Balloon Juice » Blog Archive » McArdle is Always Wrong.™

McArdle is Always Wrong.™

By John Cole July 25th, 2010

I honestly don’t understand why everyone hasn’t figured this out.

Posted in Bring on the Brawndo!, C.R.E.A.M., Going Galt, Technically True but Collectively Nonsense

This entry was posted on Sunday, July 25th, 2010 at 3:00 pm and is filed under Bring on the Brawndo!, C.R.E.A.M., Going Galt, Technically True but Collectively Nonsense. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

▲

71 Responses to “McArdle is Always Wrong.™”

1 jwb Says:

I wonder what would happen if Always Wrong® McArdle and Always Wrong® Kristol came out with opposite predictions.

July 25th, 2010 at 3:03 pm

2 Corner Stone Says:

@jwb: Good God. It would lead to the Penguins of Madagascar Time Paradox.
We’d all end up covered in sno-cone flavored ice shavings.

July 25th, 2010 at 3:07 pm

3 Corner Stone Says:

Any writer with a modicum of self-respect at The Atlantic should never link to her again.
Of course, since there is approximately one of those I guess it’s not really that big a deal.

July 25th, 2010 at 3:09 pm

4 Corner Stone Says:

Speaking of “deal”, I caught a Deal or No Deal re-run last night and forgot how much I enjoyed that show when it first came out.
A little faux drama combined with the inability to do simple probabilities. Just delish.

July 25th, 2010 at 3:11 pm

5 BR Says:

@jwb:

We’d have to go for the Third Way: school uniforms.

July 25th, 2010 at 3:12 pm

6 licensed to kill time Says:

I always read her name as McGargle. Kind of a bubbly little soundtrack.

July 25th, 2010 at 3:12 pm

7 Tom Levenson Says:

Thanks for the link. Much appreciated.

And I’m enjoying the fact that for once, I seem to have struck a nerve, chez McArdle—Susan of Texas reports that she tweets me as “some idiot,” which, as I note elsewhere has been a term of endearment around my home base of Boston since 2004. ;)

July 25th, 2010 at 3:14 pm

8 PeakVT Says:

Nice post, Tom. For their sakes, I hope Fallows and TNC read it.

July 25th, 2010 at 3:18 pm

9 dmsilev Says:

@jwb:

I wonder what would happen if Always Wrong® McArdle and Always Wrong® Kristol came out with opposite predictions.

Mutual annihilation, one hopes.

It’s unlikely, though. Kristol is Always Wrong about foreign affairs, and doesn’t really babble all that much about domestic stuff. McArdle is Always Wrong about domestic policy, but she doesn’t really seem to care about foreign matters. It’s like they’ve signed a non-compete agreement to divide up the Always Wrong duties.

dms

July 25th, 2010 at 3:18 pm

10 BombIranForChrist Says:

Man, I wish she would give financial advice. She would be the perfect contrary indicator.

July 25th, 2010 at 3:25 pm

11 c u n d gulag Says:

You kind of have to admire her.
She’s ‘Bill Kristol wrong’ on everything. You could say that she’s Bill with tit’s (my apology’s, but tit’s is funnier than breasts in this case).
But she defends her stupidity in a way that I wish Democrats defended doing something courageous and right.
It take guts to display day after day that when you don’t know anything at all about the subject you’re writing about, you’re willing to make shit up to fill in what you don’t know – whether what you made up has anything to do with what you were talking about in the first place is material or immaterial, as long as it’s loud and strong when it’s wrong.*
Why does “The Atlantic” have her writing about economics, when she can’t even make correct change? I guess “The Atlantic’s” editors must be out to sea…

*That’s my best McArdle immitaion. Sorry…

July 25th, 2010 at 3:27 pm

12 malraux Says:

@jwb: Luckily, one can be wrong in a multitude of ways.

July 25th, 2010 at 3:27 pm

13 Guster Says:

Who is aimai, and why is she so friggin’ smart? Is she secretly also Hilzoy?

July 25th, 2010 at 3:28 pm

14 Pancake Says:

However, McCardle was right. Elizabeth Warren is not going to get the new position, basically because many of the reasons Megan has enumerated are shared by Obama and his key financial team. Currently, the most likely Presidential pick will be Michael Barr.

July 25th, 2010 at 3:30 pm

15 Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle Says:

@Corner Stone: No, two. Coates and Fallows.

July 25th, 2010 at 3:38 pm

16 Lev Says:

@jwb: That’s like that question about whether God could create a rock He couldn’t lift. If one presupposes an omnipotent God, then He can lift anything. The question is just being clever with words.

Not that I’m proselytizing here, just making a point about assumptions. McArdle and Kristol agree on everything.

July 25th, 2010 at 3:39 pm

17 Corner Stone Says:

@Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle: I’m sorry. I know a lot of people here really like and respect TNC.
But his recent half and half on Goldberg disqualify him, IMO.

July 25th, 2010 at 3:41 pm

18 Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle Says:

@Tom Levenson: What it all comes down to for McArdle is that Elizabeth Warren is the equivalent of Bernie Sanders. A champion of the little guy. And McArdle can’t stand that. Which is funny because her dad used to be a civil servant, a position she constantly hates on.

July 25th, 2010 at 3:42 pm

19 Cain Says:

@Tom Levenson:

You have a nice blog there. I like your other posts too.

cain

July 25th, 2010 at 3:44 pm

20 jwb Says:

@Lev: I was thinking more along the lines of the old paradox of the irresistible cannon ball meeting the immovable post.

July 25th, 2010 at 3:44 pm

21 Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle Says:

@Corner Stone: Would you last long at a job if you disparaged a co-worker, even if he deserved it? I have to believe that’s what’s behind it. Just MHO.

July 25th, 2010 at 3:47 pm

22 ThatLeftTurnInABQ Says:

@Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle:

Which is funny because her dad used to be a civil servant, a position she constantly hates on.

You know who else had a dad in the civil service and grew up hating on it…

July 25th, 2010 at 3:49 pm

23 Lev Says:

Sounds like Tom is trying to say that McArdle is the Pat Harrison to Breitbart’s Theodore Bilbo.

Or if Harrison is too obscure, how about his fellow mild-toned segregationist Richard Russell?

July 25th, 2010 at 3:51 pm

24 amorphous Says:

@c u n d gulag: Did no one teach you apostrophe’s?

July 25th, 2010 at 3:57 pm

25 demimondian Says:

@ThatLeftTurnInABQ: I know, I know! George W. Bush was the son of a former director of the CIA!

July 25th, 2010 at 3:58 pm

26 Corner Stone Says:

@Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle: I understand what you’re saying. But I will disagree with you a little.
If TNC says, “Hey, he’s a great friend, etc.”
Well, ok then. TNC and anyone can choose who they like or dislike, so on and so forth.
But to affirmatively state that you believe Goldberg is someone, “you have a lot of respect for as a reporter” is going beyond the pale. That’s not a defense so much as it is a loan of credibility. IMO, TNC didn’t have to do that to make his point(s).
So, I have to say it’s a big problem.

July 25th, 2010 at 4:03 pm

27 Bella Q Says:

@amorphous: I assumed those apostrophe’s were used satirically, or sardonically or perhaps even ironically. It’s one of those damned adverbs that either starts with an “s” or has an “onic” in it. :-)

July 25th, 2010 at 4:04 pm

28 rootless_e Says:

What about Peter Daou? He seems to be as right as often as Mcgarble.

For example: if this means anything at all, it’s utterly wrong

What’s far more interesting is that there is one thing Obama can do that transcends the ebb and flow of events, the endless swirl of opinion, the daily wins and losses, the progress and setbacks that constitute governing. It is the one thing with lasting appeal and enduring value and a prerequisite for unqualified success in any endeavor: standing for something worthwhile, for a set of well-articulated principles, and fighting for those principles tooth and nail.

July 25th, 2010 at 4:08 pm

29 jeffreyw Says:

Megan is a time traveler

July 25th, 2010 at 4:09 pm

30 robertdsc-PowerBook & 27 titles Says:

@jeffreyw:
LOL.

July 25th, 2010 at 4:15 pm

31 Belvoir Says:

@Tom Levenson: Really well done Tom, that was a great read. I appreciate any well-written critique of that awful glibtard, and I needed a cig after that one.

July 25th, 2010 at 4:31 pm

32 wilfred Says:

Chesterton once said that journalism was saying Lord so and so is dead to people who never knew that he was alive.

Blogs are a bit like that, sometimes. I don’t even know who Megan McArdle is or anything about what she thinks. Now I read that she’s an asshole. Ok.

July 25th, 2010 at 4:32 pm

33 Tom levenson Says:

@Cain: Thanks!

July 25th, 2010 at 4:33 pm

34 RSA Says:

Excellent post, Tom. Lots of fun to read, as well as being on target.

July 25th, 2010 at 4:40 pm

35 Mike in NC Says:

Bookmark this—-

http://firemeganmcardle.blogspot.com

July 25th, 2010 at 4:41 pm

36 Bill Murray Says:

@Guster: one of her parents won a Nobel Prize, I think. That can’t hurt in the smarts department

July 25th, 2010 at 4:44 pm

37 jeffreyw Says:

Thread needs more tomato sammiches.

Basic
Deluxe

July 25th, 2010 at 4:45 pm

38 grumpy realist Says:

Given the merriment that ensued when McArdle tried to divide one large number by a slightly smaller number and was off by a several orders of magnitude, I fail to see why anyone should place any credence in that woman at all.

She’s not an intellectual in search for truth. She’s a hack who cherry-picks data to support whatever miserable glibertarian-theory-of-the-day she’s professing. And then continues screaming: “I’m right!” when the fallacies of her mathematics/data/authority quoting are pointed out.

July 25th, 2010 at 4:46 pm

39 Violet Says:

@BombIranForChrist:

Man, I wish she would give financial advice. She would be the perfect contrary indicator.

I thought Jim Cramer already had that position locked up.

McMegan is wrong so often it should embarrass The Atlantic. Not holding my breath.

July 25th, 2010 at 4:58 pm

40 dmsilev Says:

@Bill Murray: One of my high school classmates was the son of a Nobel prize winner. He was living proof that intelligence wasn’t hereditary.

dms

July 25th, 2010 at 5:00 pm

41 KG Says:

For me, the standard bearer of Always Wrongism is Hugh Hewitt. Not sure the guy has made an accurate prediction in all the time I’ve known him. Though it could just be a byproduct of being a Cleveland sports fan.

July 25th, 2010 at 5:07 pm

42 Eric U. Says:

@grumpy realist:is one order of magnitude “several?” Granted, $250 is a lot more than $25.

The story I read about McArdle’s father didn’t paint a very favorable picture of him. In fact, you could say it implied strongly that he used his civil servant position in a corrupt manner.

July 25th, 2010 at 5:07 pm

43 Mark S. Says:

I suck at song parodies so maybe someone could do better here, but here’s my stab at the MacGruber theme song:

McArdle!
She blogs for the Atlantic and she doesn’t know anything
McArdle!
She thinks Atlas Shrugged is a real philosophy
McArdle!
She can’t do long division
McArdle!

July 25th, 2010 at 5:09 pm

44 Cain Says:

@dmsilev:

@Bill Murray: One of my high school classmates was the son of a Nobel prize winner. He was living proof that intelligence wasn’t hereditary.

It probably wasan’t any picnic for your classmate. Having had the experience of being the son of a high class scientist/professor and not even reaching anywhere close his stature is quite shall we say regrettable.
cain

July 25th, 2010 at 5:24 pm

45 Mike G Says:

For me, the standard bearer of Always Wrongism is Hugh Hewitt.

“Harriet Meiers is superbly qualified to be on the Supreme Court…Wha? Why are you frantically waving at me? I’m reading from the talking points you sent out yesterday.
We’re throwing her overboard now? I wish you guys would do a better job of keeping me informed when you change the propaganda orders. Sheesh.”

July 25th, 2010 at 5:28 pm

46 arguingwithsignposts Says:

I would like for McArdle to point to her own research publications before she starts shitting on the methodology of others who have put in the considerable time to produce such research.

July 25th, 2010 at 5:34 pm

47 Roger Moore Says:

@dmsilev:

One of my high school classmates was the son of a Nobel prize winner. He was living proof that intelligence wasn’t hereditary.

Are you sure, because I’ve met a Nobel Prize winner or two who have convinced me that you don’t have to be a genius to win the prize. That’s not to say that they were idiots, but it’s sometimes enough to be in the right place at the right time and have a talent for self promotion, or even to have the alternative choices be such jackasses that nobody wants to give them the prize.

July 25th, 2010 at 5:42 pm

48 Bill Murray Says:

Sadly, this lie is travelling the world while the truth is still putting on its pants

http://agonyin8fits.blogspot.c.....igger.html

July 25th, 2010 at 5:45 pm

49 KG Says:

@Mike G: it’s kind of funny, the guy is absolutely a party hack; I learned that shortly after meeting him. But I am just amazed, continually, by how far off his predictions can be.

July 25th, 2010 at 5:50 pm

50 DKF Says:

I would love to see Megan offer her criticisms to Elizabeth Warren in person. Warren would absolutely chew her up and spit out the bones. In the nicest, sweetest, most charming way, of course. Full disclosure: I have a mad crush on Elizabeth Warren.

July 25th, 2010 at 6:35 pm

51 eco2geek Says:

@Guster: aimai is the granddaughter of journalist I.F. Stone. Nobody really knows for sure why she’s so damn smart, although there are rumors. She comments here from time to time, so watch your manners.

(I like reading her posts too.)

July 25th, 2010 at 6:39 pm

52 grumpy realist Says:

Eric U.: You’re right. I remembered it as being a 25/2500 sort of difference.

Even so, McArdle should have easily caught the discrepancy had she done a cross-check of the orders of magnitudes. It’s not like there were units of c and h and e and 2 pi to confuse things.

July 25th, 2010 at 6:40 pm

53 RSA Says:

@arguingwithsignposts:

I would like for McArdle to point to her own research publications before she starts shitting on the methodology of others who have put in the considerable time to produce such research.

This is my biggest complaint about pundits who take on experts, and you see it on an enormous range of topics: global climate change, the “link” between vaccines and autism, school education policies, etc. (I’ll leave out economics, because I don’t understand how a field can function when equally respected people can hold irreconcilable views for their entire careers.) It’s easy to poke holes in an op-ed here and there, but if you want to challenge peer-reviewed research, there’s a clear avenue for that—more peer-reviewed research.

July 25th, 2010 at 6:41 pm

54 Napoleon Says:

@KG:

Wasn’t he the first director of the Nixon library and when the US Gov took it over got rid of him because his position was as a pure propagandist in favor of how honest Nixon was?

July 25th, 2010 at 6:55 pm

55 jcricket Says:

Why is McMegan always wrong? She’s a Libertarian. QED.

She just tries harder than other Libertarians to attempt to prove their point, proving the point that Libertarians are always full of shit.

Basically the only Libertarians that aren’t full of shit are the ones that basically say, “yeah, fuck the consequences you’re probably right about, I do believe in getting rid of all that legal stuff.”

July 25th, 2010 at 6:57 pm

56 Origuy Says:

@eco2geek: Oh, great. Now we’re going to have the troll who uses I. F. Stone as his/her pseudonym. Or is he/she still banned?

July 25th, 2010 at 6:58 pm

57 Wannabe Speechwriter Says:

With due respect to TNC and Fallows, they do have to work with McArdle (and Goldberg for that matter). I think asking them to attack McArdle is a bit like asking Paul Krugman to go after David Brooks. Even when Kristol had his year-long experiment with the NY Times, Krugman never publicly went after Kristol (though he did love to say “my former colleague” when talking about Kristol after they let him go, always putting it in a sarcastic tone basically letting his bosses know how he felt). If memory serves me correct, most of the Atlantic staff went after McMegan for her nonsensical take on obesity.

And if TNC and Fallows denounce McMegan, then what? Nothing changes. Let’s say The Atlantic lets her go, she’s still going to find a place to work. Remember, she came to the Atlantic from The Economist. She’ll be hired by the WSJ or WaPo op-ed page. She’ll become a Senior Fellow at Cato (or Brookings). TNR will hire her to be their “in-house critic.” And we haven’t even got into the Reason gravy train. In fact, firing her would actually raise her street cred on the right. Suddenly, she’s the victim of Big Liberal Media. Hell, with that she can be a sub for Glenn Beck.

The problem is at the end of the day, there will always be a job for Megan, no matter how factual inaccurate her pieces are. And if an Act of God took her from this world, The Village would just invent a new McMegan (she was an English major and then got an MBA. Her start was here love of good ol’ Ayn Rand, so if she can be called an expert on Economics, anyone can). With all do respect, asking for her colleagues to call her out is a bit like demanding Obama go emo every time there’s a crisis. We need to move beyond debunkings, denouncements and mocking those who are consistently wrong. We need these people just to be ignored, not even discussed. How we get people who are in power to do this, well, I’ll be honest, I don’t know…

July 25th, 2010 at 7:08 pm

58 Mark S. Says:

@Origuy:

I’m pretty sure he’s still banned; I haven’t seen him since.

Is Brick Oven still banned? I have seen him a few times recently, but it really seemed like someone was spoofing him.

July 25th, 2010 at 7:08 pm

59 arguingwithsignposts Says:

@Mark S.:
Last I heard, BoB was over at Wonkette driving the commentariat there insane.
@Wannabe Speechwriter: Very good point. McArglebargle can only fail upwards. I still can’t believe “Marketplace” has her on as a commenter on NPR.

July 25th, 2010 at 7:13 pm

60 Corner Stone Says:

@Bill Murray:

Sadly, this lie is travelling the world while the truth is still putting on its pants

And the info at the link you provide there is EXACTLY why I don’t give any of The Atlantic circle jerkers any leeway when they approve of dishonest hackery.

July 25th, 2010 at 7:15 pm

61 QuaintIrene Says:

Hey, same thing with Dick Morris. He’s another ‘wrong 99.9 percent of the time.” Yet he keeps getting trotted out as some kind of savvy political sybil, and not just on Fox News.

July 25th, 2010 at 7:31 pm

62 Bill Murray Says:

@Mark S.: isn’t he in this thread at #14? I’m pretty sure that sobriquet is related to Stone

July 25th, 2010 at 8:08 pm

63 Hob Says:

@Eric U.: Yeah, except that McCardle’s explanation was “the calculator doesn’t go to billions so I entered 750 million by mistake”, which, if true, would have given her an answer of $2.50 – two orders of magnitude off. So the fuckup she claimed she made was not even fucked up correctly.

July 25th, 2010 at 8:41 pm

64 Mark S. Says:

@Bill Murray:

I don’t know if it’s the same guy. Pancake usually trolls threads about Israel; his name is a hi-lar-i-ous joke about Rachel Corrie.

July 25th, 2010 at 9:34 pm

65 PeakVT Says:

@arguingwithsignposts: Marketplace is an APM production, not NPR.

July 25th, 2010 at 10:21 pm

66 thomas Levenson Says:

@Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle: the notion that the little guy might need advocates is itself cognitively dissonant for glibertarians…which is another way of saying you are onto something.

July 25th, 2010 at 10:54 pm

67 thomas Levenson Says:

@Belvoir: thanks to you too.

July 25th, 2010 at 10:55 pm

68 thomas Levenson Says:

@Wannabe Speechwriter:

I think you are right—but what I think is important is reducing her influence beyond wherever she perches. I would love to see Marketplace and wherever think twice and thrice before booking her; I’d like Felix Salmon to realize he just can’t cite her and so on. She can have a very lucrative life w/in the winger echo chamber and it would gall me, but it would do much less damage to the body politic than she can as long as other folks, outside that bubble, continue to take her more seriously than she deserves.

July 25th, 2010 at 11:02 pm

69 Bill Murray Says:

@Mark S.: I believe that is Pancake Rachel Corrie. Within the last couple of weeks this Pancake said it was based on a “Soviet spy” [despite the quotes that is a paraphrase, the quotes are mine indicating skepticism of Stone being a true spy]. Pancake supposedly was a code name for IF Stone, of course, FDR, Churchill and a host of others were given code names. And of course the word used was blin, not pancake as an English word would rather have stood out

July 26th, 2010 at 12:22 am

70 Andy Says:

I canceled my economist subscription because any magazine that employs her is not worth reading.
Every time they phone to try to get me to renew I tell them exactly why I canceled.

July 26th, 2010 at 5:51 am

71 Douche Baggins Says:

@jeffreyw: Those are some fine sammiches.

July 26th, 2010 at 1:28 pm

McArdle is Always Wrong.™

71 Responses to “McArdle is Always Wrong.™”

Recent Post

Categories

Archives

Authors

Google Search

Recent Comments

Premium Blogads

Support this site- Shop

Sitemeter

Blogroll

Blogs We Monitor And Mock As Needed

Contact

Balloon Juice Store

Standard Blogads

Meta