Kay’s post on sloganeering for the media made me take another look at a couple recent articles about Elizabeth Warren’s latest appearance before the House. Paul Krugman summarizes the War on Warren:
Last week, at a House hearing on financial institutions and consumer credit, Republicans lined up to grill and attack Elizabeth Warren, the law professor and bankruptcy expert who is in charge of setting up the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Ostensibly, they believed that Ms. Warren had overstepped her legal authority by helping state attorneys general put together a proposed settlement with mortgage servicers, which are charged with a number of abuses.
__
But the accusations made no sense. Since when is it illegal for a federal official to talk with state officials, giving them the benefit of her expertise? Anyway, everyone knew that the real purpose of the attack on Ms. Warren was to ensure that neither she nor anyone with similar views ends up actually protecting consumers.
__
And Republicans were clearly also hoping that if they threw enough mud, some of it would stick. For people like Ms. Warren — people who warned that we were heading for a debt crisis before it happened — threaten, by their very existence, attempts by conservatives to sustain their antiregulation dogma. Such people must therefore be demonized, using whatever tools are at hand…
Andy Kroll at Mother Jones points out that Warren has all the right enemies in the business world as well — the Wall Street Journal‘s slogan-intensive attacks on Warren are being written by a former Goldman Sachs banker.
But it was Dana Milbank, semi-reformed Media Village Insider, who picked up the Useful Catchphrase:
It seems everybody is afraid of Elizabeth Warren, the Harvard law professor charged by President Obama with setting up the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
__
The Wall Street Journal editorial page called her “President Warren” and a “czar” in command of an “empire.” Richard Shelby of Alabama, the top Republican on the Senate banking committee, thinks she’s orchestrating a “regulatory shakedown” of mortgage companies. And Spencer Bachus, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, told Warren on Wednesday that she is “probably directing the most powerful agency that’s ever been created in Washington.” That will come as news to the Pentagon.
__
But in the tradition of Chief Justice John Roberts, who described himself to lawmakers as a lowly “umpire,” Warren declared herself to be a mere sheriff’s deputy.
__
“If there had been a cop on the beat with the authority to hold mortgage services accountable a half-dozen years ago,” she announced, “the problems in mortgage servicing would have been exposed . . . long before they became a national scandal.”
__
Warren added: “We need a cop on the beat that American families can count on. It is critical that we get this right – a real cop on the beat.”
__
“You kept saying ‘cop on the beat, cop on the beat,’ ” complained Rep. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), who chaired the day’s hearing.
__
Warren could not dispute this. In reply, she said that banks must know “there will be a cop on the beat” and that her agency will need “enough money to put enough cops on the beat.” Before completing her testimony, Officer Warren made four more references to cops-on-beats – possibly putting her in violation of public-nuisance statutes.
__
But it was a useful metaphor: If she’s the cop, then banks are the robbers, and members of the Republican majority on the committee sounded like lawyers for the accused.
I’ve been on Team Warren for quite some time, and the fact that she’s driving the Repubs (even more) bonkers using their favorite rhetorical weapons is just one more vindication, yes?
Barb (formerly Gex)
I heart her so much.
Sister Machine Gun of Quiet Harmony
I love her, too. She is teh awesomes!
Phil Perspective
I’ve been on Team Warren for quite some time, and the fact that she’s driving the Repubs (even more) bonkers using their favorite rhetorical weapons is just one more vindication, yes?
Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes!!!! 10 times, yes!
RalfW
More of this, dammit. We’ve been robbed blind, beaten and left for dead. I’d say some cops are called for. And ones that can still bargain collectively, thank you.
Brachiator
Absolutely.
And this is one of those areas where I has a happy that Obama stuck with Warren despite powerful attempts by Republicans to keep her out of the Administration.
FlipYrWhig
Elizabeth Warren is rapidly becoming my #1 celebrity crush.
The Sheriff's A Ni-
@Brachiator: I see what you did there.
a hip hop artist from Idaho (fka Bella Q)
Absofuckinglutely.
trollhattan
Loved it when Jon Stewart confessed he wanted to make out with her.
Is this our “Because she drivez Republicans Krazy” moment? When used by Republicans, it’s generally intended to divert attention from the vast shortcomings of the craze-maker du jour.
Maude
The Repubs don’t like Warren because the people around the country understand what she is talking about.
BGinCHI
She has credibility and brains. It’s a wonder the Senators could even understand her.
JPL
@trollhattan: OMG… Who doesn’t feel that way, gay or straight. She is one amazing woman.
Brachiator
@The Sheriff’s A Ni-:
Huh?
By the by, I hope that Obama can nominate an equally frightening Commerce Secretary to replace Gary Locke, and would dearly like to see Hilda Solis replaced with someone who was more like Francis Perkins. Or Elizabeth Warren.
geg6
Elizabeth Warren is the most awesome public servant, perhaps ever but surely right now. She’s whip smart and very funny in her appearances on Real Time, where it’s obvious that Bill Maher has a crush on her. Hell, so do I. I’d totally go gay for her. Love, love, love her.
jayjaybear
“These old Wall Street boys are putting up an awful fight to keep the government from putting a cop on their corner.” – Will Rogers
Zifnab
Wasn’t DougJ complaining about the damnable talking point and its habit of playing to the lowest common denominator just a few posts back?
I hope “Cop-on-the-beat” gets its own tag line. We could use more Elizabeth Warren posts. That woman never fails to make me smile.
Comrade Mary
@Phil Perspective:
I’ll have what he’s having.
Elizabelle
Annie: good post. Reading Kay’s thread on messaging, I thought about Elizabeth Warren too and her effective — but not simplistic — prowess in communicating.
I am dreaming a little of Obama-Warren 2012 — use the second term to clean up the banksters’ mess and ensure it does not happen again.
Wondering if rather than sidelining, administration has been saving her.
Barb (formerly Gex)
@geg6: If she were a dude, I’d go straight for her.
Elizabelle
PS: nothing against Joe Biden. He’s effing great.
But Elizabeth Warren is a force of nature.
Comrade Mary
Looking at everyone squealing and sighing above (and I’m with you, guys and gals, I’m with you), I can’t help but think that Warren is a Bieber for grownups.
Please don’t ever cut your hair, Liz. I’m not afraid that you’ll lose your power or anything — are you kidding? — but I just think it looks really, really nice on you.
#makes international sign for “call me”#
'Niques
Elizabeth Warren needs to be the headliner of the Democratic ticket in 2016.
AhabTRuler
@Comrade Mary: Just fer you.
geg6
@Barb (formerly Gex):
Heh. Looks like pretty much all of Balloon Juice is madly in love with her. A rare moment of concensus. We should all hold hands and sing Kumbaya or something. Doesn’t happen often that this crowd squeals with delight like tween girls at a Bieber concert. Which just another reason EW is fucking awesome.
Mark S.
What’s amazing to me is that she is controversial because she doesn’t suck our Galtian Lords’ cocks and genuflect at the altar of Capitalism every time she talks. She actually doesn’t say anything controversial to non-billionaire bankers, but our bought-and-sold Congress finds her terrifying.
Martin
Dems would do well to pick up this ‘cop on the beat’ line and apply it to all regulatory actions.
brucds
Read this great piece from Rortybomb – 3/18 – Warren is bringing clarity, forthrightness and a razor-sharp intellect to the consumer protection front. She scares the bejeezus out of these jerks… (Also – there’s a great chart that shows how the new agency simplifies an absurdly tangled net of regulators – which seems designed to make them ineffectual.)
http://rortybomb.wordpress.com/2011/03/18/the-bizarre-smear-campaign-on-elizabeth-warren-continues/
http://titanicsailsatdawn.blogspot.com/2011/03/smear-campaign-against-elizabeth-warren.html
AhabTRuler
@Martin: Yes, that’s how we know that it won’t happen.
Comrade Mary
@AhabTRuler: Squeee! Thanks! You know, that’s one of my favourite songs, but I never saw the video before. (Probably because I was 33 when it came out, MuchMusic had almost given up on videos, the Net was barely a gleam in our collective eyes, and I thought I was old. Idjit.)
Martin
@AhabTRuler: Probably right.
Mark S.
If you want a good laugh, check out this Ohio Tea Party thread Jim, Once linked to earlier. It’s finally dawning on some of these patriots what Galtism really means.
AhabTRuler
@Comrade Mary: Hey, when I first got that album someone gave it to me on cassette.
TomG
“Anyway, everyone knew that the real purpose of the attack on Ms. Warren was to ensure that neither she nor anyone with similar views ends up actually protecting consumers.”
This quote reminds me of the scene in The Incredibles where Bob Parr is castigated by his boss (in an insurance company) because he has been secretly helping the insured navigate their way through the complex rules set up so that the company won’t actually have to pay out any legitimate claims.
a hip hop artist from Idaho (fka Bella Q)
@Mark S.:
That’s the wonderful garnish for this whip smart, wonked out yet still a great communicator, average looking woman. She is everything I always wanted to grow up to be.
freelancer
@Mark S.:
Holy Crap, that is awesome. There needs to be a Balloon Juice ambush at the bottom of that thread, screaming, “The DFH’s have been saying it over and over and over again. This is what happens when you vote Republican. -Signed, a shitload of former Republican voters.”
Barb (formerly Gex)
@freelancer: The difference being, once these guys get the TP to back off their issue, they’ll be right back on board with going after what everyone else has.
Rainy Day
I watched the hearings, and I kept wishing/hoping Elizabeth would say something like, “It’s simple. The CFPB is going to be like Amazon, except with more teeth and greater enforcement of honesty. You’ll be able to pick and choose the financial product you want based upon an outline of costs/benefits and other customer reviews. The CFPB doesn’t care what you do with the credit you get; we only care that you get all the information you need, that you understand the payments required, and that you can afford the payments. If you can’t afford the payments, you’ll have to go through some more hoops to prove you fully understand the indebtedness you’re willing to take on and/or that you have backers to cover your indebtedness. And, let me remind you, this is for PERSONAL debt only. Business debt/credit is under a difference umbrella.”
Canadian Observer
CHINA is no denouncing the crimes of the US in Libya:
Maybe its time for them to start selling some Yankee debt…
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/23/world/asia/23beiijing.html?_r=1&hpw
Canadian Observer
Brilliant editorial from People’s Daily:
Sharl
Another Warren fan here, also too.
OT – in case it hasn’t been noted in these parts, former Balloon Juice co-ombudsman* Radley Balko is leaving flagship ayntard outlet Reason to be crime reporter (?) for HuffAOLPo (woof!).
BTW, FTR, FWIW, FYI – I actually appreciate Balko’s work. Glad to see him leave Reason, for, um, that reason.
*first line of this post, inspired by post(s) cited here
Suffern ACE
@Canadian Observer: Ah. Makes me so proud to be an American. So, have the French showed up yet to take that leadership role and undo the potential damage to foreign relations between the powers?
Sly
The problem for liberals is that for the past forty years we’ve been communicating in an environment made receptive to conservative language through a carefully and systematically constructed political mythology. Rugged individuals! Incompetent government!
Control the language and you control politics.
stuckinred
The thread is dead
Suffern ACE
@stuckinred: It happens. I mean, there are only so many ways to say, “I like Elizabeth Warren.” To generate comments, I’d like to say “I don’t like Elizabeth Warren” and make up some reason about an instance where she has pissed me off.
stuckinred
@Suffern ACE: And this canadian idiot is a threadkiller fo sho!
Mark S.
What are Elizabeth Warren’s views on Operation Odyssey Dawn?
slag
@Maude:
I think there’s a lot of truth to that. Well, there are many reasons why Republicans don’t like her, but a big one is that she’s a strength for their enemies–the entire working class population.
And since I’ve already mentioned RadioLab here today, I might as well do it again. Here’s Robert Krulwich’s speech, at CalTech’s commencement event, urging the graduates to communicate scientific concepts to the uninitiated using narrative: http://www.radiolab.org/blogs/radiolab-blog/2008/jul/29/tell-me-a-story/. The basis for his argument is the fact that (whether they like it or not) scientists need to compete with creationists for public opinion. Truth, to some extent, is a vague, illusory concept that doesn’t really matter to people. Stories, on the other hand, seem to matter to people.
Emily L. Hauser/ellaesther
This is a woman who took the messaging class and clearly got the point. “Cop on the beat” = perfect.
To echo Barb: I, too, heart her. Very much.
mikefromArlington
And remember, Obama being just like Bush, nominated her.
Suffern ACE
@stuckinred: I felt badly for posting a reply to an off-topic post, especially when there were so many other threads available to post on Libya. Unfortunately, this whole operation has awakened simmering anti-French attitudes that I can’t seem to control. More appropriately to the thread, another thing I don’t like about the French government is that Elizabeth Warren has not been made President of that country yet.
stuckinred
@Suffern ACE: So you liked them when the didn’t join up?
Calouste
@Suffern ACE:
Ungrateful Americans. You help them gain their independence. You give them a statue that becomes the symbol for their nation. And what do you get for it? They accuse you of eating cheese.
/French
Suffern ACE
@stuckinred: Nope. I found it to be a pleasant coincidence, but not much more.
Marc McKenzie
@mikefromArlington:
Good point Mike…funny how we’ve forgotten that…
Superluminar
@Canadian shithead
So, the Russians, Chinese and Chavez are unhappy at taking action against an autocratic regime? Wow, clearly they are right and acting completely out of principle. I suppose Canada’s sending of fast jets to help out is just made-up speculation then…
Omnes Omnibus
@Superluminar: I wonder what would have happened if any of those countries has a seat on the UN Security Council and could have vetoed it. I guess we will never know.
Comrade Mary
@Superluminar:
Stephen Harper posts here now? Fucking hell. (Of course, it now looks as if the Harper Government (TM) will lose a vote of confidence very soon, so maybe he’s trying out a new hobby for his upcoming underemployed days.)
Ozymandias, King of Ants
@Sly:
And much more to boot . . .
kdaug
Ain’t a RvD issue. That’s a distraction.
It’s a class war, and Warren’s on the side of the good guys. She’s an old-school, hard-headed, (those with <$100m, $40m not adequate. Trust me.)
Put the inheritance tax at 95%, and make Paris Hilton/Kardashian clone/whoever-the-latest-bubble-gum-pop-shithead/(OK, kdaug, calm down) pay their own goddamned way, and then we can talk about fucking Social Security and Medicaid.
Elizabelle
Paul Krugman blogpost today on how nominations of Elizabeth Warren, Donald Berwick to head Medicare/Medicaid and Peter Diamond to the Fed, are all stymied by opposition and “controversy”.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/22/ignoramitocracy/
brucds
Thanks for this discussion AL – in the spirit, I’m going to distill it into a two-short-paragraph post at my econ/politics blog right now – Reclaim the Narrative! (that’s not the name of the blog, just my verbal fist-bump to y’all)
Yutsano
@Comrade Mary:
STOP! TEASING! ME! DAMMIT!!
(I will seriously Snoopy dance if that fucktard loses PM.)
bob h
The super-competent and super-knowledgeable must be avoided because they might demonstrate that government is the solution, not the problem.
rikryah
I think Warren is good people. and a good public servant.
mclaren
Wunderbar! The Wall Street Urinal calling her “President Warren” and a “czar” proves reminiscent of the Hearst papers smearing Eugene Debs as “Dictator Debs” the “King of America” back during the Pullman Strike.
She’s definitely doing the right things…which means that our spineless Whimperer In Chief Obama will fire her soon.
Corner Stone
@mclaren: I’ve been wondering for a while when she’s going to get tired of the Village Treadmill.
It won’t be Obama “firing” her, as we all know.
piratedan
ty for all of the links regarding what she’s done and how she’s handling the spite of those who are most definitely aligned against her.
Wolfdaughter
Mark S:
Thanks for posting the link to the site which links to the TP site in Ohio. It is heartening to see that quite a few people who were supporting the TP and their candidates are all of a sudden saying, “Wait, I didn’t sign up to have my salary and bennies cut to the max! I didn’t sign up for union busting!” Maybe if these people are going, whoa, they might start to question some of their other assumptions. A girl can hope anyway.
I second, third, ad infinitum, all of you praising Elizabeth Warren.