presumably the ones who voted against him. “They’re very unpatriotic and disloyal to our Constitution,” he said of those justices…

There was also an awkward moment last year after Mr. Trump addressed Congress. As he was leaving, the president greeted the chief justice by saying, not long after the immunity decision: “Thank you again. I won’t forget it.”

Amid speculation that Mr. Trump was referring to the immunity decision, which largely shielded him from charges that he had plotted to subvert the 2020 election, Mr. Trump later explained that he was thanking Chief Justice Roberts for swearing him at his inauguration.

Last month, in an attempt at humor at the annual Alfalfa Club dinner, Mr. Trump said he would not tell a “vicious joke” about the chief justice, who was present. “I’m going to kiss his ass for a long time,” the president said…

How filthy is the ‘joke’ now being written into the SotU?…

Trump: "I want to be a good boy"

[image or embed]

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) February 20, 2026 at 1:28 PM

Sidebar: Between this & the recent Epstein revelations, IMO, Lutnick is on shaky ground. Someone’s gotta be sacrified to the media wolves slavering behind the fleeing troika:

The Supreme Court ruling has helped the family of one man in particular: the architect of Trump’s tariffs himself.
A firm headed by Lutnick’s sons was allowing its traders to purchase the rights to hundreds of millions of dollars of refunds in the event tariffs were struck down. trib.al/JcwQ9MT

[image or embed]

— The New Republic (@newrepublic.com) February 20, 2026 at 5:45 PM

Open Thread: Trump’s Tariff TantrumsPost + Comments (139)

Saturday Morning Open Thread

by Anne Laurie|  February 21, 20266:39 am| 147 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads, Post-racial America, Proud to Be A Democrat, Republican Politics

you don't have to like it, but this is what peak progressivism looks like
the left will go so much farther if it embraces patriotism and joy as a rallying cry to aspire for the country to be better

[image or embed]

— Thorne ?? (@ens0.me) February 20, 2026 at 10:35 AM

Speaker Mike Johnson denies request for the Rev. Jesse Jackson to lie in honor in Capitol www.nbcnews.com/politics/pol…

[image or embed]

— Timothy McBride (@mcbridetd.bsky.social) February 20, 2026 at 6:27 PM

Happy Black History Month. To put it in terms he might recognize, Self-styled ‘Speaker Moses’ cravenly denies the claims of an actual prophet:

Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has denied a request for the late Rev. Jesse Jackson to lie in honor in the rotunda of the U.S. Capitol, according to two sources familiar with the matter.

Jackson’s family made the request to Johnson after the civil rights icon and two-time presidential candidate died Tuesday at the age of 84, the sources said. CNN was first to report the development…

A GOP leadership source said that in denying the family’s request, the speaker looked to precedent where the practice has been reserved for former presidents, military leaders and other top government officials.

The GOP source noted that recent requests for former Vice President Dick Cheney and Turning Point USA co-founder Charlie Kirk to lie in honor had been denied.

Yet a handful of private citizens have lain in honor in the majestic rotunda. That short list includes civil rights leader Rosa Parks in 2005 and Capitol Police officers who died in the 1998 shooting and after the Jan. 6 attack. The Rev. Billy Graham, the Southern Baptist minister and evangelist, lay in honor in 2018.…

[Billy Graham]

Black leaders slammed Johnson’s decision to deny the Jackson family’s request.

“Mike Johnson will defend a president who wants to unlawfully nationalize elections, but won’t authorize a civil rights legend to lie in honor. That tells you everything you need to know about Mike Johnson and his gross disregard for our Constitution and our democracy,” NAACP President and CEO Derrick Johnson said in a statement.

“Rev. Jesse Jackson preached to all Americans to Keep Hope Alive, and to dream of a nation where all people are treated with dignity and respect. No message could be more fitting for all Americans to embrace at this time,” the NAACP leader said.

The Rev. Jesse Jackson will lie in state for two days next week before he is laid to rest following services at his Rainbow/PUSH Coalition headquarters in Chicago. https://to.wttw.com/46TFZmT

[image or embed]

— WTTW – Chicago PBS (@wttw.bsky.social) February 19, 2026 at 1:42 PM

Big victory for the American people.
And another crushing defeat for the wannabe King.
www.cnbc.com/2026/02/20/s…

[image or embed]

— Hakeem Jeffries (@hakeem-jeffries.bsky.social) February 20, 2026 at 10:33 AM

show full post on front page

Donald Trump illegally stole your money.
He should give it back to you.
Instead Trump is scheming up new ways to force Americans to pay even more.

[image or embed]

— Elizabeth Warren (@warren.senate.gov) February 20, 2026 at 2:14 PM

I'm not sure if you could come up with a more perfect anti-Trump message for the Treatlerite age than "America deserves a refund"

[image or embed]

— Chatham Harrison dba TRUMP DELENDUS EST (@chathamharrison.bsky.social) February 20, 2026 at 7:59 PM

Not good enough.
Ensuring our veterans can access life saving medications is the least we can do to repay them for their lifetime of selfless service. 
This rule was shameful from the beginning and must be officially rescinded.

[image or embed]

— Rep. Jim McGovern (@repmcgovern.bsky.social) February 20, 2026 at 4:57 PM

Maryland Gov. Wes Moore is pushing back on President Donald Trump while trying to rally Democrats in his state around a mid-decade redistricting fight.

[image or embed]

— The Associated Press (@apnews.com) February 19, 2026 at 7:00 PM

Ossoff: "There are some folks who are doomscrolling in the fetal position. Every day there is a new outrage. It's easy I know to fear that maybe we could lose our republic. I think what John Lewis would tell us is it's up to us. We have the power to right the ship. Nobody is gonna do it for us."

[image or embed]

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) February 19, 2026 at 9:33 AM

Saturday Morning Open ThreadPost + Comments (147)

Late Night Open Thread: Modest Proposal

by Anne Laurie|  February 21, 20263:28 am| 34 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads, Show Us on the Doll Where the Invisible Hand Touched You

sometimes i like to imagine a world where we have an entirely new era of pirate flotillas in 2030 because so many of the ultrawealthy elite who enabled this second administration have had to flee law enforcement in the united states, forcing them to be stateless yacht dwellers

— GOLIKEHELLMACHINE (@golikehellmachine.com) February 20, 2026 at 12:56 AM

only voting for candidates who promise to imprison Elon Musk

A sensible moderate, I will also accept fining him into oblivion followed by exile.

[image or embed]

— Academician Prokhor Zakharov (@shake1n1bake.bsky.social) February 20, 2026 at 4:05 PM

"If you seized all Elon's wealth it'd only be like $2,000 per American."

Do you know what a $2,000 'Fuck Elon' stimulus check would do for people and the country economically, emotionally and morally?

— Academician Prokhor Zakharov (@shake1n1bake.bsky.social) February 20, 2026 at 4:10 PM

Well, towards space. Whether he makes it is kind of on him, you know.
bsky.app/profile/kont…

[image or embed]

— Academician Prokhor Zakharov (@shake1n1bake.bsky.social) February 20, 2026 at 4:50 PM

And that, is the beauty of it

— Konta (@kontaendless.myatproto.social) February 20, 2026 at 4:52 PM

I mean, I'd take the check, but the real bonus would be no more Elon Musk.
But also, why stop at Elon Musk? If you're going to confiscate his wealth, confiscate all wealth over a billion dollars. Now we're talking serious money.

— C.V. Danes (@cv-danes.com) February 20, 2026 at 5:14 PM

It would also – almost more importantly – mean that you wouldn't have Musk sitting on top of global democracy like a bowling ball on top of a flan.

— Hermetic Opus (@hermeticopus.bsky.social) February 20, 2026 at 4:36 PM

show full post on front page

Not to mention the inevitable stories of chuds who try to get everyone to pool their checks for a "Restore Elon Fund" and end up raising like $60,000, which is immediately stolen by the guy who controls the PayPal account.

— Thomas Bsketty (@wykstrad.bsky.social) February 20, 2026 at 6:38 PM

Also it would honor the 250th commemoration of the Revolution, 'cause that Founding generation feared that very wealthy men would endanger the republic. time.com/7297269/foun…

[image or embed]

— Dan Mandell (@dhistoryman.bsky.social) February 20, 2026 at 4:19 PM

… The Founders… believed great wealth in politics would corrupt and destroy the republic. Those beliefs were shaped by a range of influences: the widely read works by Roman historians who blamed the empire’s decline on a widening gap between rich and poor; radical Protestants who called for a Godly republic with limits on property or even its redistribution in a Great Jubilee every 50 years; James Harrington’s 1656 novel Oceana, describing an island country with a constitution that gave land to all and placed explicit limits on income and wealth; Enlightenment philosophers, particularly John Locke’s Two Treatises of Government (1689), which argued “all Men by Nature are equal” and that individuals should not hoard surplus wealth; and Cato’s Letters, a series written by British “radical Whigs” in the 1720s who, angered by the infamous South Sea Bubble, called for reforms while bitterly criticizing the corrupting ties between wealth and politics.

By the mid-18th century, Anglo-Americans generally believed in the virtues of a “rough” economic equality, that a republic needed to avoid concentrated wealth and great poverty in order to maintain the public good and prevent corruption. These ideals held particular power because they reflected the experiences of most British Americans. Widespread property ownership among white settlers meant that in every province a far higher percentage of white adult men could vote than in England. Even the wealthiest Southern planters needed the political support of their poorer—yet still property-holding—neighbors.

The widespread embrace of these ideas can be glimpsed in the publication of Cato’s Letters in the Boston Independent Advertiser in 1748. The very first selection included the warning that when a man’s wealth “become immeasurably or surprising great,” the community “ought to make strict Enquiry, how they came by them, and oblige them” to surrender part of their riches. “But, will some say, is it a Crime to be rich? Yes, certainly. At the publick expence, or to the Danger of the Publick.” The Advertiser was edited by Samuel Adams for artisans and laborers fired up by their successful resistance to impressment—the Navy’s effort to grab men for forced service—and concerned about rising poverty in the postwar depression. Sixteen years later, Adams would organize those artisans and laborers into the Sons of Liberty to resist British imperial measures…

Late Night Open Thread: Modest ProposalPost + Comments (34)

Respite: Some Vaccine Good News

by Tom Levenson|  February 20, 202611:08 pm| 18 Comments

This post is in: Healthcare, Open Threads, Respite, Science & Technology

Meant to get this up earlier, but life got in the way,  so I’m just going to post this anyway, just to give us some good news to chew on.

First up on what I guess we can call vaccine Friday: we can now immunize you against a whole bunch of nasty viruses all at once–if you’re a mouse.

Quick Respite/Reminder: Vaccines Are...Kinda Good, Ya Know

This is from the Nature summary of the research, which was published today in Science.

Imagine if a nasal spray could make you immune not only to the viruses that cause COVID-19 and influenza, but to all respiratory diseases. In a paper1published in Science today, researchers describe a vaccine that has done just that. When given to mice, the vaccine protected them for at least three months against multiple disease-causing viruses and bacteria — including the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19 — and even quelling responses to respiratory allergens.

What’s coolest about this (to my historically inclined mind) is that the research that led to this new “universal” vaccine began with an investigation of an old one, the Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccine. BCG was developed over more than half a century in Germany and France in an effort that began with the isolation of the bacterium that’s the pathogen behind bovine tuberculosis, and culminated with work at the Pasteur Institute that followed Louis Pasteur’s signature move of attenuating a disease-causing microbe until it could induce immunity without making the person receiving the jab sick. It became the first vaccine for tuberculosis in 1921.

Fast forward a century, and the mechanism of action in that vaccine–activating the latent immune system, which, as Liam Drew writes in that Nature summary, is an  “evolutionarily ancient system [that] has a much broader reactivity than does the adaptive immune system”–led researchers to this:

In the latest study, Pulendran’s team developed a universal vaccine that targets the innate immune system, with three components. The first two are drugs that stimulate specific receptor proteins that can activate innate immune cells, such as macrophages that reside in the lungs. [link in the original]

The third component stimulates a population of T cells, which are part of the adaptive immune system. Their task is to keep sending signals to the innate immune system to maintain its active state.”

The vaccine works a treat in mice, but, as the linked Nature news piece makes clear, there are significant hurdles to overcome to create a safe and effective human version. But even so, this is a necessary and genuinely exciting first step.

The second bit of good vaccine news–not so much “good” as “promising” or potentially valuable–comes from a very early human trial of personalized mRNA vaccines for triple-negative breast cancer, a particularly nasty and intractable form of disease in which the cancer cells lack targets for the three most common drugs for the condition.

A paper published in Nature a couple of days ago provided the results of a trial of a vaccine approach that in essence persuades patients’ immune systems to react to the drugs, using mRNA as the vector–or as the clinical brief summary put it:

We conducted an exploratory trial of these personalized vaccines to assess their feasibility, safety and mechanism of action, rather than clinical benefit. We genetically sequenced tumour cells and healthy cells from 14 individuals with early-stage, surgically removed TNBC and used algorithms to select mutations that generate neoantigens. For each participant, we manufactured a personalized mRNA vaccine encoding up to 20 neoantigens. Once administered intravenously, the vaccine reaches lymphoid organs, where T cells are taught how to recognize the mRNA-encoded neoantigens.

This trial was intended to test the feasibility of the approach, but it did have an impact on the patients involved:

Ten participants remained disease-free, and one participant died of unknown causes. Relapse occurred in three individuals, enabling us to gain insights into possible resistance mechanisms.

Again–very early work, miles to go before we sleep, and caution around any small scale cancer study is not just warranted but required. Still, another exciting first step.

In sum: A) science is so cool. And B) while this is a respite post, I’d be remiss if I didn’t add that this is reason ∞ that RFK Jr.’s antivaccine crusade–and his anti-mRNA technology pathology in particular–is such a disaster. Both of the studies above are fine preliminary research results. They won’t mean anything if the next stages of the work don’t happen, and if the US scientific shut down continues for much longer, the basic science that won’t get done will prevent any new such leads to appear. Worse, the damage so far to ongoing research program is such that we’ve already lost potential advances in human flourishing.

So yes, this is all good news. But there’s a lot of work to be done to make it possible for more such promising outcomes to arrive down the road.

Happy weekend, everyone. The thread, as usual, is open.

[Crossposted at Inverse Square]

Image Zhu Zhenji, Mouse and stone, 1427.

Respite: Some Vaccine Good NewsPost + Comments (18)

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 11841
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - ema - Midtown Manhattan Fall Foliage 2
Photo by ema (2/21/26)

Election Resources

Voter Registration Info – Find a State
Check Voter Registration by Address

Recent Comments

  • Another Scott on How About a New Orleans Story for a Saturday Afternoon? (Feb 21, 2026 @ 3:57pm)
  • AM in NC on How About a New Orleans Story for a Saturday Afternoon? (Feb 21, 2026 @ 3:54pm)
  • Omnes Omnibus on An Optimistic View of the Supreme Court Ruling on Tariffs (Feb 21, 2026 @ 3:49pm)
  • stinger on How About a New Orleans Story for a Saturday Afternoon? (Feb 21, 2026 @ 3:47pm)
  • TurnItOffAndOnAgain on Saturday Morning Open Thread (Feb 21, 2026 @ 3:47pm)

Mary Peltola Alaska Senate

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Outsmarting Apple iOS 26

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Order Calendar A
Order Calendar B

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Mary Peltola Alaska Senate

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc