There Is Something Deeply, Deeply Wrong With These People
By John Cole August 17th, 2011
These wingnuts just lack any trace of empathy or humanity. Empty souls.
(via)
Posted in Assholes, Gay Rights are Human Rights, Sociopaths, Teabagger Stupidity
Hateful sociopaths.
August 17th, 2011 at 1:18 pm
It takes balls to execute an innocent man easily translates into trashing a dead lesbian.
August 17th, 2011 at 1:23 pm
I knew better than to get out of the boat, but I did it anyway.
The level of sociopathy needed to get to where that guy is used to get a guy locked up…
August 17th, 2011 at 1:24 pm
“Evil, I think, is the absence of empathy.”
Captain G. M. Gilbert, the Army psychologist assigned to
watching the defendants at the Nuremberg trails
August 17th, 2011 at 1:25 pm
I’m going to ignore the cruelty for the moment to observe that the NoH8 tribute was touching and classy.
August 17th, 2011 at 1:25 pm
Opponents of marriage equality would love to make talking about it after a death off limits. After all, it’s one of the times when the repercussions of an inability to form legal bonds are most strongly felt – when hospital visitation is denied, communal property taken away by greedy/hateful family members, social security benefits and pensions denied.
It’s not a lack of empathy, or at least not one any different than the lack that informs their entire position. This is just cold and calculating gamesmanship.
August 17th, 2011 at 1:27 pm
Were you not around for “It takes balls to execute an innocent man.”?
ETA: and I see Jager was following the same linear thought process. Kudos.
August 17th, 2011 at 1:27 pm
Christ, what an asshole.
August 17th, 2011 at 1:29 pm
It’s called “Wellstoning”
“Wellstoning is the accusation by conservatives of politicizing a funeral or memorial service of a liberal political figure in order to deflect criticism of the conservative agenda by speakers at the service, or offset any political value the service might have to liberals.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wellstoning#Aftermath
August 17th, 2011 at 1:29 pm
It’s important that when one eulogizes someone, one must never mention political causes that were central to the departed’s life. Unless, of course, the pundit agrees with the cause; that’s different.
August 17th, 2011 at 1:33 pm
unless your a blond chick that goes missing in Aruba
August 17th, 2011 at 1:35 pm
If you go to the comments on the American Power post there are a couple of reasoned, heartfelt rebuttals. Then there is this comment, the one I really liked:
Dear hste-filled wingnut asshole,
Go fuck yourself.
Too bad it wasn’t a moron like you who got snuffed out instead of a loving person working to change the world for the better. The fewer clueless motherfuckers like you around, the better.
Did I tell you to go fuck yourself? Just checking…
August 17th, 2011 at 1:35 pm
Conservatives trash these heartfelt and spontaneous (and, yes, politically motivated) tributes for a reason: they resonate. Deeply and emotionally, they resonate; and they change people’s thoughts and actions.
August 17th, 2011 at 1:35 pm
Previous “Wellstoning”:
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com.....arned.html
http://mediamatters.org/research/200908270005
August 17th, 2011 at 1:36 pm
Nothing that can’t be solved by heads on chopping blocks and lots of enthusiastic people wielding axes.
August 17th, 2011 at 1:36 pm
The best part is that when I opened this site, right under the post headline “There Is Something Deeply, Deeply Wrong With These People,” there was a picture of Allen West.
August 17th, 2011 at 1:38 pm
@Brian R.:
Which is perfect. West is definitely one of these people.
He’s “principled” you know. So was Reinhard Heydrich.
August 17th, 2011 at 1:42 pm
@Villago Delenda Est: Although most all, if not all, of the Nuremburg defendants were ammoral monsters, I do believe one can have empathy & still commit evil acts.
The person might cry over it or agonize over it, but they still may end up doing the same evil if they can rationalize it in some manner.
The ammoral sociopath doesn’t worry about rationalizing it (at least to themselves).
August 17th, 2011 at 1:44 pm
Dr Douglas PhD (Long Beach City College)is not a good human being – Details here.
Is this sadly hateful jerk representative of a known and large quantity of others, I do not know. I hope not.
August 17th, 2011 at 1:44 pm
Apparently these conservative sociopath fucksticks weren’t paying attention to the fap-fest that was the tribute to Ronald Reagan.
Or 9/11, where we were admonished not to “play the blame game” or use the tragedy to make a political point—right up to the point where Jerry Falwell accused everyone he didn’t like (primarily liberals, gays, and lesbians) of causing 9/11 to happen.
August 17th, 2011 at 1:44 pm
@Paul in KY:
Indeed – that’s the real hazard of having political and religious institutions hijacked by sociopaths. The few who utterly lack morals get to convince the rest that they NEED to do horrible things for “freedom”, “country”, and/or “Jeebus” and disaster ensues…
August 17th, 2011 at 1:48 pm
@WeThePurple: That comment is indeed a thing of beauty.
August 17th, 2011 at 1:50 pm
@Paul in KY:
The point is, they need to be led into it. Which as Matt points out at #21, is what leads those who might have empathy down the path.
Most Germans were not sociopaths. But their leadership in WWII consisted, predominantly, of sociopaths.
Hitler loved dogs, you know.
August 17th, 2011 at 1:53 pm
I love how the original post shakes his fist angrily about the “sick sympathy shakedown” by NOH8.
Don’t worry, dude. You were apparently born without the ability to feel sympathy or empathy. Just knee-jerk hatred.
Have fun dying alone and unloved, asswipe.
August 17th, 2011 at 1:57 pm
@Matt: Right on, brother.
August 17th, 2011 at 1:59 pm
@Villago Delenda Est: See your point (and Matt’s). IMO, Hitler was a sociopath. His liking dogs said nothing about his contempt for humanity.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:01 pm
@Paul in KY:
I think the word you want is “sympathy” rather than “empathy.” There is a difference. Sympathy is kind of a general understanding of someone’s feelings while empathy is an identification with a person and their feelings or experiences.
For example, the person with sympathy understands that torture is painful and distressing and feels sorry for the person being tortured. The person with empathy imagines what torture would feel like on his or her own body and mind and identifies with the person being tortured.
I think this would make a huge difference in which of these people could carry out an evil act.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:04 pm
His response and complaint read like standard conservative double standard. If it supports them it’s justified, if it doesn’t it must be illegitimate somehow. It’s more tribalist than strictly sociopathic. The feelings of others matter, but only if they’re on his side.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:13 pm
@Brian R.:
[Allen West ad]
Under mine was some doofus holding a book about liberalism destroying the world or some such nonsense. What I can’t figure out is why these folks pay to advertise on this site.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:14 pm
not to trivialize the discussion, but…..bumper stickers.
Am I the only one who loses their shit when they see a car covered with ignorant, lying bumper stickers?
Recently I was exiting the gym when I saw a woman sitting in car with a “Nobama” on one side and a “No Hope in Socialism” on the other—the O’s, of course, pirating the Obama logo.
“You’re an idiot,” I noted. She didn’t hear me—the windows were closed. And besides, she was too fucking stupid to see her nose in front of her face, let alone someone walking right beside her car.
But then finally she did look up, and I said “You’re an idiot” again and gave her a look that I hope conveyed every ounce of the disgust that possessed my being.
This morning, there was a car parked outside the Whole Foods store which sported “It’s Not Right vs. Left—It’s Right vs. Wrong” and “Obama: Trickle Up Poverty” among others. This time there was no one in it. I thought about writing “I’m a Pig” on a stickie note and sticking it on there, but didn’t. Then I thought about waiting around, just to see what the creature who owned that car looked like, but I didn’t do that either.
Dunno, guess I’m overreacting. They’re just stupid bumper stickers. But I do hate those people so. very. much.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:14 pm
@merrinc: The site’s using Google’s matching algorithm to match ads to content being discussed. They aren’t specifically targeting us, just based on a few keywords. But, if we can take some of their money off of their hands, I’m all for having them here.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:16 pm
OT: But it looks like the MSM, still flush with that certain glow only Perry-mania can bring, will soon have yet another shiny new toy to play with. Christie might enter the race. Hope they saved Taft’s old bed.
Even weirder: Cantor’s making sense, for some reason. Wonder what the catch will be?
August 17th, 2011 at 2:17 pm
Michele and Marcus praying the ghey away = Sympathy
It Gets Better Campaign = Empathy
August 17th, 2011 at 2:19 pm
I don’t know if you guys have noticed, but the one common factor connecting the disparate entities of the modern conservative movement is this:
A complete and total hatred of all living things.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:21 pm
This is the Sasquatch Israel guy! (If you don’t know the story, that link is a must-read.) There is definitely something not right about him.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:22 pm
@Belafon (formerly anonevent): Another thing they might be targeting on is other sites you’ve visited in their network. I’ve gotten a bunch of gaming ads when I visit from home and B2B software ads when I come here on my work computer.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:23 pm
@Elliecat: Excellent point. Sympathy it is!
August 17th, 2011 at 2:25 pm
But guys, everyone knows that empathy is a horrible, horrible thing! We were told that all the time in the Sotomayor hearings!! Empathy is the WORST thing you can have in politics!! It’s just so…evil and biased!!
August 17th, 2011 at 2:27 pm
@Judas Escargot: The catch is that when it comes time to the shutdown, Cantor will point back at this statement to show that he doesn’t want a shutdown, but the President is making him force one anyway.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:28 pm
Presumably the gentleman enjoyed having the “Fvck you” comment because my (more moderate) one went to moderation. I told him that the only merit of his post was that now I know where to send a donation, which I have done.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:29 pm
@Paul in KY:
Yeah, I know.
But it’s amazing if you compare Churchill side by side with Hitler on some traits, Hitler comes out “ahead” in the conventional wisdom. Which shows you how stupid conventional wisdom can be.
One of the interesting things about Hitler was that many Germans couldn’t believe he was at fault for so many things; it was always his bad advisers who seemed to be the reason for reversals. This is pretty much cognitive dissonance on a high level, given the concept of the Führerprinzip itself, but you see this same sort of thinking during the deserting coward assmalistration (bad advisers steering Bush wrong), and after he’s out of power…he wasn’t REALLY a “conservative” at all!
August 17th, 2011 at 2:32 pm
@FormerSwingVoter:
Exactly. I’m car shopping and I’ve gone to various manufacturers’ sites. I now get car ads all the time.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:33 pm
I’m waiting for the religious crackpots to claim God dropped the stage on them for being lesbians.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:35 pm
@Elliecat:
Yup, that is a very, very good point. Some men see some other guy get kicked in the crotch, and they reflexively cover their own…that’s empathy.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:36 pm
Given the unprecedented levels of hagiography when Reagan died several years ago, the Right should be silent regarding how anyone chooses to commemorate a passing.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:36 pm
OT: Interesting bit on a whistleblower in the US-side Floorgraphics – News America/News Corp situation. Bastards play seriously hard-ball. Murdoch empire falls and GSD knows how many lawyers will be instantly unemployed.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:37 pm
I think
Evil = Selfishness + arrogance
would be more appropriate
When you are selfish you do not concern yourself with other And When you are arrogant you think you are better than other, you deserve more, witch lead you to do thing that help you even if it harm other
August 17th, 2011 at 2:39 pm
And his bathtub.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:41 pm
@Judas Escargot: Belafon has a good point about pre-emptive ass-covering by Cantor. It could also be a matter of him noticing the polling on Congress/the GOP/teabaggers, or he may simply have been getting a good earful from his constituents or—more likely—his Wall Street overlords. Or maybe he’s just trying to flush his behavior during the debt ceiling imbroglio down the memory hole. Or any or all of the above.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:45 pm
@Steve:
Oh man, I forgot about that. You would think generating that many fallacies would require at least a dash of intelligence, but no, it doesn’t.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:46 pm
OT: This Obama staffer must be reading this blog.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:51 pm
@FormerSwingVoter:
You forgot
Polandstem cells! Those are sacrosanct. You even get to promote them to the major leagues of “living things” for the precise purpose of empathizing with their alleged pain.August 17th, 2011 at 2:52 pm
@The Dangerman:
No kidding. I and my small circle of friends dreaded what we called “The Reagasm” for years prior to its actual occurance. It was as dreadful as we expected it to be.
I cringe ever year September 11th rolls around too. I call it “The Wallow”.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:55 pm
@FlipYrWhig: Single-cell organisms gotta stick together, without becoming more complex that is.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:56 pm
@Villago Delenda Est: Gird yourself. This year it will be a doozy since it’s the ten year.
August 17th, 2011 at 2:58 pm
What I would have posted to The Donalde’s site comment, if I didn’t have to risk being cyber-stalked by disturbed Donalde:
“Can’t speak to these advocacy groups using the occasion of this woman’s untimely death to make statements.
But I do note that you have used this occasion to 1) grind a political ax, and 2) post a snuff film where people died and scores were horribly injured.
I’m no theologian, but this is exactly the sort of blog post that is probably going to greet you in hell, Ms. Douglas.”
August 17th, 2011 at 3:01 pm
OT: And….speaking of Sociopaths…
Lieberman goes onto FOX again to claim that Obama is encouraging and giving moral support to Israel’s enemies.
August 17th, 2011 at 3:03 pm
Sir Cole. Can you please release my comment from moderation jail. It is sorry for using the S word and promises not to do it again.
August 17th, 2011 at 3:05 pm
@Judas Escargot:
At a time when the Republicans’ latest shiny new candidate is being criticized, by people in his own party, for an implied threat of violence against a federal official, do they really want a candidate who can’t control his temper? Earlier this year, Chris Christie teed off on one of his constituents just for writing to his local paper. The letter had a mild and indirect criticism of Christie’s policy toward the poor in New Jersey. (The constituent concerned is Bruce Springsteen, but that’s not important here.)
He is arrogant and petulant with citizens. He is no paragon of gubernatorial competence. What’s worse, Christie’s temper overwhelms his judgment too readily for him to be trusted with high office. And he’s very easily provoked. His Presidential candidacy would always be just one big tantrum away from a meltdown.
August 17th, 2011 at 3:12 pm
At the end of the day, they believe it’s illegitimate for anyone to the left of Newt Gingrich to even attempt to make their case. Any ideas that they don’t entirely agree with feel like an attack to them. Since that argument, made plainly, is obviously ridiculous, they hide behind crap like this, or arguments about union political activity. Also so stupid, but not quite so overwhelmingly so.
August 17th, 2011 at 3:14 pm
GAH don’t go in the water! Brain-eating amoeba kills second victim:
August 17th, 2011 at 3:16 pm
@drkrick:
Bingo. They’re so gracious that they’ll tolerate our presence here, just as long as we shut up and don’t challenge the Real Americans.
August 17th, 2011 at 3:16 pm
@Southern Beale:
So, in other words, it’s perfectly safe for guys like RedState maven Fucker Fuckerson to go swimming, as, like Fry from Futurama they are in no danger from brain eating amoebae.
August 17th, 2011 at 3:23 pm
@Ash Can:
It’s a very good point. Just find the timing odd—the time to get reasonable (or even to pretend to be reasonable) was before the S&P downgrading, not afterwards.
Either the downgrade was unexpected, or Cantor’s indulging in an 11-dim chess game of his own.
Time, as always, will tell.
August 17th, 2011 at 3:32 pm
@Alex S.:
...and Hamsher responds
August 17th, 2011 at 3:38 pm
@Amir Khalid:
All true. But there’s definitely an “Angry White Male” demographic that would see itself reflected in Christie’s demeanor. His team is probably running polls to see if that demo is big enough to get him the numbers he needs. It probably isn’t.
BTW, random thought: Christie the AWM from the northeast; Perry the libertarian cowboy; Bachmann the radical Christianist… each of these is an identifiable rightwing archetype that you’ll find in any online forum (going all the way back to USENET, really).
I just realized why this election cycle seems so particularly weird: it’s almost as if each of the various online rightwing archetypes is trying to manifest itself in the real world as a Presidential candidate.
This, IMO, is new.
August 17th, 2011 at 3:42 pm
Donald Douglas is a very stupid man. How stupid? TBogg had it right when he called him “JuCo Toynbee.”
August 17th, 2011 at 3:43 pm
@Judas Escargot: Well, we do have budget negotations to, theoretically, go through. And this one is fun because it really is about deciding what gets funded, unlike the faux crisis of the debt ceiling.
August 17th, 2011 at 3:44 pm
Jane Hamsher, via @Alex S.:
Oh, clearly that would be FDL bloggers.
August 17th, 2011 at 3:46 pm
@63: I won’t get into the political tactics issues, but the NM Obama staffer was totally wrong and off base about the criticism of WH economic policy from Krugman.
What the staffer misses is that the criticism of the current WH economic stimulus efforts is that it is not just Krugman’s opinion. Krugman is the most visible because he has a very high profile media platform.
Pretty much all prominent Keynesian economists are saying the same thing, based on a model that they can use independently to churn out results that agree. Examples of other high profile Keynesian macroeconomists who agree are Brad Delong, Joseph Stiglitz, Robert Shiller, James Galbraith, Oliver Blanchard, Alan Blinder, Dean Baker, and ex WH staffers Peter Orszag, Lawrence Summers, and Christina Romer. And I could name a few more.
Krugman is correct when he says the standard Keynes/Hicks model of macroeconomics has stood up pretty well. All these economists take the standard model, with some minor variations usually related to each individual’s area of specialty, and can use it to reproduce (as well as things can be reproduced in the very soft science of macroeconomics) the same analysis and the same forecasts, and the same policy prescriptions.
This differentiates them from the hapless new classical and real business cycle people who are all over the map in their analysis, to the extent that they have any independent analysis at all. Mostly they are reduced to nit picking Keynesian analysis and working on half a dozen 20/20 hindsight and Monday morning QB schools of thought about different ways the government messed it up, or how the evil of the CRA finally manifested itself after decades of being a very minor macro policy and blew up the world.
August 17th, 2011 at 3:54 pm
@Judas Escargot: I had a thought along similar lines when Rand Paul was running. He just seemed exactly like the classic libertarian douche who thinks he’s rather clever from Usenet. But your theory has a pleasing SkyNet/The Matrix quality about it.
August 17th, 2011 at 3:57 pm
@Judas Escargot:
Usenet, huh? I wonder when Archimedes Plutonium or Robert McElwaine will enter the GOP primary race? (for those who were lucky enough never to encounter the underbelly of Usenet back in the Nineties, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_celebrity )
August 17th, 2011 at 4:00 pm
@jl:
This is what the criticism is about though.
August 17th, 2011 at 4:01 pm
Fun fact for the day:
CHART OF THE DAY: Government Jobs Led To Perry’s Economic Boom
’ As Bernstein notes [the BLS data show] “Texas to be following a traditional Keynesian game plan: as the private sector contracts, turn to the public sector to temporarily make up part of the difference.” ’
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.....hp?ref=fpa
August 17th, 2011 at 4:02 pm
@Alex S.: Did we read the same link? Seemed to me that half of the blast was defending the economics of the WH approach, not just the politics.
August 17th, 2011 at 4:03 pm
OT… I so want to see a debate between Christie and Perry. When’s the next repub debate?
August 17th, 2011 at 4:05 pm
@Alex S.: The OFA point person c&p’d from “The People’s View” clownsite. What more needs to be said?
August 17th, 2011 at 4:07 pm
@Alex S.: Jane Hamsher saying that someone else’s writing “smacks of narcissism” has to be a new benchmark for lacking self-awareness.
@jl: All of that rings true to me, but there is a hypersensitivity to any suggestion of “cuts,” even cuts to the provider side, even cuts aimed at bloat and looting, that has been immensely counterproductive to the prospects of controlling medical costs. And treating those lost dollars, rhetorically at least, as macroeconomically calamitous shows that something is askew in Keynesian prescriptions. To pull a reductio ad absurdam on it, if the government somehow gave the Koch brothers $1 billion, that would “stimulate the economy”; and if the government somehow took away from them $1 billion, that would shrink the economy. But we can’t just total up the dollars and evaluate policy on that basis. All cost-cutting isn’t inherently virtuous, but it isn’t inherently vicious, either.
August 17th, 2011 at 4:16 pm
@jl: There were so many great points in that, my favorite being that while Texas only loast 178K over the three year period, which is small for the population of the state, it added nearly half of the government jobs created in the entire country.
August 17th, 2011 at 4:19 pm
@jl: I agree that the objections weren’t, this time, about the politics (e.g., “Krugman complains that there wasn’t a bigger stimulus, but where were the votes for it?”). But on the economics the point seemed to be that, contra Krugman and “firebaggers,” the agreed-to cuts didn’t qualify as austerity and weren’t taking money out of everyday people’s pockets.
August 17th, 2011 at 4:20 pm
@jl:
I think I interpreted it differently, that is, the policy of the deal is closely linked to the politics. Or in other words, policy-wise this was as good as possible (I might be biased because I think that medicare and defense spending cuts have to happen anyway). But yeah, this is just one side of the austerity medal.
@Corner Stone:
What makes them a clownsite (honest question, never really paid attention to them)?
August 17th, 2011 at 4:21 pm
@FlipYrWhig:
the other quote Chyron HR notes above is killer too—i.e., Hamsher taking credit for “keeping Obama’s poll numbers afloat.” bwaaaahaaaahaaahaaaaa.
Truly a contender for the Top 10 Shits You Can’t Make Up.
August 17th, 2011 at 4:27 pm
@Keith G:
Is this sadly hateful jerk representative of a known and large quantity of others, I do not know. I hope not.
Good lord, the commentators on that site are so bad it almost makes the Donalde look good! (almost)., “TexasFred” is quite a piece of work himself…
August 17th, 2011 at 4:31 pm
@FlipYrWhig:
Oddly enough… with 2012 looming, I decided to re-read The Invisibles not too long ago. So that’s probably influenced my framing. Between the real “King Mob” running amok in London, and the 2012 election cycle turning out the way it is, I suspect Grant Morrison would approve.
Speaking of the present catching up to the future: Stand on Zanzibar, an oddly prescient 1968 novel set in 2010 and long out of print, is finally out on the Kindle. I had a hardcover edition nicked by a long-ago gf when I was only halfway through, so I never got to finish it. Now I can.
August 17th, 2011 at 4:35 pm
@Alex S.:
Facts
August 17th, 2011 at 4:37 pm
@dmsilev:
Damn, I’m old: I remember almost 2/3 of those people. And found myself wondering “whatever happened to…” about a few more who didn’t make it on that list. Doctoress Neutopia? ‘Andrew, Beckwith’? Andrea Chen?
Fellow old-timers might be amused by this.
Wonder if Kibo ever googles himself.
August 17th, 2011 at 4:53 pm
This type of stuff goes a long way to explaining why liberals will never be able to stop wringing their hands and wondering “Why won’t they just listen to Rachel and her facts?” There is a moral and ethical chasm there that I have stopped trying to bridge. There is nothing to do w/ such folks except neutralize their capacity to poison the communal well.
August 17th, 2011 at 4:53 pm
@eemom:
My favorite was when I saw a brand new 2010 GM vehicle with the Sticker ‘Is this the change you voted for’ with a communist flag.
It was certainly the change that enabled her car to come into existence
August 17th, 2011 at 4:53 pm
@Ian:
heh. And you can be sure that thought never got anywhere close to her tiny little mind, much less crossed it.
August 17th, 2011 at 5:01 pm
You’re not telling me something I don’t already know John. These people are disturbingly hateful of anyone who is not ‘one of them’. How people can hate fellow human beings is beyond me. I was raised in a colorblind home (thank you very much Mom!!) and when I look at someone I see a fellow human. Humans are diverse and differences are to be expected, but only if you acknowledge reality.
Reality is something that these people have been avoiding for decades. They can’t handle it.
@Judas Escargot:
“Even weirder: Cantor’s making sense…”
Methinks his Galtian Overlords (translation: donors with DEEP pockets) have given him his marching orders. The change is too abrupt for this asshole, it couldn’t be anything else.
IMO, Cantor has been read the riot act and is jumping as high as they have told him to.
August 17th, 2011 at 5:04 pm
Isn’t yon Donalde Douglas better known as Mr. Ann Althouse?
Which explains a lot, when you think about it.
He was trolling Lawyers Guns & Money for the longest time. I don’t know whether he got tired of the game or they banned his IP address.
August 17th, 2011 at 5:15 pm
@Jay mentioned: “JuCo Toynbee.”
Heh. had to goggle and then think for a moment…
tbogg, g1.
(and a reminder that he does occasionally write about something besides all things Palin.)
August 17th, 2011 at 5:21 pm
@Alex S.: Mainly the clowns that FP there. But take a tour and make up your own mind on them.
August 17th, 2011 at 5:52 pm
@Corner Stone: rootless_e is on the frontpage, that’s a pretty big clue right there. The articles on the front page all seem to be anti-emo progressive/professional left, fee-fee hurt rants. not many facts in evidence when hippie bashing. there ere some facts when they attacked the right, but then hippies aren’t respectable enough to deserve facts.
August 17th, 2011 at 6:29 pm
@efgoldman: No. You’re getting your loons mixed up (and it embarrasses me that I know this).
August 17th, 2011 at 7:15 pm
@Villago Delenda Est: Definitely some historical revisionism with both Hitler/GWB vis a vis their true believers. Good point comparing the two.
August 18th, 2011 at 9:42 am
@FlipYrWhig: My thought when Rand Paul was running was more along the lines of ‘I can’t believe we’re losing to this guy’.
August 18th, 2011 at 9:47 am