Shake your money maker
This is genuinely troubling (via):
The Washington Post company is most identified with its newspaper, the Washington Post. But in fact its biggest source of revenue is its Kaplan subsidiary. Kaplan, in turn, is primarily identified with test prep work.
[....]
Fairly reasonably, the Obama administration has proposed that taxpayers stop subsidizing programs with dismal performance rates. That way educational entrepreneurs at places like the Post will have to work on making sure they’re delivering some real value to their customers. Also quote reasonable, the Post would prefer to keep on getting free money from taxpayers and thus “spent $350,000 on lobbying in the third quarter of this year, more than any other higher-education company.”
But what’s more, Donald Graham has personally “gone to Capitol Hill to argue against the regulations in private visits with lawmakers” and just to make the full scope of his interest in the issue clear “[h]is newspaper, too, has editorialized against the regulations.” Meanwhile, it looks like the new GOP majority in the House of Representatives has decided that taxpayer subsidies to low-performing for-profit colleges like Kaplan is one of the forms of wasteful government spending they like. And presumably every member of congress is now on notice that the city’s most influential newspaper is prepared to go to bat for its corporate partners.
As national newspapers become increasingly unprofitable, it may be that their only value is as a source of prestigious-sounding propaganda in the service of the money-making branches of the conglomerates that own them.
You’re just noticing this? It’s the wave of the future, self-publicizing diploma mills. You don’t even have to make a weekend trip to Central America to get a degree anymore!
I tell you, someday Mike Judge will be hailed as a modern-day Nostradamus. Unless we’re all living in caves and eating our neighbors, which is a distinct possibility.
November 11th, 2010 at 1:56 pm
I’m on board.
First up: Defunding the Pentagon.
November 11th, 2010 at 1:56 pm
Wonderful. The Foxification of the American Media continues.
November 11th, 2010 at 1:56 pm
I initially read the headline as “Shake your monkey maker”.
November 11th, 2010 at 1:58 pm
Also the sun is generally hot and made of fusion.
Next thing you know they’ll be doing that with niche cable stations and internet news sites.
November 11th, 2010 at 1:59 pm
OT but wow.
Boy howdy, Google has done it now! The company’s special Veterans Day logo this year, you see, features a mysterious crescent shape. And you know who loves crescent shapes? The Muslims. Yeah, some people are actually upset about this.
http://gawker.com/5687649/does.....u#comments
My head hurts from hitting it against my desk. Perhaps these people were edumacated at Kaplan?
November 11th, 2010 at 2:03 pm
This might be a good place to insert a good word for 2-year community colleges. They can offer everything that Kaplan does, they are accredited, they have good instructors, they are cheaper than the private schools, and they even offer online classes. Win-win-win, etc.
November 11th, 2010 at 2:06 pm
I’m moving to Nigeria where they have less corruption.
November 11th, 2010 at 2:07 pm
@Blackfrancis:
Google:
Lots of snark in the comments.
November 11th, 2010 at 2:09 pm
@Blackfrancis:
Google is the schach that Ror’d. I see a teeny debil’s horn o_O
November 11th, 2010 at 2:10 pm
@Linda Featheringill: Community colleges can be a great thing (disclaimer: my s.o. works at one as a psych Prof.) cheaper, and a great bridge to a four year school for many unconventional students.
November 11th, 2010 at 2:11 pm
This is impossible.
I have repeatedly been told that there is an impenetrable wall between the news and editorial departments and their advertising departments and overall ownership.
Therefore, this cannot be a problem and there will never be a conflict of interest.
November 11th, 2010 at 2:12 pm
@BGinCHI:
For a nominal fee, I can introduce you to a prince I know there. Connections, I haz them.
November 11th, 2010 at 2:13 pm
The Washington Times has been a massive money loser since day one. But not only has it helped push Washington further and further right, it has seemingly transformed the Rev. Moon from a scary cult leader to a pillar of the American establishment, able to inject his chosen talking points directly into the veins of mainstream media.
Money well spent.
November 11th, 2010 at 2:16 pm
@jacy: This sounds promising.
First though, if you could send me $100,000, so that I could secure an even bigger fortune for you, through my law firm Cheatham & Howe, that would be most agreeable.
Plus, diamonds.
November 11th, 2010 at 2:21 pm
@Blackfrancis: One of the tweets on that Gawker post is from Ruben Bolling. There must be shenanigans afoot.
November 11th, 2010 at 2:26 pm
Meanwhile, Olbermann had Howie Kurtz on yesterday to scold him for donating money, and Kurtz scoffed at the notion that the people at the top of the corporation have any influence on the news. That’s crazy talk!
Unmentioned by any of them: the fact that Howie’s wife is a Republican consultant.
November 11th, 2010 at 2:34 pm
They really won’t rest until every single aspect of American society that actually WOULD benefit from free-market competition is under the direct control of the government and every aspect that should be kept out of the marketplace is completely unregulated in any way.
November 11th, 2010 at 2:45 pm
Regarding the for-profit universities in general, there was a piece on Gawker today by Joe Cook discussing how the NSA trains a lot of its workers at these places.
So you have these companies eating up our tax dollars in loans for average Joes AND adding to our already catastrophically bloated defense spending by charging the DoD to train people. Woo-ha.
November 11th, 2010 at 2:56 pm
My “moonlighting” job is at Kaplan Test Prep. Actually, Kaplan can’t do anything that a 2 year community college does, because we don’t offer any degree or diploma programs. The only thing that we do is prepare you to write ADMISSION tests. Our performance in that area (which is measured by what scores the students get when they write the tests) is actually very good. But it does not mean that the students learned anything about what they are GOING to study after they get into whatever school they are admitted to.
Maybe the US government gives subsidies to this kind of teaching, but I doubt it. I would think that a private school has to offer some sort of diploma, certificate or degree before it could get any money.
One of the frustrating things about working at Kaplan is watching the Washington Post suck up our profits, rather than investing them in making our courses and materials better. Those of us who teach for the GMAT can figure out financial statements, and the WaPo statements show that Kaplan contributes about 200% of the company’s profits. I don’t think that Stanley, God rest his soul, would be happy about this.
November 11th, 2010 at 2:58 pm
@Steve Finlay:
I hate to break it to you, but your parent company does, in fact, run for-profit schools that people can get student loans to attend.
November 11th, 2010 at 3:01 pm
My girlfriend read this article earlier and told me about it. She wrote this in response, not only to the article, but also about the consumer model of education in general.
November 11th, 2010 at 4:11 pm
GE/NBC? Hello?
November 11th, 2010 at 4:35 pm
Thanks, Mnemosyne. I stand corrected!
November 12th, 2010 at 1:37 pm